
US Immigration Backlog Hits All-Time High
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is grappling with an unprecedented backlog of immigration cases, reaching a record 11.3 million pending applications.
USCIS data from January to March shows some immigration categories experiencing worsening delays, with processing times creeping up. As backlogs grow larger each quarter, applicants are left waiting months or even years longer than they expected.
Immigration attorneys told Newsweek that the Trump administration's efforts to find fraud in applications is significantly slowing down processing times and creating "massive backlogs" across an already overwhelmed immigration system.
"The Trump administration has told USCIS to slow down processing of cases. Predictably, the system has quickly developed massive backlogs. By the end of 2028, we will pine for the days of a functioning legal immigration system because it will effectively not exist by the end of the Trump term," Charles Kuck, the founding partner at Kuck Baxter in Atlanta, told Newsweek.
Newsweek contacted USCIS for comment via email on Monday afternoon.
Petitioners at a naturalization ceremony for 225 people seeking U.S. citizenship at the National Archives.
Petitioners at a naturalization ceremony for 225 people seeking U.S. citizenship at the National Archives.
Chris Maddaloni/CQ Roll Call via AP Images
Why It Matters
The 11.3 million applications backlog marks the highest volume of pending cases ever recorded by the agency. For the first time in over a year, USCIS reported a "frontlog"—cases received but not yet opened or officially entered into the processing system—that stands at more than 34,000. The high number of unprocessed applications raises concerns about delays beginning even before formal review processes commence.
What To Know
USCIS is funded solely through the fees it charges immigrants applying for various benefits, such as green cards and work authorization, and replacement visa documents. Reports over multiple administrations have laid out the difficulties with this model and the ongoing struggles to fully staff the agency, leading to delays.
The latest data showed several form categories with an uptick in processing times, with some applicants waiting several years for their cases to be decided.
Forms I-90, the Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card, and I-765—the Application for Employment Authorization, with the EAD card issued on Form I-766— have shown increases in processing times compared to the previous quarter.
This is partially attributed to the agency's suspension of its Streamlined Case Processing (SCP) program, an automated system that expedited approvals without the need for officer review. The suspension is intended to allow enhanced vetting, though no timeline has been announced for the SCP's reinstatement.
Greg Siskind, an immigration attorney at Siskind Susser in Memphis, Tennessee, told Newsweek that attorneys had been expecting longer wait times since the presidential election in November. He said staff were likely to have left without replacements, particularly in the face of Department of Government Efficiency pressures across the federal government.
"Then there was an expected increase in the rate of Requests for Evidence, where USCIS demands more documentation before approving a case," Siskind said. "This happened in the first Trump term, and a spike in RFE rates will show up in the processing times, often doubling or tripling the amount of time one can expect in a given case."
Some categories saw improvements, however. The backlog of Form I-131, the advance parole application, decreased by almost 60,000 cases this fiscal year. Still, it remains high, with about 260,000 cases pending and a median processing time of 5.8 months—a length considered unacceptably long by immigration advocates.
"It is still early to draw firm conclusions from the data, as processing trends may shift based on staffing, litigation, or new policy guidance. However, outside the boundaries of congressional mandates or statutory requirements, what may appear to be backlogs may be better described as policy choices," Morgan Bailey, a partner at Mayer Brown and former senior official at the Department of Homeland Security, told Newsweek.
Work authorization applications paint a mixed picture. Cases tied to adjustment of status and asylum, known as categories C09 and C08, are facing little to no backlog. However, other types of work permits add up to about 775,000 pending cases. Most notably, the parole-based C11 category alone includes about 531,000 applications, many of which have been reopened for revocation under programs for nationals of Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela—commonly referred to as the CHNV parole program.
Employment-based applications made up a large share of USCIS's workload this quarter, with 1.73 million forms filed in Q2 alone. This category includes key programs such as H-1B visa petitions, employment authorization applications and green card applications for skilled workers. The high numbers highlight how much the U.S. economy continues to depend on foreign talent across a wide range of industries.
