Karnataka proposes stringent law to combat fake news and misinformation on social media. ‘7 year jail term and…'
In a significant move to tackle the spread of misinformation online, the Karnataka government is set to introduce a new law that proposes tough penalties for those found guilty of sharing fake news on social media platforms. The draft legislation — Karnataka Misinformation and Fake News (Prohibition) Bill, 2025 — is expected to be tabled before the next cabinet meeting. Peddling fake news on social can land one in massive trouble, according to the new bill proposed by Karnataka government. (Representative image/Pexel)
Also Read - Bengaluru's bike taxi riders in a fix over ban, urge Karnataka govt to reverse crackdown
According to the proposed bill, individuals found guilty of deliberately sharing false information that threatens public health, safety, peace, or the integrity of elections could face imprisonment of up to seven years, a fine reaching ₹ 10 lakh, or both. Even those residing outside the state who target Karnataka audiences with such content will fall under the ambit of this law.
For spreading misinformation that disrupts public order or electoral processes, the bill suggests a minimum sentence of two years, extendable up to five years, along with monetary penalties. Furthermore, aiding or abetting the dissemination of such content could also lead to two years of imprisonment.
The legislation aims to establish a complete ban on the circulation of fake news across social media platforms. To enforce this, the government plans to set up a regulatory body named the Fake News on Social Media Regulatory Authority.
Also Read - Bengaluru Stampede: Karnataka CM, DCM responsible for tragedy, says activist - Report
This authority will include the Minister for Kannada and Culture, who will serve as the ex-officio Chairperson, one member each from the Legislative Assembly and Legislative Council, Two members representing social media companies, appointed by the state and senior IAS officer designated as the Secretary of the Authority.
The bill defines "misinformation" as a false or misleading factual claim made either knowingly or with reckless disregard for accuracy. However, it excludes opinions, satire, parody, religious or philosophical expressions, and comedy — provided an ordinary person would not interpret them as factual assertions.
"Fake news," on the other hand, includes manipulated statements, misquoted content, edited videos or audio that distort reality, and outright fabricated narratives.
In addition to targeting misinformation, the Authority will oversee restrictions on content deemed abusive, obscene, or insulting to women, including posts that are anti-feminist or demean the dignity of women. The bill also proposes banning content that disrespects Sanatan beliefs and symbols or promotes superstition.
To expedite justice, the draft bill proposes the creation of special courts dedicated to trying such offences swiftly. It also calls for appointing special public prosecutors — at least one for each special court and one for every bench of the High Court.
If passed, the law would mark a major step in the state's efforts to regulate online spaces, amid growing concerns about the impact of digital misinformation on public life and democracy. (With PTI inputs)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
Preamble tampering a blot on Constitution, betrayal of Sanatan soul: VP Dhankhar
New Delhi: In a strongly worded speech resonating with the ideological spectrum of the RSS, Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar on Saturday launched a blistering critique of the 1976 amendment to the Constitution's Preamble, calling it a 'nasoor' (festering wound) and an "unpardonable insult to the Sanatan soul of India." Speaking at a book release function at the Vice President's residence, the VP said, 'The Preamble is the soul of the Constitution. It was disfigured during the darkest phase of Indian democracy – the Emergency – when terms like 'Socialist', 'Secular', and 'Integrity' were inserted under coercion.' Calling the 42nd Amendment 'an unjust and illegitimate act,' the VP said, 'We altered something that should never have been changed. And that too, not by the will of the people but at a time when the people, the source of power, were behind bars.' Resonating with long-standing RSS criticism of the secular and socialist labels, the Vice President remarked that no other country in the world has tampered with the Preamble of its Constitution and described the 1976 additions as "a betrayal of our civilisational ethos and the intentions of our Constitution makers." Quoting from landmark Supreme Court judgments like Kesavananda Bharati and Golaknath, he reminded the audience that the apex court has always treated the Preamble as the guiding light of the Constitution. Referring to B.R. Ambedkar as a 'visionary who lives in our soul,' the Vice President said the sanctity of the Constitution must be preserved and warned against the growing political polarisation and caste-based divisions that threaten India's unity. The remarks given by the Vice President are likely to intensify the ongoing debate around restoring the 'original Preamble', a demand growing louder in saffron circles. RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale on Thursday triggered a political storm when he demanded the removal of the terms 'socialism' and 'secularism' from the Preamble of the Constitution, alleging that they were inserted 'forcibly' during the Emergency period. Since then, opposition parties, including Congress and other national and regional parties, have upped their ante against the RSS for pushing a narrative which has long been brewing in the saffron camps for decades.
