EXPLAINED: How Germany's extended rent brake will impact tenants
agreed
on May 27th to pass the measure. However, it will continue not to apply to buildings built after 2014.
Real estate groups criticised the extension as deterring new construction.
'If the new federal government's first measure is to extend rent controls, diggers will stop instead of rolling,' German Real Estate Association President Dirk Wohltorf said.
By contrast, tenants groups criticised the extension for not going far enough and having too many exceptions.
So tenants in Berlin, North Rhine-Westphalia, Hamburg and other areas with tight housing markets can continue to invoke the rent brake when renting apartments beyond 2025.
What is the rental price brake?
The rental price brake is a nationwide law that came into effect in 2015, and works as a form of rent control in dense housing areas – stipulating the maximum amount of rent a landlord can charge.
According to the law, cold rent cannot be set more than 10 percent above the average rent for comparable units in the same neighbourhood, which is recorded in the regional rent index (
Mietspiegel
).
Under the
Mietpreisbremse,
if a landlord charges more than the permitted rent, the tenant is entitled to a rent reduction.
READ ALSO:
EXPLAINED: Why renting is still cheaper than buying in Germany
Helping to ensure that renters aren't overcharged are legal service providers like
Conny
, that help tenants' to decrease their rents if their landlord has surpassed legal limits.
Conny's CEO, Dr. Daniel Halmer, says that the rental price brake is the most powerful instrument available to keep rents down and buy time until more affordable housing is available.
Advertisement
It's not a perfect form of rent control
However, the rent brake's power is limited in some important ways. The current law doesn't come with any real consequences for landlords who break it, for instance, beyond needing to reduce rents to the legal rate and reimburse tenants for the excess that was collected.
In the capital city's notoriously tight housing market, landlords can easily net thousands of euros per rental each year by overcharging.
Asked how often landlords are caught ignoring the rent brake, Halmer told The Local, 'We see a violation rate of 75 percent in Berlin. And that's pretty consistent over the last seven years.'
Halmer says the high violation rate isn't surprising: 'If you have a law that has no sanction in case of violation, don't be surprised when people break that law.'
He added that when Conny wins rent reductions for clients, they pass their legal fees onto the landlords. When Conny doesn't win a case, tenants are not charged.
Does the rent brake save renters money?
When the rent brake was applied in 2015, it was largely celebrated by renters and tenant advocacy groups as a strong and necessary step to support renters in a country with an affordable housing shortage.
Advertisement
Three years after the rent brakes adoption,
The Economist
published a story called
'Why Germany's rent brake has failed.'
The article suggests that rents in central Berlin shot up by almost ten percent immediately following the introduction of the rent brake whereas they had previously been rising around two percent annually.
'After the law was announced, some landlords took the opportunity to increase their rents before the legislation took effect,' Halmer said.
He added that the rent price hike around 2015 was a one-time effect: 'For tenants this law is totally a good thing. And there's no other no other way to look at it.'
View of newly built apartments in the Schöneberg district of Berlin. Apartments first rented after Oct. 1, 2014 are not subject to the rent brake. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Monika Skolimowska
For its part, the German Tenants' Association (DMB) wants to strengthen the rent brake. "The rent brake has numerous exceptions and loopholes, which urgently need to be closed in the course of the extension," DMB President Lukas Siebenkotten
told
Berliner Zeitung
.
Currently the rental price brake does not apply to: new apartments (rented for the first time after October 2014), apartments that have been modernised, apartments rented for temporary use (less than one year), rental contracts signed before the law came into effect, and apartments where the previous rental price had already been set too high.
How does the rent brake extension affect tenants and landlords?
The agreement to extend the rental price brake is exactly that – it will extend the
Mietpreisbremse
law as is until 2029. It does not imply any changes to the law at this time.
So tenants currently protected by the rental price brake can continue to enjoy that protection, at least for five more years. On the other hand, tenants living in rentals that don't qualify for rent controls under the law will remain unprotected.
The same applies to landlords – properties that are affected by the law will see their rent price caps remain.
READ ALSO:
What are the cheapest and most expensive places to live in Germany?
While the decision to extend the price brake was agreed by the SPD and FDP parties at the federal level, the extension hasn't yet worked its way into legislation. Up next the extension agreement will need to be written up as a bill and then passed by the Bundestag. Then it is passed onto the states, which are ultimately responsible for how the law is applied locally.
