South Korean firms likely to announce new US investment plans
While no specific details have been confirmed, potential announcements would align with the deal that lowers tariffs on South Korean exports to the United States to 15 percent, down from the originally planned 25 percent, in exchange for a US$350 billion investment package pledged by Seoul.
U.S. President Donald Trump has said he will hold a summit with South Korean President Lee Jae Myung at the White House in two weeks, during which the leaders would likely discuss implementation and follow-up steps, reports Yonhap news agency.
Lee said South Korea's investment pledge under the agreement would support bilateral cooperation in key economic areas. Of the total, $150 billion will be dedicated to helping revitalise the U.S. shipbuilding industry.
Yoon Sang-ha, head of the international macroeconomics team at the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (KIEP), said the presence of top conglomerate leaders in Washington during the trade negotiations strongly suggests that some form of a coordinated investment package may be announced at the proposed summit.
"Large business group leaders often accompany summits like this, and many of them have flown to the U.S. to back the negotiations," Yoon said. "It is likely they will bundle together their existing plans with new strategies to address the evolving global trade environment and unveil them in some package format."
In terms of the overall size of the commitment, Yoon said he believes Seoul "handled it fairly well," especially considering Japan's $550 billion and the European Union's $600 billion pledges.
South Korea's Hanwha Group, which acquired Philly Shipyard in Philadelphia last year, is expected to play a key role in a U.S. shipbuilding revitalization initiative backed by both governments.
A spokesperson for Hanwha Ocean Co. said that while the company does not yet have an official position on the trade deal, it plans to expand or upgrade facilities at Philly Shipyard have previously been discussed at the group level.
"In that sense, we believe this trade agreement could have a positive impact," the spokesperson said. "Hanwha Philly Shipyard has already signed a liquefied natural gas (LNG) carrier construction contract, and we expect such projects to move forward more actively."
Hyundai Motor Group has already pledged to invest $21 billion in the U.S. by 2028, largely focused on mobility technologies.
Industry watchers speculate the group could announce additional investments at the upcoming summit to align with the broader economic vision outlined in the new deal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
30 minutes ago
- Mint
Indian-origin woman advocates working ‘14+ hours a day… It's baseline'; internet reacts
An Indian-origin woman and founder of a US-based startup has stirred a heated discussion online after claiming that working 80 hours a week is not excessive but simply the 'baseline'. Neha Suresh, the founder of April – a US-based AI voice assistant app – posted a timelapse video on X (formerly Twitter), showing her working from early morning until late at night. In her now-viral post, Suresh wrote: 'If you're not spending 14+ hours a day working on your dream, you're ngmi.' She added, 'You can't build a world-changing product on 9–5 energy. 80-hour weeks aren't extreme. It's baseline.' Her comments, which have racked up over 65,000 views, sparked a range of responses from users — from admiration to criticism. One person asked, 'What do you do to decompress after an 80-hour week? Physically. What actually works?' Another replied with sarcasm, 'Why just 14 hours? Make it 24.' Some shared personal experiences. 'I burned out chasing 80-hour weeks. Found I actually build better products when I'm rested and thinking clearly,' a user wrote. Another commented, 'Wow, another person who's never had to pay bills or have a social life telling me how to live my best life.' The post has since fuelled a wider conversation about work-life balance and the pressure of hustle culture in startups and tech. Joining the ongoing conversation about work-life balance, India-origin tech leader Dharmesh Shah had offered a frank take on the reality of building a successful startup. Shah, who is the founder and Chief Technology Officer of HubSpot, shared his thoughts in a post on X (formerly Twitter) in March, where he spoke openly about the challenges of managing both work and personal life in the startup world. He acknowledged that maintaining balance is difficult, especially when aiming for high levels of success. "Wanting work-life balance is OK. Wanting to build a breakthrough startup is OK. But you shouldn't expect both," he wrote. 'In 30+ years and knowing hundreds of founders, I've never met a single founder that built a breakthrough startup while maintaining work-life balance. Any competitive human endeavor requires sacrifice to stand-out. Whether it's athletics, arts or entrepreneurship. Raw talent is not enough. You have to toil,' Shah wrote. 'Unhappiness comes from expecting more out of the system than you put in. Either path is totally OK, as long as you understand that you picked a path. Two roads diverged in a wood, and if you take the one most traveled by, don't think that won't make a difference,' Shah said.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
From Thirteen Days To X-Men: How Cold War Tension Became Pop Culture's Go-To Narrative