Notably, Form I-765, the Application for Employment Authorization, saw 698,586 cases processed far faster, especially for asylum-seekers—with a median processing time of 0.7 months.
Data published by USCIS for January to March of fiscal year 2025 shows about 2.4 million approvals compared to 261,000 denials, resulting in an overall approval rate of about 90.2 percent.
Meanwhile, immigration courts are overwhelmed, with a backlog exceeding 3.7 million cases, according to Syracuse University's Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse. Asylum-seekers often wait years for decisions on their cases.
The growing backlog means longer waits for family reunification, employment opportunities and humanitarian protections for millions of immigrants. The "frontlog" shows slowdowns even at the earliest stages of the process, compounding delays.
What People Are Saying
Greg Siskind, an immigration attorney at Siskind Susser, told Newsweek: "The one thing that was giving me hope that we might not see the big increase in processing times we were expecting is the acceleration of USCIS's accepting online filings of cases versus the labor-intensive paper filing process.
"USCIS is still moving along with e-filing, and that is making things less bad as far as processing times go. And USCIS's long-term goal is to totally move away from paper filings, so I expect that trend to continue. More worrisome is the expectation by many in the immigration bar that USCIS will increasingly use AI—often poorly designed AI—that will speed up decision-making but in a way that lacks transparency and with serious quality control concerns."
Charles Kuck, the founding partner at Kuck Baxter, told Newsweek: "The rapid growth in the USCIS is 100 percent predictable given the Trump administration's approach to immigration. Starting with the staff reductions ordered at the USCIS (which is funded by user fees, not tax dollars). Followed by seeking "volunteers" from USCIS to assist ICE in enforcement efforts. Which then leads to the administration's effort to find fraud in every application, slowing down processing times."
Morgan Bailey, a partner at Mayer Brown, told Newsweek: "The Trump administration believes that the primary mission of USCIS is to serve as a screening and vetting agency rather than as a benefits granting agency."
What Happens Next
USCIS will likely get a funding boost through increased fees and charges for immigration applications, but it remains to be seen whether this will affect processing times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
As US grapples with China relations, Taiwan's president scraps stop on American soil
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Taiwanese government has called off a plan for its president to transit through the United States on his way to Latin America, The Associated Press has learned — a decision leading to conflicting accounts of the reason for the cancellation. Amid speculation that the Trump administration had opposed a proposed stopover by Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te in New York, Taipei said Lai had no overseas travel plans due to domestic issues, including natural disasters and tariff negotiations with the United States. The other proposed stop on Lai's itinerary was Dallas, Texas. Whatever the reason, the cancellation is certain to hand a major diplomatic victory to Beijing and has drawn concerns from experts that the White House is setting a bad precedent for U.S.-China relations. Details about the administration's decision were scant, but one person with knowledge of the discussions told AP that the U.S. 'had asked Taipei to rearrange the transit — not go through New York.' Another person with knowledge of the discussions said Beijing had sensed that it could ask President Donald Trump not to allow Lai to transit through the U.S. because of the perceived 'desperation' by Trump to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping. Both people spoke on condition of anonymity because they are in current sensitive discussions with administration officials. The White House said it had nothing to say on this matter. Tammy Bruce, spokesperson for the State Department, said it was a 'hypothetical' issue because Taiwan had not announced any travel plans for Lai. 'There are a lot of questions and a lot of suppositions that have happened," she told reporters on Tuesday. 'But I can say that it is a hypothetical at this point. There have been no plans.' Discussions unfolded late last week By the end of last week it was clear that the Trump administration was discussing the likely transit by Lai, though it was unclear if the administration had moved to block it, according to one of the people. It was also unclear if the Trump administration would be open to allowing Lai to transit through a city other than New York. The United States is obligated by its own laws to give military support to Taiwan, which split from China in 1949 during a civil war. Beijing claims the island off its southeastern coast as sovereign territory and has vowed to seize it, by force if necessary. Jason Hsu, senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and a former legislator in Taiwan's Legislative Yuan, said Taiwan always consults with the United States on transit and called it 'abnormal' for Washington not to agree when such stopovers are permitted under the Taiwan Relations Act. Bruce said transits by high-level Taiwanese officials, including presidents, 'are fully consistent with our longstanding policy and practice.' In Taipei, Karen Kuo, spokesperson for the presidential office, said there was no immediate plan for Lai to travel. "Considering the recent typhoon disaster recovery efforts in southern Taiwan, the U.S.