Cosatu defends B-BBEE policy amid criticism from Solidarity and FMF
Image: Supplied
Banele Ginidza
The battle for the scrapping of "race laws" in South Africa went a notch up on Thursday as the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) shot down a call to review and drop South Africa's Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) policy.
This comes as trade union Solidarity and the Free Market Foundation (FMF) on Thursday released a report claiming that B-BBEE has caused serious damage to the country's economy and to its population while only enriching a small, politically-connected elite.
The report draws on data from the B-BBEE Commission, Stats SA, the JSE, and international comparisons to assess the real costs of compliance across the key BEE scorecard elements: ownership, skills development, enterprise and supplier development, management control, and socio-economic development.
According to the report, the annual cost of BEE compliance is between R145 billion and R290bn per year. It claimed that this has resulted in an annual reduction of 1.5% to 3% in economic growth, and to an annual loss of between 96 000 and 192 000 jobs.
'Our findings show that BEE, as currently designed, is enriching a small elite while throttling economic dynamism and deepening unemployment,' said Dr Morné Malan, FMF senior associate and co-author of the report, speaking at the joint press conference.
The study compares South Africa's model with global 'affirmative action' policies in Malaysia, India, Brazil, the US, and Namibia, showing that South Africa's version is the most intrusive and economically damaging.
At the media briefing, the organisations claimed that B-BBEE benefits largely captured by politically-connected elites as South Africa now ranks 139th in GDP per capita, down from 87th in 1994.
Executives of both organisations said the people most affected by the current economic programme are people that work poor people and those that are beneficiaries are the elite.
"That is why we will engage with Cosatu trade unions Numsa and others to find alternatives to the current racial legislation," said Theuns du Buisson, economic researcher at the Solidarity Research Institute, and co-author of the report.
"In the second place we will continue to litigate and in the third place we will also put pressure on SA via the international world and continue to put pressure on South Africa with the outside world especially the G20 that comes."
However, Cosatu's Parliamentary spokesperson Matthew Parks said the report provided no breakdown backed up by actual research as to any financial burden to the state nor how B-BBEE has been an obstacle to growing the economy and reducing unemployment.
Parks said the report strangely cited statistics related to real and potential growth overall, but no evidence of the relationship between those and B-BBEE. He said it may as well have blamed constitutional democracy for South Africa's economic challenges.
"No reference is made to the need to overcome our still prevalent racial divides as evidenced by countless employment equity studies confirming that most senior positions in the private sector are held by White males or that economic ownership, including shares on the JSE remain largely White-held," Parks said.
Johann Rossouw, an economist at Altitude Wealth, said a more sensible empowerment model as an alternative to B-BBEE policies was Black Economic Skills Transfer (BEST), which would help with job creation and carry the economy into the future.
"At the moment all the arguments are about how many ways to cut the existing pie instead of growing the pie that we have for the future. Black empowerment is not a policy of the government of national unity," Rossouw said, commending that the study was evidence based and drew comparison with other countries.
"It is important that the GNU makes its own policies that will benefit the average poor."
However, independent economist Duma Gqubule said the study and the report was fake news on steroids, which lacked the fundamental understanding of the objectives of transformation.
Gqubule said the report lacked empirical evidence and was premised on companies counting upskilling workers for an example as a transformation contribution when both the worker and the company benefited from the exercise.
"I would call on black business to come up with a coherent response to this. It is a dangerous agenda. We need another citizen dialogue on black empowerment for the new circumstances as the situation in the 1990s when the policies were crafted were critical," Gqubule said.
