Paramount to pay Trump $16m to settle 60 Minutes lawsuit
Trump filed a lawsuit last October, alleging the network had deceptively edited an interview that aired on its 60 Minutes news programme with his presidential election rival Kamala Harris, to "tip the scales in favour of the Democratic party".
Paramount said it would pay to settle the suit, but with the money allocated to Trump's future presidential library, not paid to him "directly or indirectly".
The company noted the settlement does not include a statement of apology or regret.
A spokesperson for Trump's legal team swiftly hailed the settlement as a "win for the American people" over the "fake news media".
"CBS and Paramount Global realised the strength of this historic case and had no choice but to settle," the spokesperson added. "President Trump will always ensure that no one gets away with lying to the American people."
CBS, which is owned by Paramount, previously said the case was "completely without merit" and had asked a judge to dismiss it.
The settlement marks the latest concession by a US media company to a president who has targeted outlets over what he describes as false or misleading coverage.
According to the lawsuit filed in federal court in Texas, CBS aired two versions of the Harris interview in which she appeared to give different answers to the same question about the Israel-Gaza war.
Interviewer Bill Whitaker asked the Democratic nominee about the Biden administration's relationship with Israel. The network later aired two different versions of her response, according to the claim.
One clip aired on Face the Nation and the other on 60 Minutes. Trump claimed Harris's "word salad" answer had been deceptively edited in one version to shield her from backlash.
CBS said it edited Harris's answer for time, in accordance with television news standards.
Trump sued, originally claiming for $10bn (£8.5bn) but that figure was later increased to $20bn ($17bn) for damages.
In May this year, the company offered $15m (12.7m) to settle the suit but Trump wanted more than $25m (£21m).
In a statement released on Tuesday, Paramount confirmed the settlement fee included the president's legal fees, and that it had agreed that 60 Minutes will release transcripts of interviews with future presidential candidates.
According to both the Wall Street Journal and New York Times, the settlement was agreed - with the help of mediator - so as to not affect Paramount's planned merger with Skydance Media, which the Federal Communications Commission has been reviewing and therefore Trump technically has the power to halt.
During the month-long settlement talks, some CBS News executives including chief executive Wendy McMahon have left their roles, due to their unwillingness to issue an apology to Trump.
There were also reportedly concerns over whether paying to settle the lawsuit could be viewed as bribing a public official.
A spokesman for Trump's legal team said the settlement was "another win for the American people as he, once again, holds the Fake News media accountable for their wrongdoing and deceit."
He added that CBS and Paramount "realised the strength of this historic case."
CBS has said the broadcast was "not doctored or deceitful".
The Paramount settlement follows a decision by Walt Disney-owned ABC News to settle a defamation case brought by Trump.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
28 minutes ago
- Business Insider
'We're Getting the Band Back Together': Stellantis Stock (NASDAQ:AVAV) Notches Up on Multiple Moves
Today proved to be a big day for legacy automaker Stellantis (STLA), which brought back a division, expanded a major leadership slot, and even brought out some less-than-exciting sales numbers. All of this together left investors a bit conflicted, but optimistic enough to send Stellantis shares rising fractionally in Wednesday afternoon's trading. Don't Miss TipRanks' Half-Year Sale Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. New CEO Antonio Filosa hit the ground running, setting up a major shift in the company's leadership by moving Tim Kuniskis to take over all American brands. Kuniskis will now be handling lead marketing and strategy duties for North America as well. Given that Kuniskis was already in charge of Ram, this makes particular sense; Ram is a major brand in the United States, and now, he handles all of the United States' brands. Stellantis is also restarting its Street and Racing Technology (SRT) division, which will bring in engineers across several brands to put more design capability into the high-performance divisions. Kuniskis declared, 'SRT is another box we needed to check. We're getting the band back together.' And Kuniskis has an ambitious schedule ahead of him, with plans to bring out 25 new products over the next year and a half. And Not a Moment Too Soon This comes at a time when Stellantis is in desperate need of something, anything, that will inject new life into the company and new cash into its coffers. Stellantis' second-quarter sales figures demonstrated as much when they were released. Stellantis' quarterly sales dropped 10% in the United States for the second quarter of 2025, reaching just 309,976 cars sold. This is actually something of a pattern at Stellantis, as reports noted that sales were down 15% against the year prior in the second quarter of 2024 as well. First-quarter sales for 2025 were down as well, down 12% against the first quarter of 2024. This is, hopefully, a development Kuniskis can turn around with his new command position over the North American brands. Is Stellantis Stock a Good Buy Right Now? Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Hold consensus rating on STLA stock based on four Buys, 10 Holds, and one Sell assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. After a 48.57% loss in its share price over the past year, the average STLA price target of $11.65 per share implies 13.49% upside potential.
