Top China official says U.S. Defence Chief 'inciting conflict'
China and the United States last month said they had reached an understanding on a trade deal — a truce after bruising tit-for-tat tariffs on each other's goods.
But the two countries still disagree on issues ranging from technology and security to geopolitics, including the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, as well as Beijing's territorial claims in Asia.
Also Read | Hegseth says US will stand by Indo-Pacific allies against 'imminent' threat of China
U.S. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has warned that China is preparing to use military force to upend the balance of power in Asia and has urged American allies to achieve "peace through strength".
On Thursday, Liu Jianchao, the head of the International Department of China's ruling Communist Party, said Hegseth's remarks constituted "hegemonic thinking".
"What he truly wants is force, not dialogue," Mr. Liu told the World Peace Forum in Beijing.
"What he is inciting is confrontation and conflict, not peace and harmony," he said.
China and the United States have long been at odds over Beijing's expansive claims in the strategically crucial South China Sea, and its refusal to rule out using force to seize Taiwan, the self-governed island it claims as its own.
"The Chinese government has made it crystal clear that it will never back down on these issues," Liu said.
"The Chinese people will do their utmost to strive for the prospect of peaceful reunification of the motherland, but we will never allow Taiwan independence," he added.
"The United States must respect China's sovereignty on this issue."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
What is US citizenship test? What changes Trump administration is bringing to make it tougher
USCIS new director said the present US citizenship is easy and can be memorized. The US citizenship test, officially known as the Naturalization test, is an examination that an applicant has to take to become a naturalized American citizen. This test is not for green card holders unless they are applying for citizenship. The new director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service said the existing test is too easy and the answers can be memorized. The Donald Trump administration is planning to bring back the 2020 version of the test. US Citizenship test First, the applicants have to submit Form N-400 seeking for naturalization. They need to pass a background check and meet residency and other requirements. Then there have to attend an interview where they take two tests: English and a civic test. In the civic test, there are 100 questions; the officer asks the applicant 10 and the applicant must answer at least six correctly. During the first term of Donald Trump, there was a new rule for a very brief time where there are 128 questions; applicants are asked 20 and they must get at least 12 right. The USCIS is planning to bring back some version of this type of test. Before 2008, the test was random but the Bush administration introduced the 6 out of 10 questions benchmark. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Angola: New Senior Homes (Prices May Surprise You) Senior Apartments | Search Ads Search Now Undo USCIS director said the present version is not really "comforting with the spirit of the law". Sweeping H-1B changes The development regarding the US citizenship test comes as the Department of Homeland Security proposed sweeping changes for the H-1B visa program that allows US companies to hire foreign workers. According to the proposed changes, H-1B will not be for entry-level workers. It will be only for high-skilled jobs for which there will higher salary. If this becomes implemented, US graduates will not lose out jobs in the entry level and tech companies will not be able to hire foreign workers at a lower wage.
India.com
33 minutes ago
- India.com
Big setback for Donald Trump as Federal Court strikes down birthright citizenship order across US; how will it affect Indians?
(Image: Reuters) New Delhi: A federal court in America has again stayed President Donald Trump's order which said that if a child's parents are living illegally in America, then that child will not get American citizenship. This is the third time that the court has stopped Trump's order from being implemented. The court also said that the final decision on this matter will be taken by the Supreme Court, but until any order comes from there, this rule of Trump will not be implemented. When was the order passed? Trump had banned Birthright Citizenship by signing an executive order on January 20, the day of his swearing-in. A few days after this, the US Federal Court had stayed President Donald Trump's decision to end the right to birthright citizenship for 14 days. Earlier on June 28, the US Supreme Court had given a decision in favour of President Trump. The Supreme Court had said that the judges of the lower courts cannot stop Trump's birthright citizenship order across the country. They should reconsider their order. What did the US Supreme Court say? The Supreme Court had said with a majority of 6-3 that a federal judge alone cannot decide to stop policies across the country. Now if a case like Trump's order has to be stopped, then many people will have to sue together, not just one state or person. Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who wrote the decision, had said – the job of federal courts is not to monitor government orders. Their job is to resolve matters according to the powers given by Parliament. However, the court did not give any immediate decision on Trump's order and also ordered not to allow Trump's order to be implemented for 30 days i.e. till July 28. This means that for now, children born in America will continue to get citizenship, as they used to get earlier. Under which 3 situations citizenship is not granted by Trump's order? The executive order by which Trump abolished the birthright citizenship law is named 'Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship'. This order refuses to grant American citizenship in 3 situations. If the mother of a child born in America is living there illegally. At the time of the child's birth, the mother is a legal but temporary resident of America. The father should not be a US citizen or a legal permanent resident at the time of the child's birth. The 14th Amendment to the US Constitution gives the right to birthright citizenship. Through this, children of immigrants living in the US also get the right to citizenship. What will be the effect on Indians? According to the data of the US Census Bureau till 2024, about 54 lakh Indians live in America. This is about one and a half percent of the US population. Two-thirds of these people are first generation immigrants. That is, they went to America first in the family, but the rest are citizens born in America. If the Supreme Court gives an order in favour of Trump's bill, then it will become difficult for first generation immigrants to get American citizenship. However, if it gives an order against it, then citizenship will remain as before.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
‘Buying Chinese products is indirectly funding enemy'
Nagpur: The 26th Kargil Vijay Diwas was held by Bhonsala Military School on Saturday. Deputy Commandant of the Army's Uttar Maharashtra and Gujarat (UMANG) sub-area, Brigadier Abhijit Valimbe, was the chief guest. Member of RSS' all India executive body (publicity wing), Mukul Kanitkar, was the keynote speaker. Addressing a gathering of over 400 students, Kanitkar said Indians who buy Chinese mobile phones are actually indirectly funding the enemy to procure the weapons that they used to martyr Indian soldiers in Doklam. "At Doklam, the Chinese troops hit the unarmed Indian soldiers with sticks wrapped with barbed wire. When I saw those images, I thought that such sticks could easily be procured for Rs 300 to 500 by them. The money to buy the sticks that were used to take the lives of Indian soldiers went from Indians' pockets. Even today, those who use Chinese brands are indirectly funding the enemy," he said. The items from toothpaste with which the day begins to the mosquito repellent coils that are burnt in the night should be completely Indian. Not only the Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) has to be taken back but even the areas like Tibet and Ladakh have to be freed from China. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Easy Trick to Protect Your Kids From Mosquitoes (They Can't Stand This) Squito Stickers Undo When the British left the country, international boundaries were drawn merely on paper, and Indians were forced to accept it," said Kanitkar. He criticised the Shimla Pact between India and Pakistan that followed the 1971 war, calling it to be a disgrace. "I went to deliver a lecture at the Institute of Advanced Studies, the place where the Shimla Pact was signed. The hosts insisted I visit the room where the agreement was signed but I refused." Kanitkar also expressed concern about people becoming ignorant about national heroes. He said once, he went to Prayagraj and wanted to see the place where freedom fighter Chandrashekar Azad laid down his life. The place is still popularly known as Company Garden rather than Chandrashekhar Azad Park, though it has been named after him.
