logo
EXCLUSIVE DR PHIL: I know what REALLY led to the ICE raids that triggered the LA riots... and it's not what the reckless media is telling you

EXCLUSIVE DR PHIL: I know what REALLY led to the ICE raids that triggered the LA riots... and it's not what the reckless media is telling you

Daily Mail​12-06-2025
Over the past several days, all manner of allegations have been made about legal and targeted federal immigration enforcement operations in Los Angeles — and my apparent involvement in them.
So many of these claims are untrue, provoking unnecessary distractions and more of the destructive rage that already pervades too much of our political dialogue.
So allow me to set the record straight.
Despite the so-called 'reporting,' I was not actually 'embedded' with Immigration and Customs enforcement officers making arrests during the raids in LA on Friday, June 6.
I was privy to the parameters of the operation and conducted an on-camera interview with Border Czar Tom Homan the evening before the Friday operation and on the Saturday morning afterward for broadcast on MeritTV.
I was also present for a multi-agency briefing early Friday morning at ICE's LA headquarters involving the FBI, ATF, US Marshal Service and the IRS. I garnered additional insights from Mr. Homan as we drove through the area Friday.
And contrary to what's been reported — or more accurately, not reported — in the mainstream media, federal activities on June 6 did not conduct a random round-up of illegal immigrants in Los Angeles.
Rather, their coordinated multi-agency operations were conducted pursuant to a duly authorized federal search warrant — not a rumor nor hunch.
To obtain a search warrant, the government is required to present evidence to a federal judge who will evaluate if there is probable cause to issue such a warrant and that was done regarding a particular company in LA.
The primary business targeted in Friday's operations was Ambiance Apparel, which, I'm told, is suspected of involvement in criminal activity.
And this is not the first time that this company has been in hot water. In 2020, the business and its owner, Sang Bum 'Ed' Noh were accused by federal prosecutors of undervaluing imports and skirting millions of dollars in tariffs. Ambiance Apparel pleaded guilty to eight offenses, such as conspiracy and money laundering, and Noh was sentenced to a year in prison.
Now, according to the White House border czar Tom Homan, the troubled manufacturer is being investigated again for alleged money laundering, tax evasion and customs fraud.
After federal officers raided that company facility, they audited the workforce and reportedly encountered some 40 individuals believed to be in the US illegally. Following US law, they took those individuals into custody.
I was at ICE's LA headquarters when these individuals were brought in, and I can report that these people were treated with dignity and respect, offered food and water and then interviewed.
In short, Friday operations were a strategic enforcement of the law — deliberate and legally sanctioned. But the response of some so-called activists, on the other hand, have been dangerous, destructive and utterly lawless.
Rioters attacked law enforcement officers throwing chunks of broken concrete and other projectiles at moving vehicles. Others blocked agents from doing their jobs. Still more rampaged through the city looting, destroying public property and even torching cars in the streets.
For what?
I've spoken extensively to Border czar Homan and President Donald Trump about their immigration enforcement goals, which are to close the southern border with Mexico, prioritize the deportations of the most dangerous illegal immigrants in the country, finally, to find an estimated 300,000 undocumented children who have gone missing over the last several years.
Some of these children have very likely found their way to families, but an untold number of these vulnerable minors have been pushed into prostitution and forced labor, and they need to be rescued.
Additionally, after these children are located, they'll require medical, psychological and sociological services to help them recover from the inevitable trauma that they've suffered.
Who among us would object to these priorities? Yet, Los Angeles erupted into chaos.
Where were these protesters when President Barack Obama was deporting 2.8 million illegal immigrants during his administration? Perhaps, today's 'activists' are motivated more by politics than principle.
The truth, though it may be hard to hear, can't be avoided: laws are not suggestions. They aren't 'optional,' and being a good person or worker does not grant immunity from them.
If these impassioned protesters really want change, they should show up in Washington, DC, to protest Congress or write to their representatives to demand legislative reform.
While the right to peaceful protest is the cornerstone of our democracy, the ICE agents who risked their safety to perform their jobs are neither politicians nor lawmakers. They did not put pen to paper to propose these policies – they are merely operating under a sworn duty to enforce the law, not rewrite it.
But throwing rocks at law enforcement officers? Blocking vehicles? That's not speech, it is criminal conduct, plain and simple — and it certainly should not deter ICE operations.
Make no mistake the violence perpetrated against ICE and other law enforcement officers is not a negotiation for justice. It is a demand for surrender. But that cannot happen.
If you want to change immigration policy — fine. Let's have that debate. Let's talk reform.
We need more truth, not more rage. And we need a media willing to inform, not inflame.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump said he wanted to protect ‘Dreamer' immigrants with DACA. Now, officials say they should self-deport
Trump said he wanted to protect ‘Dreamer' immigrants with DACA. Now, officials say they should self-deport

The Independent

time20 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump said he wanted to protect ‘Dreamer' immigrants with DACA. Now, officials say they should self-deport

