FF Plus claims White House officials want ANC to publicly denounce ‘Kill the Boer' chant
US President Donald Trump meets with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on 21 May 2025 amid tensions over Washington's resettlement of white Afrikaners that the US president claims are the victims of 'genocide'. Photo: AFP
Freedom Front (FF) Plus leader Corne Mulder says President Cyril Ramaphosa and his team were unable to reset relations with the United States (US) government.
Ramaphosa met US President Donald Trump in May, accompanied by businessman Johann Rupert, some Cabinet ministers and South African golfers Ernie Els and Retief Goosen.
However, Mulder told reporters at the OR Tambo International Airport on Wednesday that Ramaphosa's meeting with Trump was a failure.
He had just returned from a trip to the US, where he met with US government officials and businesspeople.
'We all took notice of the events in the Oval Office, and we saw that it did not look like a success. Our delegation came back to South Africa and said everything went well, the problem is that no one we met, including the appointments, told us that the meeting was a success.
'On the contrary, they are concerned about what happened and they desperately want to reset relations between South Africa and the US, but there are certain problems that need to be solved,' he said.
Four conditions given to FF Plus
Mulder said he was told that there are four conditions that must be met for South Africa's relationship with the US to be reset.
The four conditions are:
To classify farm attacks and crime in rural areas as priority crimes;
The ANC should publicly denounce the 'Kill the Boer' chant;
Government must ensure that land expropriation happens with fair market compensation; and
American companies and organisations must be exempt from race-based policies, such as BEE.
'Anyone who thinks that these conditions are a figment of our imagination or that we went and stood outside the White House, no you do that at your own peril. It should be noted that these things are set as preconditions for the normalisation of the relationship between South Africa and the US, the country's second largest trading partner,' he said.
Who did the FF Plus meet at the White House?
Mulder said his delegation had not gone to Washington to 'complain'.
'We met with people from the office of the Vice President; we met people in charge of the National Security Council as well as the Homeland Security Council.
'The current situation is that the current administration has reached out by name to the Afrikaner people, we would be foolish not to act on that,' he said.
Mulder also said he did not view Trump's involvement with South Africa's policies as 'interference'.
'I do not think the US is interfering with South Africa. If South Africa prefers the US to have nothing to do with South Africa, we should just ignore these four preconditions and it will happen automatically,' he said.
He said he would brief Ramaphosa about his party's trip to the US.
The Citizen also understands that the FF Plus had a meeting at the US consulate in Sandton after their media briefing at OR Tambo.
Presidency dismisses 'personal ambitions' of FF Plus
Meanwhile, Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya told The Citizen on Wednesday that the FF Plus had gone to the US as non-state actors.
'Our experience is that state actors do not use non-state actors as intermediaries; therefore, the FF Plus visit and subsequent pronouncements will be viewed as nothing more than their personal ambitions,' he said.
Political analyst Ntsikeleo Breakfast told The Citizen that he believes that FF Plus did not go to Washington DC with good intentions.
'I do not believe what they are saying, that the relationship has not been fixed. From my understanding, that issue was fixed,' he said.
More strain in the GNU?
Breakfast said the FF Plus visit to the US further complicates matters for Ramaphosa, who just fired a DA minister for going to the US without permission.
The FF Plus is a partner in the government of national unity (GNU).
'This complicates matters for the GNU. These political parties, they need to work together as a united force and as a team of the GNU. You can't want to be a member of the GNU and still take a step back and draw swords with another member,' he said.
The Citizen had reached out to both the DA and the ANC, the two biggest partners in the GNU, about claims made by the FF Plus. Their comments will be added once they are received.
