University of the West of Scotland staff ballot for strikes
The ballot will close at noon on Tuesday, July 22.
READ MORE: 22 powerful images showing thousands marching in Glasgow to support refugees
Garry Ross, EIS National Officer for Higher Education, said: "It is deeply regrettable that the University of the West of Scotland has chosen to make this large number of job cuts and pushed staff to the point of balloting for strike action.
"The proposed redundancies are a short-sighted and damaging strategy that will have a devastating impact on the livelihoods of dedicated staff, many of whom have worked at UWS for years.
"Furthermore, it will inevitably lead to a decline in the academic provision, research capacity, and overall student experience at the university.
"We urge UWS to step back from this path and engage meaningfully with the EIS ULA to secure a no-compulsory-redundancy guarantee."
READ MORE: Council reprimanded by watchdog over delays affecting abuse survivors
The ballot follows ongoing disputes with university management over the OCP, which includes plans to cut 75.2 full-time equivalent academic posts.
The union has raised concerns about transparency and consultation during the process, lodging a formal dispute in March.
EIS ULA argues that compulsory redundancies threaten job security, academic standards, and research at UWS.
The union said it has a strong mandate for industrial action following a previous consultative ballot that showed broad support for a strike if redundancy guarantees were not provided.
READ MORE: Work begins on 'major' school expansion to increase capacity by 500 pupils
Members are determined to protect jobs and maintain the university's role within the Scottish higher education sector.
EIS ULA is urging UWS management to re-enter negotiations and work towards an agreement that avoids compulsory job losses and safeguards the institution's future.
The union said it remains committed to finding a negotiated solution but is prepared to take strike action if necessary to protect its members and academic standards.
UWS has been approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
15 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Gender critical campaigners demand action from government on toilet access
Sex Matters, which intervened in the For Women Scotland case against which went to the Supreme Court, are threatening a lawsuit against Scottish ministers – with the latest letter demanding action by a deadline of next Wednesday. The Supreme Court's ruling in April said the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex. Sex Matters say the government must make a statement that all single-sex facilities on its estate must be interpreted as meaning biological sex. Ministers, including John Swinney, say they accept the judgment and have convened a working group to review their policies, as well as having discussions with the Equalities and Human Rights Commission. The campaign group, led by Maya Forstater, sent its first letter before action in June and another was sent to Scottish Government officials on Wednesday. The latest letter gives the government seven days to respond and says: 'To the extent that the Scottish Government does not immediately stop the unlawful practices set out in this letter we may decide to commence proceedings without further warning.' It notes there are 1,016 toilets across the government's core estate, in a mixture of unisex and separate-sex facilities. The letter calls on the government to make a statement that 'all facilities designated as male or female within the Scottish Government estate are to be interpreted as meaning biological sex, and that gender-neutral options are widely available'. A Scottish Government's official responded to Sex Matters' previous letter, saying they accept the Supreme Court ruling. The letter, dated June 27, said: 'We are now taking action to implement the ruling. 'This includes the establishment of a short life working group to review existing policies, guidance and legislation which may be impacted by the judgment. 'The work of this group is under way and covers all relevant portfolios across government. 'This work is enabling us towards a state of readiness to take all necessary steps to implement the ruling.' The government has been approached for further comment.
STV News
16 minutes ago
- STV News
UN expert backs Regan's Bill to criminalise the buying of sex in Scotland
A UN expert has backed Ash Regan's Bill to criminalise the buying of sex in Scotland while decriminalising people selling sexual services. The Alba MSP's 'Unbuyable Bill' won support from the United Nations special rapporteur on violence against women and girls, Reem Alsalem, on Friday. Ms Alsalem said the proposals put forward by Regan were 'in line' with recommendations she made in a report to the UN Human Rights Council last year. In her opinion, the UN expert said the Bill provides an 'effective framework for ending the exploitation and violence that women are subjected to in prostitution, by discouraging the demand for buying sexual acts and offering exit strategies for the victims'. On Friday, Regan welcomed the support and urged her colleagues in the Scottish Parliament to 'take note' of Ms Alsalem's support, with the UN expert describing the Bill as 'an effective framework for ending the exploitation and violence that women are subjected to in prostitution'. Regan launched the Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill in Scottish Parliament last month to criminalise the buying of sex in Scotland while decriminalising the people selling sexual services. The MSP hopes the Bill, which would also quash historic convictions for prostitution and create a statutory right to support for those leaving the trade, will be passed before parliament breaks for next year's Holyrood election. However the Bill has faced criticism from some sectors of the sex-work community, who say it could be 'disastrous' for their safety. The support comes as Scotland's community safety minister, Siobhian Brown, raised concerns on Monday about the potential cost of quashing convictions as part of the legislation. Under Regan's proposals, those convicted of buying sex in Scotland could be fined up to £10,000 if the case was prosecuted in Scotland's Sheriff Courts – with these courts also able to impose jail sentences of up to six months. Holyrood's Criminal Justice Committee is currently seeking views on the Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill. The call for views closes on September 5, 2025. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Western Telegraph
21 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Gender critical campaigners demand action from government on toilet access
Sex Matters, which intervened in the For Women Scotland case against which went to the Supreme Court, are threatening a lawsuit against Scottish ministers – with the latest letter demanding action by a deadline of next Wednesday. The Supreme Court's ruling in April said the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex. Sex Matters say the government must make a statement that all single-sex facilities on its estate must be interpreted as meaning biological sex. Ministers, including John Swinney, say they accept the judgment and have convened a working group to review their policies, as well as having discussions with the Equalities and Human Rights Commission. John Swinney has said he accepts the ruling (Jane Barlow/PA) The campaign group, led by Maya Forstater, sent its first letter before action in June and another was sent to Scottish Government officials on Wednesday. The latest letter gives the government seven days to respond and says: 'To the extent that the Scottish Government does not immediately stop the unlawful practices set out in this letter we may decide to commence proceedings without further warning.' It notes there are 1,016 toilets across the government's core estate, in a mixture of unisex and separate-sex facilities. The letter calls on the government to make a statement that 'all facilities designated as male or female within the Scottish Government estate are to be interpreted as meaning biological sex, and that gender-neutral options are widely available'. A Scottish Government's official responded to Sex Matters' previous letter, saying they accept the Supreme Court ruling. The letter, dated June 27, said: 'We are now taking action to implement the ruling. 'This includes the establishment of a short life working group to review existing policies, guidance and legislation which may be impacted by the judgment. 'The work of this group is under way and covers all relevant portfolios across government. 'This work is enabling us towards a state of readiness to take all necessary steps to implement the ruling.' The government has been approached for further comment.
