As ‘Turkish Hairlines' meme goes viral, here's a closer look at India's troubled hair transplant industry
Within 24 hours of undergoing a hair transplant at a private clinic in Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, two engineers lost their lives. The doctor disappeared, and the clinic was sealed. In another case, two men reportedly died after a dentist – yes, a dentist – performed the procedure. A separate incident in Kerala left a patient with necrotizing fasciitis, a rare flesh-eating bacterial infection, following surgery allegedly conducted by someone with a fake medical degree.
Amid rising reports of botched surgeries, growing medical tourism, and mounting social media pressure, more Indians are flying to Turkey, the unofficial global capital of hair restoration, for transplants that promise natural-looking results, often at lower costs. That's also how the viral 'Turkish Hairlines' meme was born: a video showing a plane full of bald men en route to Istanbul, all in search of hair and hope.
Indianexpress.com spoke to industry experts to understand what's driving this trend and how Turkey became the global epicenter of this follicular phenomenon.
According to Dr Katheeja Nasika, consultant in the department of dermatology at Rela Hospital, Chennai, the rush for perfect hairlines is driven by a mix of peer pressure, the impact of influencer marketing, and societal expectations, especially among men prepping for marriage or public life.
Dr Veena Praveen, head dermatologist (South), Kaya Limited, agreed but attributed the increasing popularity to technological advancements and a rise in awareness. 'People want long-term, natural-looking solutions. For many, it's not about improving appearance alone; it's about regaining confidence,' she said.
Social media and celebrity endorsements have also significantly contributed to making hair restoration more accessible and widely accepted.
Shradha Rajani Mordani, CEO of Tejco Global LLP, said that the hair transplant industry is set to explode – from USD 7.3 billion in 2025 to USD 49.9 billion by 2035, growing at a CAGR of 20 per cent. 'At the heart of this surge is the new buzzword – precision technology – delivering perfected hairlines where science meets style and confidence,' she said.
Mordani believes that the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated self-image anxieties. 'Video calls made people hyper-aware of their appearance. Combine that with a growing acceptance of grooming among men, and we saw a sharp rise in demand for aesthetic procedures,' she said.
And it's not just hair. From micro needling to laser hair removal and PRP therapy, Indians are embracing cosmetic enhancement, but not always safely, said Dr Praveen.
A post shared by Life is Beautiful (@lifeisbeautiful080808)
Turkey offers advanced techniques like Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE), skilled practitioners, and all-inclusive packages – flight, stay, surgery, recovery – at competitive prices, said Dr Nasika.
Dr Praveen said, 'The country has built an impressive reputation for hair restoration, combining medical excellence with cost-effective services.'
'Turkey also has a bunch of trained professionals and certified programs, which interest youngsters to pursue hair transplantation courses,' Dr Nasika said, pointing out that while India has affordable transplant options, 'the number of well-trained, ethical practitioners here is far fewer than in Turkey.'
That is why Aditya Awasthee, a private investor and realtor with the Nexus Group, had been exploring the idea of getting a hair transplant and after consulting several cosmetologists and fashion industry experts, zeroed in on Turkey as the best option — even if not the most cost-efficient one.
'Turkey also has some internationally trained doctors and uses modern techniques like FUE (Follicular Unit Extraction) and DHI (Direct Hair Implantation). It's more like medical tourism, with a focus on hair restoration,' said Awasthee. His research led him towards 'highly acclaimed and established clinics offering packages that include airport transfers, hotel stay for 3–4 nights, translator services as well as medication and an aftercare kit.'
Having learned about promising results and sustainable outcomes, Awasthee derived that Turkey has the highest success rate. 'Typically, Istanbul and other cities have a reputation for delivering natural-looking results,' he said, revealing that to be his primary goal.
According to him, the cherry on the cake is that 'Turkey also permits combining treatment with a vacation — which allows to explore Istanbul, Cappadocia, Antalya before or after the surgery.'
Dr Nasika urged people to check if the doctor is certified and the clinic or hospital has a commendable reputation before getting the procedure done. 'According to the National Medical Commission (NMC), only plastic surgeons or dermatologists are authorised to perform hair transplants in India,' she said.
Money is also an important factor to consider. 'A cheap fix could lead to complications that cost far more to treat later,' Dr Nasika said.
Experts say yes, but not without reforms.
While Turkey is an appealing option, India also has a rich medical heritage and boasts world-class dermatologists and hair restoration experts. 'India already has world-class doctors and infrastructure,' said Dr Praveen. 'But the focus now needs to be on transparent practices, credible patient testimonials, competitive pricing, and the highest standard of post-op care. That's how trust is built,' she said.