Before the extension, rental price brakes were expected to expire in North Rhine-Westphalia, Hamburg and Berlin in 2025.
Advertisement
Housing and owners associations are not happy about the rent brake
Beyond renters and the German Tenants' Association, not everyone is happy about the extension of the rental price brake.
In fact, the home and land owners' association Haus und Grund wants to sue against it. President Kai Warnecke said in
Bild
that "The Federal Constitutional Court only accepted the first rent brake because it was limited to five years...'
In response, German Building Minister Klara Geywitz (SPD) told
RBB24 inforadio
that she assumes the Ministry of Justice has examined the extension "sufficiently thoroughly".
In 2019, the judges in Karlsruhe ruled that the rent brake was not constitutionally objectionable. The rules introduced in 2015 did not violate the guarantee of property, freedom of contract or the general principle of equality, the court found at the time.
Germany's housing industry association (GdW) told
Berliner Zeitung
that, "It is positive that the already very restrictive German tenancy law is not to be tightened…' Speaking on behalf of housing companies, the association argues that restricting rents intensely could reduce housing companies' ability to invest in energy-efficient and age-appropriate renovations.
In-line with these concerns, the current law includes an exception for properties that have been comprehensively modernised.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
German Chancellor Merz goes into summer in crisis mode – DW – 07/14/2025
Just over two months in power — and already facing a political crisis. Recently, Friedrich Merz's coalition has been thrown into turmoil. What does the chancellor intend to do about it? In the final answer of his 30-minute interview with Germany's public broadcaster ARD on Sunday, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz struck a clearer note than in any other part of the discussion: "I have not liked what the Israeli government has been doing in the Gaza Strip for many weeks now." He had also expressed this view in several meetings and telephone calls with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, he insisted. The chancellor said he hoped that the Europeans, together with the US, could bring about a solution to the conflict "that ultimately leads to a two-state solution." The Palestinians have a "right" to a place where they can live, he said. "The way things are going at the moment is unacceptable." Merz did not discuss the fate of the last remaining Israeli hostages in Hamas captivity, or the tens of thousands of Palestinians killed by Israel in Gaza, nor was he asked to. It was day 69 of Merz's term as chancellor, and nominally day 2 of the German parliament's summer recess. The Bundestag is currently not scheduled to reconvene until September 8 — another two months. Merz and his government had hoped to usher in a spirit of renewal in Germany by now, which is what he had been promising since shortly after the federal elections at the end of February. In recent days, Merz's loyal supporters have been trying to paint a picture of success, insisting that the economy is showing positive signs, and pointing to the decline in the number of refugees coming to Germany. But there can be little talk of renewal before the summer vacation, at least not in domestic politics, given the coalition crisis that nearly erupted on Friday. Merz's coalition had wanted the parliament to elect three new judges to the Constitutional Court, Germany's highest court, which requires a two-thirds majority in the Bundestag. According to accounts by many of those involved, Jens Spahn, leader of the CDU parliamentary group, had promised the Social Democrats (SPD) the CDU's support weeks ago. Yet there was opposition, with dozens of MPs outraged by statements made by one of the candidates to the court. Shortly before the plenary session, the coalition partners withdrew the topic from the agenda, leaving the question unresolved as summer recess arrives. This is much more than just a row over a personnel decision. The larger issue is how much power Merz and Spahn can exert over members of their conservative bloc in parliament. Consequently, nearly half of the ARD interview focused on this unprecedented incident in German history. The chancellor referred to each member's freedom to make certain decisions according to their own conscience. Then he sidestepped all subsequent questions, citing upcoming consultations, internal deliberations, dialogue within the coalition, or unresolved issues. Interestingly, Merz did not mention a single active CDU politician by name in the entire interview. And only afterwards, in a shorter ARD roundtable discussion broadcast only online, did he complain about the "wave of outrage" in the past few days, as well as "untruths, unbelievable malice, unbelievable personal insults." Merz came also under fire again this Sunday — not from parliament, but from Germany's president, Frank-Walter Steinmeier. Hours before the chancellor's interview on ARD, Steinmeier made a statement in an interview on ZDF, Germany's other national public broadcaster. Steinmeier said he believes that the coalition between the CDU and the SPD has "damaged itself" as a result of the failure to elect the judges. To limit any further damage to Germany's highest court, he added, the Bundestag should take up the "decisions in the immediate future." "If this doesn't happen, we