BUSINESS REPORT
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
US demands on exemption from South Africa's BEE requirements yet to be discussed with Ramaphosa
The Freedom Front Plus delegation in Washington last week. Image: Facebook/FFPlus FF Plus leader Corné Mulder says he has yet to brief President Cyril Ramaphosa on claims that the Trump administration has demanded that US entities be exempted from all Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) requirements as a precondition for normalising bilateral relations with South Africa. There are more than 600 US companies based in South Africa. Mulder made the claims as a FF Plus delegation returned from the US where they met with senior White House officials. This demand is part of a broader set of conditions that include addressing farm attacks, condemning the "Kill the Boer" chant, and ensuring fair market compensation for land expropriation. According to Mulder, the White House officials expressed concern that these conditions have not been adequately addressed. In May President Cyril Ramaphosa and his delegation embarked on a working visit to the US to meet with US president Donald Trump to help reset strained relations between the two countries and secure a favorable trade deal after a fallout over the International Court of Justice (ICJ) case against Israel that had been instituted by South Africa. Mulder, who held a press briefing on Wednesday, said the delegation is committed to normalising relations between South Africa and the US and described Ramaphosa's visit with Trump in May as 'premature'. "We have a clear understanding of the US Administration's expectations," Mulder said. "The delegation has undertaken to communicate these pre-conditions to both the South African government and the broader public in the interest of transparency, accountability, and the restoration of strong bilateral ties,' said Mulder. Mulder added that they had not gone to the US to complain. He said that discussions on claimed genocide did not arise and they did not meet with the 50 white Afrikaners that were granted refugee status by the Trump administration. Southern African Agri Initiative chairman Theo de Jager, and National Employers' Association CEO Gerhard Papenfus were part of the delegation. According to business group Sakeliga's CEO Piet le Roux, this development marks a substantial escalation in international pressure against South Africa's 'race-restrictive economic policies'. "The international backlash against BEE and other race-restrictive policies of the South African government is set to escalate further in the coming months and years," Le Roux said. Le Roux noted that the US demand elevates race-restrictive legislation beyond domestic affairs to the level of international economic and diplomatic relations This could lead to a ratcheting up of US-led bilateral or multilateral pressure opposing restrictive legislation in South Africa. Speaking on BEE, De Jager said there was only one way to avoid economic migrants and that was by improving their livelihoods. "The principle here is that there must be equal citizenship…there must be respective property rights and there must be an environment where we can also do business. 'They (Trump administration) said to us that they had heard us on the BEE matter, that it is a non-trade tariff barrier and they said that they would not restore any trade relationship if these preconditions are not adhered to. 'The biggest war of our generation is poverty and hunger and the only way we can deal with that is to create wealth…So we are gradually losing investment because of the likes of BEE and the threat to expropriate your property without compensation. You cannot invest in a country where you are not safe. 'We need an environment that will safeguard investment whether you are black or white. As Afrikaners we don't have access to production financing anymore. We need that kind of access,' said de Jager. Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) spokesperson Chrispin Phiri told IOL that the group was pursuing its "own agenda". "Our experience is that State actors do not use non-state actors as intermediaries; therefore, Freedom Front Plus (VF Plus) visit and subsequent pronouncements will be viewed as nothing more than their ambitions," he said. Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya did not respond to questions on how the South African government would react to the US demands. However, Ramaphosa has previously indicated that he would not back down from implementing BEE policies. "BEE is not holding back the economy, but rather the concentrated nature of our economy is," Ramaphosa said. He defended using racial designations as a means to address economic disparities, although he acknowledged that this might not be necessary in the future.
The Citizen
4 hours ago
- The Citizen
FF Plus claims White House officials want ANC to publicly denounce ‘Kill the Boer' chant
The FF Plus met officials in the US and claimed Ramaphosa's meeting with Trump was a failure. US President Donald Trump meets with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on 21 May 2025 amid tensions over Washington's resettlement of white Afrikaners that the US president claims are the victims of 'genocide'. Photo: AFP Freedom Front (FF) Plus leader Corne Mulder says President Cyril Ramaphosa and his team were unable to reset relations with the United States (US) government. Ramaphosa met US President Donald Trump in May, accompanied by businessman Johann Rupert, some Cabinet ministers and South African golfers Ernie Els and Retief Goosen. However, Mulder told reporters at the OR Tambo International Airport on Wednesday that Ramaphosa's meeting with Trump was a failure. He had just returned from a trip to the US, where he met with US government officials and businesspeople. 'We all took notice of the events in the Oval Office, and we saw that it did not look like a success. Our delegation came back to South Africa and said everything went well, the problem is that no one we met, including the appointments, told us that the meeting was a success. 'On the contrary, they are concerned about what happened and they desperately want to reset relations between South Africa and the US, but there are certain problems that need to be solved,' he said. Four conditions given to FF Plus Mulder said he was told that there are four conditions that must be met for South Africa's relationship with the US to be reset. The four conditions are: To classify farm attacks and crime in rural areas as priority crimes; The ANC should publicly denounce the 'Kill the Boer' chant; Government must ensure that land expropriation happens with fair market compensation; and American companies and organisations must be exempt from race-based policies, such as BEE. 