logo
More than 60 scientists issue dire warning that the Earth is careening toward catastrophe: 'Things are all moving in the wrong direction'

More than 60 scientists issue dire warning that the Earth is careening toward catastrophe: 'Things are all moving in the wrong direction'

Yahoo3 days ago
Our planet is speeding toward a dangerous temperature milestone, and dozens of climate scientists warn we could surpass it before the end of this decade.
A group of more than 60 leading scientists warns that if the Earth continues its current levels of pollution and carbon pollution, average global temperatures in the next three years will likely surpass 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit over preindustrial levels, the BBC reported.
That threshold is one agreed to by nearly 200 countries as part of the Paris Agreement as a level that the planet's temperature needs to stay below. If temperatures consistently surpass that number, the United Nations warns, the planet could see severe consequences.
Ideally, the UN says, the planet wouldn't hit that 2.7-degree threshold before the end of this century. But since the treaty was signed, scientists say not enough has happened to limit carbon pollution.
"Things are all moving in the wrong direction," University of Leeds climate researcher Piers Forster told the BBC. "We're seeing some unprecedented changes, and we're also seeing the heating of the Earth and sea-level rise accelerating as well."
The planet is warming at a rate of nearly half a degree Fahrenheit each decade — a level, the scientists note, that has never been seen before. The rate of warming is roughly double what it was 50 years ago.
In fact, each of the 10 warmest years on record occurred within the past decade, with 2024 setting the all-time high mark. And that record is also expected to be broken within the next few years.
As the planet gets warmer, extreme weather events are occurring with more frequency, more severity, or both. One expert has even referred to our warming climate as "steroids for weather."
Scientists have pointed to the changing climate as a driving force behind events such as this year's deadly Los Angeles wildfires and last year's devastating Hurricane Helene.
Although scientists are concerned about how fast we're speeding toward that 2.7-degree threshold, all hope is not lost.
Do you worry about air pollution in your town?
All the time
Often
Only sometimes
Never
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
As more countries adopt green technologies and clean energy sources like solar and wind, the rate of harmful carbon pollution can slow down. And while some drastic carbon cuts will be needed to keep the planet from reaching that threshold, every bit of slowing helps.
"Reductions in emissions over the next decade can critically change the rate of warming," Imperial College London climate science professor Joeri Rogelj told the BBC. "Every fraction of warming that we can avoid will result in less harm and less suffering of particularly poor and vulnerable populations and less challenges for our societies to live the lives that we desire."
Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

United Nations Considering These Four Crucial Actions To Save The World From Dire AGI And Killer AI Superintelligence
United Nations Considering These Four Crucial Actions To Save The World From Dire AGI And Killer AI Superintelligence

Forbes

time5 hours ago

  • Forbes

United Nations Considering These Four Crucial Actions To Save The World From Dire AGI And Killer AI Superintelligence

