UN expert backs Regan's Bill to criminalise the buying of sex in Scotland
The Alba MSP's 'Unbuyable Bill' won support from the United Nations special rapporteur on violence against women and girls, Reem Alsalem, on Friday.
Ms Alsalem said the proposals put forward by Regan were 'in line' with recommendations she made in a report to the UN Human Rights Council last year.
In her opinion, the UN expert said the Bill provides an 'effective framework for ending the exploitation and violence that women are subjected to in prostitution, by discouraging the demand for buying sexual acts and offering exit strategies for the victims'.
On Friday, Regan welcomed the support and urged her colleagues in the Scottish Parliament to 'take note' of Ms Alsalem's support, with the UN expert describing the Bill as 'an effective framework for ending the exploitation and violence that women are subjected to in prostitution'.
Regan launched the Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill in Scottish Parliament last month to criminalise the buying of sex in Scotland while decriminalising the people selling sexual services.
The MSP hopes the Bill, which would also quash historic convictions for prostitution and create a statutory right to support for those leaving the trade, will be passed before parliament breaks for next year's Holyrood election.
However the Bill has faced criticism from some sectors of the sex-work community, who say it could be 'disastrous' for their safety.
The support comes as Scotland's community safety minister, Siobhian Brown, raised concerns on Monday about the potential cost of quashing convictions as part of the legislation.
Under Regan's proposals, those convicted of buying sex in Scotland could be fined up to £10,000 if the case was prosecuted in Scotland's Sheriff Courts – with these courts also able to impose jail sentences of up to six months.
Holyrood's Criminal Justice Committee is currently seeking views on the Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill.
The call for views closes on September 5, 2025.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
25 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Top Scots civil servant now paid £180,000 moaned about long work days & joked about video game distraction
Newly unearthed texts sent during the pandemic also show the Scottish Government's new Permanent Secretary calling Boris Johnson 'irresponsible' MOAN-DARIN Top Scots civil servant now paid £180,000 moaned about long work days & joked about video game distraction Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A TOP civil servant now on a £180,000 salary was last night blasted for moaning about his long working days. Joe Griffin also joked to a colleague about being distracted from playing the video game Tetris. Sign up for the Politics newsletter Sign up 2 Joe Griffin with First Minister John Swinney 2 Griffin joked to a colleague about being distracted playing the classic video game Tetris Credit: Alamy Newly unearthed texts sent during the pandemic also show the Scottish Government's new Permanent Secretary calling Boris Johnson 'irresponsible'. The WhatApp messages were sent while Mr Griffin was £100,000-a-year Director of Safer Communities. They emerged a week after Scotland's highest-ranked mandarin provoked anger by ruling home-working staff should not automatically be disciplined if they refuse to return to offices at least two days a week. Scottish Tory MSP Murdo Fraser hit out: 'Scots who lost loved ones or saw their business go to the wall during the pandemic will have little sympathy for this senior official moaning about long days. 'Mr Griffin also has a duty to steer clear of criticising politicians or his neutrality will be called into question.' Chats from December 2020 obtained under freedom of information show his reply to an official who asked if a winter planning meeting was 'really needed'. He said cancellation 'probably wouldn't go down well', then added: 'We should be prepared to do that in future — not just sleepwalk into even longer days becoming standard. 'Today started with pre-cabinet call for Humza (Yousaf) at 8.30am, in part to brief on a paper 87 pages long issued at 10.30pm.' In a discussion about a meeting with John Swinney on November 17, 2020, another staffer was told by Mr Griffin they'd 'rudely interrupted my Tetris'. By January 2021, then Prime Minister Mr Johnson was 'optimistic' Covid restrictions would be loosened. Anas Sarwar promises to tackle Scotland's 'unfair' tax system Mr Griffin hit out that this 'shows you how irresponsible the PM's promises are'. Mr Griffin was appointed as Permanent Secretary formally on April 7. In 2021, he was appointed as Director General for Education and Justice before becoming the head of the External Affairs Division. A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Throughout the pandemic, the focus and intention of ministers, clinicians and officials was to protect people of Scotland from the harms of Covid-19, including providing advice and information about how to stay safe.'
