First Indian, Hungarian and Polish astronauts arrive at the ISS
For the first time an Indian, a Hungarian and a Pole have arrived at the International Space Station (ISS).
A Crew Dragon capsule carrying the three astronauts and former NASA astronaut Peggy Whitson docked at the ISS on Thursday at 1031 GMT, according to the US space agency NASA.
The capsule had been launched from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida on a Falcon 9 rocket operated by Elon Musk's space company SpaceX just under 30 hours earlier.
The Ax-4 mission had been postponed several times due to technical problems with the rocket and the ISS. This is the fourth commercial space mission for Houston-based Axiom Space, in collaboration with the US space agency NASA and SpaceX.
While Whitson has been in space several times, this is the first space flight for the three amateur astronauts. Shubhanshu Shukla from India works for his country's air force, while Tibor Kapu from Hungary and Sławosz Uznański-Wiśniewski from Poland are engineers.
People from all three countries have already been in space, first on Russian Soyuz missions in the 1970s and 1980s, but never before on board the ISS.
The crew of the Ax-4 mission is scheduled to spend around two weeks on board the ISS, where they plan to take part in numerous scientific experiments.
Also currently on the ISS are NASA astronauts Nicole Ayers, Anne McClain and Jonny Kim, Japanese astronaut Takuya Onish, and Russian cosmonauts Kirill Peskov, Sergei Ryzhikov and Alexei Zubritsky.
According to media reports, such a flight costs around $80 million per passenger.
The company organized the first private mission to the ISS in 2022, with more to follow in 2023 and 2024. At just under three weeks, the third Axiom mission was the longest commercial space flight to date.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nozzle blows off rocket booster during test for NASA's Artemis program (video)
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. An upgraded version of one of the solid rocket boosters being used for NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) experienced an anomaly during a test June 26. The Demonstration Motor-1 (DM-1) Static Test took place at Northrop Grumman's facility in Promontory, Utah, simulating a launch-duration burn lasting about two minutes. It was the first demonstration of Grumman's Booster Obsolescence and Life Extension (BOLE) upgrade, an enhanced five-segmented motor designed with greater lifting power for later versions of SLS. Shortly after the spokesperson on Grumman's recording marks T+100 seconds into the test, an outburst of flames can be seen erupting form the top of the engine nozzle. A few seconds later, as another spokesperson announces, "activate aft deluge," an even larger burst comes from the rocket's exhaust, blowing nearby debris into the flames and around the test site. "Whoa," one of the test operators said as burn continued, before audibly gasping. Beyond that in-the-moment reaction, though, the anomaly was not acknowledged during the remainder of the test, which seemed to conclude as planned. "While the motor appeared to perform well through the most harsh environments of the test, we observed an anomaly near the end of the two-plus minute burn. As a new design, and the largest segmented solid rocket booster ever built, this test provides us with valuable data to iterate our design for future developments," Jim Kalberer, Grumman's vice president of propulsion systems, said in a statement. SLS, NASA's rocket supporting the agency's Artemis program, was designed on the foundation of legacy systems used during the space shuttle era. SLS's core stage fuel tank is an augmented version of the one used to launch space shuttles, and the same RS-25 engines responsible for launching the space shuttles are launching to space again on SLS missions. The segments from the shuttle's solid rocket boosters are also flying again, too. Northrop Grumman supported Artemis 1, and will support Artemis 2 and Artemis 3 with shuttle-era hardware, before transitioning to newer hardware for Artemis 4 through Artemis 8. The company's BOLE engines aren't slated to be introduced for launch until Artemis 9, on the SLS Block 2. The upgraded BOLE engines include improved, newly-fabricated parts replacing those no longer in production, carbon fiber composite casings and updated propellant efficiencies that increase the booster's performance more than 10 percent compared to the solid rocket engines being used on earlier SLS launches. Thursday's DM-1 BOLE test included more than 700 points of data collection throughout the booster, which produced over 4 million pounds of thrust, according to Northrop Grumman. Whether the BOLE design will ever fly, however, is far from certain. NASA's proposed budget for 2026 calls for the cancelation of the SLS rocket following Artemis 3.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Northrop Grumman tests future Artemis booster, but suffers destructive ‘anomaly'