-Taiwan reciprocal tariff measures and regional developments, the president currently has no plans for overseas visits in the near future,' Kuo said. Routine practice that draws routine protests from Beijing The Chinese Embassy did not respond to an AP request for comment. Beijing, however, has routinely protested any transit through the U.S. by Taiwanese leaders. Lai was elected president of Taiwan in 2024. On his first overseas trip last November he made stops in Hawaii and Guam, where he was received by U.S. politicians. While such transits had been routine by previous Taiwanese presidents and under previous U.S. administrations, the person familiar with the discussions said Beijing considers Lai an exception because it views him as being more aggressive in seeking Taiwan independence. Zack Cooper, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, said that while recent U.S. administrations have not allowed Taiwan to be used in negotiations with Beijing, "this decision raises questions about whether the Trump administration is reconsidering that approach.' And Jason Hsu, a senior fellow at Hudson Institute and a former legislator from Taiwan's KMT party, said that in preventing Lai's stopover 'the Trump administration appears to be accommodating China's red lines.' Democrats on the House Foreign Affairs Committee said on Tuesday that Trump is folding to Beijing. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi of Illinois, who is the top Democrat on the House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party, called it 'another example of the Trump Administration caving to China in hopes of reaching a trade deal.' 'Presidents of both parties have allowed Taiwan officials to transit through the U.S. in the past, and now should be no different," he said in a statement.


NBC News
13 minutes ago
- NBC News
Pete Hegseth has discussed running for political office in Tennessee, sources say
WASHINGTON — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has privately discussed the idea of running for political office next year in Tennessee, according to two people who have spoken directly with him about it. If Hegseth were to follow through on those discussions, it would amount to a major leadership shake-up at the department that oversees the American military and millions of federal employees. The Defense Department bars civilian employees from running for political office, meaning Hegseth would have to resign to do so. In a statement, Sean Parnell, the Pentagon's chief spokesman, said, 'Hegseth's focus remains solely on serving under President Trump.' One of the people said their discussion with Hegseth happened within the past three weeks and that it was serious, not simply spitballing ideas. The other person, who also characterized it as serious, would not say when they had spoken — except that it was since Hegseth became defense secretary in January. The two sources, along with others in this article, were granted anonymity to speak candidly. The discussions centered around what it would take to run. One person said they discussed the eligibility requirements to run for governor of Tennessee and Hegseth's chances of winning. The other person said they talked with Hegseth about the realities of a campaign. The people who have spoken with Hegseth said he has specifically mentioned a possible gubernatorial campaign in Tennessee, where Hegseth lives. The state has an open race for governor next year, though there are eligibility requirements for candidates that Hegseth might not meet. Ultimately, both sources said it was unclear after their conversations with Hegseth whether he would take the leap. But they both said he has contemplated it. 'Fake news NBC is so desperate for attention, they are shopping around a made up story… again. Only two options exist: either the 'sources' are imaginary or these reporters are getting punked. Secretary Hegseth's focus remains solely on serving under President Trump and advancing the America First mission at the Department of Defense,' Parnell said in the statement. Others in Hegseth's orbit said he doesn't plan to launch a campaign. One person who spoke with the secretary last week asked him about speculation that he was looking for an off-ramp from being defense secretary, such as running for political office in Tennessee. This person said Hegseth was 'very, very clear' that he was not going to run and denied even considering it. The idea, this person said, is 'totally off the table.' And when asked, a longtime Trump adviser familiar with political discussions around Hegseth said he will not run for office