The Trump administration is continuing to chip away at the guarantees of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which temporarily protects certain children brought to the U.S. illegally from deportation. The move comes despite the president's campaign-trail claim he wanted to protect DACA recipients, known as Dreamers. In response to questions about a recent case, in which DACA recipient Erick Hernandez accidentally drove across the U.S.-Mexico border from California in June without permission then was put in deportation proceedings, the Department of Homeland Security said it was encouraging Dreamers to self-deport. "Illegal aliens who claim to be recipients of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) are not automatically protected from deportations," DHS assistant press secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement, encouraging Dreamers to accept the administration's $1,000 incentive to self-deport on a government-funded flight. "DACA does not confer any form of legal status in this country." Valerie Sigamani, an attorney for Hernandez, expressed alarm at the apparent immigration policy shift. 'This administration assured DACA recipients that something should be done to cement their status in the United States,' she told NBC San Diego. 'It's unfortunate that this DHS would encourage DACA recipients to self-deport.' Others argued the administration was not correctly applying the law regarding the DACA program, which was created in 2012 to protect immigrants who arrived illegally as children before 2007. "The notion that it does not provide protection is simply false," Thomas A. Saenz, president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, told NPR, which first reported on the change in DACA priorities. President Trump has vacillated for years over the fate of the Dreamers, a group for whom a majority of Americans support creating some form of lasting residency or citizenship. DACA recipients, who receive work permits, currently have to re-apply for their protections every two years. During his first term, he tried to end the program, but the Supreme Court found in 2020 that the administration had not put forth an adequate justification to justify ending the initiative. As Trump plotted his political comeback, advisor Stephen Miller, now White House deputy chief of staff, told reporters in 2023 the president would try again to end the program. However, a year later, after winning the 2024 election, Trump seemed to flip again, telling NBC News that he wanted the Dreamers to stay in the country after all. 'They have great jobs,' he said on Meet The Press. 'In some cases, they have small businesses, some cases they might have large businesses. And we're going to have to do something with them.' 'I want to be able to work something out,' he added. Now that Trump is back in the White House, that priority seems to have evaporated, and agencies have moved to further restrict DACA recipients' access to the federal health insurance marketplace, while investigating universities that offered financial aid to Dreamers. Some immigrants with DACA have already chosen to self-deport, including Patricia Vázquez Topete, who came to the U.S. from Mexico at age 12, fleeing sexual abuse. 'I want people to understand that if we had a pathway, so many of us would have taken advantage of it,' said Topete, who left the U.S. in May, speaking with The Fresno Bee. 'We looked at the options, we are proactive, and we remain undocumented because there's still not an option.' ' The fate of DACA not the first time the president has wavered over the status of a sensitive category of immigrants. In June, the president conceded his mass deportation agenda was hurting the U.S. farm labor and hospitality labor force and reportedly planned a pause in enforcement against these sites while seeking some kind of reprieve, though immigration officials disagreed, and by July the president was saying there was no ' amnesty ' planned. 'We've got to give the farmers the people they need, but we're not talking amnesty,' Trump said earlier this month.

Bernie Sanders puts Senate Democrats on notice over Gaza – and on the record with vote to block arms to Israel
Bernie Sanders puts Senate Democrats on notice over Gaza – and on the record with vote to block arms to Israel

The Independent

time20 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Bernie Sanders puts Senate Democrats on notice over Gaza – and on the record with vote to block arms to Israel