Mordani, too, said that Indian cosmetology is rapidly evolving and making it big. 'Millennials and Gen Z are pushing the demand. High-quality hair transplant instruments and devices, resulting in 'real no-downtime' results, are paving the way for a growing international doctor-clientele base adopting our technology, bringing India on the global footprint for hair restoration,' she said.
According to Mordani, India's aesthetic industry is poised to lead globally by collaborating with international experts. With these advancements, Indian clinics can offer world-class treatments while meeting the growing demand for effective and accessible aesthetic solutions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
10 minutes ago
- The Wire
Recovery, the Unfinished Business of the Pandemic
The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic far outlasted the health emergency. Long after infection curves flattened and emergency declarations were lifted, countries across the globe continued to wrestle with a deep economic, social and health-related fallout. In India, over 23 crore people were pushed into poverty during the pandemic years, with rural and informal sector workers bearing the brunt, and the economic spillover continues to be seen in the form of increased government debt, rising inflation, a stagnating hospitality industry and other things, even after half a decade has passed since the onset of COVID. In the health sector, the disruption to routine immunisation services led to measles outbreaks in numerous Sub-Saharan countries, while a UNICEF report warned that about 23 million children missed out on essential vaccines in 2020 alone. Mental health outcomes also deteriorated sharply. Data from the WHO shows that there was a 25% global increase in anxiety and depression in the first year of the pandemic. These aftershocks demonstrate that recovery is not a passive return to normalcy – it is a protracted and complex phase that demands sustained attention, governance and resource mobilisation. The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered worldwide efforts to mitigate the scale and impact of future health emergencies, including amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR); the creation of the Pandemic Fund and the WHO Pandemic Intelligence Hub; and the ACT-Accelerator, COVAX and One Health initiatives. The latest – and most talked-about – in this series of efforts is the WHO Pandemic Agreement, which was adopted on May 20, 2025 after three years of negotiations and discussions. It will become a legally binding international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response once it is signed by 60 countries. After India's vote in favour of the resolution to adopt the agreement, making it an official state party to the agreement, the prime minister has talked about its importance for vulnerable populations in the Global South that disproportionately bear the effects of health challenges. In order to successfully achieve this goal, the agreement needs to accomplish two things – chart out obligations targeted towards vulnerable populations, and highlight the specific ways in which pandemics' disproportionate impact on the Global South can be mitigated. While the agreement does lay the ground for equity in both aspects, it falls short of outlining implementable measures to achieve these goals meaningfully without hindering sovereign decisions. Notably, the Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing (PABS) annex, a critical component tied to equity and access, still has another year to be worked out, further delaying clarity on how benefit-sharing commitments will be operationalised. Commendably, the agreement talks about the need to provide affordable health and other social support services to 'persons in vulnerable situations'. It also calls for the mitigation of the socioeconomic impacts of pandemics on such persons. However, it misses an opportunity to guide state parties on when and how this should be done at the domestic and trans-national levels, especially at the time of recovery. Integrating recovery into the pandemic agreement Article 3 of the agreement, titled 'Preparedness, health system resilience and recovery', gestures toward the importance of post-pandemic strategies. However, recovery is buried within broader health system resilience goals and mentioned only in passing. It refers vaguely to 'developing post-pandemic health system recovery strategies' without outlining how, when or by whom such strategies must be developed, implemented or monitored. This diluted treatment effectively renders recovery a discretionary task, rather than an obligation. There is no requirement for countries to assess the long-term impacts of pandemics on vulnerable populations, nor is there any architecture for coordinating recovery efforts, allocating responsibilities or ensuring accountability. In the light of this gap, recovery must be established as a clear, foundational pillar within the pandemic agreement – not a vague aspiration buried under resilience. It is important to acknowledge at the onset that international treaties cannot impose rigid mandates on sovereign states. However, by creating shared expectations and enabling frameworks, they can support states in fulfilling recovery goals without infringing on national autonomy. Rather than prescribe uniform recovery models, the agreement can promote adaptable, equity-based cooperation that complements domestic efforts while ensuring accountability and consistency across borders. The agreement should require states to develop standalone national recovery frameworks tailored to their contexts, with explicit mandates for implementation, periodic review and transparent reporting. Recovery should be understood broadly – not just as restoring health systems but as encompassing social, economic and mental health dimensions affected by pandemics. A comprehensive recovery approach must