Could One Shot Replace Flu and COVID-19 Vaccines?
METHODOLOGY:
The mRNA-1083 is an investigational, multicomponent vaccine that combines the components of a hemagglutinin-based influenza vaccine (mRNA-1010) and a second-generation SARS-CoV-2 vaccine encoding the spike glycoprotein's N-terminal and receptor-binding domains.
Researchers present interim findings of a phase 3 trial that assessed the immunogenicity and safety of this vaccine in adults aged 50 years or older across the United States, enrolling participants between October 19, 2023, and November 21, 2023.
They randomly assigned 8061 participants to receive either the mRNA-1083 vaccine plus placebo or the active comparator vaccines for seasonal influenza or COVID-19.
Participants were stratified into those older than 65 years (n = 4017; 54.2% women) and those aged 50-64 years (n = 3998; 58.8% women).
The primary objective was to demonstrate the noninferiority of humoral immune responses — measured by antibody levels — to mRNA-1083 vs active influenza and COVID-19 vaccines against vaccine-matched strains, 29 days post-vaccination.
TAKEAWAY:
The mRNA-1083 vaccine demonstrated noninferiority to the active comparator vaccines against the four influenza strains and SARS-CoV-2 in both age groups, as determined by a 97.5% CI lower bound greater than 0.667 for the geometric mean ratio and more than −10% for the seroconversion rate difference.
In adults aged 50-64 years, mRNA-1083 elicited superior immune responses to all four influenza strains relative to the active comparator influenza vaccines, whereas in adults aged 65 years or older, superiority was observed for three strains (A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B/Victoria).
Most local and systemic adverse reactions were grade 1 or 2 across vaccine groups. Grade 4 adverse reactions, all of which were systemic events (fever), were reported by two participants in each age group.
In both age groups, no severe or serious adverse events or adverse events of special interest were deemed vaccination-related. No deaths or cases of myocarditis or pericarditis were reported.
IN PRACTICE:
'As such, an annual vaccination campaign with a multicomponent vaccine could occur during the seasonal period when the burden of respiratory hospitalizations is the greatest, while allowing for a standalone COVID-19 vaccine option for additional doses or if the vaccine is updated in the interim should any antigenically divergent strain emerge,' the authors wrote.
SOURCE:
This study was led by Amanda K. Rudman Spergel, MD, Moderna Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts. It was published online on May 7, 2025, in JAMA .
LIMITATIONS:
The efficacy of mRNA-1083 was not established in the study and requires further investigation. Although the diversity of the study population mirrored that of the general US population, the results may not be generalizable to other geographic areas.
DISCLOSURES:
This study was funded by Moderna, Inc. Many authors were employees of Moderna and may hold stock or stock options.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Is Desperately Trying to Rig Economic Data in His Favor
On Friday, Donald Trump fired Erika McEntarfer, the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, for the crime of doing her job. Earlier that day, the BLS had released new jobs numbers that showed anemic growth in July—just 73,000 jobs were added—and revised numbers for May and June that showed decreases in total jobs for those months. Overall, the picture was bleak: Just 106,000 jobs added over three months. The president, unsurprisingly, was furious, and as such, immediately began alleging an elaborate and nonsensical conspiracy to undermine his administration. 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump wrote on his bespoke social network Truth Social. McEntarfer wasn't the only federal employee in his sights; he also took the opportunity to lambaste Fed Chair Jerome Powell, who has long been a target of his ire. 'The Economy is BOOMING under TRUMP,' he wrote in a wild run-on sentence with a variety of punctuation, 'despite a Fed that also plays games, this time with Interest Rates, where they lowered them twice, and substantially, just before the Presidential Election, I assume in the hopes of getting 'Kamala' elected—How did that work out? Jerome 'Too Late' Powell should also be put 'out to pasture.' (Powell was appointed by Trump in 2018.) Trump is right, obviously, to be upset about the jobs numbers. They're really bad—the worst numbers since the height of the Covid pandemic. Before that, the last time there were jobs numbers this bad was during the Great Recession. But Trump, although he will never admit it, has no one to blame for the state of the economy but himself. His decision to fire McEntarfer—and, as a result, cast doubt on the reliability of all future data, not just from the Bureau of Labor Statistics but from any economic agency—will only make things worse. After six months of deportations, purges, and chaos, it's easy to forget that the primary reason voters sent Donald Trump back to the White House was their widespread displeasure about post-pandemic