The United Nations releases an important report on AGI and emphasizes four key recommendations to ... More help save the world from dire outcomes. In today's column, I examine a recently released high-priority report by the United Nations that emphasizes what must be done to prepare for the advent of artificial general intelligence (AGI). Be aware that the United Nations has had an ongoing interest in how AI is advancing and what kinds of international multilateral arrangements and collaborations ought to be taking place (see my coverage at the link here). The distinctive element of this latest report is that the focus right now needs to be on our reaching AGI, a pinnacle type of AI. Many in the AI community assert that we are already nearing the cusp of AGI and, in turn, we will soon thereafter arrive at artificial superintelligence (ASI). For the sake of humanity and global survival, the U.N. seeks to have a say in the governance and control of AGI and ultimately ASI. Let's talk about it. This analysis of an innovative AI breakthrough is part of my ongoing Forbes column coverage on the latest in AI, including identifying and explaining various impactful AI complexities (see the link here). Heading Toward AGI And ASI First, some fundamentals are required to set the stage for this weighty discussion. There is a great deal of research going on to further advance AI. The general goal is to either reach artificial general intelligence (AGI) or maybe even the outstretched possibility of achieving artificial superintelligence (ASI). AGI is AI that is considered on par with human intellect and can seemingly match our intelligence. ASI is AI that has gone beyond human intellect and would be superior in many if not all feasible ways. The idea is that ASI would be able to run circles around humans by outthinking us at every turn. For more details on the nature of conventional AI versus AGI and ASI, see my analysis at the link here. We have not yet attained AGI. In fact, it is unknown whether we will reach AGI, or whether AGI may be achievable in decades or perhaps centuries from now. The AGI attainment dates that are floating around are wildly varying and wildly unsubstantiated by any credible evidence or ironclad logic. ASI is even more beyond the pale when it comes to where we are currently with conventional AI. United Nations Is Into AI And AGI I've previously explored numerous U.N. efforts regarding where AI is heading and how society should best utilize advanced AI. For example, I extensively laid out the ways that the U.N. recommends that AI be leveraged to attain the vaunted Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs), see the link here. Another important document by the U.N. is the UNESCO-led agreement on the ethics of AI, which was the first-ever global consensus involving 193 countries on the suitable use of advanced AI (see my analysis at the link here) The latest notable report is entitled 'Governance of the Transition to Artificial General Intelligence (AGI): Urgent Considerations for the UN General Assembly' and was prepared and submitted to the Council of Presidents of the United Nations General Assembly (UNCPGA). Here are some key points in that report (excerpts): The bottom line is that a strong case can be made that if AGI is allowed to be let loose and insufficiently overseen, society is going to be at grave risk. A question arises as to how the nations of the world can unite to try and mitigate that risk. Aptly, the United Nations believes they are the appropriate body to take on that challenge. UN Given Four Big Asks What does the U.N. report say about urgently needed steps regarding coping with the advent of AGI? These four crucial recommendations are stridently called for: Those recommendations will be considered by the Council of Presidents of the United Nations General Assembly. By and large, enacting one or more of those recommendations would indubitably involve some form of U.N. General Assembly resolutions and would undoubtedly need to be integrated into other AI initiatives of the United Nations. It is possible that none of the recommendations will proceed. Likewise, the recommendations might be revised or reconstructed and employed in other ways. I'll keep you posted as the valued matter progresses. Meanwhile, let's do a bit of unpacking on those four recommendations. I will do so, one by one, and then provide a provocative or perhaps engaging conclusion. Global AI Observatory The first of the four recommendations entails establishing a global AGI Observatory that would keep track of what's happening with AGI. Think of this as a specialized online repository that would serve as a curated source of information about AGI. I agree that this would potentially be immensely helpful to the U.N. Member States, along with being useful for the public at large. You see, the problem right now is that there is a tremendous amount of misinformation and disinformation concerning AGI that is being spread around, often wildly hyping or at times undervaluing the advent of AGI and ASI. Assuming that the AGI Observatory was properly devised and suitably careful in what is collected and shared, having a source about AGI that is reliable and balanced would be quite useful. One potential criticism of such an AGI Observatory would be that it is perhaps duplicative of other similar commercial or national collections about AGI. Another qualm would be if the AGI Observatory were allowed to be biased, it would misleadingly carry the aura of something balanced, yet would actually be tilted in a directed way. Best Practices And Certification For AGI The second recommendation requests that a set of AGI best practices be crafted. This would aid nations in understanding what kind of governance structures ought to be considered for sensibly overseeing AGI in their respective country. It could spur nations to proceed on a level playing field basis. Furthermore, it reduces the proverbial reinventing of the wheel, namely that the nations could simply adopt or adapt an already presented set of AGI best practices. No need to write such stipulations from scratch. On a similar vein, the setting up of certifications for AGI would be well-aligned with the AGI best practices. AI makers and countries as a whole would hopefully prize being certified as to their AGI and its conformance to vital standards. A criticism on this front is that if the U.N. does not make the use of best practices a compulsory aspect, and likewise if the AGI certification is merely optional, few if any countries would go to the trouble of adopting them. In that sense, the whole contrivance is mainly window dressing and not a feet-to-the-fire consideration. U.N. Framework Convention In the parlance of the United Nations, it is somewhat expected to call for a Framework Convention on significant topics. Since AGI is abundantly a significant topic, here's a snapshot excerpt of what is proposed in the report: 'A Framework Convention on AGI is needed to establish shared objectives and flexible protocols to manage AGI risks and ensure equitable global benefit distribution. It should define clear risk tiers requiring proportionate international action, from standard-setting and licensing regimes to joint research facilities for higher-risk AGI, and red lines or tripwires on AGI development.' The usual criticism of those kinds of activities is that they can become a bureaucratic nightmare that doesn't produce much of anything substantive. Also, they might stretch out and be a lengthy affair. This is especially disconcerting in this instance if you believe that AGI is on the near horizon. Formulate U.N. AGI Agency The fourth recommendation indicates that a feasibility study be undertaken to assess whether a new U.N. agency ought to be set up. This would be a specialized U.N. agency devoted to the topic of AGI. The report stresses that this would need to be quickly explored, approved, and set in motion on an expedited basis. An analogous type of agency or entity would be the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). You probably know that the IAEA seeks to guide the world toward peaceful uses of nuclear energy. It has a founding treaty that provides self-guidance within the IAEA. Overall, the IAEA reports to the U.N. General Assembly and the U.N. Security Council. A criticism of putting forward an AGI Agency by the United Nations is that it might get bogged down in international squabbling. There is also a possibility that it would be an inhibitor to the creative use of AGI rather than merely serving as a risk-reducing guide. To clarify, there are some that argue against too many regulating and overseeing bodies since this might undercut innovative uses of AGI. We might inadvertently turn AGI into something a lot less impressive and valuable than we had earlier hoped for. Sad face. Taking Action Versus Sitting Around Do you think that we should be taking overt governance action about AGI, such as the recommendations articulated in the U.N. AGI report? Some would say that yes, we must act immediately. Others would suggest we take our sweet time. Better to get things right than rush them along. Still others might say there isn't any need to do anything at all. Just wait and see. As food for thought on that thorny conundrum, here's a memorable quote by Albert Einstein: 'The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything.' Mull that over and then make your decision on what we should do next about AGI and global governance issues. The fate of humanity is likely on the line.

