Major clothing retailer loved by Kate Middleton on brink of collapsing into administration risking huge job losses
SHOP SHOCK Major clothing retailer loved by Kate Middleton on brink of collapsing into administration risking huge job losses
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
A MAJOR clothing retailer beloved by Kate Middleton is on the brink of collapsing into administration.
The maternity fashion brand was a favourite of Kate's during her pregnancies.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
3
The brand was popular with Kate Middleton during her pregnancies, as seen here
Credit: Getty
3
Seraphine has filed its intention to appoint administrators
Credit: Getty
3
Seraphine was founded in 2002 and specialises in maternity-wear, seen here on Kate
Credit: GC Images
Seraphine has reportedly filed a notice of intent to appoint administrators two years after leaving the London stock market.
In June the company filing indicated its plan to find a new strategic partner which could include finding a new investor or pursuing a full sale.
It leaves the company's future uncertain, putting jobs at risk.
Seraphine currently employs 95 individuals who could be made redundant depending on the outcome of the process.
It had undergone a relaunch in April, emphasising "forum, function and fit" according to Theindustry.fashion.
The company was founded in 2002 in London by Cécile Reinaud, but it has experienced financial difficulty since she left the company in 2021.
It comes despite the brand's former success among celebrities, being worn by Kate Winslet, Anne Hathaway and Myleene Klass.
Seraphine was also the brand donned by the Princess of Wales for the first official family portrait after Prince George's birth.
While it was valued at £150m on the London Stock Exchange in 2021, by 2023 its majority shareholder Mayfair Equity Partners, had decided to take it back off the market.
Its value had fallen to a reported £15.3m as profits declined.
Popular retailer to RETURN 13 years after collapsing into administration and shutting 236 stores
The financial trouble did not improve even after going private, making an operating loss of £13m on revenues of £42m in the last financial year.
In a post on LinkedIn earlier this year, Reinaud criticised the direction the brand had taken after she left.
She wrote: "My original vision was to create clothes you'd want to wear even if you weren't pregnant.
"That guiding principle seems to have vanished now."
She also criticised the company's rebrand as it moved away from its "unique British heritage and signature regal purple" towards a more Scandinavian inspired logo.
Cécile added: "Seraphine was once a proud example of British fashion entrepreneurship, recipient of two Queen's Awards: now, it seems to have lost its recognisable identity."
It comes as other high street retailers struggle to survive among declining business.
Fellow retailers like Quiz Clothing and Select Fashion have recently entered into administration.
Since Covid, many retailers have struggled to adapt to a consumer base that has moved increasingly online.
With high streets left almost empty, brick and mortar stores have begun to close at a concerning rate.
These issues have been compounded by the cost of living crisis - with businesses facing higher National Insurance contributions and minimum wage since April of this year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
Halifax explains '12 month' rule on savings after customer questions
Halifax explains '12 month' rule on savings after customer questions A customer contacted Halifax after receiving a letter about the account change Halifax has explained the rules for one of its savings accounts (Image: Getty ) Halifax has provided clarity for its customers about an important change to many savings accounts. The issue came to light after customer asked the bank to explain a letter they had received. The letter mentioned that their bonus saver was "ending soon" and mentioned an instant saver account. Halifax clarified the situation by stating: "After 12 months the account changes to an instant saver." The Bonus Saver account pays 3.05 percent interest over a 12-month period. This is as long as you make no more than three withdrawals are within that year. Exceeding this limit by making four or more withdrawals means the interest rate drop significantly to 0.95%. Interest on the Bonus Saver is paid out monthly, coinciding with the date the account was opened. The account can be started with a mere £1 deposit and allows for up to £9 million to be added. However, at the end of the 12-month term, the account transitions to an instant saver, which comes with a much lower interest rate of 1.35%, equating to a decrease in the interest rate of 1.7%. Bonus Saver account holders may also want to take note that the interest rate is subject to change as it is variable. Article continues below This means Halifax can alter it at any time. The bank says on its website: "We'll always let you know of any planned changes to the rate. "Our account conditions explain when and how we do this. For example, we might change it if it costs us more to run this account for you." The account can be managed online, via the app, in branch or over the phone. If you open the account and later decide it's not for you, you can cancel the account free of charge within 30 days of opening. Halifax customers with an easy access savings account have the option to convert it into a bonus saver without needing to open a new account. Article continues below In other banking news, Nationwide Building Society customers may want to act now as they only have a few days left to take advantage of a £200 switch offer. Existing members can receive the bonus cash when switching from a non-Nationwide account to a new or existing FlexPlus, FlexDirect or FlexAccount account. The offer is available until Thursday, July 10. You can check your eligibility using the checker tool on the Nationwide website.