Leader Live
2 hours ago
- Leader Live
MPs back move to protect llamas and alpacas from dog attacks
Dog owners already face a fine if their pet attacks or worries farm animals listed in the Dogs (Protection of Livestock) Act 1953, such as cattle, sheep, pigs and horses. But after a Commons debate, MPs have agreed to add 'camelids' to this list, giving llamas and alpacas in England and Wales similar protections as they have in Scotland. The Dogs (Protection of Livestock) (Amendment) Bill, which now faces further scrutiny in the Lords at a later date, will also see unlimited fines rolled out in dog attack cases, lifting a £1,000 cap. 'They're no laughing matter, alpacas and llamas,' Labour MP Peter Lamb said. 'The Inca empire never developed the wheel. 'The entirety of that empire was built off the back of alpacas and llamas and, as a result, they are an animal that's worthy of great respect.' Mr Lamb said he had heard of 'pretty harrowing cases of what happened to that livestock' at a centre in Tilgate Park in Crawley, West Sussex, where he was the borough council leader. 'In one case, a sheep was just literally set on fire whilst still alive and while the Bill does not directly deal with that, I think some of the mentality that goes into disrespecting these animals is worthy of note,' he said. 'But what we have done is very often, far more often than that, had dogs set on these animals, or at least, people have not been in control of these. 'And we've eventually had to remove the sheep entirely from the publicly accessible areas on the basis of that.' Conservative MP for Chester South and Eddisbury Aphra Brandreth, who proposed the private member's Bill, told the Commons: 'Livestock worrying, as we know, has devastating consequences for both animals and farmers.' She added: 'The damage of a livestock attack can be horrific, causing brutal injuries which are tragically often fatal. 'There are instances of stress causing pregnant livestock to miscarry, and separation of mothers and young leading to hypothermia or starvation. 'I've seen pictures from farmers in my constituency where attacks have mutilated their calves beyond any hope of keeping them alive. 'The consequences, no matter what the scale of an attack, are profound.' As part of the draft new law, authorities would get the powers to treat attacking livestock as separate to 'worrying', which includes chasing farm animals in a way which could cause injury, suffering or loss or 'diminution in their produce'. The Bill would also expand the 1953 Act's scope, which applies on agricultural land, to roads and paths, where animals might be herded. Labour MP Mike Reader praised Ms Brandreth for her 'responsible and balanced approach'. The Northampton South MP said it was 'positive that this expands that definition to roads and paths, because it sets clear requirements that when someone is accessing land, particularly throughout Northamptonshire where there're so many paths that run through farmland, there's a clear definition in the law to both protect farmers but also to set clear boundaries for those who are perhaps walking their dogs… when they access farmland'. Environment minister Emma Hardy said the Government was 'fully committed to supporting this important Bill as it progresses through the other place', before the Bill cleared the Commons at third reading.
Leader Live
2 hours ago
- Leader Live
Gender critical campaigners demand action from government on toilet access
Sex Matters, which intervened in the For Women Scotland case against which went to the Supreme Court, are threatening a lawsuit against Scottish ministers – with the latest letter demanding action by a deadline of next Wednesday. The Supreme Court's ruling in April said the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex. Sex Matters say the government must make a statement that all single-sex facilities on its estate must be interpreted as meaning biological sex. Ministers, including John Swinney, say they accept the judgment and have convened a working group to review their policies, as well as having discussions with the Equalities and Human Rights Commission. The campaign group, led by Maya Forstater, sent its first letter before action in June and another was sent to Scottish Government officials on Wednesday. The latest letter gives the government seven days to respond and says: 'To the extent that the Scottish Government does not immediately stop the unlawful practices set out in this letter we may decide to commence proceedings without further warning.' It notes there are 1,016 toilets across the government's core estate, in a mixture of unisex and separate-sex facilities. The letter calls on the government to make a statement that 'all facilities designated as male or female within the Scottish Government estate are to be interpreted as meaning biological sex, and that gender-neutral options are widely available'. A Scottish Government's official responded to Sex Matters' previous letter, saying they accept the Supreme Court ruling. The letter, dated June 27, said: 'We are now taking action to implement the ruling. 'This includes the establishment of a short life working group to review existing policies, guidance and legislation which may be impacted by the judgment. 'The work of this group is under way and covers all relevant portfolios across government. 'This work is enabling us towards a state of readiness to take all necessary steps to implement the ruling.' Commenting on the campaigners' letter, Scottish Conservative MSP Tess White said: 'The SNP Government must stop dragging its heels. 'The Supreme Court ruling was crystal clear, and so was the Equalities and Human Rights Commission's guidance in the wake of it, so there is no excuse for the SNP failing to comply fully with the law now. 'Indeed, their failure to do so is leaving the Scottish Government and its public bodies open to the legal challenge Sex Matters are threatening.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'The Scottish Government has made clear it accepts the Supreme Court ruling and since April has been taking forward the detailed work that is necessary as a consequence of the ruling. That work is ongoing.'