Australian Rock Art Site Near LNG Hub Gets World Heritage Status
Australian Rock Art Site Near LNG Hub Gets World Heritage Status

Bloomberg

time7 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

Australian Rock Art Site Near LNG Hub Gets World Heritage Status

The United Nations has granted World Heritage status to an ancient Aboriginal rock art site in Australia that's close to an industrial gas hub, a development that will require the government to protect the cultural area. The Murujuga site, located on the Burrup Peninsula in northwest Australia, contains the largest collection of rock art in the world. Covering around 100,000 hectares, it has more than 1 million engravings known as petroglyphs with depictions of animals, plants — and perhaps the oldest depiction of a human face.

Experts issue warning as invasive snakes torment island creatures: 'They advance as if they were on the front of a battle zone'
Experts issue warning as invasive snakes torment island creatures: 'They advance as if they were on the front of a battle zone'

Yahoo

time18 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Experts issue warning as invasive snakes torment island creatures: 'They advance as if they were on the front of a battle zone'

Invasive snakes are spreading throughout Ibiza, Formentera, and the surrounding islets, according to El País. Several species of native creatures have already gone locally extinct. In 2003, snakes were found on a shipment of ornamental trees bound for Ibiza. Now, over 20 years later, they're wreaking havoc. "They advance as if they were on the front of a battle zone," Oriol Lapiedra, a researcher studying the snakes, told El País. "You have to imagine the snakes as if they were an actual wave, devouring what they find." Last year, over 3,000 snakes were found, increasing a thousandfold from 2023. The snakes have even managed to swim to the islets outside Ibiza, ensuring that nowhere is safe for their native prey. Experts informed El País that field mice, shrews, and geckos have become locally extinct as a direct result of their spread. And another animal might be next in line for the chopping block. The Ibiza wall lizard is a crucial pollinator for its ecosystem. Because of the snakes, a majority of the island is now uninhabitable for the species. As the former head of the food chain, it hasn't adapted to having a predator. Their spread is indicative of a larger pattern worldwide. A 2023 United Nations report found that human activity has introduced over 37,000 invasive species into non-native environments, costing the global economy over $423 billion. Zebra mussels, for instance, have invaded the Colorado River, threatening local marine life and water supplies. And the ash borer beetle has colonized most of the United States, leaving millions of dead trees in its wake. Specifically, these snakes' invasion of Ibiza has disrupted its delicate ecosystem. Lapiedra told El País that they pose an even greater threat to the islets, where the ecosystems are smaller. It's a conservation nightmare. Instead of focusing on eradication — the snakes are too widespread for that option to be viable — scientists are trying to find ways for the snakes and the Ibiza wall lizards to coexist peacefully. According to El País, Spain's Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and the Natural Environment and the Barcelona Zoo are launching a breeding program for the lizard species. Do you worry about air pollution in and around your home? Yes — always Yes — often Yes — sometimes No — never Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. It could keep the species alive while researchers work to create safe havens for the existing lizards. If the population remains stable, Ibiza wall lizards may be able to develop defense mechanisms against the snakes, restoring some balance. To fight this battle at home and help your local ecosystem thrive, consider rewilding your yard with native plant species. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store