The Hindu
5 hours ago
- The Hindu
New draft of U.S. law cuts remittance tax to 1%, exempts bank and card transfers
U.S. legislators have significantly diluted the provision in the proposed legislation to tax remittances to other countries, including to India. The latest version of the Bill, released on Friday (June 27, 2025), reduces the tax on remittances to 1% from the earlier proposal of 3.5%, and excludes remittances made from bank accounts and other financial institutions and those made via debit or credit cards from the tax. The 1% tax will now apply only on remittances made in cash, a money order, or a cashier's check. According to international tax experts, this will come as a significant relief to the non-resident Indian (NRI) community in the U.S. The 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' was passed by the U.S. House of Representatives in May 2025. It is now up for debate in the U.S. Senate, following which it will be voted upon. 'There is hereby imposed on any remittance transfer a tax equal to 1 percent of the amount of such transfer,' the latest version of the Act says. 'The tax imposed by this section with respect to any remittance transfer shall be paid by the sender with respect to such transfer.' However, the latest draft also inserts additional paragraphs to the section on the tax on remittances. 'The tax imposed under subsection (a) shall apply only to any remittance transfer for which the sender provides cash, a money order, a cashier's check, or any other similar physical instrument (as determined by the Secretary) to the remittance transfer provider,' the draft Bill said. In addition, the Bill now says that remittances made from 'an account held in or by a financial institution' and 'funded with a debit card or a credit card which is issued in the United States' are exempt from the tax. 'Senate Republicans released their updated draft of the proposed One Big Beautiful Bill Act on June 27 and have a self imposed deadline of July 4 to try to pass this bill,' Lloyd Pinto, Partner - U.S. Tax at Grant Thornton Bharat said. 'The updated Senate version significantly changes the remittance transfer provisions that were passed by the House Republicans. In the latest Senate draft, the remittance transfer tax has been reduced to 1% from the erstwhile proposal of 3.5%.' The 3.5% tax proposal itself was a reduction brought into the Act in May from the original proposal of 5%. 'This (the latest relaxations) should come as a huge relief to the NRI community in the US as they will not be subject to this remittance tax if the remittances are made through accounts held with designated US banks and financial institutions or funded via debit or credit cards issued in the U.S.'
Indian Express
7 hours ago
- Indian Express
‘Sacrilege to spirit of Sanatan': V-P Jagdeep Dhankhar questions addition of ‘socialist', ‘secular' to Preamble
Terming it a travesty of justice, Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar on Saturday said changing the Preamble to the Constitution by adding the words 'socialist', 'secular' and 'integrity' during the Emergency was 'sacrilege to spirit of Sanatan'. Speaking at an event in Delhi, Dhankhar said the Preamble was the soul of any Constitution, and apart from India, no other country had changed it. 'Preamble is not changeable. Preamble is not alterable. Preamble is the basis on which the Constitution has grown. Preamble is the seed of the Constitution. It is soul of the Constitution but this Preamble for Bharat was changed by 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1976, adding words socialist, secular and integrity,' he said. We are changing the soul of the Constitution by this flash of words, added during the period of Emergency — the darkest period for the Constitution of the country. These words have been added as नासूर. These words will create upheaval. Addition of these words in the Preamble… — Vice-President of India (@VPIndia) June 28, 2025 His comments come two days after RSS general secretary Dattatreya Hosabele said there should be a discussion on whether the words 'socialist' and 'secular' should remain in the Preamble. A day later, Union ministers Shivraj Singh Chouhan and Jitendra Singh had thrown their weight behind the idea even as Congress leaders and other Opposition parties criticised the remark. Vice-President Dhankhar was speaking at an event at his official residence where he was presented the first copy of the book, Ambedkar's Messages, compiled by author and former Karnataka MLC D S Veeraiah. 'We must reflect. Dr [B R] Ambedkar did painstaking work. He would have surely focused on it. The founding fathers thought it befittingly wise to give us that Preamble…what a travesty of justice. First, we change something which is not changeable, alterable – something that emanates from 'We the People' – and then, you change it during Emergency. When 'We the People' were bleeding in heart, in soul, they were in darkness,' he said. Calling the Emergency imposed by then-Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in 1975 as the 'darkest period for the Constitution of the country', Dhankhar said, '…if you deeply reflect, we are giving wings to existential challenges. These words have been added as nasoor [festering wound]. These words will create upheaval. Addition of these words in the Preamble during the Emergency signal betrayal of the mindset of the framers of the Constitution. It is nothing but belittling the civilisational wealth and knowledge of this country for thousands of years. It is sacrilege to the spirit of Sanatan.'
