US extends deadline for reciprocal tariffs on EU to August 1
The order means that the deadline which had been due to fall tomorrow (Wednesday, July 9) will now be pushed back to August 1.
President Trump's decision was "based on additional information and recommendations from various senior officials, including information on the status of discussions with trading partners".
The US administration has already placed a 50% tariff on all US imports of steel and aluminium, along with a 25% tariff on cars and car parts.
A universal baseline 10% tariff also remains in place on most other exports to the US. The proposed US reciprocal tariffs could result in that baseline tariff increasing to 50% for the EU.
Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade Simon Harris, who was briefed on the ongoing EU-US trade talks last night, has welcomed the extension.
The Tánaiste said he remains "cautiously optimistic we can reach a balanced, forward-looking agreement in principle".
"However, it remains the position of the EU and the Irish government that we would like to conclude discussions on a trade agreement before August 1," he said.
"I want to be clear that while it is likely there will be some form of tariffs going forward, their imposition even at a lower rate is bad for consumers, jobs, economic growth and investment.
"As I have been saying for some time, the uncertainty is also bad for economic confidence and Irish businesses seeking clarity on the trading environment in which they operate.
"We have consistently called for zero-for-zero tariffs in as many areas as possible and I know the EU has advocated this course of action," he added.
The Tánaiste said his "hope is that in the coming days and weeks both sides can work intensively and constructively to bring about an agreement".
It is understood that Tánaiste Harris will update his Cabinet colleagues on the current situation today.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
12 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Moves to revive referendum on joining EU patent court as business groups contacted on timing
There have been tentative moves to revive the delayed referendum on Ireland's participation in the European Union's Unified Patent Court (UPC), with the Government seeking views of business groups on the timing of a rescheduled vote. The referendum on Ireland joining the 18 other EU member states that have signed up to the UPC system was originally pencilled in for June 2024 on the same day as the local and European elections. However, the holding of the UPC referendum was thrown into doubt amid the fallout from the defeat of the family and care referendums three months earlier. Soon afterwards the then-government announced it would be deferring the vote. Peter Burke , then minister for enterprise, said at the time: 'While the government continues to believe that joining the UPC is essential and that the referendum should be pursued, it is clear to me that more time is needed for public discourse and engagement on the matter to help inform the debate.' READ MORE The UPC is designed to provide a one-stop shop court for litigation on patents. The court's decisions will be binding on participating EU member states. Ireland joining in the UPC has been long called for by business groups and sectors such as the pharmaceutical industry. The Department of Enterprise has contacted business organisations and government departments about the referendum. Records released under the Freedom of Information Act include a letter from senior Department of Enterprise official John Newham to the American Chamber of Commerce Ireland (AmCham). The March 28th letter set out how the legislation on the UPC referendum was pending committee and final stages in the Seanad. Mr Newham, the assistant secretary general, wrote that 'once the legislative process has been concluded an order setting a date for the referendum will issue'. He wrote that the timing of any further advancement of the Bill would be subject to a decision by Government and it would decide a referendum date 'in due course'. He noted the last government 'had concluded that a broader public conversation' on the UPC 'was essential before a referendum was held' and he sought feedback 'in order to assess if sufficient engagement is being held on the matter'. Mr Newham asked for information on 'any initiatives undertaken or planned to assist public understanding of this critical issue'. He also sought 'views on the appropriate timing of a referendum'. Enterprise Ireland , IDA Ireland and Research Ireland were among government agencies contacted by the department as it sought feedback on public awareness of the UPC referendum. The Department of Enterprise confirmed that other organisations contacted included Chambers Ireland , Ibec , the Irish Congress of Trade Unions and BioPharmaChem Ireland, all of which, like AmCham sent responses. AmCham, which represents US companies in Ireland, responded on April 30th, saying: 'It is of the utmost importance that an informed discussion occurs to generate public engagement with the topic.' It said it would work with its members to advance discussion and consideration of the UPC. AmCham said a member survey from 2024 showed that 41 per cent of respondents supported Ireland joining the UPC and 58 per cent were neutral on the matter. The organisation said it would be holding a webinar 'outlining the impact for Ireland, with key expert and member perspectives' and it would also be developing a fact sheet on the UPC for dissemination among members. In response to queries AmCham told The Irish Times: 'While we continue to work with members on this topic, a webinar has not taken place.' It said that the timing of the referendum was 'a matter for Government'. A Department of Enterprise statement said: 'While the Government remains committed to holding the referendum, the timing remains under consideration at this juncture.'