prioritise impact assessments focused on marginalised and vulnerable populations – including gender minorities, workers in the informal sector, migrants, senior citizens, homeless populations, persons with disabilities and ethnic minorities – who disproportionately suffer during crises. These assessments should directly inform targeted economic and social policies, such as livelihood restoration, social protection adjustments and reintegration support, to prevent widening inequalities in the post-crisis phase. Further, recovery goals must be multi-dimensional and should account for the wide-ranging impact of pandemics across different key areas. Accordingly, the agreement should embed principles for access to justice and redressal mechanisms for harms suffered during pandemics, the restoration of disrupted education systems, safeguards for the continuity of essential public and welfare services, mechanisms for the review of governmental decisions and actions during the state of exception, and the rebuilding of public trust through transparent and participatory governance. The absence of these dimensions risks a recovery that is piecemeal and opaque, weakening institutional integrity and leaving societies more vulnerable to future crises. International cooperation in recovery efforts In order to achieve the aim of equity, especially across the Global North-Global South divide, the international community must direct its attention to recovery efforts across national borders. The agreement must institutionalise mechanisms for international coordination and solidarity during the recovery phase, facilitating sharing of expertise, resources and data across countries to reduce regional vulnerabilities and promote equitable resilience. The bodies set up under the agreement do not account for this adequately, in terms of function or finances. The mechanisms set up under the agreement, such as PABS, deal with important functions like pathogen and data sharing, and pharmaceutical supply and distribution. There are no such systems established for recovery. The Coordinating Financial Mechanism previously established under the IHR has been envisaged as the mechanism to promote sustainable financing for the implementation of the pandemic agreement as well. Its mandate under the pandemic agreement is to 'support strengthening and expanding capacities for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, and contribute to the prompt availability of surge financing response necessary as of day zero, particularly in developing country Parties.' This conspicuously and concerningly misses recovery as a crucial stage of assessing impacts and developing strategies for rebuilding, which is especially crucial for low and middle-income countries in the Global South, including India. The cultural impact of international documents Understandably, international agreements cannot impose specific obligations in the same way that domestic laws can. Given the legally binding nature of the pandemic agreement, it should also refrain from interfering with sovereign and context-specific decisions adopted at the national and sub-national levels. At the same time, beyond policy prescriptions, international treaties play a critical role in shaping legal cultures and empowering civil society to demand justice and reform. By embedding preparedness, resilience-building and recovery within the pandemic agreement, the global community will be able to create a shared vocabulary and normative framework that activists, policymakers and courts can invoke domestically to advance equity and resilience. India's past experience has illustrated this dynamic vividly. The Vishakha Guidelines on workplace sexual harassment, which transformed protections for women, were grounded in India's commitments under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. Similarly, the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has influenced landmark judicial decisions and legislative reforms enhancing disability rights and access to welfare in India. What can be done to prioritise recovery? While laying out the rules or procedure and terms of reference, the Intergovernmental Working Group empowered under the agreement must lay down specific provisions on recovery, including indicative domestic guidance, mechanisms for international cooperation and sustainable financing or recovery that recognises marginalisation and prioritises equity. Embedding principles that prioritise domestic and international efforts will shift recovery from a discretionary afterthought to a binding commitment that demands accountability without prescribing inflexible solutions. It provides states with a flexible but clear mandate to build inclusive, adaptive recovery architectures that address the deep, lasting fallout of pandemics. Shreyashi Ray is a senior resident fellow with the health team at the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy. Anchal Bhatheja is a research fellow at the centre.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
GMCH-32: Newly constructed block to be inaugurated on Aug 8, to decongest gynaecology dept
