Nine production cars that weren't as good as their concepts
Toyota actually unveiled the stunning FT-1 concept – which married influences from old Supras and the 2000GT – at the beginning of 2014. At this point there were no firm plans for a new Supra, so when it came to redressing a BMW Z4 a lot of the concept car's drama was lost.
Advertisement - Page continues below
Built on GM's J-body FWD platform, the 1995 Pontiac Sunfire was a woeful thing in coupe, cabrio or saloon form. And yet, at the start of the decade Pontiac got everyone excited with the futuristic Sunfire concept. Heck, it even had carbon fibre body panels and a voice activated phone inside. You might like
Before Daimler came along, Chrysler was planning on selling the PT Cruiser as a Plymouth. Same retro 1930s hot rod styling as the Prowler, you see? Oh, and the PT Cruiser could have actually looked pretty cool too – just see the original three door Pronto Cruizer concept from the late 1990s for proof. Shame.
Advertisement - Page continues below
The Vision EQS concept from back in 2019 had us thinking big electric Mercs of the future would be full of tech but also hugely dramatic to look at. We were correct on the former, but when the production EQS arrived in 2021 it looked more like a flabby pebble than an executive saloon.
You probably don't remember the production version of the Suzuki Kizashi. Why would you? It's hard to forget the first concept that previewed it though. The Kizashi 1 was a gloriously 2000s slammed estate concept with an Alfa Brera bum and massive 21in wheels.
Making its debut at the 2011 Geneva show, the Captur concept was a sporty two-door SUV with 22in wheels, a removable hard-top roof and a centre exit exhaust. It even had a twin-turbo four-pot engine. The 2013 production car was basically just a bloated Clio.
Another crossover concept that promised much and delivered... a crossover, was the Kia Niro. In late 2013 Kia used Robert De's surname for the first time on a show car that featured a stainless steel roof, butterfly doors and rally style spotlights.
Advertisement - Page continues below
At the British Motor Show in 1988, Jaguar showed a monstrous V12 supercar. It promised 4WD, four-wheel steering, adjustable suspension and scissor doors. The production version was signed off just as recession hit, and customers withdrew their deposits upon finding out it had none of the concept's features.
How good does the 2007 Chevrolet Volt range extender concept look with its chunky arches, chopped roof and windows reaching into the doors? Unfortunately a financial crash meant what we got instead was a Prius shaped plug-in hybrid that you might better know as the Vauxhall Ampera.
Advertisement - Page continues below
Top Gear's Top 9
Concept
News See more on Top Gear's Top 9
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
33 minutes ago
- Reuters
VW resumes exports of ID.Buzz bus to US, Focus reports
July 15 (Reuters) - German automaker Volkswagen ( opens new tab has resumed deliveries of its electric minibus to the United States, a company spokesperson said on Tuesday, confirming a report by Focus magazine. The exports were halted due to a technical recall and the issue of tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump's administration, a Handelsblatt media report had said last week. The vehicles have been modified accordingly and can be returned to customers after the recall, a spokesperson said. The US regulator had criticized the vehicle's rear seat as being too wide, saying it allowed three people to sit on two seats, posing a safety risk.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Landmark Tesla trial after ‘autopilot car runs red light & kills stargazing woman sending her flying 75ft through air'
A LANDMARK trial against Tesla has begun after one of the company's self-driving cars killed a woman as she was stargazing with her boyfriend. Naibel Benavides, a university student, was sent flying 75ft through the air after she was hit by a Tesla that allegedly ran through a red light and a stop sign in Florida. 4 4 4 Naibel's boyfriend was left seriously injured in the 2019 incident, while her body was found in a wooded area following the harrowing smash. The trial began Monday in Miami, with a jury to decide if Elon Musk's company is partly to blame for Naibel's death. Lawyers argue that Tesla's driver-assistance feature - Autopilot - should have warned the driver and braked before the tragic crash. The Model S blew through flashing red lights as well as a a stop sign and a T-intersection at nearly a staggering 70 miles an hour in the April 2019 crash, it's alleged. Tesla lays the blame solely on the driver, who was reaching for a dropped mobile phone at the time. George McGee, who was behind the wheel, was sued separately by the plaintiffs before reaching a settlement with the victims' families. Tesla said in a statement: "The evidence clearly shows that this crash had nothing to do with Teslas Autopilot technology. "Instead, like so many unfortunate accidents since cellphones were invented, this was caused by a distracted driver." Musk's company has continuously worked to convince the public its self-driving