Irish Times
35 minutes ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on funding for nature: not an optional extra
Two developments, one national and one at EU level, have caused legitimate alarm and anger among environmental NGOs. They regard them both as 'gutting' commitments to green measures at the very moment when we should be supporting the development of coherent nature recovery plans under the flagship Nature Restoration Law. It is understandable that such measures slip down the priority list, given the multiple challenges our societies are facing. But this is not acceptable. The existential threats of climate change and biodiversity collapses remain. So it is disturbing that the European Commission's proposal for its next budget indicates that the EU Life Programme – the dedicated fund for environment, nature and climate action – is likely to be repealed. Life's proven return on investment can be seen in many Irish rural communities, exemplified by the Burren Programme. 'It would gut one of the EU's most effective tools just when we need it most,' according to the European Environmental Bureau, which represents 190 member organisations and 30 million individual supporters. It should be listened to. READ MORE Meanwhile, the Environmental Pillar, the national platform for environmental charities, uses similar language to describe the Government's revised National Development Plan: 'the gutting of nature from the Infrastructure, Climate & Nature Fund to finance transport, energy and water infrastructure projects in the National Development Plan is very alarming' the group says, as it undermines guarantees on nature restoration. It certainly seems to make nonsense of the current consultations on developing and implementing the National Nature Restoration Plan with farmers, fishers and environmentalists. Funding for this plan is naturally a key concern for all involved, and if it is not ring-fenced it will inevitably shift to areas of more immediate concern. We cannot continue to consider the health of our natural landscape and climate as an optional extra in planning; if it does not inform the core of our thinking, everything else is undermined.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trump ally Jeanine Pirro confirmed as top federal prosecutor for Washington DC
The US Senate has confirmed Jeanine Pirro – a former Fox News host and staunch Donald Trump ally who boosted lies that he lost the 2020 presidential race because of electoral fraudsters – as the top federal prosecutor for the nation's capital. Ms Pirro – a former New York state district attorney and county judge who joined Fox News in 2011 – was confirmed on Saturday in a 50-45 vote along party lines. In a statement issued by Ms Pirro after the vote, the Republican said she was 'blessed' to have been confirmed as the US attorney for Washington DC. 'Get ready for a real crime fighter,' said Ms Pirro's statement, which called the US attorney's office she had been confirmed to lead the largest in the country. Before her media career, Ms Pirro spent more than a decade as a Republican district attorney in Westchester county, New York, and also served as a county judge. She hosted her own Fox show Justice with Judge Jeanine. More recently, she became a co-host on the Fox show The Five. Ms Pirro used her time at Fox News in part to publicly support the baseless claims that Mr Trump lost his first presidency to Joe Biden in 2020 because of voter fraud. In 2021 she was among several Fox News hosts named in the defamation lawsuit against Fox News by Dominion Voting Systems, which accused the network of knowingly airing false claims about the company's voting machines after the previous year's election. Fox ultimately settled the lawsuit for $787.5 million and has acknowledged that the fraud claims were false. Ms Pirro has been serving as the interim US attorney since May, when Mr Trump nominated her to the post months into his second presidency. She was nominated after Mr Trump withdrew the nomination of conservative activist Ed Martin, his first choice for the role. A key Republican senator, North Carolina's Thom Tillis, had said he would not support Mr Martin's nomination. In announcing Ms Pirro's nomination in May, Mr Trump praised her record, and said she was a 'powerful crusader for victims of crime' and someone who 'excelled in all ways'. 'Jeanine is incredibly well qualified for this position,' the president said. The US attorney general, Pam Bondi, on Saturday published a statement exalting Ms Pirro as 'a warrior for law and order'. At the end of his first presidency, Mr Trump pardoned Ms Pirro's former husband, Albert Pirro Jr, after he had been convicted in 2000 on federal charges of fraud and tax evasion. Ms Pirro is one of a number of Trump loyalists with ties to Fox who have joined the president's administration. Other prominent names include her fellow ex-Fox News host Pete Hegseth, the embattled defence secretary, and the former Fox Business personality Sean Duffy, the embattled transportation secretary. In June US senator Adam Schiff said Ms Pirro's 'blind obedience to Donald Trump is nearly unrivalled among his ardent supporters'. 'For an important prosecutorial position like this one, the country has a right to demand a serious and principled public servant,' Mr Schiff said. 'Jeanine Pirro is not it.' Despite Ms Pirro's confirmation, the US Senate left Washington DC on Saturday night for its month-long August recess without a deal to advance dozens of Trump nominees despite days of contentious, bipartisan negotiations. An irate Mr Trump went on social media and told Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer to 'GO TO HELL!'