Northrop Grumman saw some fiery drama during a test of a more powerful version of the solid rocket booster that would be used if NASA's Artemis program ever gets to its ninth launch using the beleaguered Space Launch System rocket. During a Thursday live stream by NASA of a static fire of the 156-foot-long Booster Obsolescence and Life Extension (BOLE) solid rocket motor, the end nozzle blew apart, sending debris flying across the camera followed by a black plume of smoke rising up from Northrop's Promontory, Utah test site. 'Whoa,' said one of the test controllers during the stream, just after the 100-second mark of the hot fire. Laying on its side, the booster was burning through the same amount of fuel that it would as if used on a launch. Northrop Grumman officials addressed the nozzle's demise in a press release later Thursday. 'Today's test pushed the boundaries of large solid rocket motor design to meet rigorous performance requirements,' said Jim Kalberer, Northrop Grumman's vice president of propulsion systems. 'While the motor appeared to perform well through the most harsh environments of the test, we observed an anomaly near the end of the two-plus minute burn.' The test is for a booster that wouldn't fly until at least next decade, and only if NASA sticks with SLS as a rocket option for its Artemis missions. 'As a new design, and the largest segmented solid rocket booster ever built, this test provides us with valuable data to iterate our design for future developments,' Kalberer said. Under the current NASA plan, the first eight Artemis launches use an SLS rocket with boosters that produce 3.4 million pounds of thrust each. The pair, combined with the core stage, created 8.8 million pounds of thrust on the Artemis I launch in 2022, which still is the most powerful rocket to ever make it into orbit. The BOLE version would increase thrust to 4 million pounds each, which would push SLS to near 10 million pounds of thrust on Artemis IX. The Trump administration's proposed budget for NASA, though, wants to kill off the use of the SLS rocket after Artemis III, although Congress is the ultimate decision-maker on what gets funded. So until directed otherwise, contractors continue to work on future versions of the SLS. Northrop Grumman's solid rocket boosters for Artemis are enhanced versions of similar boosters used during the Space Shuttle Program. The BOLE design is a solution to components no longer in production. The update uses a carbon fiber composite case and a different propellant formula among other features. The goal is a 10% increase in booster performance over the boosters used on Artemis I. That would equate to SLS being able to carry another 11,000 pounds of payload to lunar orbit. The nozzle issue was reminiscent of another Northrop Grumman booster problem seen in 2024. SpaceX Crew Dragon with 4 Axiom Space astronauts docks with space station Kennedy Space Center goes retro for Y2K after-hours event SpaceX launches historic mission to space station on new Crew Dragon dubbed 'Grace' Space Coast launch schedule With SLS rocket future uncertain, L3Harris still cranking out engines That's when a nozzle flew off of one of the boosters used on the United Launch Alliance Vulcan Certification-2 mission from Cape Canaveral. That incident contributed to a delay in the Space Force giving ULA the OK to fly national security missions. Northrop Grumman officials, though, said the ULA and Artemis boosters are not directly related. 'It is an entirely separate product,' said Mark Pond, senior director of NASA programs for Northrop Grumman's propulsion systems during an Artemis II media day last December at Kennedy Space Center. Artemis II is slated to launch no later than April 2026 on what would be the first crewed mission sending four astronauts on a trip around the moon, but not landing on it. 'From a concern standpoint, we've met all of our requirements, we've done all of our testing, we've met all of our acceptance tests and our delivery requirements, and for that reason, we are not concerned from an Artemis II perspective,' he said.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
America's Newest Space IPO Was a Smashing Success
Voyager Technologies was supposed to IPO for a price as low as $26 a share -- but didn't. IPO shares began trading on their first day near $70 a share. They've gone nowhere but down since. Voyager IPO investors made out like bandits, but now investors must come to terms with this fact: Voyager stock won't be profitable anytime soon. 10 stocks we like better than Voyager Technologies › As the old saying goes, "Sometimes, it's better to be lucky than to be good." Take investors in the Voyager Technologies (NYSE: VOYG) initial public offering (IPO), for example. Once upon a time, space stocks were a rarity. So much so that Sir Richard Branson was able to IPO Virgin Galactic as the only real way for investors to "dabble a little bit in a spaceship company, own a little bit of a