From the Cuban Missile Crisis to the Doomsday Clock, Cold War paranoia gave pop culture its favourite script: countdowns, close calls, and the edge of annihilation When former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev responded to Donald Trump's economic taunts with a nuclear-laced warning, invoking the Soviet 'Dead Hand" system, a Cold War-era semi-automated retaliation protocol, Trump hit back within hours, ordering two US nuclear submarines into undisclosed 'appropriate regions." The platforms may have changed, missile silos back then, social media posts now, but the standoff feels familiar. Nuclear threats, strategic posturing, the world holding its breath. We've seen a version of this before. It starts the same way every time. A room. A red phone. A general's jaw clenched. A screen blinking with incoming missiles. Somewhere, a politician hesitates. Somewhere else, a clock ticks ominously toward midnight. Maybe it's a film. Maybe it's a game. Maybe it's a scene so overused you could storyboard it from memory. And yet, it still works. The stakes still feel unbearable. If pop culture has a favourite genre, it's the end of the world. And if it has a favourite moodboard, it's pulled straight from the Cold War: the iconic mushroom clouds of nuclear blasts, satellite feeds, presidents sweating through their shirts, and a symbolic clock that's always just a few seconds from catastrophe. The Crisis That Launched A Thousand Scripts October 1962. A Soviet ship is spotted heading towards Cuba. American spy planes snap grainy black-and-white images of missile silos under construction. In Washington, then President John F. Kennedy orders a naval blockade, or a 'quarantine", as the US diplomatically called it. In Moscow, Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev fumes. For nearly two weeks, the world sits on a knife's edge. One wrong move, one itchy trigger finger, and the Cold War could become a hot one, with nukes flying over the Atlantic and cities wiped off the map. In the end, diplomacy wins. The Soviets agree to remove their missiles from Cuba; the US quietly withdraws its own missiles from Turkey. But what lingers isn't relief, it's the realisation that the world came this close to oblivion. And that kind of tension? It doesn't just end. It seeps into stories. For filmmakers and writers, the Cuban Missile Crisis offered something irresistible: a real-world thriller with global stakes, impossible decisions, and the ever-present question — what if it had gone the other way? Meanwhile, The Clock Was Already Ticking Long before Soviet missiles showed up in Cuba, the anxiety had already taken shape, in the form of a metaphor. In 1947, shaken by Hiroshima and the birth of the atomic age, a group of scientists from the Manhattan Project created the Doomsday Clock. It wasn't a device you could set your watch to — it was a symbol, printed on the cover of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, showing just how close humanity was to 'midnight", a.k.a. annihilation. Unlike regular clocks, this one didn't tick forward with time; it moved based on how badly humans were behaving. Nuclear weapons? Tick. Climate change? Tick. AI gone rogue? Tick. In January this year, the clock was set to 89 seconds to midnight, the closest it's ever been. Not just because of war, but because of everything else humanity has added to the danger pile: emerging tech, global instability, failing climate pledges. But what made the Clock powerful wasn't just its scientific backing; it was its cinematic quality. The countdown. The symbolism. The mounting dread. It didn't just belong in policy reports. It belonged in stories. Hollywood's Favourite Crisis The first major filmmaker to seize the emotional fallout of 1962 was Stanley Kubrick. Dr Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb (1964) wasn't just a film; it was a cultural detonation. Just two years after the Cuban Missile Crisis, Kubrick turned the unthinkable into something darkly hilarious and deeply unsettling. A rogue general launches a nuclear strike. Bureaucrats panic. A wheelchair-bound ex-Nazi scientist with a mind of his own cackles about unstoppable doomsday devices. It was satire, but it felt too real. That was the point. Then came Topaz (1969), Alfred Hitchcock's take on Cold War espionage. Based on a real Soviet defector, the film unfolds like a chess match, with double agents, Paris backchannels, and missile secrets traded in whispered French. It doesn't have explosions; it has paranoia. In The Missiles of October (1974), we go inside the White House itself. This docudrama strips away fiction and focuses on tense decision-making, backroom debates, and Kennedy's own ethical calculus. It's low on visual drama, high on historical claustrophobia. Decades later came Thirteen Days (2000), a straight-laced, high-stakes retelling of the Cuban standoff. Kevin Costner plays JFK's adviser, navigating a labyrinth of generals, secrets, and political brinkmanship. It's moody, dialogue-heavy, and built for history buffs. Not all films stuck to realism. X-Men: First Class (2011) rewrites the Cuban Crisis as a mutant showdown, with Magneto pulling missiles out of the sky and the standoff becoming a superpowered morality play. The metaphors are loud, but the tension still Cold War. And then there's The Courier (2021), a more recent Cold War thriller, starring Benedict Cumberbatch as Greville Wynne, the British businessman turned reluctant spy who helped ferry missile intelligence out of Moscow just before the Cuban standoff. Tick, Tick, Boom: The Clock In Pop Culture The Doomsday Clock has become a universal language in fiction. Think of every scene where a red countdown flashes on a screen. Every moment where someone mutters, 'We have ten minutes until impact." Every dramatic voiceover that begins with, 'If we don't act now…" That's the Clock talking. In Watchmen, the iconic 1986 graphic novel and the 2009 Zack Snyder film, the clock isn't just symbolism, it's part of the story. The fear of nuclear war doesn't just linger, it saturates the world. In Interstellar, the clock becomes ecological. The planet is dying, and