Business Insider
28 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Weak Fundamentals Facilitate Shrewd Options Trade on Intel Stock (INTC)
On the surface, semiconductor giant Intel (INTC) presents a risky narrative. Sure, INTC stock gained 14% since the start of the year, an impressive performance given that the benchmark S&P 500 is up around 5% during the same period. However, over the past 52 weeks, the security has declined by more than 26%, which is well below that of semiconductor leaders like Nvidia (NVDA). Don't Miss TipRanks' Half-Year Sale Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. Adding to the complex narrative, tense relations between the U.S. and China cloud the fundamental case for INTC stock. Recently, President Donald Trump has stepped up export controls to block the Asian juggernaut's access to advanced semiconductors. Combined with the Trump administration's tough trade policies, particularly regarding tariffs, the situation is challenging for Intel. Last year, China accounted for 29% of Intel's revenue, exposing the company to foreign policy dynamics. Still, bullish investors may be able to read between the lines. Although Trump's tariffs have rattled Wall Street, he has also consistently backed off from going full bore. Impolitely, this back-and-forth process has earned the president the nickname 'TACO' — 'Trump always chickens out,' they say. From a practical perspective, the cloud hanging over INTC stock may be a Bullish opportunity, as there's reason to believe that cooler heads will (eventually) prevail. To amplify gains from this speculative position, traders may consider diving into the options market. The Art of Probability Helps Investors Capitalize on INTC While scrolling through various financial publications can provide color and context for a particular enterprise, this approach lacks specificity. Options traders require a thesis to cover not only the magnitude component (y-axis) but also the time element (x-axis). Being correct on one but not the other leads to a suboptimal transaction, to put it mildly. Stated differently, traders must view the market in probabilistic terms, and it's here that the game of blackjack — and the concept of card counting — becomes supremely relevant. Professional blackjack players will keep a running count of the card values dealt. Low cards are assigned a value of +1, neutral cards are assigned a value of 0, and high cards are assigned a value of -1. Essentially, the idea is to raise one's bet when the odds favor the player and reduce bets when the odds favor the dealer. When done correctly, this approach provides a slight but tangible edge for the card counter, making it a superior framework compared to simply guessing randomly. However, making the strategy work requires a player to calculate two types of probabilities: derivative and conditional. The baseline success ratio is derived from the Gaussian (or standard) distribution, which indicates the likelihood of success based on all aggregate hands. However, the Markovian (or conditional) odds show the possibility of success for a specific hand. It's possible to apply this same game-theory logic to the stock market but with a catch: it's difficult, if not impossible, to conduct Markovian analyses on continuous scalar signals like stock prices. Therefore, this metric should be converted into discrete states, just like how a pro blackjack player would approach the problem. Subsequently, this is the reason why market breadth — or t he sequence of accumulative and distributive sessions — is such a vital measurement metric. As a representation of demand, market breadth is effectively binary, facilitating easy categorization and quantification. These attributes serve as the backbone of past analogs for the formulation of probabilistic analysis. Plotting a Bullish Trading Strategy for INTC Stock With Tuesday's solid performance, INTC stock is on track this week to print a 6-4-U sequence: six up weeks, four down weeks, with a positive trajectory across the 10-week period. Admittedly, converting INTC's price action into a simple binary sequence compresses its magnitude dynamism. Still, the benefit to the trader is that the process segregates price action into distinct, discrete behavioral events. These events can then be tracked to determine transitional probabilities. For instance, using the above approach, the trader can identify that the 6-4-U sequence has flashed 46 times since January 2019. In 56.52% of cases, the price action for the following week (which would coincide with the business week beginning July 7) results in upside, with a median return of 2.47%. Assuming INTC closes around $23 by the end of this week, if the implications of the 6-4-U sequence materialize, the security could reach around $23.57 relatively quickly. And if the bulls maintain control of the market, a push toward $24 over the next few weeks wouldn't be out of the question. Finally, what makes this setup so intriguing is that, as a baseline, the chance that INTC stock will rise on any given week is only 51.03%. Therefore, an incentive exists to consider a debit-based options strategy. Based on the market intelligence above, an aggressive yet rational trade would be the 22.50/23.50 bull call spread, expiring on July 18. This transaction involves buying the $22.50 call and simultaneously selling the $23.50 call, for a net debit paid of $52, representing the maximum potential loss in the trade. Should INTC stock rise through the short strike price ($23.50) at expiration, the maximum reward is $48, a payout of over 92%. Is Intel a Buy, Sell, or Hold? Turning to Wall Street, INTC stock has a Hold consensus rating based on one Buy, 26 Holds, and four Sell ratings over the past three months. The average INTC stock price target is $21.30, implying a downside risk of 6.78% over the next year. Harnessing Mathematical Probability to Trade Intel Stock While Intel's fundamentals may not appear especially compelling at first glance, the political backdrop may prove less detrimental than many fear. Adding to the bullish case for INTC stock is a statistical perspective: given the nature of Intel's demand profile, there's a reasonable basis for expecting potential upside. For bullish speculators, this could present an interesting opportunity in the options market.