spaceship company" -- and watch the stock price zoom into orbit. Virgin's success soon inspired a wave of imitators -- special-purpose acquisition companies (SPAC) that dutifully zoomed when first created, only to crater thereafter, frightening many investors away from the idea of investing in space stocks for years. That all changed, however, when President Donald Trump won his second term of office, promising to bring Elon Musk into government and invest heavily in space exploration. Space stocks zoomed once again, sending the share prices of companies like Redwire (NYSE: RDW), BlackSky (NYSE: BKSY), and Rocket Lab (NASDAQ: RKLB) to the Moon earlier this year. It was at this propitious moment in time that Voyager Technologies decided it, too, would go public. Wooing investors with promises to build an international coalition of companies and create a new, privately owned space station to replace the International Space Station (ISS), Voyager stock debuted to widespread acclaim on June 11. Expected to price as low as $26 a share (and actually pricing at $31), Voyager opened its first day of trading at $69.75 -- more than twice the expected price. Even falling to close at $56 and change, it's hard to call Voyager's IPO anything but a smashing success. If you got in anywhere near the IPO price, you were lucky indeed! But what if you were not among those lucky few who got in at the IPO price? Well, in that case, I'd say you're probably feeling a bit less fortunate. The first 10 trading days since Voyager's IPO have not been kind to momentum investors. Seeking a rocket ride "to the moon," they instead have found themselves on an elevator slowly descending to Earth. By close of trading last Friday, for example, Voyager stock had given up much of its IPO price gains and fallen to close within pennies of $43 a share. Again, a nice profit if you were lucky enough to get in on the ground floor. But a significant loss if you didn't. Now, on the flip side, Voyager's steeply fallen stock price does give investors, who didn't get in at the IPO price, a second bite at the apple and a chance to buy into the stock at a bit more than its price immediately post-IPO (it was trading at $48.25 a share at Friday's open). But should you even want to? Let's run a few numbers and see if an answer arises. Let's begin with the basics: Voyager Technologies is a $2.5 billion small-cap aerospace and defense contractor. Best known for its role leading a consortium of companies building the Starlab space station, Voyager actually gets only about half its revenue ($75 million last year) from space activities. The other half ($78 million) comes from "defense and national security" products, including "artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled edge computing platforms and missile propulsion modules." Neither half of Voyager is currently profitable according to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), however. Indeed, according to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence, Voyager reported $74 million in net losses last year -- losing about $0.50 for every $1 in products it sold. The company's also burning cash at an even higher rate, with free cash flow running negative to the tune of more than $125 million last year (nearly 70% worse than the GAAP numbers make it seem). With no Wall Street analysts yet publishing earnings forecasts for Voyager, it's hard for an investor to know when Voyager might eventually turn profitable. But here's my two cents: With Voyager currently working full tilt to build the Starlab space station, management forecasting that the station will cost "approximately $2.8 billion to $3.3 billion" to build, and Voyager hoping to launch the station aboard a SpaceX Starship rocket (which hasn't yet been certified for flight) in 2029, the absolute earliest anyone should expect to see Voyager turn a profit is 2029. Most likely, it will take some time after the first launch before Starlab begins raking in enough revenue to help Voyager turn a profit. Most definitely, the company won't be able to get anywhere near profitability before Starlab is launched. Long story short, that means Voyager will spend the next several years deeply unprofitable as it spends hand over fist to build its multibillion-dollar space station. Whether the situation then improves after the station is built is anyone's guess. Before you buy stock in Voyager Technologies, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Voyager Technologies wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $704,676!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $950,198!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 175% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Rich Smith has positions in Rocket Lab. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Rocket Lab and S&P Global. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. America's Newest Space IPO Was a Smashing Success was originally published by The Motley Fool
