logo
New NCERT textbook explains how ‘colonial powers stole India's wealth'

New NCERT textbook explains how ‘colonial powers stole India's wealth'

The Hindu16-07-2025
The new Class 8 Social Science textbook of the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) introduced to students in academic year 2025-26 describes the colonial rule of the European powers especially the British to be the one which 'drained India of its wealth'.
Chapter 4 of the new NCERT textbook Exploring Society: India and Beyond states that, '…the Industrial Revolution in Britain, which required investment, was made possible at least partly by the 'stolen wealth from India'.' 'Stolen wealth from India' is a phrase used by U.S. historian Will Durant, it states.
'The general thrust of Britain's dominance in India was plunder, exploitation, trade dominance, imposition of educational, administrative and judicial systems, and Christianization,' Michel Danino, Head, the NCERT's Curricular Area Group for Social Science, told The Hindu.
An official statement released by the NCERT said, 'All the facts presented in this textbook are based on well-known primary and secondary academic sources. However, in order to avoid generation of any prejudice and misunderstanding, 'A note on history's darker period' at page 20 has been added.'
The note states, 'While those happenings cannot be erased or denied, it would be wrong to hold anyone today responsible for them...'
The fourth chapter goes on to include a quote by William Digby which states, '...Modern England has been made great by Indian wealth, ...wealth always taken by the might and skill of the stronger.'
'A recent estimate for the wealth extracted out of India given by Indian economist Utsa Patnaik, in the period from 1765 to 1938, coming at 45 trillion U.S. dollars or about 13 times Britain's GDP in 2023. Had this wealth remained invested in India, it would have been a very different country when it attained independence,' the chapter states.
'This was extracted not just through taxes, but by charging Indians for the colonial power's expenditures on building the railways, the telegraph network and even on wars!' the chapter further states.
'In India, it is common to find the colonial period portrayed as a positive one, with the British bringing industries, railways, the telegraph, modern education, and so on. We have tried to correct this perspective by showing what really happened — the destruction of India's indigenous industries and educational system, the enormous revenue extraction from the Indian population to finance railway and telegraph, etc,' Mr. Danino stated. 'Of course we have also shown the other side — the opening up of India to the world and Europe's discovery of India's ancient culture, among others,' he further added.
The chapter also states that converting indigenous populations to Christianity was a powerful motivation (for territorial expansion of European powers). Colonisation led to loss of independence, exploitation of resources by the colonisers, destruction of traditional ways of life and the imposition of foreign cultural values, the new NCERT textbook states.
Portugese navigator Vasco da Gama 'seized, tortured and killed Indian merchants, and bombarded Calicut from sea,' the chapter states. 'The Portuguese presence was characterised by religious persecution... of Hindus, Muslims, Jews and Christian converts...,' the chapter further says. It also highlights the destruction of Pondicherry's original Vedapurishwaram temple, ordered by Joseph François Dupleix, Governor General of French India in 1748.
The chapter states that the British systematically dismantled indigenous governance systems of village communities and replaced them with a centralised bureaucracy. 'While presented as modernisation, this imposition of a foreign system unsuited to India alienated Indians from the judicial system, creating courts that were expensive, time-consuming and conducted in a foreign language,' it states.
Traditional versus modern systems of education
The chapter states that diverse educational traditions such as padashalas, madrasas and viharas transmitted not only practical knowledge but also cultural values and traditions. It quotes from British reports which stated that hundreds of thousands of village schools were present across India (for instance, 1,00,000 to 1,50,000 of them in Bengal and Bihar) 'where young natives are taught reading, writing and arithmetic, upon a system so economical ... and at the same time so simple and effectual...'
Also, the chapter states that the system education proposed by the British became a powerful tool for the creation of a class of Indians who would serve British interests; it quotes Thomas B. Macaulay who emphasised that 'Indians needed British education... to create a class of Indians who would be Indian in blood and colour, but English in taste, opinions, morals and intellect.'
The chapter goes on to say that while a few prominent British Orientalists argued that Indian students should be left to study in their own languages, Macaulay's policy gained the upper hand and India's traditional schools slowly disappeared, while English became a language of prestige associated with colonial masters. This resulted in lasting divisions in Indian society between English-educated elites and the masses.
'It also sidelined traditional sources of knowledge and authority, creating generations of Indians disconnected from their own cultural heritage,' the chapter states.
Addition of a chapter on the Maratha Empire
The new NCERT textbook, unlike the earlier ones that made a passing reference to the Marathas, has now introduced an entire chapter dedicated to 'The Rise of the Marathas'.
'In effect, the British took India from the Marathas more than from the Mughals or any other power,' the NCERT textbook states. Marathas have been described as 'a powerful political entity that will alter the course of India's history'. The chapter talks about Shivaji's need to establish a navy as a 'revolutionary step' and his exploits as 'legendary'.
The chapter goes on to state that when Shivaji attacked Surat, which was a wealthy port city in Mughal Empire, he obtained an enormous treasure of almost one crore rupees, but was careful not to attack religious places. In contrast, the Mughal rulers (like Babur, Akbar and Aurangzeb) have been described as 'brutal' in the previous chapter titled 'Reshaping India's Political Map'. The chapter says they 'destroyed temples' and their rule was fraught with 'religious intolerance.'
In contrast, Shivaji has been described as 'a devout Hindu... who rebuilt desecrated temples, promoted Sanskrit and Marathi literature, religious institutions and traditional arts'.
Ahilyabai Holkar, an 18th century Maratha ruler, has been described as 'a devout person who built and restored hundreds of temples, ghats, wells and roads throughout India, from Kedarnath in north to Rameswaram in south. She rebuilt the Kashi Vishwanath temple in Varanasi that had been destroyed by Aurangzeb and Somnath temple in Gujarat destroyed by Mahmud of Ghazni,' the chapter states.
'Evolution of India'
'Class 8 being the last year of the middle stage, the students are expected to acquire a broad multi-perspective understanding of our past between 13th to mid-19th century and how the various events of that period have helped shape and influenced the evolution of India of today,' a official statement from the NCERT said.
'This textbook attempts to provide an idea about the geography, history (medieval & modern), economic life and governance of the country, from a multi-disciplinary perspective in an integrated way,' it says.
'Our aim has been to consistently avoid attempting to load the child with too much information and to develop a critical understanding of the subject. Hence , the various facts, have been presented in a comprehensible manner to promote holistic learning in this textbook,' the statement further said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tipu Sultan laid the foundation stone for KRS: Mahadevappa
Tipu Sultan laid the foundation stone for KRS: Mahadevappa