Edinburgh Live
an hour ago
- Edinburgh Live
Amazon shoppers say £6 buy is 'great cost-effective addition to any house'
Amazon has slashed the price of an essential product that's a staple in every British home. Shoppers have been praising its ability to bring a touch of hotel-style luxury to their homes without breaking the bank. During the summer Amazon Prime Day event, running from July 8 to 11, the online retailer announced reductions on a wide range of goods, including top-tier electronic devices, stylish clothes, beauty products and children's toys. Amongst these bargains was the Amazon 2-Ply Embossed Toilet Roll. In an impressive pack of 18 rolls, the Amazon own brand batch packs in 200 sheets per roll. Available exclusively to Prime members, families can now bulk buy this bathroom necessity for the bargain price of £5.84. This means thrifty shoppers with enough storage can pick up rolls that work out at approximately 34p each, making bathroom visits a little less expensive over time. Competing bulk deals are also on offer at wholesalers like Costco with their Kirkland Signature Triple Satin 3-Ply Toilet Tissue (40 rolls, £22.99), and at B&Q with the Nicky Soft Touch White Toilet Roll (32 rolls, £10). But, many Amazon users have been persuaded to abandon the convenience of high-street stores in favour of the digital deal, reports the Mirror. A satisfied customer said: "I didn't realise what I was missing until I tried the Amazon Toilet Roll, 2-Ply Embossed, Soft. It's soft, strong, and makes me feel like I'm living in a five-star hotel bathroom. Seriously, it's like they took the concept of comfort and turned it into paper." (Image: Amazon) One more shared: "I have used many different types of toilet paper in my life, from that scratchy stuff we had as kids in the 80s to a posh hotel where they gave you a live white dove to wipe your bottom with. But this Amazon stuff is the best: soft but strong, and it doesn't try to fly off when you use it." A third added: "I usually buy toilet paper from the supermarket, when I do my weekly shopping, but I ran out, so I thought I'd look an Amazon for a quick option. They are soft, thick enough and clean well. Plus, they're budget-friendly!" However, not all reviews were glowing, with one user claiming: "It's ok but very thin and fragments and leaves bits where you don't want bits - if you know what I mean." Another cautioned: "Probably the most fragile toilet paper I've ever experienced outside of a public loo; you have to use at least three sheets for any sort of integrity!" (Image: Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images) Despite these criticisms, the product has gained thousands of positive reviews online. One such review read: "I've been using the Amazon toilet rolls for quite some time now, and I can confidently say they are a fantastic addition to any bathroom. This pack is an absolute lifesaver, especially for busy households like mine. With 200 sheets per roll, you get great value, and they last ages, so you won't find yourself running out unexpectedly." A fifth customer praised the product in their review saying: "Fantastic quality, I now use these on a rolling delivery instead of a previous brand. The paper is very soft and has a very neutral scent. The rolls are large and last really long." Shoppers can benefit from never having to think about buying toilet roll again with Amazon's Subscribe and Save model. This offers a small discount for committing to buy the same products again and again after a certain period of time.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Gunning for economic growth: Is defence spending the answer?
