logo
Disqualified State Senate District 23 candidate speaks on future plans

Disqualified State Senate District 23 candidate speaks on future plans

Yahoo28-01-2025
LAFAYETTE, La. (KLFY) – Kristopher Harrison, a former candidate for Louisiana State Senate District 23, is speaking out about his future goals one week after he was disqualified from the race.
This comes after petitioner, Taylor Fontenot, filed a court order on January 16th accusing Harrison of not filing his taxes in 2019 and 2022. Harrison and Fontenot both presented evidence to Judge Royale Colbert at the Lafayette Courthouse on January 18th.
State senate candidate Kristopher Harrison disqualified
Harrison notifed News 10 via text on January 19th that Judge Colbert ruled in favor of Fontenot, on claims of Harrison not certifying his tax documents with the Louisiana Department of Revenue.
Harrison, a Democrat, placed his name on the ballot for State Senate District 23 on January 9th. Brach Myers and Jesse Rogan, both Republicans, are also on the ballot.
Harrison tells News 10 his disqualification from the race came as a shock and has raised questions on how politics could cause barriers that can keep a person from running for office.
'Stuff like that just shouldn't happen at a sitting state senate race where a couple of years ago I ran for city council and it was not a problem at all,' said Harrison.
Harrison notifed News 10 via text on January 19th that Judge Colbert ruled in favor of Fontenot, on claims of Harrison not certifying his tax documents with the Louisiana Department of Revenue.
Harrison says despite his disqualification, he still plans to run for a future position in government, advocating on protecting the rights of the lower and middle class.
'I want to go to the state legislature and support low wage workers, I want to go to the legislature to represent people like cashiers, people in small businesses, and working for the oilfield. I want to be somebody you could talk to, I'm a very honest and reasonable person and that's the type of candidate I want to be, they could always know that I'm that candidate for them,' said Harrison.
Harrison tells News 10 he plans to file an appeal to this case with the Louisiana Supreme Court and the Louisiana Court of Appeals.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democratic governors advise strong counteroffensive on redistricting
Democratic governors advise strong counteroffensive on redistricting

Politico

time15 minutes ago

  • Politico

Democratic governors advise strong counteroffensive on redistricting

Kelly didn't cite California Gov. Gavin Newsom by name, but he is the most high profile, and likeliest, example of a Democrat considering a counteroffensive remapping effort to squeeze more seats from a blue state. On Thursday, Newsom said he'd seek a November special election to have voters approve a new House map that would boost Democrats' numbers. It's an expensive and potentially perilous gamble that his Democratic colleagues throughout the country appear to be backing — a notably more aggressive posture for the party. Various mid-decade redistricting efforts could launch a partisan arms race, as the parties look to redraw competing congressional maps to their own advantages. Democrats face a tougher path, as several blue states are bound by independent redistricting commissions and state constitutions, which would prevent them from quickly remaking maps. By contrast, discussions are already underway in several other Republican-controlled states that could follow Texas' lead, including Missouri, Indiana and Florida. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz acknowledged there's 'validity' to concerns that Republicans might gain even more seats, should redistricting wars escalate. But, Walz and Kelly said, 'there's a bigger risk in doing nothing.' 'We can't just let this happen and act like it's fine, and hope that the courts fix it,' Kelly said. 'We have no idea, quite honestly, at this point, what the courts might do, but by virtue of us responding in kind, we do send a message. We're not going to take this line down.'

Senate passes first funding package ahead of shutdown cliff
Senate passes first funding package ahead of shutdown cliff

Politico

timean hour ago

  • Politico

Senate passes first funding package ahead of shutdown cliff

'It's taken a great deal of work, good faith and negotiation to get to this point,' Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine). 'Congress has a responsibility, a constitutional responsibility under Article I, for the power of the purse. We are executing that responsibility.' The package would provide almost $154 billion for military construction and veterans programs. It would send more than $27 billion to the Agriculture department and FDA. Both represent a roughly 2 percent boost over current levels. The Senate rejected an amendment from Sen. Jeff Merkley, an appropriator and the top Democrat on the Senate Budget Committee, that would bar the rescission, or clawback, of funds in the bill by the White House. Democrats are worried that the administration will send another rescissions package ahead of the fall funding deadline, which would likely implode any hopes of getting a larger funding deal. Still, Sen. Patty Murray, the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, defended the smaller deal reached among senators, saying that the package 'rejects damaging cuts from Trump and House Republicans.' The Senate adopted by voice vote an amendment from Democratic Sens. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut and Alex Padilla of California that would bar the use of any funds in the bill to reduce services provided by the Veterans Crisis Line. Senators rejected other amendments from Democrats including one that would have halted funding of the Agriculture Department reorganization and another to require a report on staffing reductions at the VA. They also rejected amendments from Sens. John Kennedy (R-La.) and Rick Scott (R-Fla.) that would have made deeper cuts to the Agriculture-FDA bill. The chamber also voted 75-21 to reject a proposal from Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin that would bar lawmakers from taking credit for earmarks. It would require the funding to be revoked if a lawmaker were to ever tout their earmarks in interviews, mailings, speeches or even on the campaign trail.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store