NOW READ: Ramaphosa acted 'justifiably' in removing Whitfield, says SACP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Tanzania turns back clock to brutal, repressive Magufuli era as elections loom
President Samia Suluhu Hassan's government is increasingly abusing anti-terrorism legislation to suppress genuine political opposition before the October polls, according to NGO Intelwatch. The government of Tanzania's President Samia Suluhu Hassan 'has begun a systematic, unrelenting and brutal clampdown on critics, opposition leaders, civil society and even foreign activists' ahead of the October 2025 elections. Hassan's government is also increasingly abusing anti-terrorism legislation to suppress genuine political opposition before the polls, according to a report, Tanzania's Repression of Dissent under the Guise of Counterterrorism by Intelwatch, a South African-based NGO dedicated to strengthening public oversight of state and private intelligence agencies in southern Africa and around the world. 'The human rights situation has regressed to levels reminiscent of the Magufuli era, marked by enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings and systematic repression,' the report says, referring to Hassan's predecessor John Magufuli, who became notorious for his brutal crackdowns on any political dissent. 'The counterterrorism task forces, notorious for the alleged kidnapping and killing of perceived government critics, have resurfaced with full force, targeting opposition figures, activists and journalists,' the report continues. Tundu Lissu arrest It cites in particular the arrest on 9 April 2025 of opposition Chadema party leader Tundu Lissu on charges of treason, which carries a potential death penalty. This was because he vowed that Chadema would boycott and disrupt the elections in the absence of reforms, such as an independent electoral commission to ensure free and fair polls. His arrest almost ensures that the October elections will go ahead without any real opposition to the ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM), the report says. The report notes that after encouraging signs of political reform after she succeeded Magufuli in 2021, Hassan has reverted to type ahead of the elections, deploying the same methods and colonial-era and anti-terrorism legislation to undermine political freedoms and curtail opposition activities to ensure the CCM maintains its unbroken grip on power since independence. The report notes that especially after the 9/11 bombings in the US in 2001, Tanzania came under especially US pressure to strengthen its counterterrorism legislation, particularly adding provisions to address money laundering to curtail terrorism financing. Abuse of legislation However, it adds that instead of combating terrorism, these tougher measures have been repeatedly used to 'quash political opposition, muzzle independent journalism and target human rights defenders'. It cites the case of at least 50 leaders of the Association for Islamic Mobilisation and Propagation (Uamsho), a Muslim group advocating for Zanzibar's secession from the union with Tanzania, who were detained for almost nine years from 2012 to 2021. 'Despite their release, it is estimated that at least another 150 clerics are still behind bars', the report says. The report cites the case of Wilfred Lwakatare, an opposition leader from the main opposition party Chadema, who was arrested in 2013 and fought lengthy court battles before being released. Chadema leader Freeman Mbowe was arrested in 2021 – under Hassan's presidency – on terrorism charges for allegedly financing terrorist activities with the intent of assassinating government officials. No credible evidence was presented and Hassan had the case dropped after behind-the-scenes negotiations between her and Mbowe. The report says the abuse of anti-terror legislation took off with President Jakaya Kikwete and peaked under Magufuli, who was elected in 2015 and died in office in 2021, apparently of Covid. Extrajudicial killings and disappearances spiked under Magufuli. A 'credible' estimate is that security forces killed at least 3,000 people between 2016 and 2020, the report says. Tanzania plunged in the World Press Freedom Index, from 71 in 2016 to 124 in 2021 (out of 180 countries) after the government introduced stringent regulations curtailing freedom of expression. The police actively monitored internet and social media communications 'to suppress debates and messaging which portrayed Magufuli in an unfavourable light'. Optimism snuffed out The report notes that when then vice-president Hassan succeeded Magufuli, there was initial optimism that she might usher in a new era of respect for the rule of law and human rights, particularly concerning counter-terrorism efforts. She did introduce some political reforms, notably lifting Magufuli's ban on political rallies; ordering the release of prisoners facing money laundering, economic sabotage and terrorism charges; freeing the 36 Uamsho clerics; issuing a stern warning to the police and security agencies against targeting civilians; and appointing a bipartisan task force to propose minimum electoral reforms ahead of the 2025 elections. However, very little came of these moves and the hopes of reform were dashed