in Tennessee. Hegseth has campaigned for political office before. A former Army National Guard officer and Fox News host, he ran for the U.S. Senate in his home state of Minnesota in 2012 and withdrew after failing to win the GOP nomination. Minnesota also has an open Senate seat in 2026. Hegseth's political considerations come after a somewhat rocky first six months as defense secretary. During his confirmation process, allegations surfaced around his treatment of his second wife, financial mismanagement, sexual misconduct and alcohol consumption — all of which Hegseth vehemently denied. Since his confirmation, Hegseth has faced controversy over the abrupt firings of his top staff, accusations of chaos at the Pentagon and questions about his handling of sensitive military plans after he shared information about a military operation in Yemen on an unsecured group chat on Signal. A Pentagon inspector general report on the Signal chat, including the classification of the information Hegseth shared, could be released as early as next month. Hegseth also suspended aid to Ukraine three times, but those decisions were reversed by the White House, NBC News reported. Trump has said publicly that he maintains confidence in Hegseth, although privately he has at times expressed frustrations with him, NBC News has reported. Politico recently reported that Trump and his inner circle stand by Hegseth. The New York Times also reported on Saturday that Hegseth continues to clash with the military's top generals over his personnel and promotion choices and what are seen as partisan priorities. If Hegseth were to declare his candidacy for office, Trump has several replacement options, at least temporarily. These include Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, a close friend of Vice President JD Vance's, or the Pentagon's policy chief, Elbridge Colby, according to four people familiar with the matter. Both were confirmed by the Senate for their current jobs and could serve as acting secretary of defense for a period of time without another confirmation hearing. Hegseth could face eligibility requirements if he wants to run for office in Tennessee. Tennessee law says gubernatorial candidates must have lived in the state for seven years prior to the election. Hegseth moved to the state around three years ago; public records show that Hegseth's name is linked to a suburban Nashville address last sold in the middle of 2022. Tennessee Republican Party bylaws also have a series of requirements for Republican primary candidates, including having voted in three of the last four most recent statewide Republican primary elections in which the candidate is eligible to vote. There have been statewide Republican primaries in Tennessee in 2022 and 2024. Those bylaws have blocked other candidates from seeking office in the past, including in 2022, when the state GOP removed Trump-backed Morgan Ortagus, a former State Department spokeswoman, from the congressional primary ballot after she had recently moved to the state. Hegseth would likely face challenges from within his own party if he decided to run for governor. Republican Rep. John Rose is running and has loaned himself $5 million to bolster his campaign. Sen. Marsha Blackburn also has long considered a campaign for governor. Tennessee's senior U.S. senator, Blackburn has served in public office for more than 25 years and holds considerable sway among the state's GOP. A source familiar with Blackburn's plans said she intends to announce her next steps in August. If Blackburn does decide to run, and wins, she'd have to vacate her Senate seat in 2027 and appoint a successor until a special election. That could provide another political option for Hegseth in his home state. Tennessee requires candidates for the Senate to have lived in the state for at least three years. Scott Golden, chairman of the Tennessee Republican Party, said he has not spoken with Trump about a potential Hegseth run. 'Nobody has called to talk about this as a reality,' Golden said, adding, 'I don't know where it's coming from, and maybe it will be real.' Golden said the last time he spoke with Hegseth was on election night last year. He was last at the White House in April, he said, for a tour. 'Right now, it's just not something that we're even thinking about,' Golden said. Another Republican operative in Tennessee was skeptical that Hegseth's running for office was well developed or far along, saying they hadn't heard anything about it. Blackburn is close with Glenn Jacobs, the Republican mayor of Knox County and a former professional wrestler, and she would potentially appoint him to her Senate seat, according to a person familiar with the situation. This person said Blackburn hasn't had any conversations with Hegseth about an appointment. A person close to Blackburn said it was premature to discuss who she would choose as her successor. 'There has never been a conversation of anyone being appointed,' this person said, adding that Blackburn has also not spoken with anyone, including Hegseth, about him potentially running for office in Tennessee. 'I know they talk,' the person said, 'but never about this.'