time literally dilates. In Avengers: Endgame, the clock is personal, and time travel as the only hope to undo the catastrophe. In Call of Duty: Black Ops, the Cuban Crisis is woven into the gameplay, complete with historical cutscenes and paranoia-laced missions. And in games like Fallout, the clock has already struck midnight, the apocalypse has happened, and you're surviving in the ruins. From Science To Symbol, From Symbol To Spectacle Here's why these two Cold War artefacts refuse to fade: they give structure to chaos. The Crisis gives you a timeline. The Clock gives you a countdown. Together, they're a writer's dream, built-in stakes, moral ambiguity, and a ticking tension that you don't have to invent. It's already real. They're also flexible. Want to make a political drama? Use the Crisis. Want to make an action blockbuster? Throw in the Clock. Want to blend both? You've got Strangelove. Even when the threat isn't nuclear anymore, think climate collapse, pandemic panic, rogue tech, the formula remains: a slow-build problem, a looming deadline, a hero trying to stop the worst. The clock ticks on. Hollywood's Favourite Ending: The Apocalypse, On Repeat We love the apocalypse not because we want it, but because we want to beat it. top videos View all The Cuban Missile Crisis and the Doomsday Clock gave pop culture a ready-made script: the standoff, the countdown, the impossible choice. And decades later, we're still hooked. Whether it's a period drama, a superhero showdown, or a video game mission, chances are you'll find echoes of Cuba and that ticking clock, pop culture's favourite way to imagine the end… and maybe how to stop it. About the Author Karishma Jain Karishma Jain, Chief Sub Editor at writes and edits opinion pieces on a variety of subjects, including Indian politics and policy, culture and the arts, technology and social change. Follow her @ More Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : Cold War Doomsday Clock Nuclear threat view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 02, 2025, 17:34 IST News explainers From Thirteen Days To X-Men: How Cold War Tension Became Pop Culture's Go-To Narrative Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
India to keep buying Russian oil despite Trump's penalty threat: Report
India will continue to buy crude oil from Russia, despite US President Donald Trump's warning of a penalty, according to a report in Reuters, quoting two Indian government sources, who did not wish to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter. "These are long-term oil contracts," one of the sources said. "It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight." The New York Times, in its report, quoted two unnamed senior Indian officials as saying there had been no change in Indian government policy. One of the officials, in the news report, said the government had "not given any direction to oil companies" to cut back imports from Russia. The Indian authorities had, on Friday, said their energy decisions are based on national interest and market factors. Trump recently claimed India may stop purchasing oil from Russia, calling it a 'good step' if true. However, India's foreign ministry stated on Friday that no such decision has been made. Speaking to the media on Friday, Trump said, 'I understand that India is no longer going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I heard — I don't know if that's right or not — but that would be a good step.' His comment followed the US government's announcement of a 25 per cent tariff on all goods imported from India, effective from August 1, along with an unspecified penalty. Tougher stance: 100% tariff warning In mid-July, Trump issued a stronger threat, warning of up to 100 per cent tariffs on any country that continues to buy oil from Russia unless there is a complete peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine. Earlier this week, he also criticised India's economic partnership with Russia. Posting on Truth Social, Trump said, 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care.' He repeated long-standing complaints about India's high tariffs, saying, 'Their tariffs are too high, among the highest in the world. The US has done very little business with India for this reason.' On Wednesday, the US officially announced a 25 per cent tariff on all Indian exports to the United States starting August 7. India defends its position Responding to the US statements, India's Ministry of External Affairs said the country decides on oil purchases based on availability, global prices, and domestic needs. 'We look at what is there available in the markets, what is there on offer, and also what is the prevailing global situation,' said foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal during a press briefing on Friday. Russia remains India's top oil supplier Russia continues to be India's leading crude oil supplier, accounting for about 35 per cent of total oil imports. From January to June 2025, India imported around 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil — slightly higher than the same period last year, Reuters reported. Other key suppliers include Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE. India is the world's third-largest importer and consumer of oil. US Senator Marco Rubio calls India's Russia ties a concern US Secretary of State Marco Rubio also expressed concern over India's oil purchases from Russia, saying it is 'most certainly a point of irritation' in the US-India relationship. Speaking to Fox Radio on Thursday, Rubio noted that even among allies, it is normal to disagree on some foreign policy matters. 'India is a strategic partner. Like anything in foreign policy, you're not going to align 100 per cent of the time,' he said. (With agency inputs)
