
Is It Time To Look For The New Market Leaders?
The action last week reminded some veteran market observers of the Covid plunge when the Spyder Trust (SPY) dropped from a February 2020 high of $313.42 to a low six weeks later at $202.83. From the high to the low, this was a decline of 35.2 %.
The severity of the decline made me and others wonder whether this might be the start of a new bear market. The decline was so fast that many investors were not miserable for too long. The A/D lines moved above the Covid highs by July still It was a surprise that by August 8th, 2020, the SPY had closed back above the February 2020 high.
The investor pain in 2018 was even greater in my opinion as the SPY had a last-quarter decline of 13.9%. The 2.7% S&P decline in the abbreviated December 24th session led to headlines like this from the LA Times 'Stocks slump, bringing the S&P 500 to the brink of a bear market'. Many experts as well as CEO were discussing the concerns over a possible or imminent new recession.
NYSE 2018
On the daily chart of the NYSE Composite, the December 2018 plunge is very evident, as it dropped from 12624 to 10723. That was a decline of just over 15% in just 15 trading days. The plunge in the NYSE All A/D Line was equally sharp. On the December 24 drop well over 90% of the SPY and QQQ stocks were lower with over 90% of the volume on the sell side.
The NYSE All A/D Line was well below its EMA at the December lows while the survey from the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) recorded a drop to 20% which was the lowest reading in two years. The A/D line rallied sharply and by January 4th it had moved above its EMA.
The A/D ratios were quite strong and by January 9th the initial downtrend, line b, had been broken. Just ten trading days later the longer-term downtrend, line a, was also overcome.
By February 15th the NYSE A/D line had moved above the September 2018 high and made a new all-time high. In my analysis, this indicated that the NYSE Composite would also now rally at least 9.5% to also make a new high. This did occur in November 2019.
Spyder Trust Weekly
The SPY's 9.1% decline last week slightly violated the August 2024 low of $505.48 (red arrow) as it closed the week at $505.28. That is 11.8 % below the 20-week EMA at $573.09 and the most oversold reading since 2022. The close was well below the yearly pivot at $551.51 which reversed the positive trend signal from the start of the year.
The yearly S1 is at $497.81 with additional support from April 2024 at $487.65, line a. The late 2021 and the early 2022 high is at $457-$578, line b, as this former resistance has become good support. The April starc- band at $521.04 has already been exceeded.
Invesco QQQ Trust & A/D Line
The Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) was down 9.9% last week to close at $422.67 and just below the S1 at $427.66. The October 2021 high, line a, is at $399.45 with additional support at $366.25, line b. The uptrend from the Covid and the late 2022 low, line c, corresponds to the yearly S2 at $337.51. Currently, QQQ is trading well below the 20-week EMA at $447.68 which is now strong resistance.
The weekly NDX 100 Advance/Decline line has closed exactly on its 21-period EMA but has been below its 21 WMA since the middle of March. The key support is now at the early 2025 low and then the uptrend from the 2020 and 2022 low, line e. The A/D line had staged a major upside breakout in late 2023 as the former resistance at line d, is now major support.
NYSE Composite Monthly
The large capitalization tech stocks led the market's decline but last week the common stocks, represented by the NYSE Composite, were also hit as it was down 8.6%. The close at 17,618 was well below the yearly pivot at 18,683 as the NYSE is just 3.3% above the yearly S1 at 17,033. The late 2021 high, line a, at 17,442 was almost reached last week. There is further support from July 2023 at 16,458, line b. The support from the 2022 and 2023 lows, line c, is currently at 16,498.
The monthly NYSE All A/D line made a new high in November with the NYSE Composite as no divergences were formed. The declining monthly A/D line is still above its rising EMA but the weekly A/D line has dropped further below its EMA and is now close to support from the early January lows.
Nasdaq Composite - Monthly
The Nasdaq Composite (COMPQ) has over 4600 issues compared to just 2860 for the NYSE Composite. The financial quality of the Nasdaq Composite stocks is not quite as high as that of the NYSE stocks and it often leads during market rallies and declines.
COMPQ has declined 22.8% from the December 15th high at 22,204 as it closed last week below the yearly S1 at 15,997 as well as the late 2021 high, line a. There is additional support now at 14,646, line b, and then the July 2023 high at 14,446. The close below the S1 makes the yearly S2 at 12,374 the next pivot target. There is chart resistance in the 17,000 area with the sharply declining 20-week EMA at 28,407.