technology is safe during a planned rollout of hundreds of thousands of Tesla robotaxis on US roads by the end of next year. A jury trial is rare for the company - with past suits over crashes being often dismissed or settled. Heartstopping moment self-driving car smashes into van parked in driveway as driver is slapped with a ticket And what's more, this case could be the rarest one yet as a judge recently ruled that the family of the stricken Naibel can argue for punitive damages. The 2021 lawsuit alleges the driver relied on Autopilot to reduce speed or come to a stop when it detected objects in its way. This included a parked Chevrolet Tahoe that Naibel and her boyfriend had gotten out of near Key West, to look up at the sky. The Tesla rammed the couple's car at highway speeds, causing it to rotate and slam into Naibel, throwing her into a wooded area and tragically killing her. In legal documents, Tesla denied nearly all of the lawsuits allegations and said it expects that consumers will follow warnings in the vehicle and instructions in the owners manual, as well as comply with driving laws. Tesla warns owners in manuals that its cars cannot drive themselves and they need to be ready to intervene at all times. Lawyers argue that Tesla should have a geofence on Autopilot so it could only work on the big roads it was designed for rather than smaller ones. They also say data and video evidence shows the Autopilot did detect the couple's car but then failed to warn the driver as they claim it should have done. Tesla has since improved its driver-assistance and partial self-driving features, but still faces lawsuits and investigations over what critics say is a gap between its depictions of how well they work and the actual reality of what they can do. In 2023, federal auto safety regulators recalled 2.3 million Teslas for problems with Autopilot failing to sufficiently alert drivers if they weren't paying attention to the road. They then put Tesla under investigation last year for saying it fixed the problem - though it was unclear it actually did that. Musk has also continued to suggest that Tesla's Full Self-Driving technology allows cars to drive themselves - despite warnings from regulators not to do so as it could lead to over-reliance on the systems, crashes and deaths. The technology has been involved in three fatal crashes and is under investigation of its ability to see in low-visibility conditions such as sunlight glare or fog. 4
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Tesla goes to trial over Autopilot crash that killed stargazing student
A jury will decide whether Tesla is partly to blame for the death of a university student, after a runaway car sent her flying while she was stargazing. Naibel Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, had got out of a Chevrolet Tahoe near Key West, Florida, to look up at the sky in April 2019. George McGee was driving a Tesla Model S sedan which blew through flashing red lights, a stop sign and a T-intersection at nearly 70 miles an hour before ramming into the Tahoe and sending it into a spin. The Tahoe, in turn, slammed into Benavides and sent her flying 75 feet through the air, killing her. Angulo was also seriously injured in the incident. Lawyers for the plaintiff argue that Tesla's driver-assistance feature, Autopilot, should have warned McGee and braked. Elon Musk 's company lays the blame solely on McGee, who was reaching for a dropped cell phone. 'The evidence clearly shows that this crash had nothing to do with Tesla's Autopilot technology,' Tesla said in a statement. 'Instead, like so many unfortunate accidents since cellphones were invented, this was caused by a distracted driver.' McGee was sued separately by the plaintiffs. That case was settled. A judgement against Tesla could be especially damaging as the company works to convince the public its self-driving technology is safe during a planned rollout of hundreds of thousands of Tesla robotaxis on U.S. roads by the end of 2026. A jury trial is rare for the company, which often settles lawsuits, and this one is rarer yet because a judge recently ruled that Benavides' family can argue for punitive damages. The judge, Beth Bloom of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, issued a partial summary judgement in June, throwing out charges of defective manufacturing and negligent misrepresentation against Tesla. But she also ruled plaintiffs could argue other claims that would make the company liable and ask for punitive damages, which could prove costly. 'A reasonable jury could find that Tesla acted in reckless disregard of human life for the sake of developing their product and maximizing profit,' Bloom said in a filing. The 2021 lawsuit alleges the driver relied on Autopilot to reduce speed or come to a stop when it detected objects in its way. In legal documents, Tesla denied nearly all of the lawsuit's allegations and said it expects that consumers will follow warnings in the vehicle and instructions in the owners' manual, as well as comply with driving laws. Tesla warns owners in manuals that its cars cannot drive themselves and they need to be ready to intervene at all times.