would have cause for concern." Failure to act quickly would endanger the rule of law, said Steinmeier, pointing to the current situation in the US. Neither the interviewer nor the chancellor responded to Steinmeier's statement. On Friday, the coalition parties set September as the next date for voting on the three judges. The Greens, on the other hand, are pushing for a new vote in a special Bundestag session this week, something Steinmeier signaled he would also prefer. Merz, however, showed no signs of moving in this direction. "The whole thing is overblown," he said. Adding, we will come back to it later. "Next time, we'll do better." But when? Why did this dramatic Friday cause such a stir and prompt criticism of the coalition in the media? It might be because the new chancellor's first day in office also showed signs of discord in his coalition. Much to the surprise of political observers, and for the first time in the country's history, the chancellor failed to get the required majority in the first round of voting in the Bundestag, normally a formality. This crisis has overshadowed whatever the government has achieved since then. Meanwhile, as Merz pointed out in Sunday's interview, there are huge reform projects pending for the second half of the year. His coalition plans to reform the social security systems covering health, welfare and pensions, something the CDU and the SPD do not always see eye to eye on. Merz says the coalition acknowledges "that we… have to reform," and work on this is "in full swing." This could become even more difficult following President Donald Trump's announcement this weekend that the US would impose 30% tariffs on all imports from the EU, starting on August 1. This does not bode well for the German economy, as the US is Germany's most important trading partner. Merz told ARD that the tariffs will "cut to the bone." The EU must now show unity, Merz said, and "ensure that tariffs of this magnitude do not come into effect." Merz visited Trump in early June and warned against such trade barriers, among other things. It seems very unlikely that any of this will happen before the beginning of the eight-week summer recess. Merz's spokesperson has already announced several meetings for Friday, including trips to Munich and London. On July 18, he will answer questions at an annual summer press conference in Berlin, for the first time as chancellor. For his predecessors Angela Merkel and Olaf Scholz this was usually the last public appearance before going on you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
Germany's Constitutional Court becomes political football – DW – 07/14/2025
The Bundestag was supposed to elect three new judges to Germany's highest court. But the vote was canceled due to a dispute over one of the candidates. It is unclear what will happen next. The German parliament failed to complete one of its more important constitutional tasks on Friday: The planned vote on three vacant positions of the panel of judges in the Constitutional Court was removed from the agenda at short notice. The reason: It became apparent that at least one of the candidates, jurist and professor Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf, might not receive enough votes. Since the governing parties, the conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD), do not command a two-thirds majority in the Bundestag, they are dependent on support from the opposition for votes affecting the court. This was not supposed to have been a problem, as the opposition Greens and the Left Party had signaled that they would vote for the SPD-nominated Brosius-Gersdorf. But then it became clear that some CDU members would not — especially because of her liberal stance on abortion. The far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), the second biggest faction in the parliament, had already made clear they were vehemently opposed to her nomination — unsurprising, as she had also suggested she would be in favor of banning the party if the necessary legal requirements were fulfilled. A few hours before the planned vote, the CDU demanded that the SPD withdraw Brosius-Gersdorf's nomination, citing new allegations that she might have plagiarized her PhD dissertation in 1997, which left-wing politicians see as spurious. As a result, the Bundestag session was interrupted and, after crisis talks, the Bundestag voted to postpone all three scheduled elections. The AfD voted against the postponement, with its parliamentary secretary, Bernd Baumann, calling for an immediate vote: "This judge is unacceptable, and the proposal has severely damaged the reputation of the Constitutional Court," he said. Heidi Reichinnek, head of the Left Party parliamentary group, blamed the CDU for the parliamentary impasse: "You are playing party political power games here and once again causing absolute chaos." The leader of the Green Party, Britta Hasselmann, shared this view: "Today is a bad day for parliament, for democracy, and for the Federal Constitutional Court." During the debate, SPD member Dirk Wiese spoke of a "smear campaign" against a highly respected constitutional lawyer. This prompted Gottfried Curio of the AfD to interject by dismissing Brosius-Gersdorf as a "left-wing extremist" — earning himself a reprimand from the parliamentary presidium for his trouble. Steffen Bilger of the CDU said that the long-standing practice of nominating and electing judges to the Federal Constitutional Court had proven its worth. "That is