Ryanair profits more than double to €820m
Ryanair Holdings said it carried 57.9 million passengers from the end of March to the end of June, the first quarter of its financial year, an increase of 4 per cent over the same period in 2024.
Profit after tax grew 128 per cent to €820 million from €360 million as sales increased 20 per cent to €4.34 billion.
Michael O'Leary, chief executive, said that fares in the first quarter benefited substantially from a having a full Easter holiday in April.
READ MORE
He noted that full-year traffic remained on track to grow just 3 per cent to 206 million passengers, a result of delayed deliveries of new aircraft from Boeing.
'While summer 2025 demand is strong, quarter two fare increases will be lower than in quarter one and we now expect to recover almost all of the 7 per cent fare decline we saw in the previous year's quarter two,' Mr O'Leary said.
He added that it was too early to give meaningful profit after tax guidance for the current financial year, which ends on March 31st 2026.
However, he noted that the airline 'cautiously expected' to recover almost all of last year's 7 per cent slide in fares.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
24 minutes ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the State's new investment plans: the work is only starting
The Government's plan to invest more to address the infrastructure deficits in the Irish economy is a move in the right direction. Shortfalls in housing, water, energy and transport are not only crippling competitiveness but affecting people's daily lives. The Government is correct to push ahead with its planning, despite the international uncertainty. A growing economy and a rising population have left recent administrations running to catch up. International investors have been increasingly outspoken about Ireland's infrastructural shortfalls. All of this needs to be addressed. And Taoiseach Micheál Martin is correct when he says that State investment spending must be protected no matter what. However, the plans published yesterday raise of number of important questions. The lack of any detail of the projects to be included in the plan is somewhat puzzling. Everyone knew in the final period of the last government and the opening months of this one that the review was due. So why has no list of projects been completed? Because of this, as Prof Alan Barrett of the Economic and Social Research Institute pointed out, we do not have any of the essential detail on how the projects all fit together. READ MORE There are, of course, a significant number of projects which we do know about and which will be funded by the money now being put aside. The focus on vital areas such as water, wastewater and energy is important. But with last-minute rows over housing in particular, it is unclear that the Government yet has a convincing plan in this key area. An updated housing plan, due in the autumn, needs to give a clear view . The Government is also – belatedly – looking seriously at the blockages and delays to project planning. This is welcome but long overdue. These issues have been hiding in plain sight in recent years, leading to extraordinary delays and additional costs in projects large and small. Too much time was lost here by the last government. This one needs to get serious on the issue of the delivery. This will be uncomfortable politically and it remains to be seen if the Government has the stomach for the necessary fights. The scale of the investment commitments being made are significant. And paying for it will use a lot of the leeway in the national finances and also the cash put aside from the Apple tax payment and the sale of AIB shares. This means a higher level of risk. To create the required leeway in the national finances – and ensure yet more cash is not pumped into the economy – the increased investment spending must be combined with much tighter control of day-to-day spending. This is the trade off. If this does not happen, then the scale of the financial risks facing the State will increase yet further. And they are already high enough.
Irish Times
24 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Budget plan for €9.4bn public spending boost will be reconsidered if tariffs hit
Plans to spend an extra €9.4 billion on public services , tax cuts and building projects next year will be reconsidered if the US imposes tariffs on EU imports, Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe and Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers said on Tuesday. But they, along with Taoiseach Micheál Martin and Tánaiste Simon Harris , pledged that if there is pressure on spending plans, they would protect infrastructure budgets and cut growth in current spending on public services, welfare and tax cuts to realise the necessary savings. The Coalition leaders launched a review of the National Development Plan (NDP), promising to spend €100 billion between now and 2030 – a €30 billion increase over what was planned – to improve water, energy, transport and housing infrastructure. [ National Development Plan shows the Government is about to bet big on capital expenditure Opens in new window ] The ambitious plans were overshadowed by the threat of a trade war between the European Union and United States, which Mr Donohoe and Mr Chambers admitted could compel them to revise plans published on Tuesday for a budget day package of €9.4 billion in October. READ MORE In the event of high tariffs, the Government would 'recalibrate its fiscal strategy' and reduce the budget package to keep public finances stable, said Mr Donohoe. Already, the plans for October's Budget 2026 envisage growth in public spending being trimmed from 8-9 per cent of recent years to 6.4 per cent next year. Mr Donohoe said there would be a package of tax cuts of some €1.5 billion. But he added that the cost of cutting VAT on hospitality – a Fine Gael election promise included in the programme for government – would amount to nearly €1 billion in a full year, meaning the scope for any tax adjustments to rates and bands would be reduced significantly. Tariffs: Why has Donald Trump threatened the EU again? Listen | 47:35 'It would not be right to grow