The newly constructed 283-bed Emergency-cum-Trauma Block at GMCH-32 is all set to be inaugurated on August 8, to coincide with the 11th convocation, promising to reduce overload on the existing emergency units in the city, improve patient care and ensure better utilisation of resources. In the hospital's history, the A Block, where 24-hour emergency services are provided to patients, was the first to become functional, and since 1996, there has been no renovation of this block. 'With the new state-of-the-art trauma block ready for patients, the first step will be to renovate the area, with the engineering and fire safety departments already in action to ensure the latest facilities, amenities and safety. Once this is complete, we will start the process of decongesting our gynaecology department, which also comprises the labour room, and witnesses patients from across the region, including the large migrant population that we have. We will be utilising this space for the expansion of the department, and also add more beds to ease rush. We are making efforts to provide more speciality and super-speciality services. The process of space creation is a dynamic one,' said Prof A K Attri, Director-Principal, GMCH-32. The gynaecology department of the hospital has 100 beds, with 10 beds added way back in 2017. The number of patients in the gynaecology department is very high, and despite the increase in beds, there are not enough beds for pregnant women. More than 5,000 women deliver in GMCH every year, and when the number of cases is higher, two women have to be adjusted on one bed, with the occupancy rate almost 200 per cent. The hospital receives delivery cases from Chandigarh, Punjab, Haryana, Himachal, Uttarakhand, UP, and despite the shortage of beds, the effort is to provide treatment. As per doctors, the gynaecology department of GMCH-32 has the highest number of deliveries, followed by GMSH-16 and then PGI. Both PGI and GMCH-32 will have exclusive Mother and Child Centres, with work on the project of GMCH-32 having started in 2018, but was delayed due to COVID and has now restarted. With a budget of about Rs 73 crore, the centre, which will be open in about two years, will have two basements and four floors and have a facility of 251 beds, with the latest facilities and services under one roof. Dr Attri said it will decrease infant and mother mortality rate. PGI's Advanced Mother and Child Care Centre, where work is in full swing and may be inaugurated at the end of this year, will be equipped with the latest technologies and offer world-class facilities in both maternal and neonatal care. A human milk bank, advanced infertility treatment, robotic surgery, critical care obstetrics, high-risk maternity unit, foetal medicine unit, pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, prenatal diagnosis, and reproductive endocrinology unit will be part of the centre. Here, there will be a modern developmentally supportive and family-centred level IV NICU designed as per current International NICU design specifications, a family-centred Kangaroo Mother Care ward, and a comprehensive high-risk follow-up programme. A long-needed facility, the Advanced Paediatric Centre at GMSH-16 was inaugurated last year. The 32-bedded facility offers state-of-the-art specialised care, featuring a 12-bedded hybrid ICU unit comprising ventilator beds and high-dependency unit beds. The centre includes 20 oxygen-supported beds and features ECG, echocardiography, and ultrasonography, all under one roof, so that parents don't have to go anywhere for these tests and their children receive the best care. There are 24-hour services like blood transfusion, sample collection, nebulisation etc, for critical patients, and this advanced centre has eased the burden on PGI.
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Rye vs Sourdough: Which bread is better for blood sugar control?
Multigrain, whole wheat, sourdough. The market is flooded with varieties of bread to accompany your eggs and pasta, seemingly offering a healthier choice to digest your meals. For diabetics, mindful choices can help control insulin levels and keep spikes under check. If you are confused between rye and sourdough and curious about their impact on your insulin level, comes to you with inputs from a nutritionist. Deepika Sharma, personal fitness expert with a focus on functional nutrition, told that the primary difference between rye and sourdough is that rye is a grain and sourdough is a process. Still, both show up a lot in conversations around digestion, gut health, and blood sugar, so it's worth unpacking. 'Rye bread (the dense, old-school kind — not the soft, sweetened stuff from supermarket shelves) is naturally high in fibre. It's got these slow-digesting carbs that help keep your blood sugar steady. It's also rich in something called arabinoxylans, basically food for your good gut bacteria. So it's not just about sugar spikes, it's also about how your gut holds up over time,' said Sharma. Sourdough, on the other hand, is more of a technique. According to her, it can be made with rye, wheat, spelt, whatever flour you choose. 'What makes it different is the wild fermentation. Instead of commercial yeast, it uses natural bacteria and yeast (mostly lactobacilli) that slowly break things down, including carbs and gluten,' she explained, adding that the process is what makes it easier to digest, lowers the glycemic load, and even reduces compounds that block mineral absorption. 'If you're eating rye sourdough, that's the sweet spot, you get both the grain and the fermentation benefits,' said Sharma. If it's a basic rye vs a good white sourdough, then the sourdough often comes out ahead, especially if it's slow-fermented and made with whole grains, she added. The part most people miss? It's not just the ingredient. It's how it's made. 'A fluffy, fast-baked rye with added sugar won't do much for your gut. But a slow-fermented whole wheat sourdough? That's a different story,' said Sharma. More often than not, labels don't tell the whole truth. The process does, she concluded. Nutritionist Apeksha Chandurkar, founder of Balanced Bite, added that according to dietary recommendations, consuming plain or toasted bread solely depends on the individual's health status and preference. Between the both, toasted bread, which has a slightly lower GI (glycaemic index), could help keep blood glucose levels in check compared to plain bread. Another way to reduce glucose spikes is to freeze and thaw bread. 'Take a plain slice of bread. Put it in a box or container. Freeze it in the refrigerator. The next day, you toast it. This reduces blood sugar spikes by 40 percent. When it is frozen and thawed, resistance starch forms, which is great for gut bacteria,' she added.