And following a commitment last month by the UK as one of the 32 members of NATO, defence spending is set to reach 5% of GDP by 2035. This target - which falls after the next UK general election - is as much about keeping US president Donald Trump in the European defence fold as it is a response to the menace of Vladimir Putin or Xi Jinping. That's not to dismiss the threats posed by Russia, China and others, which are authentic and should not be ignored. Realpolitik demands mustering the most muscular and united front as possible. Read more: In that vein of practicality, the Prime Minister and Chancellor (for the time being, at least) Rachel Reeves have been championing the benefits set to be unleashed by higher military spending as the latest rescue remedy for the UK economy. "We must now seize a defence dividend for the British people," the Prime Minister declared last month during a visit to the BAE Systems shipyard in Glasgow. "Creating new jobs, skills and community pride across the country." Not all agree that defence spending is a tonic. Writing for The Herald, professor Karen Bell of the University of Glasgow said the assumption that military investment will deliver economic dividends demands "urgent scrutiny". "Analysis for the Scottish Government showed military spending has one of the lowest employment multipliers of any public investment," she said. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer speaks during a visit to BAE Systems in June in Glasgow (Image: Andy Buchanan/PA) "For every pound spent, sectors like care, education and renewable energy produce far more and better-quality employment. At the same time, excess government defence spending comes at the cost of these other socially necessary jobs." Khem Rogaly, senior research fellow at the thinktank Common Wealth, is among others who support this view. He points out that London and the south of England accounted 56% of Ministry of Defence spending with UK businesses last year, while nearly 40% of the £37.6 billion military equipment budget went to just 10 multinational companies. BAE is the largest of these suppliers, accounting for roughly 15% of the annual equipment budget. Its main operations in Scotland include the aforementioned site in Govan along with the Scotstoun shipyard in Glasgow. Its next largest site is at Prestwick airport, where 240 employees provide engineering support for the commercial aircraft built by BAE, a further 160 staff at Hillend near Edinburgh specialising in electronics development, and 100 employees working at RAF Lossiemouth. Read more: In a study commissioned by BAE that was published last week, researchers at Oxford Economics determined that the UK Government's aim of delivering a "defence dividend" is already taking effect with BAE spending £550 million with 300 suppliers in Scotland. Throughout the UK, the company was said to have contributed £13.7bn to GDP in 2024, accounting for one in every £200 of economic output. 'With 4,500 employees in Scotland and spending £550m with 300 suppliers, we're proud to support both national security and economic growth," BAE naval ship supply chain director Sean Scott said. 'As one of the UK's largest employers we recognise the impact we have - creating jobs, developing skills and strengthening communities in Scotland and across the country.' Whatever your view on the merits of a higher defence budget versus those of other public services, the reality is that this additional money is going to be spent if the government holds to its commitments. With that in mind, the engineering industry in Scotland needs to secure as much of this as possible. Read more: This point was raised earlier this year by Gerry Hughes, managing director of family-owned KRG Specialist Engineering in Coatbridge. He maintains that more needs to be done to ensure large contractors source locally, ensuring small and medium-sized firms in Scotland benefit from the financial rewards. 'While major defence firms such as BAE Systems, Babcock, and Leonardo have operations in Scotland, much of their supply chain spending still goes elsewhere," Mr Hughes told The Herald. "The UK Government has committed to directing 25% of defence spending to SMEs, but how much of that truly benefits Scottish businesses? Without stronger links between local firms and defence procurement, Scotland risks missing out on a vital economic opportunity." The solution? Better support for advanced manufacturing in Scotland with backing from the Scottish and UK Government in skills, innovation and infrastructure to keep firms competitive in defence supply chains. Mr Hughes also argues that Scottish firms should have greater access to Ministry of Defence contracts, declaring that they must be embedded in procurement to prevent local expertise from being overlooked in favour of larger, more established suppliers. Read more: 'Scotland's engineering excellence is not just history - it is the foundation of a resilient and secure defence industry," he said. "While shipbuilding remains critical, the future of UK defence cannot be confined to the Clyde alone. "A genuine commitment to local procurement will not only bolster national security but also ensure Scotland's world-class precision engineering and manufacturing capabilities are fully utilised." So will defence spending turbocharge economic growth? The verdict from analysts at Capital Economics is a conditional "no". The rise in defence spending that looks likely in many countries across Europe will boost demand and output, but not by as much as some would hope due to several factors such as capacity restraints and the reliance on imports referred to by Mr Hughes. There could be "significant" improvement to productive potential in some economies in the long run, according to Capital Economics, but this will happen over decades and is not guaranteed. The UK is particularly constrained by a lack of spare capacity, which is all the more reason to ensure no viable firm is overlooked in the distribution of any "defence dividends".