Washington Post
30 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Takeaways from AP report on company that sold 200,000 carbon credits to remove CO2 from ocean
Formed three years ago, Gigablue says it has designed particles that when released in the ocean will trap carbon at the bottom of the sea. Gigablue says its work will do nothing less than save the planet. But outside scientists frustrated by the lack of information released by the company say serious questions remain about whether the technology works as the company describes. Their questions showcase tensions in an industry built on little regulation and big promises . Here are highlights from The Associated Press' reporting : Gigablue, founded by a group of entrepreneurs in Israel, was originally named 'Gigaton' after the one billion metric tons of carbon dioxide most scientists say will be necessary to remove from the atmosphere each year to slow global warming. The company began trials in the South Pacific Ocean last year, and says it will work with country authorities to create a 'sequestration field' — a dedicated part of the ocean where 'pulses' of particles will be released on a seasonal basis. The company announced earlier this year that it reached a historic milestone: selling 200,000 carbon credits. It's the largest sale to date for a climate startup operating in the ocean, according to the tracking site making up more than half of all ocean-based carbon credits sold last year. Carbon credits, which have grown in popularity over the last decade, are tokens that symbolize the removal of one metric ton of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. On paper, companies that buy credits achieve a smaller carbon footprint without needing to reduce their own emissions — for instance, by paying another vendor to plant trees or capture carbon dioxide from the air . Only a few countries have required local industries to purchase carbon credits. Most companies that buy them do so voluntarily. The credits have helped fund a band of startups like Gigablue that are eager to tackle the climate crisis, but they are also unevenly regulated, scientifically complex, and have in some cases been linked to fraud . Gigablue's 200,000 credits are pledged to SkiesFifty, a newly formed company investing in greener practices for the aviation industry. Gigablue wouldn't reveal what it earned in the sale, and SkiesFifty's team declined to be interviewed. Most credits are sold for a few hundred dollars each — but a chart on Gigablue's website suggests its prices are lower than almost any other form of carbon capture on the market. The particles Gigablue has patented are meant to capture carbon in the ocean by floating for a number of days and growing algae, before sinking rapidly to the ocean floor. Algae has long been attractive to climate scientists because it absorbs carbon dioxide from the surrounding water as it grows. If the algae sinks to the deep sea or ocean floor, Gigablue expects the carbon to be trapped there for hundreds to thousands of years. The ultimate goal is to lower carbon dioxide levels so drastically that the ocean rebalances with the atmosphere by soaking up more CO2 from the air. It's a feat that would help slow climate change, but one that is still under active study by climate scientists. While Gigablue has made several commercial deals, it has not yet revealed what its particles are made of. Partly this is because the company says it will build different particles tailored to different seasons and areas of the ocean. 'It's proprietary,' said chief technology officer Sapir Markus-Alford. Documents provide a window into the possible ingredients. According to information on the permit, Gigablue's first New Zealand trial last year involved releasing particles of pure vermiculite, a porous clay often used in potting soil. In the second New Zealand trial, the company released particles made of vermiculite, ground rock, a plant-based wax, as well as manganese and iron. A patent published last year hints the particles could also be made of scores of other materials, including cotton, rice husks or jute, as well as synthetic ingredients like polyester fibers or lint. The company said it had commissioned an environmental institute to verify that the particles are safe for thousands of organisms, including mussels and oysters. Several scientists not affiliated with Gigablue interviewed by the AP said they were interested in how a company with so little public information about its technology could secure a deal for 200,000 carbon credits. The success of the company's method, they said, will depend heavily on how much algae grows on the particles, and the amount that sinks to the deep ocean. So far, Gigablue has not released any studies demonstrating those rates. Thomas Kiørboe, a professor of ocean ecology at the Technical University of Denmark, and Philip Boyd, an oceanographer at the University of Tasmania who studies the role of algae in the Earth's carbon cycle, said they were doubtful algae would get enough sunlight to grow inside the particles. It's more likely the particles would attract hungry bacteria, Kiørboe said. The rates at which Gigablue says its particles sink — up to a hundred meters (yards) per hour — might shear off algae from the particles in the quick descent, Boyd said. It's likely that some particles would also be eaten by fish — limiting the carbon capture, and raising the question of how the particles could impact marine life. Boyd is eager to see field results showing algae growth, and wants to see proof that Gigablue's particles cause the ocean to absorb more CO2 from the air. In a statement, Gigablue said that bacteria does consume the particles but the effect is minimal, and its measurements will account for any loss of algae or particles as they sink. The company noted that a major science institute in New Zealand has given Gigablue its stamp of approval. Gigablue hired the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, a government-owned company, to review several drafts of its methodology. In a recent letter posted to Gigablue's website, the institute's chief ocean scientist said his staff had confidence the company's work is 'scientifically sound' and the proposed measurements for carbon sequestration were robust. — This story was supported by funding from the Walton Family Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content. __ Contact AP's global investigative team at Investigative@ or