The closeness of the major averages to long-term support when combined with the extremely high level of bearish sentiment does make it likely that the stock market will rally sharply in the next two weeks. That does not mean it will be a major low like what formed in early 2019 but it is possible.
Spyder Trust - Daily AAII
The daily chart of the SPY shows the down gaps in price last Thursday and Friday after the April pivot at $567.27 was tested on Wednesday. SPY closed 9.6% below its 20-day EMA which is the lowest reading since February 2020. The close at $505.28 was well below the daily starc- band at $523.51 and the August 2024 low. There is initial strong resistance in the $545-$550 area.
The S&P 500 A/D line spiked on April 2nd before dropping sharply to close well below its EMA. Even though SPY is now below all the lows going back to last August the A/D is still above the March lows as well as the stronger support from the December and January lows, line c. The stronger relative performance of the A/D line when compared to price is a sign of strength as it indicates more stocks are rising than falling.
Last week the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) survey came in with the AAII Bull-AAII Bear reading of -40. This means there were 40% more investors who think stock prices will be lower in the next six months than those who think stocks will be higher. Readings below -30 are a contrarian level that bullish sentiment is too low.
My review of the technical evidence still does not indicate that we are in a bear market even though the market averages have dropped considerably more than I expected over the past two weeks. The market examples of 2018 and 2020 demonstrated that even after a scary and powerful decline the market averages can still make new highs.
The extreme selling on Thursday and Friday revealed that over 90% of the stocks on the NYSE declined and over 90% of the volume was declining volume. When this happens the historical data analysis reveals a very positive future market. In a recent post by Charlie Bilello found positive returns after large two-day declines for the next 1, 3, and 5 years.
Consumer Staples
Only the Consumer Staples Select (XLP) is up YTD and the relative performance analysis (RS), from the T&J Sector Watchlist, shows a positive trend since the start of the year. I will be watching the market closely over the next few weeks to find those stocks and ETFs that are performing better than the S&P 500. When the weight of the evidence favors a market bottom I will update my analysis.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Miami Herald
19 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Why did stocks tumble this week?
The stock market had a tough week, with the S&P 500 and tech-stock-heavy Nasdaq retreating sharply on Thursday and Friday following a batch of concerning news on inflation, jobs, and tariffs. The S&P 500 fell 2.7% from an early-week high while the Nasdaq lost 3.9% of its value from its peak on Thursday. Here's why stocks retreated, and what could happen next. The stock market sell-off began in earnest following the Federal Reserve's controversial decision to keep interest rates at 4.25% to 4.5%. President Trump has advocated for Fed Chairman Jerome Powell to cut rates aggressively, recommending a 3% reduction. Related: Goldman Sachs revamps Fed interest rate cut forecast for 2025 Lower interest rates support stock prices because they increase household and business spending, fueling revenue and profit growth. Powell's reluctance to lower rates remains a headwind for stocks this year. Powell cited risks of tariffs driving inflation higher later this year and a "solid" economy for the decision to leave rates unchanged. Many viewed his hawkish tone during his press conference as an indication that rates may not get cut at the next meeting in September either. The decision drew the ire of President Donald Trump, who has previously called Chairman Powell "Mr. Too Late" and a "numbskull" for not already reducing interest rates. The President renewed his calls for Powell to resign following the Fed meeting. Despite White House pressure, the Fed's dual mandate targets low unemployment and inflation, which dictates its decisions on monetary policy. The Fed's mandate purposefully excludes political jawboning. Unfortunately, the Fed's dual goals are contradictory. While Fed rate cuts boost economic activity and lower unemployment, they increase inflation. The opposite is true when it raises rates. This dynamic often means that the Fed hesitates for fear of causing more economic problems than it solves. Unfortunately, that often means that the Fed falls behind the curve when setting interest rates at appropriate levels, forcing it to act more aggressively than it might otherwise because the economy has gotten too hot or cold. That chasing can lead to greater uncertainty, causing stock market volatility. The stock market's sell-off earlier in 2025 was primarily due to higher-than-expected import tariffs and the risk that they would boost inflation, zapping economic activity. Those worries fell when President Trump paused many tariffs on April 9, kickstarting a massive stock market rally that sent the S&P 500 and Nasdaq up over 28% and 38%, respectively. More Layoffs: Intel's recent layoffs take an unexpected turnWalmart makes more cuts customers won't likeLooking for a job? Job ads probably won't help you find one However, now that President Trump's tariff pause expired on August 1, he's announced new tariffs ranging from 10% to 41%, including a 35% tariff on Canada, up from 