Will Trump change daylight saving time? He says it's a ‘50/50' issue
Most of the US is about to "spring forward" on March 9, when clocks will be set one hour ahead to adjust from the extra hour of sunlight heading into the warmer months of the year.
That is, unless Trump changes things.
The president has spoken previously about his desire to make the springtime clock permanent, and eliminate the practice of setting clocks back an hour in the winter time. The practice as we know it started in the early 1900s in Canada and central Europe and is meant to shift people's schedules so they experience more daylight in a typical day.
According to Trump, getting rid of the clock adjustments is a "50/50 issue," so he's not sure what he's going to do about the practice, Axios reports.
"It's a 50/50 issue, and if something is a 50/50 issue, it's hard to get excited about it,' Trump said on Thursday. 'I assume people would like to have more light later, but some people want to have more light earlier because they don't want to take their kids to school in the dark.'
Trump said the fact that the nation was split on the issue was holding him back from making any decisions.
"And it's something I can do, but a lot of people like it one way, a lot of people like it the other way, it's very even and usually I find when that's the case what else do we have to do?" Trump said.
If Trump makes any change one way or the other, it will affect most Americans. Only two states keep consistent clocks all year long — Arizona and Hawaii — but depending on what Trump decides, they may also have to adjust their time keeping.
Daylight saving time was adopted for the US under the Uniform Time Act of 1966, and Congress would have the ultimate say in whether or not the clocks change.
Over the past few years, then-Senator Marco Rubio has attempted to push for a permanent daylight saving time across the nation under the Sunshine Protection Act, but the bills ultimately die before they can reach a vote.
Earlier this year, Senator Rick Scott of Florida introduced the bill once again.
"I'm excited to have President Trump back in the White House and fully on board to LOCK THE CLOCK so we can get this good bill passed and make this common-sense change that will simplify and benefit the lives of American families," Scott wrote in January.
It seems like that Trump backing is a little less sure now.
Trump wasn't always so middle of the road on daylight saving time; back in December he made it clear that the Republicans, under his leadership, would try to eliminate it completely.
"The Republican Party will use its best efforts to eliminate Daylight Saving Time, which has a small but strong constituency, but shouldn't!," Trump said at the time.
He further called it "inconvenient" and "very costly to our nation."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
22 minutes ago
- New York Post
Thank the Supreme Court for helping Trump return power over America's schools to parents
The Supreme Court's decision to let Team Trump fire hundreds of Education Department employees hands him — and the nation — a double-barreled win. First, it reinforces the concept, underscored by another high-court ruling last week, that the executive branch has a fundamental right to hire and fire employees who work for . . . the executive branch. Second, planned layoffs of more than 1,300 of the agency's 4,000 employees will significantly help President Donald Trump achieve his goal of dismantling it entirely. This is terrific news for students, parents — and taxpayers. The department, after all, has spent billions of taxpayer dollars and produced close to no improvement in learning — with much of that loot going to blue states and teachers unions. If anything it's saddled schools with woke agendas, forcing boys into girls' sports and locker rooms, for example, and kowtowed to labor. Though many of the programs it administers wouldn't be affected even if the agency were to be scrapped entirely (other agencies would simply take on the task), the hope is for less red tape and a less bloated workforce. And removing education-policy decisions from the federal government. Remember, the DOE didn't even exist at all until 1980. Its creation was the result of a cheap deal Jimmy Carter made for the National Education Association's endorsement. Yet for most of the nation's history, educational policy has rested in the hands of states, towns, school boards — and parents. True, to formally abolish the department, the prez would need Congress' approval. That may be an uphill battle for Republicans, but it's one worth fighting. In the meantime, if Trump can rein in DOE's headcount — and narrow the scope of its work — that alone will be a tremendous victory.
CBS News
27 minutes ago
- CBS News
Trump administration releases 2,000 California National Guard members from duty in Los Angeles
The Trump administration is releasing thousands of California National Guard troops from a federal mission in Los Angeles, the Pentagon said Tuesday, over a month after President Trump deployed the troops — over Gov. Gavin Newsom's objections — to respond to protests in the nation's second largest city. "Thanks to our troops who stepped up to answer the call, the lawlessness in Los Angeles is subsiding," Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement. Around 2,000 Guard troops will be released, Parnell said, or half of the roughly 4,000 who were brought under federal control. About 700 active-duty Marines were also sent to the Los Angeles area last month, part of an effort to protect federal immigration agents. In response to the decision, Newsom called on the Trump administration to also return the remaining Guard forces. "For more than a month, the National Guard has been pulled away from their families, communities and civilian work to serve as political pawns for the President in Los Angeles. While nearly 2,000 of them are starting to demobilize, the remaining guardsmembers continue without a mission, without direction and without any hopes of returning to help their communities," Newsom said in a statement. The Trump administration argued the deployment was necessary to deal with chaotic protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrests. But Newsom and other local politicians called the deployment unnecessary and warned it could escalate tensions. This is a breaking story; it will be updated.
Washington Post
27 minutes ago
- Washington Post
In Pennsylvania, Trump touts jobs, hails ‘AI technological revolution'
President Donald Trump traveled to Pennsylvania Tuesday to claim credit for billions of dollars in investments that companies have planned, which he said would make the key swing state 'a leading hub' for energy and artificial intelligence. The visit was the latest effort by the White House to tout what the president and his aides call the 'Trump Effect.' Many of the deals for which the president has taken credit predate his presidency, however, or are part of companies' existing plans to partake in the AI gold rush.