Fox News
15 minutes ago
- Fox News
Cory Booker slams Dem colleagues as 'complicit' with Trump in angry 'wake-up call' floor speech
Democrat New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker blasted his fellow Democrats for being "complicit" with President Donald Trump's actions during a testy objection to a package of new police legislation voted on by the Senate earlier today. Booker accused his fellow Democrat senators of aligning themselves with Trump because they are in favor of passing legislation, which, void of amendments Booker just began pushing, still allows the president to pick winners and losers in terms of who receives the benefits, he says. "This to me is the problem with Democrats in America right now," Booker complained while objecting to the package of pro-police bills. Booker's objection to the bill, which he says boosts Trump's use of federal funding as leverage to get jurisdictions and entities to change their behavior, comes as the president has threatened to repeal funding and resources from cities and other jurisdictions that push sanctuary city policies, fail to adequately address homelessness, or refuse compliance with other federal directives. "The Democratic Party needs a wake up call. I see law firms bending a knee to this president … I see universities that should be bastions of free speech bending at the knee to this president … I see businesses taking late-night talk show hosts off the air because they dare to insult a president. I see people who want mergers suddenly think they need to pay tribute to this president," Booker complained from the Senate floor. "And what are the very people here elected to defend the constitution of the United States saying?" he asked. "'Oh well today lets look the other way and pass some resources that won't go to Connecticut, that won't go to Illinois, that won't go to New York, that will go to the states [Trump] likes.'" "That is complicity with an authoritarian leader who is trashing our country," Booker argued to his fellow Democrats. "It is time for Democrats to have a backbone, it's time for us to fight, it's time for us to draw a line, and when it comes to the safety of my state being denied these grants that's why I'm standing here." Booker's objection stemmed from a call from Democrats to pass a package of law enforcement-related bills aimed at boosting resources for police, including resources to help shore up death benefits for police officers lost in the line of duty, resources for greater mental health support for officers, resources to address child exploitation, and more. The bills, eventually passed Tuesday, were discussed and approved in committee before reaching the Senate floor. Democrat leaders, including Sens. Catherine Cortez-Masto, D-Nev., and Amy Klobuchar, D-Mass., urged passage of the legislative package amid Booker's objection, noting it went through the proper bipartisan procedure and obtained bipartisan support. "We have committees for a reason, and we have hearings for a reason," Klobuchar said in response to Booker's objections. She added that "We need to have [law enforcement's] backs and that is what this package of bills does." Cortez-Masto noted that the bills, which she helped sponsor and bring to the floor for a full vote, slammed Booker for attempting to tank a package of bills deemed critical by both parties. "I don't need lectures about the urgency of this," Booker shot back in response to his party colleagues' criticism. "I am tired of when the President of the United States violates the constitution, trashes our norms and traditions, and what does the Democratic Party do? Comply? Allow him? Beg for scraps? No! I demand justice!" "NOT ON MY WATCH!" Booker added during his objection, while also urging Democrats to be more cohesive in their fight against Trump. "If we don't stand as Democrats we deserve to lose." Booker's criticism of his fellow Democratic Party members lays bare Democrats' intra-party fighting between the more radical wing of the party and the more moderate wing. The New Jersey senator's criticism also comes as the party is seeking to find the best strategy forward following big GOP gains during the 2024 election. Former President Barack Obama spoke to the matter at a party fundraiser earlier this month, reportedly telling leaders of the party and major donors to "stop looking for a quick fix" and start supporting candidates who can really win and produce results. As an example, the former president pointed particularly at the upcoming elections in New Jersey and Virginia. Later this year, Virginia will face a major gubernatorial battle between incumbent GOP Gov. Glenn Youngkin's Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears and former long-time Virginia Rep. Abigail Spanberger, D-Va. In New Jersey, Democrat Rep. Mikie Sherrill, who was reportedly in attendance at the fundraiser Obama spoke at, is running for her state's open gubernatorial seat against GOP candidate Jack Ciattarelli. "The most important thing you can do right now is to help the team, our candidate to win," Obama told attendees at the fundraiser.