why we are a stable democracy," he said. However, he warned, the election should not be the subject of a heated political debate. At the same time, he reiterated the CDU's reservations about Brosius-Gersdorf: Candidates for the Constitutional Court must be above any professional doubt. "And in our view, that is no longer entirely the case," Bilger said. The Federal Constitutional Court is one of Germany's five organs of state. The other four are the lower house of parliament (Bundestag), the upper house of parliament (Bundesrat), which represents the state governments, the federal president, and the federal government. Together, they ensure the separation of powers, one of the core principles of a democratic society. The Constitutional Court's role in this system is to safeguard Germany's constitution, known as the Basic Law. Half of the 16 judges are elected by the Bundestag, while the Bundesrat elects the other half. A two-thirds majority is required in each case. If this is achieved, the federal president officially appoints the successful candidates as new members of the court. The state institutions are closely entwined in this election, which is why the parties represented in parliament, who nominate candidates for the court, are particularly dependent on coordination. It is still unclear when the postponed election of three judges will be held. The parliamentary summer recess is scheduled to begin this week and last until September. However, the Greens are already calling for a special session of the Bundestag next week, out of respect for the candidates and for the Federal Constitutional Court. "We cannot accept a stalemate over the summer in which the country is left in the dark about whether we still have a stable government," the two Green parliamentary leaders, Britta Hasselmann and Katharina Dröge, said in a statement. "The canceled election to the Federal Constitutional Court has plunged the coalition into a serious crisis." This fear is apparently shared by Vice Chancellor Lars Klingbeil of the SPD. "When there are controversial votes, there must also be leadership and responsibility, and that must be demonstrated," he demanded in the Bundestag, though without overtly pointing any accusatory fingers at the conservative party with which he governs. While you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.
Local Germany
3 hours ago
- Local Germany
How could welfare reforms in Germany affect you?
Bürgergeld and other unemployment benefits are is to be reformed (read cut) in order to save money, according to statements made by Chancellor Friedrich Merz to ARD in a televised interview on Sunday. Specifically, Merz spoke in favour of noticeable cuts to Bürgergeld, including potentially enforcing a cap on payments towards rent. "It should be called basic security ( Grundsicherung ) and no longer citizen's money ( Bürgergeld )...' Merz said, adding that he envisions the government saving more than one or two billion euros via cuts to welfare cash benefits. Federal Labour Minister Bärbel Bas (SPD) reportedly wants to present a draft for a Bürgergeld reform after the summer break. What would a Bürgergeld reform look like? Among the main points Merz addressed on camera were a cap on the amount of rental costs that can be covered, as wekk as adjustments intended to stop people from collecting unemployment money on top of undeclared or other part-time work. A cap on rental costs could have a particular impact on people living in tight housing markets, such as in Berlin, Munich or other major cities, where housing costs are often high and more affordable options aren't readily available READ ALSO: Germans taking on personal debt at 'nearly twice the European average' The Chancellor also suggested that in some cases, like immediately after losing one's job, he could imagine increasing the unemployment benefits rate in some cases. Merz' comments, taken along with similar comments from Federal Labour Minister Bärbel Bas (SPD), suggest a looming cuts to Germany's welfare benefits system. For her part, Bas has also spoken of a broad reorganisation of Bürgergeld to make it 'more targeted and better at getting people into work', according to a report by The Labour Minister has also spoken out in favour of stricter rules for welfare recipients, including sanctions for people who miss appointments at the job centre . Advertisement Welfare politicised Germany's long-valued welfare benefits, and Bürgergeld in particular, have become issues of political contention in recent months. The far-right Alternative for Germany party has taken to pushing a narrative that immigrants in Germany are milking the country's welfare system, despite evidence to the contrary . READ ALSO: Fact-check - Are immigrants in Germany taking advantage of the welfare state? It's not surprising that the conservative Christian Union parties under Merz' leadership are pushing for social welfare reforms, but exactly how far they will push remains to be seen. The black-red government was confronted with a substantial hole in the federal budget as soon as it came to power, and having run on plans to cut certain taxes and raise spending on defence and infrastructure, they are limited in where they can look for potential savings. But exactly which benefits will be capped or cut, and by how much, will ultimately come down to the compromises reached in debates between Merz' conservatives and the centre-left Social Democrats (historically regarded as defenders of the welfare state).