The Hindu

time27 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Tipu Sultan laid the foundation stone for KRS: Mahadevappa

The foundation stone for KRS built across river Cauvery in Srirangapatna was originally laid by the eighteenth century ruler Tipu Sultan, said Minister for Social Welfare H.C. Mahadevappa. Speaking after laying the foundation stone for Ambedkar Bhavan in Srirangapatna near here on Sunday, Mr. Mahadevappa said the foundation stone for the reservoir laid by Tipu Sultan is found at its entrance. Claiming that nobody has the courage to say so now, the Minister quoted B.R. Ambedkar and said people, who 'don't know history cannot create it'. Srirangapatna, which is historical place, was the capital of the region during the reign of Tipu Sultan. Mr. Mahadevappa said Tipu had a mosque on one side and a temple on the other. 'He would hear Allahu Akbar from one end and the temple bells on the other,' he remarked. The Minister went on to credit abolition of devadasi system to Tipu Sultan and said the erstwhile ruler also strove to protect the interests of oppressed classes. Further, Mr. Mahadevappa said sericulture was introduced in the country for the first time by Tipu Sultan. Describing Tipu Sultan as a freedom fighter, who fought the British in the battlefield and even forged an alliance with the French to counter the British, Mr. Mahadevappa said the ruler made Gubbi and Harihar as commercial centres. Taking exception to people, who do not understand Tipu Sultan, Mr Mahadevappa said the eighteenth century ruler did not discriminate among his subjects. EoM