when opposition Chadema leader Mbowe was arrested. As it became clear that the state had no evidence against him, and under mounting domestic and international pressure, Hassan eventually released Mbowe in exchange for 'reconciliation' talks between Chadema and CCM. Brutality after democracy pretensions abandoned The Intelwatch report says, 'if any evidence were needed to confirm that President Hassan and her advisers have abandoned all pretensions to democracy and reform, it is the recent wave of attacks on foreign human rights defenders that came to support Lissu ahead of his treason trial'. It notes that a group of politicians, jurists and human rights activists from the region, including former Kenyan Minister of Justice Martha Karua, 'renowned Kenyan human rights defender' Boniface Mwangia, and Agather Atuhairet, a 'high-profile Ugandan lawyer-activist', were detained at Julius Nyerere International Airport in Dar es Salaam on 18 May 2025. They were kept in police custody for four days, the report said. Karua and Athuhairet were 'brutally tortured, humiliated and tormented… both … suffered inhuman, degrading and brutal treatment'. They were allegedly handcuffed and blindfolded, told to strip naked and tortured, and sexually assaulted before being dumped on the Kenyan border, the report said. But the report adds that such cases are not new, as opposition figures have continued to disappear or be murdered under Hassan's rule. It cites Chadema's secretary, Ally Kibao, who was kidnapped in September 2024 from a bus in broad daylight. His lifeless body, the face burned with acid, was dumped in a forest. In July 2024, 24-year-old artist Shadrack Chaula was sentenced to two years in prison or a fine of $2,000 for drawing and burning a picture of President Hassan. After paying the fine and securing his release, Chaula 'disappeared less than a month later and has never been seen again'. State repression The report says that 'Tanzania's transformation into a surveillance state has been largely facilitated by external actors who have provided sophisticated technological capabilities, training and operational support to the country's security apparatus.' It cites mainly China, Russia and Israel for supplying such technology, though also mentioning Western countries. The report concludes that 'the history and evolution of state repression in Tanzania reveals a disconcerting narrative of a democracy in decline — one in which counterterrorism has become a euphemism for authoritarian consolidation. 'Under the guise of ensuring national security, successive leaders have normalised arbitrary arrests and detentions, enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings, digital surveillance and the silencing of dissent. 'The brief moments of optimism under President Hassan's early presidency, when reformist rhetoric suggested a push towards democratic renewal, have quickly given way to the weaponisation of terrorism legislation against opposition leaders such as Tundu Lissu. 'The brutal treatment of foreign human rights defenders, and the systemic targeting of journalists and activists indicate an intensification of the repressive apparatus honed under President Magufuli. 'Held in such an atmosphere of digital authoritarianism and the attendant fear and repression, the October 2025 elections are unlikely to produce an outcome reflecting the democratic will of Tanzanians.' Intelwatch urged the international community, regional partners and Tanzanian citizens to address the crisis 'with urgency and resolve' or 'the Tanzanian model will become a blueprint for future repression across Africa'. DM
The South African
4 hours ago
- The South African
Return of corporal punishment? Minister of Education responds
Pieter Groenewald's suggestion to reintegrate corporal punishment into the system has been shot down by the Minister of Education, Siviwe Gwarube. The Minister of Correctional Services made the controversial claim whilst discussing how to curb overcrowding in prisons. In 1996, corporal punishment was officially abolished in South African schools. Delivering his budget vote at the National Assembly on Tuesday, 1 July, Minister of Correctional Services Pieter Groenewald discussed several challenges within his department. They included overcrowding, particularly of offenders who could not afford to pay their bail for petty offences. Some of them included minors, as young as 10 years old, who were jailed for stealing loaves of bread. Groenewald then suggested a debate on reintroducing corporal punishment, which was abolished in South African schools in 1996 under the Corporal Punishment Act, and later the South African Schools Act, specifically Section 10. In his speech, he said, 'If you look at our criminal justice system, we must start a debate about whether we should bring back corporal punishment.' 'A young person who steals 10 loaves of bread sits in prison and waits about three years for sentencing. Think about whether we should bring back corporal punishment.' Groenewald added: 'We must consider the costs. Keeping each of these individuals in custody costs the taxpayer R463 per person each day'. Although Pieter Groenewald's suggestion was met with strong opposition, ACDP leader, Dr Kenneth Meshoe, agreed with the minister's stance, claiming that the 1996 corporal punishment ban had 'fuelled lawlessness in schools' He said: 'We have seen a number of children acting foolishly. Bullying has increased in schools, rape is taking place in schools much more than before the banning of corporal punishment. 