25%. Canada was our third-largest trading partner in 2024. The higher tariffs are problematic, given that they occur even as the impact of tariffs left in place earlier this year seems to be increasing inflation. The Personal Consumption Expenditures index showed inflation increased to 2.6% in June, up from 2.4% in May and 2.2% in April. The higher and faster inflation rises, the more likely business and household spending will shrink, dinging corporate revenue and earnings growth at publicly traded companies. The stock market was also hit by disappointing jobs data. Stocks perform best when the economy creates more jobs and wages grow, creating extra discretionary income. Related: Jobs report shocker resets Fed interest rate cut bets On Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said the US economy only added 73,000 jobs in July, far fewer than the 100,000 expected and 147,000 in June. As a result, the unemployment rate increased to 4.24%, its highest level this cycle. Meanwhile, the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) showed the number of open jobs fell to 7.4 million in June from 7.7 million in May. In case that wasn't concerning enough, Challenger, Gray & Christmas reported that US employers announced 62,075 layoffs in July, up 29% from June and 140% year over year. Stocks have had a remarkable rally, and it's not shocking that they might take a break. August is a notoriously weak month for stock market returns, and recent gains have lifted the S&P 500's forward price-to-earnings ratio, a key valuation measure, to lofty levels. According to FactSet, the S&P 500's forward P/E ratio was 22.4 on Friday, near the highs set in February before tariff announcements caused a sell-off, and up from about 19 in April, when stocks were near the lows. With valuation arguably rich and inflation and jobs uncertainty growing, stocks could experience more volatility than usual this month. Long-term investors are likely best off simply recognizing that pullbacks are common. According to Capital Group, a money manager with $2.2 trillion under management, the S&P 500 retreats 5% to 10% about once per year. Short-term investors may want to take a different approach, locking in recent gains and looking for lower entry points in the coming weeks. Related: Morgan Stanley resets S&P 500 target for 2026 The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.


Business Upturn
an hour ago
- Business Upturn
Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Reminds Investors in Bitfarms or Reddit of The Class Action Lawsuits Filed and Urges Investors to Inquire About Their Rights
Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Litigation Attorney Brandon Walker Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Bitfarms (BITF) or Reddit (RDDT) To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options If you purchased or acquired securities in any of the above companies during their class period and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Bragar Eagel & Squire partner Brandon Walker or Marion Passmore directly at (212) 355-4648 NEW YORK, Aug. 02, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., a nationally recognized shareholder rights law firm, reminds investors that class actions have been commenced on behalf of stockholders of Bitfarms Ltd. (NASDAQ: BITF) and Reddit, Inc. (NYSE:RDDT). Stockholders have until the deadlines below to petition the court to serve as lead plaintiff. Additional information about each case can be found at the link provided. Bitfarms Ltd. (NASDAQ: BITF) Class Period: March 21, 2023 and December 9, 2024 Lead Plaintiff Deadline: July 8, 2025 The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Bitfarms maintained deficient internal controls over financial reporting; (ii) as a result, the Company incorrectly categorized proceeds derived from the sale of digital assets as a cash flow from operating activities rather than as a cash flow from investing activities; (iii) in addition, the Company overstated the extent to which it had remediated, and/or its ability to remediate, the material weakness in its internal controls over financial reporting related to its classification of the 2021 Warrants; (iv) the foregoing errors caused Bitfarms to misstate various items in several of the Company's previously issued financial statements; (v) as a result, these financial statements were inaccurate and would likely need to be restated; and (vi) as a result, the Company's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times For more information on the Bitfarms class action go to: Reddit, Inc. (NYSE:RDDT) Class Period: October 29, 2024 and May 20, 2025 Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 18, 2025 The complaint alleges that the social media website Reddit receives a significant portion of its user traffic from Google Search, and Reddit's primary source of revenue is generated from advertising to users on its own platform. Throughout the relevant period, Google Search began implementing new Artificial Intelligence ('AI') capabilities such as AI Overview that could change the nature of search results. Defendants are alleged to have made false and misleading statements, and failed to disclose, that: (i) changes in Google Search's algorithm and features like AI Overview were causing users to stop their query on Google Search; (ii) these algorithm changes were materially different than prior instances of reduced traffic to the Reddit website; (iii) Defendants were aware that the increase in the query term 'Reddit' on search engines was because users were getting the sought