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) is now forcing Senate Democrats to reckon not only with the images of starvation and suffering in Gaza but also the tectonic shift within voters in their own party. Sanders – the democratic socialist independent, former presidential candidate and gadfly-turned vanguard of the left-wing – will force two votes to pressure the Senate to block arms to Israel in response to civilian massacres in Gaza and the impending famine. The votes are similar to those Sanders held in the weeks after the election, when many wondered whether President Joe Biden's outspoken support for Israel's war in Gaza after a surprise assault by Hamas may have cost Kamala Harris votes in Michigan and with young voters. 'What polling shows is the American people are sick and tired of supporting a racist extremist government in Israel, which is now starving, starving children to death with U.S. taxpayer money,' Sanders told The Independent. Sanders has some polling to back up his claim. A Gallup poll shows 32 percent of Americans support Israel's military action in Gaza and 60 percent oppose. The Democrats' divide is much starker. While 25 percent of Independents support Israel's actions only 8 percent of Democrats are in support. For those wondering, Marjorie Taylor Greene is firmly in the minority of Republicans who think the war is a 'genocide,' as 71 percent support Israel's actions. Unsurprisingly, Sanders's fellow progressive, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) supports his push to block arms to Israel. 'The Prime Minister has instead created a humanitarian catastrophe, and every day that goes by, the world sees it more vividly and makes clear that they want Netanyahu to stop, stop starving little babies,' Warren told The Independent. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told The Independent early on Wednesday that he hadn't seen Sanders's amendment, but given his outspoken support for Israel, he likely will not vote for it. The next generation of Democratic Senate leaders is clearly angry. On Tuesday, before Sanders announced his votes, Sen. Brian Schatz of Hawaii, who like Sanders is Jewish, unloaded on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. 'There's nobody that can credibly claim that one of the most capable militaries in the world is unable to do basic food distribution, they've been doing this in war zones for decades,' he told The Independent. Many expect Schatz to succeed retiring Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the first senator to support a ceasefire, as Democratic whip in the Senate. So his condemnations speak volumes, specifically, his critique of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the Israel and U.S.-supported group which supplanted United Nations food distribution. 'They kicked out all the organizations that know how to do this,' Schatz said. 'They stood up a new organization that's never done this before, that's mostly comprised of military contractors, and it is flat and freely and people are dying so we're all furious, and there's some bipartisan fury.' The same can be said of Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), a potential candidate to succeed Schumer when he eventually retires. When Klobuchar ran against Sanders and Warren, in the Democratic presidential primary, she occupied the moderate lane and has earned a reputation as an consensus builder who can pass legislation. But last week, she delivered a floor speech excoriating the Netanyahu government's treatment of Gaza. Many on social media pointed out how a few weeks ago, she joined a bipartisan delegation that met with Netanyahu when he came to Washington. Klobuchar told The Independent on Tuesday that she specifically went to the meeting to ask Netanyahu about Israel's Defense Minister Israel Katz's proposal to create a ' humanitarian city ' for displaced Palestinians. 'In fact, the reason I went to the meeting, I was invited as number-three in Democratic leadership, and I went,' Klobuchar said. 'The reason I went was to raise the lack of humanitarian aid into Gaza and that they had to have more access point.' Klobuchar's fellow Minnesotan Sen. Tina Smith said she would back Sanders's amendment and has voted for them in the past. 'I think it is just very important that we show these votes our strong disapproval of the way the Netanyahu government is the prosecuting this war,' she said. Smith, who is retiring at the end of next year said the 'horrible images' out of Gaza have signaled a change. Smith has often been mistaken for Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), who just won re-election last year, despite Harris losing the Badger State. Baldwin did not say whether she had read the legislation, though she denounced the treatment of Gazans. 'The situation in Gaza is a humanitarian crisis and action must be taken,' she told The Independent. 'We need to send a strong message to our president, as well as Netanyahu, and I expect to support them.' A swing-state Democrat, a future whip and a potential majority leader who narrowly won re-election shows Democrats no longer see opposing Israel's treatment of Palestinians as a politically verboten topic. The Democratic Party clearly has seen how it no longer sees Israel's actions as acceptable, and regardless of how the vote will go, they will have been woken up by Sanders: the Jewish son of Polish immigrants who fled antisemitism and lived on an Israeli kibbutz in his youth.

Republican, 91, feebly fires back after being 'offended' by Trump's deeply personal attacks on his character
Republican, 91, feebly fires back after being 'offended' by Trump's deeply personal attacks on his character

Daily Mail​

time20 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Republican, 91, feebly fires back after being 'offended' by Trump's deeply personal attacks on his character

A top-ranking Senate Republican lashed out about a 'personal insult' from the Oval Office after he became President Trump's latest target. Trump, 79, called Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley, 91, 'weak and ineffective' in a post on his Truth Social media site Tuesday. Trump laid out his frustrations in his Tuesday night post, writing that 'because of an ancient, and probably Unconstitutional, 'Custom,' that if you have, even one person in the opposite Party serving in the U.S. Senate, he/she must give consent, thereby completely stopping the opposite Party's Nomination.' 'The only way to beat this Hoax is to appoint a Democrat or, a weak and ineffective Republican,' Trump added. The attack on Grassley was over an age-old custom of letting senators object to judicial nominees from their home jurisdictions using the 'blue slip.' The president also argued that 'Senator Grassley must step up, like Crooked Joe Biden did, when he openly broke, at least two times, the 'Blue Slip' Scam, and like others have done over the years, and let our Great Republican Judges and U.S. Attorneys Be Confirmed.' Grassley responded on at a Judiciary Committee meeting Tuesday. 'Last night, I was surprised to see President Trump on Truth Social go after me and Senate Republicans over what we call the 'blue slip,' the Iowa Republican said. 'I was offended by what the President said, and I'm disappointed that it would result in personal insult,' Grassley continued. Trump apparently saw the move by Grassley as an affront to his agenda. Emphasizing how bad this made the GOP look in Trump's eyes, the president said that Grassley should give consent 'Immediately, and not let the Democrats laugh at him and the Republican Party for being weak and ineffective.' Nearly 150 of Trump's nominees have yet to be confirmed by the Senate, including the president's picks for diplomatic and judicial posts. Trump has urged the Senate to finish the confirmations before they head back to their states for the month-long August recess break from business in Washington, D.C. Earlier this week, Grassley posted on X that he was willing to stay in session in the Senate to move Trump's agenda along by getting the picks confirmed. Known for his unique use of shorthand in social media posts, Grassley wrote on July 27th that, 'If Pres Trump asks us to not take august recess im w him. Democrats hv been slow walking nominations We hv to make up for their wasted time Trump needs his administration in place.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store