the scale of our tax package,' said Mr Donohoe. The Coalition published the amended NDP and summer economic statement at Government Buildings on Tuesday. The NDP promises expenditure of €25 billion on capital projects in 2026, with the amount increasing every year and peaking at €28 billion in 2029. The total is set to reach more than €100 billion by 2030. The plan was immediately criticised for not identifying individual projects, though the Government did point to a small number of 'megaprojects', including the Dublin Metro and two big water schemes: the Shannon to Dublin water supply project and Greater Dublin Area drainage initiative. Social Democrats spokesman on public expenditure Cian O'Callaghan said the plan is 'so vague it doesn't even rise to the level of wish list'. Sinn Féin 's health spokesman David Cullinane said the allocation for health falls 'far short of what is needed' over the next five years. Labour 's Marie Sherlock, meanwhile, has said the €2 billion allocated for the MetroLink is 'hardly a vote of confidence that the project will be substantively progressed in this decade'. The summer economic statement, normally a key document in the preparation of the October budget, was considerably shorter and less detailed than usual. It contained several warnings, however, about threats to the State's public finances from several sources. [ NDP shows Government about to bet big on capital expenditure Opens in new window ] 'Even before the full impact of tariffs takes hold, it is increasingly evident that heightened levels of uncertainty have prompted firms to delay investment plans and households to step up precautionary savings. These headwinds are set to slow the pace of economic expansion,' it said. The document also warned that the 'headline surplus is now likely to be considerably lower than set out in the spring'. It flagged that spending pressures in several Government departments will require additional funding above their agreed allocations, prompting Mr Chambers to warn of the need for spending discipline and an end to bailouts in the second half of the year – a now familiar necessity in some departments.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
National Development Plan shows the Government is about to bet big on capital expenditure
Unveiling a plan to spend more than €100 billion on infrastructure and capital projects by 2030 , and another €175 billion in the five years after that, the Coalition is betting heavily that it can achieve a step-change in addressing the infrastructure deficit that has developed in recent years. If that deficit is the biggest problem facing the State – and the Coalition say constantly this is so – then the Government is planning to solve the problem by throwing a ton of money at it. Tuesday's announcement adds more than €30 billion to previous plans, promising a surge of investment, especially in the areas of water, energy infrastructure and housing. A further €175 billion is due to be spent by 2035, though much of that will fall to the next government to make those final decisions. [ National Development Plan: €275bn to be spent over next 10 years, with housing receiving biggest boost Opens in new window ] Spending money – or promising to spend it – is in itself no guarantee of success. Past performance is evidence enough of that. READ MORE As Tánaiste Simon Harris acknowledged, the real test will be the Government's capacity to deliver the projects within something like the timescale envisaged. 'Our watchword,' said Harris, 'must be delivery … We have to say to [Government] agencies, 'get on with it'.' But experience suggests this is easier said than done. However, the ability to ensure that Government and its agencies deliver those projects expeditiously now becomes a critical issue for this Coalition. It has mortgaged its future on transforming the State's infrastructure, especially housing. But those housing units are visible and countable: if the Government fails to deliver 50-60,000 a year, there will be nowhere to hide. Do Sinn Féin need to change tack after slump in the polls? Listen | 38:36 In private, Taoiseach Micheál Martin has reportedly expressed impatience with the system's failure to move more quickly in response to decisions of its elected leaders. But there is nobody in Irish politics with deeper or broader experience of the system than Martin. Success or failure of the Government – and perhaps his legacy as Taoiseach – depends on his ability to get the machine to produce results. It is a formidable task. It is complicated by factors outside the Government's control. Chief among them is the uncertain international environment. The European Union and United States stand on the brink of a trade war that has potentially serious consequences for our economy and those corporation tax revenues which will bankroll much of the planned building spree. Launching their summer economic statement, barely an hour after the National Development Plan announcement, Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe and Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers admitted that their budget plans would have to be rewritten if US president Donald Trump's 30 per cent tariffs – or anything like that – take effect. The two men promised a budget package of €9.4 billion in October – a number that means sharp reductions to the recent growth in current spending budgets (but growth all the same). But then they immediately said that number may change if the conditions change. Here's the budget, they said – for now, anyway. This is the world we live in. Martin, Harris, Donohoe and Chambers were united and unambiguous on one thing: if budgets come under pressure, they will trim current spending growth to safeguard capital budgets. The principle is a laudable one: taking short-term pain for long-term gain. But what if that short-term pain comes in the shape of severely constrained spending on welfare, pensions, public services and increased taxes? In recent budgets, the Government was able to cut taxes, increase spending, save money and still run surpluses. That happy era is coming to an end. Tougher choices will soon be unavoidable. With them comes tougher politics.