after answer from Google Search without having to go to Reddit, and not because they intended to visit Reddit; (iv) this zero-click search reality was dramatically reducing traffic to Reddit in a manner the Company was unable to overcome in the short term; and (v) Defendants, therefore, lacked a reasonable basis for its outlook on user rates and advertising revenues. On May 1, 2025, after the market close, Reddit issued an earnings release announcing its first quarter 2024 financial results for the period ending March 31, 2025. The earnings release revealed that Reddit had experienced three consecutive quarters of deceleration in daily active user growth. On this news, the price of Reddit's common stock fell $4.96 per share, or 4.2%, from a closing price of $118.79 per share on May 1, 2025, to a closing price of $113.83 per share on May 2, 2025. Then, on May 19, 2025, Wells Fargo analysts downgraded Reddit's stock and lowered their price target to $115 per share from a previous $168 per share. Wells Fargo called Google Search's implementation of new AI features as likely 'permanent' disruptions on user traffic for Reddit. On this news, the price of Reddit's common stock fell $5.24 per share, or 4.6%, from a closing price of $113.23 per share on May 16, 2025, to a closing price of $107.99 per share on May 19, 2025. Finally, on May 21, 2025, Baird analysts substantially downgraded Reddit's stock, reducing the price target to $120 per share from the previous $140 per share. Citing similar concerns as the Wells Fargo analysts, Baird analysts additionally noted the new and disruptive developments in Google Search that had just been presented at the Google I/O developer conference. On this news, the price of Reddit's common stock fell $9.79 per share, or 9.3%, from a closing price of $105.64 per share on May 20, 2025, to a closing price of $95.85 per share on May 21, 2025. For more information on the Reddit class action go to: About Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C.: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm with offices in New York, California, and South Carolina. The firm represents individual and institutional investors in commercial, securities, derivative, and other complex litigation in state and federal courts across the country. For more information about the firm, please visit . Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. Contact Information: Bragar Eagel & Squire, Walker, Esq. Marion Passmore, Esq.(212) 355-4648 [email protected]


Business Upturn
an hour ago
- Business Upturn
UNITEDHEALTH CLASS ACTION ALERT: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Reminds Investors that a Class Action Lawsuit Has Been Filed Against UnitedHealth Group Incorporated and Encourages Investors to Contact the Firm
NEW YORK, Aug. 02, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., a nationally recognized stockholder rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against UnitedHealth Group Incorporated ('UnitedHealth' or the 'Company') (NYSE: UNH) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of all persons and entities who purchased or otherwise acquired UnitedHealth securities between December 3, 2024 and April 16, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'). Investors have until July 7, 2025 to apply to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit. Click here to participate in the action. According to the lawsuit, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) UnitedHealth had, for years, engaged in a corporate strategy of denying health coverage in order to boost its profits, and ultimately, its share price; (2) this anti-consumer (and at times unlawful) strategy resulted in regulatory scrutiny (as well as public angst) against UnitedHealth, which ultimately resulted in the murder of Brian Thompson ('Thompson'); (3) animus towards UnitedHealth was such that, subsequent to the murder of Thompson, many Americans openly celebrated his demise, expressed admiration for his accused killer, and/or otherwise demanded that UnitedHealth change its strategy even if they condemned Thompson's killing; (4) the foregoing regulatory and public outrage caused UnitedHealth to change its corporate practices; (5) notwithstanding the foregoing, UnitedHealth recklessly stuck with the guidance it issued the day before Thompson's murder, which was unrealistic considering UnitedHealth's changing corporate strategies; and (6) as a result, defendants' public statements were materially false and/or misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. If you purchased or otherwise acquired UnitedHealth shares and suffered a loss, are a long-term stockholder, have information, would like to learn more about these claims, or have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Brandon Walker or Marion Passmore by email at [email protected], telephone at (212) 355-4648, or by filling out this contact form. There is no cost or obligation to you. About Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C.: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm with offices in New York, California, and South Carolina. The firm represents individual and institutional investors in commercial, securities, derivative, and other complex litigation in state and federal courts across the country. For more information about the firm, please visit . Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, and Facebook, and keep up with other news by following Brandon Walker, Esq. on LinkedIn and X. Contact Information: Bragar Eagel & Squire, Walker, Passmore, Esq.(212) 355-4648 [email protected]