Shaadi.com founder Anupam Mittal slams US over visa delays, says Indians are powering its economy; Hails India-UK trade deal
Shaadi.com founder Anupam Mittal slams US over visa delays, says Indians are powering its economy; Hails India-UK trade deal

Economic Times

timean hour ago

  • Economic Times

Shaadi.com founder Anupam Mittal slams US over visa delays, says Indians are powering its economy; Hails India-UK trade deal

Synopsis Anupam Mittal, the founder of has criticised the United States for its sluggish progress on trade and visa matters, in contrast to the UK's more welcoming stance. He highlighted the significant contributions of Indians to the US economy, especially in the fields of technology and finance, while urging India to assert its economic influence and demand fair treatment. Anupam Mittal (Image: Linkedin) founder Anupam Mittal didn't hold back as he criticised the United States for dragging its feet on trade and visa matters. In a viral post on LinkedIn, Mittal praised India's new trade agreement with the UK, calling it a major shift in global power dynamics.'After years of colonial hangover, it's finally India calling the shots,' he wrote, taking a clear dig at the US for failing to keep the UK seems to be rolling out the red carpet, Mittal said the US is still 'playing hardball.' He pointed out the irony, Indians are no longer just exporting goods, they're actually powering the American economy.'Tech? Mostly run by Indians. Wall Street? Flooded with Indian-origin fund managers. Even the new CEO of P&G is Indian. And most VC-backed startups? You'll likely find at least one Indian founder at the table,' he said. Mittal noted that while Indians are making waves across industries, the US hasn't updated its policies to reflect this change. 'What we're seeing is more posturing than partnership,' he wrote. He even suggested that India should no longer accept such behaviour quietly. 'India needs to flex its diplomatic and economic muscle. Time for a counter ultimatum, play fair or we bring back our Kohinoors,' he said cheekily, along with an AI image of himself on a billboard in Times post struck a chord online, with many agreeing that India is no longer waiting for a seat at the table. One user wrote, 'We're redesigning the table. Talent, tech, leadership, that's where India wins.'Another added, 'The rise of Indian talent is clear as day. What's missing is policy support that respects this rise.'

Devendra Fadnavis Defends Public Security Bill, Warns Urban Naxals Of Arrest
Devendra Fadnavis Defends Public Security Bill, Warns Urban Naxals Of Arrest

NDTV

timean hour ago

  • NDTV

Devendra Fadnavis Defends Public Security Bill, Warns Urban Naxals Of Arrest

Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has made it clear that the Special Public Security Bill is not for taking action against those who criticise the government, but warned that those who act like urban Naxals will be arrested under it. The Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill, 2024, which seeks to prevent unlawful activities of Left Wing Extremist organisations with focus on urban Naxalism and "passive militancy", was passed by the state legislature during the recent monsoon session of the state legislature. The bill, which has stringent provisions, including hefty fines and jail term up to seven years for those found guilty, has sparked criticism from civil society groups and opposition parties, who view it as a tool to suppress dissent under the pretext of national security. Talking to reporters here on Saturday, Fadnavis said the law was not against demonstrators or those who criticise the government. "If you act like an urban naxal, you will be arrested," he said when asked about Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) president Raj Thackeray's challenge to the CM to arrest his party workers under the newly-passed legislation. On Raj Thackeray's charge that the CM wanted to forcibly teach young children Hindi but not Marathi to those coming from outside, Fadnavis said Marathi is mandatory in Maharashtra, but an additional Indian language should be learnt along with it. "I am opposed to laying a red carpet to English instead of an Indian language," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store