'Anyone who thinks that these conditions are a figment of our imagination or that we went and stood outside the White House, no you do that at your own peril. It should be noted that these things are set as preconditions for the normalisation of the relationship between South Africa and the US, the country's second largest trading partner,' he said. Who did the FF Plus meet at the White House? Mulder said his delegation had not gone to Washington to 'complain'. 'We met with people from the office of the Vice President; we met people in charge of the National Security Council as well as the Homeland Security Council. 'The current situation is that the current administration has reached out by name to the Afrikaner people, we would be foolish not to act on that,' he said. Mulder also said he did not view Trump's involvement with South Africa's policies as 'interference'. 'I do not think the US is interfering with South Africa. If South Africa prefers the US to have nothing to do with South Africa, we should just ignore these four preconditions and it will happen automatically,' he said. He said he would brief Ramaphosa about his party's trip to the US. The Citizen also understands that the FF Plus had a meeting at the US consulate in Sandton after their media briefing at OR Tambo. Presidency dismisses 'personal ambitions' of FF Plus Meanwhile, Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya told The Citizen on Wednesday that the FF Plus had gone to the US as non-state actors. 'Our experience is that state actors do not use non-state actors as intermediaries; therefore, the FF Plus visit and subsequent pronouncements will be viewed as nothing more than their personal ambitions,' he said. Political analyst Ntsikeleo Breakfast told The Citizen that he believes that FF Plus did not go to Washington DC with good intentions. 'I do not believe what they are saying, that the relationship has not been fixed. From my understanding, that issue was fixed,' he said. More strain in the GNU? Breakfast said the FF Plus visit to the US further complicates matters for Ramaphosa, who just fired a DA minister for going to the US without permission. The FF Plus is a partner in the government of national unity (GNU). 'This complicates matters for the GNU. These political parties, they need to work together as a united force and as a team of the GNU. You can't want to be a member of the GNU and still take a step back and draw swords with another member,' he said. The Citizen had reached out to both the DA and the ANC, the two biggest partners in the GNU, about claims made by the FF Plus. Their comments will be added once they are received. NOW READ: Ramaphosa acted 'justifiably' in removing Whitfield, says SACP
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
South Africa prepares for US trade framework amidst Trump's tariff uncertainties
The Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, Parks Tau, said South Africa welcomed this indication and expressed a preparedness to engage with the said template once finalised. Image: Independent Media Archives Banele Ginidza The ongoing evolution of trade relationships between the United States and sub-Saharan Africa has entered a critical phase as the USA moves towards establishing a new trade-matters template. This template will guide its future engagements with African nations, a development revealed by Deputy Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, Zuko Godlimpi, following discussions last week with the US Assistant Trade Representative for Africa, Connie Hamilton. On the heels of South Africa's submission for a proposed Framework Deal aimed at bolstering trade and investment relations with the US, the government has urged local businesses to brace themselves for potential changes poised to emerge from this new framework. Godlimpi's dialogue with Hamilton occurred during the recent US-Africa Summit in Luanda, Angola, where pertinent issues surrounding reciprocal tariffs were also addressed. While the proposed Framework Deal, submitted on 20 May 2025, underscores measures designed to resolve trade deficits and promote bilateral investment, its future may hinge on the forthcoming US internal approval process. The expiry of a 90-day tariff freeze, initially set for 9 July 2025, has raised concerns within the South African government about the adequacy of this timeline. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ As such, African countries are collectively advocating for a deadline extension to allow adequate preparation for aligning their proposed deals to the forthcoming US template. The Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, Parks Tau, said South Africa welcomed this indication and expressed a preparedness to engage with the said template once finalised. 'In this regard, we are of the view that South Africa may need to re-submit its Framework Deal in accordance with the new template. It is thus expected that the deadline may be shifted,' Tau said. The government is keen to ensure that the new requirements do not unduly disadvantage local enterprises, hence the appeal for strategic patience from the South African industry. Prospectively, South Africa's Framework Deal aims to tackle a range of US concerns, including non-tariff barriers and longstanding market access issues. It seeks specific exemptions from Sections 232 duties for key export products such as automobiles, auto parts, steel, and aluminium, ensuring these critical sectors can remain competitive in the US market. South Africa is also seeking the maximum tariff application of 10%, as a worst-case situation. The Framework also seeks exemption for Small and Medium Enterprises, counter-seasonal products and products that the US does not have productive capacity for. 'We urge the South African industry to exercise strategic patience and not take decisions in haste and that the government will continue to use every avenue to engage the US government to find an amicable solution to safeguard South African interests in the US market,' Tau said. As South Africa navigates these complexities, international sentiment has shifted towards urgency. The New York Times recently reported that governments around the globe were racing to negotiate trade deals with the US in order to forestall President Donald Trump's punishing tariffs. Trump announced what he referred to as 'reciprocal tariffs' on April 8, saying they were in response to other countries' unfair trading practices. However, he agreed to pause those levies for 90 days to give countries time to reach trade deals with the US. The coercive nature of previous tariffs has spurred conversations across the globe about fair trade practices, with Trump signalling readiness to impose tariffs on countries perceived as uncooperative—compounding existing anxieties surrounding the impending July deadline.