'Many teachers need protection from their own students. Students have learned to attack teachers, some even attack their parents at home. Now these children end up in prisons because there are parents who are brave enough to lay charges against their own children.' Meshoe added to the National Assembly: 'There's a difference between abuse and correctional discipline. I know that there are some parents out of frustration, who have gone to extremes and used corporal punishment where they shouldn't have used it.' Although Pieter Groenwald did not specifically indicate that corporal punishment should be reintegrated into schools, Minister of Education Siviwe Gwarube has already firmly rejected the idea. She simply posted 'No', responding to the fellow minister's suggestion. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
TimesLIVE
5 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
DA rejects Simelane, Nkabane departmental budgets
The DA has followed through on its threat to vote against departmental budget votes of ministers who are facing allegations of wrongdoing. This after the party this week voted against budgets of the departments of human settlements and higher education led by Thembi Simelane-Nkadimeng and Nobuhle Nkabane respectively. This decision was taken as a direct response to President Cyril Ramaphosa axing trade and industry deputy minister Andrew Whitfield, of the DA, last week for defying his order that none of the members of his executive were allowed to go to the US at the height of the diplomatic tensions between the two countries. The DA in response argued that Ramaphosa had been harsh on Whitfield and that it was not acceptable that he fired him for such a minor transgression while he still kept Simelane and Nkabane in his cabinet. Unlike Whitfield, the DA argued, Simelane was accused of corruption and Nkabane stood accused of lying to parliament. Instead of dealing with the two ministers who were facing serious allegations, Ramaphosa decided to axe Whitfield for going on a trip without getting permission, the DA argued. DA MP Luyolo Mphithi on Wednesday said his party was voting against Simelane's budget vote because of the corruption allegations she was facing. Mphithi said the DA was concerned that instead of firing Simelane, Ramaphosa had moved her from the department of justice to human settlements. 'You'd think that the response to this that the president would have shown minister Simelane the door, he did not. He asked for the report that he stayed with for three months,' said Mphithi. 'And even though the DA sustained pressure asking the president to act, he lacked courage to act and instead decided to dump minister Simelane at human settlements, one of the most important departments for South Africans.' 'It seems that this president does not take an issue with the fact that a person accused of corruption sits in his cabinet and will have to look after a budget of R30bn that is set aside for South Africans,' he said. Ideally, Mphithi said, the DA would not have a problem with voting for the department of human settlements' budget as it relates to people's housing and security but they could not do it because of the allegations faced by Simelane. 'The DA will always support the granting of funds to house the vulnerable at the same time fast-tracking jobs and growth to give many more South Africans the dignity of being able to buy and own their own houses,' he said. 'And though this budget and the department have many challenges under normal circumstances it would be supported. However, we sit with a minister who faces corruption allegations who has not been accountable to the South African public. And it is because of this we struggle support this particular budget.' Mphithi and the MK Party's Thulani Gumede raised several issues with the human settlements budget presented by Simelane, saying it was not dealing with some of the key issues faced by South Africans in the sector. 'A critical examination reveals a fundamental flaw, an overall real decline in the department's budget. None of its five main programmes demonstrates above-inflation increases,' said Gumede. 'This systemic underfunding of human settlements initiatives will inevitably worsen existing backlogs and impair the progressive realisation of adequate housing.' He said his party could not vote for as it would mean they accepted the decrease in allocation. 'I asserted during the committee meeting last week and I reiterate now that this draft budget must be rejected. It's real term decline across key programmes particularly in integrated human settlements and informal settlements upgrading directly contradicts the constitutional obligation to provide adequate housing and the strategic goals of the national development plans,' he said. 'Accepting this budget will constitute a retreat from addressing deeply entrenched structural inequalities and the pressing needs of the vulnerable communities for basic services and dignified living conditions.'
