
"Justice Must Prevail": Families Of Mumbai Blasts Victims Demand CBI Probe
Hours after the Bombay High Court acquitted all 12 men convicted in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case, families of the victims on Monday voiced strong concerns and demanded a fresh investigation, urging the Centre to hand over the case to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
The victims questioned the integrity of the initial investigation and called for accountability, expressing fear that justice may have been denied to the 189 people who lost their lives and over 800 who were injured in the devastating attack.
Speaking to IANS, Radhe Shyam Dubey, one of the injured in the blast, said, "There must be a proper re-investigation. The CBI should take over the case. Those responsible should not be allowed to go free. There seems to be serious collusion in this matter. I urge the government to act - this case should go to the Supreme Court. Around seven coordinated blasts happened that day. So many families were destroyed. We deserve answers. Justice delayed cannot mean justice denied."
He added, "There have been irregularities from the start. Kirit Somaiya led the charge back then, but now it's unclear what happened. The truth must come out, and justice must prevail."
Another family member of one of the victims said, "This is heartbreaking. If they were truly guilty, they should not walk free. We are confused. We don't fully understand what changed in the case. If the High Court found them innocent, we have to respect that, but it still leaves us with unanswered questions."
The Bombay High Court's verdict, delivered by a bench comprising Justice Anil Kilor and Justice S.G. Chandak, has overturned the 2015 decision of a special MCOCA court, which had convicted 12 men - sentencing five to death and seven to life imprisonment.
With Monday's order, the High Court directed the immediate release of the 12 accused, stating that the prosecution had failed to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt.
Out of the 13 men originally arrested, one - Dr. Wahid Sheikh - was acquitted by the special court in 2015. The remaining 12 have now been exonerated as well.
The 2006 blasts - one of the worst terror attacks in Mumbai's history - occurred during evening rush hour on July 11. In a span of 11 minutes, seven bombs exploded in pressure cookers hidden inside bags across local trains travelling between Churchgate and Borivali, killing 189 people and injuring 824.
Forensic investigations had confirmed that the bombs were composed of RDX and ammonium nitrate, raising suspicions of cross-border terrorism.
The Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) had filed a chargesheet under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), alleging involvement of Pakistan-backed Islamic militants.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
a few seconds ago
- Business Standard
Lok Sabha to hold special discussion on 'Operation Sindoor' today
Lok Sabha is set to hold a special discussion on 'Operation Sindoor', India's military response to the Pahalgam terror attack on Monday. A fiery debate on the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor is expected to unfold in Parliament, between top leaders from the ruling alliance and the Opposition. Lok Sabha List of Business for Monday states, "Special Discussion on India's strong, successful and decisive 'Operation Sindoor' in response to terrorist attack in Pahalgam". Twenty-six civilians were killed in the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir, after which India retaliated through precision strikes under Operation Sindoor, targeting terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK). Meanwhile, the first week of the Monsoon session of Parliament witnessed major disruptions with the surprise resignation of Jagdeep Dhankhar as Vice President. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh is likely to initiate the discussion on Operation Sindhoor in the Lok Sabha on Monday. Sources said that Home Minister Amit Shah, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar and BJP MPs Anurag Thakur and Nishikant Dubey are also expected to take part in the discussion in Lok Sabha. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to intervene in the discussion in the Lok Sabha. He may also intervene in the discussion in the Rajya Sabha. Sources said discussion on Operation Sindoor will begin in the Rajya Sabha on Tuesday. Rajnath Singh and S Jaishankar will be among ministers who will take part in the discussion in the Rajya Sabha, sources said. TDP's Lavu Sri Krishna Devarayalu and GM Harish Balayogi are expected to participate in the discussion on Op Sindoor in the Lok Sabha. The sources said the party has been allotted 30 minutes. From the Samajwadi Party, its chief Akhilesh Yadav, and MP Rajiv Rai will participate in the debate. Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju stated that the debate on Operation Sindoor will be held for 16 hours in the Lok Sabha on July 28 and for 16 hours in the Rajya Sabha on July 29. "All issues cannot be discussed together... The opposition has raised several issues, like the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in Bihar and others. We have told them that Operation Sindoor will be discussed first. We will decide which issues to discuss after that. Operation Sindoor will be debated for 16 hours in the Lok Sabha on Monday (July 28) and for 16 hours in the Rajya Sabha on Tuesday (July 29)," Rijiju told reporters. Opposition parties have been demanding a discussion on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor and have sought the government's clarification over US President Donald Trump's repeated claims that he brokered a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. The Opposition parties had been demanding PM Modi's presence during the debate. Since PM Modi travelled abroad on a two-nation visit this week, the discussion has been scheduled for next week. Apart from this, the floor leaders of the INDIA bloc parties will meet on Monday at 10 am to discuss the strategy for the second week of the monsoon session, with the Lok Sabha slated to take up discussion on Operation Sindoor on Monday and the Rajya Sabha on Tuesday. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)


India Today
a few seconds ago
- India Today
14,000 men receive payout under Ladki Bahin scheme, Ajit Pawar vows action
A massive controversy has erupted in Maharashtra after a verification revealed that around 14,000 men received a monthly payout under the government's flagship Ladki Bahin scheme, which is exclusively meant for women from poor Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar has promised to recover the amount and take action against the fraudsters, the opposition has sought a CBI probe into it.- Ends advertisement


India.com
a few seconds ago
- India.com
Explained: Why India Can't Withdraw From Asia Cup 2025 Fixture Against Pakistan – BCCI's Hands Tied
photoDetails english 2937864 The India vs Pakistan match in Asia Cup 2025, scheduled for September 14, has sparked massive political backlash amid rising Indo-Pak tensions following the Pahalgam terror attack. Despite opposition from political leaders and civil society, the BCCI confirmed India's participation, citing binding commitments made during the ACC meeting. The match, part of the T20-format tournament hosted in the UAE from September 9, could see up to three high-voltage Indo-Pak clashes. With fans eagerly awaiting the showdown, this fixture has become a focal point of sports diplomacy, national sentiment, and geopolitical debate. Updated:Jul 28, 2025, 07:00 AM IST 1. India vs Pakistan Asia Cup Clash Confirmed for September 14 1 / 11 Despite political tensions, India will face Pakistan on September 14, confirmed by the BCCI after the ACC meeting. This high-stakes match is a must-watch Sunday showdown in Group A. 2. BCCI Cannot Pull Out—Locked by Official Agreements 2 / 11 The BCCI's participation is non-negotiable as per ACC commitments. As the host nation, India cannot withdraw from the Asia Cup 2025 group stage match, even amidst escalating diplomatic unrest. 3. Tensions High After Pahalgam Terror Attack 3 / 11 The match's announcement came just months after the April 22 Pahalgam attack, where 26 were killed. The backdrop of terror has turned this cricket match into a political lightning rod. 4. Opposition Leaders Slam BCCI Over 'Profit Before Patriotism' 4 / 11 Top leaders like Priyanka Chaturvedi and Sukhdeo Bhagat have publicly criticized the match, accusing BCCI of prioritizing money over national pride and undermining the sentiments of Indian armed forces. 5. BCCI Maintains Silence Amid Public Outrage 5 / 11 While criticism mounts, the BCCI has not issued any formal statement on the matter. This silence has sparked further anger across political and civilian circles, demanding transparency and accountability. 6. Asia Cup 2025: A Trial Run for T20 World Cup 2026 6 / 11 This year's T20 format Asia Cup serves as a key preparatory ground for the T20 World Cup 2026, adding more weight to every fixture, especially India vs Pakistan encounters. 7. Chances of 3 India vs Pakistan Matches in One Tournament 7 / 11 With both sides expected to reach the Super Four, fans could witness up to three Indo-Pak clashes, including a potential blockbuster final—making this Asia Cup one of the most thrilling ever. 8. Kargil Vijay Diwas Announcement Fuels Symbolic Debate 8 / 11 The Asia Cup schedule was released on Kargil Vijay Diwas, commemorating India's victory over Pakistan in 1999. This symbolic overlap has deepened the patriotic and political divide. 9. India Skipped Legends Match, Yet Will Play Pakistan Now 9 / 11 India Champions boycotted the World Championship of Legends tie vs Pakistan in England, but the national team will still play in Asia Cup 2025—raising questions about inconsistent sports diplomacy. 10. Mohammad Azharuddin Weighs In on Bilateral vs Multilateral Debate 10 / 11 Ex-captain Azharuddin said, 'No bilateral ties should mean no multilateral games either.' His stance reflects growing support for a uniform policy on Indo-Pak cricket amid ongoing tensions. 11 / 11