inflation, which they blamed on Joe Biden. Prices ballooned during his presidency thanks to a variety of factors—shifts in consumer demand, supply chain disruption, even the war in Ukraine—few of which the administration had any real control over. By the time they stabilized, it was too late for Biden. By the end of his first year in office, a solid majority had concluded that inflation was his fault. It wasn't—but that hardly mattered. Trump won in large part because he was in charge of the economy the last time it was good—in the period leading up the pandemic—and because, for whatever reason, voters didn't blame him when Covid-19 caused it to collapse. There were certainly other factors that played a role in his 2024 victory—Biden's age, his steadfast support for Israel's genocidal war in Gaza, Kamala Harris's decision to run a cautious campaign despite having only 107 days to press her case. But inflation was the primary driver. A lot of voters hated the Biden economy and didn't give the administration credit for getting inflation under control. They wanted something different. They got it. Despite voters' dissatisfaction with it, the economy Trump inherited from Biden was actually pretty good: Unemployment was low, and inflation was under control. In six months, Trump has done everything possible to destroy it. Next Friday will mark the third installment of 'Liberation Day,' the nonsensical tariff regime he has imposed on most of the rest of the world, hitting key allies and trading partners like Canada and the European Union particularly hard. These tariffs have caused the stock market to crash (though it has subsequently rebounded, sort of) and prices to rise, and they have ruptured a world economic order that America built for its own benefit. Many of our closest allies are now rethinking their relationships with the United States. Meanwhile, Trump has brayed about tariffs raking in $150 billion in revenue—a number that sounds big until you remember that it is literally a tax on American citizens. In just six months, the economy looks a lot like it did during the first half of Biden's term: layoffs, inflation, instability. The big difference is that without Trump—and specifically without Trump's tariffs—none of this would be happening. The firing of McEntarfer makes a bad situation significantly worse. It's hard to think of a more unnecessary or more brutal act of economic self-destruction than, in one swoop, to shatter the integrity of the economic data produced by the federal government. If McEntarfer is removed—and it looks like she will be—then every statistic produced during the rest of Trump's term will be suspect. It was already hard to run a business, given the general instability and the insanity of Trump's tariffs. Now, given the lack of reliable economic data, it will be even harder. Five years ago, at the height of the pandemic, Trump attempted to pressure agencies to lower the number of reported Covid-19 cases—all so he could seem like he had things under control. He's now attempting to manipulate jobs numbers in a similar way. It didn't work then. It won't work now.
Newsweek
40 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Bipartisanship Is Alive, and We Governors Are Proving It
Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. In a political era often defined by division, many Americans have stopped expecting their leaders to work together. But across the country, in statehouses and communities far from Washington, cooperation isn't a relic of the past; it's how governors get things done. As the new chair and vice chair of the National Governors Association (NGA), we come from different parties, different regions, and different ideologies. But we stand united in one belief: governing isn't about scoring points, but solving problems. Governors Kevin Stitt and Wes Moore are pictured at the recent National Governors Association (NGA) summer meeting. Governors Kevin Stitt and Wes Moore are pictured at the recent National Governors Association (NGA) summer meeting. Photo Courtesy of the National Governors Association Founded more than a century ago, the NGA remains the only organization representing governors from all 55 states and territories—including Democrats, Republicans, and independents. It doesn't write talking points or campaign ads. It doesn't chase headlines or feed outrage. Its mission is not partisanship, but results. That distinction matters more now than ever. Governors are closest to the people. We're responsible for budgets, schools, roads, disaster response, and public safety. We don't have the luxury of ideological gridlock. We have to deliver every day. The NGA exists to help us do that by bringing leaders together around what unites us: responsibility, pragmatism, and shared purpose. In that spirit, NGA convenes about 100 times a year not only with governors and staff but also with members of Congress, Cabinet members, and other administration officials to engage on the most pressing issues confronting Americans. We know that unity takes work. We also know it works. During the COVID-19 pandemic, governors collaborated through NGA to coordinate health responses and federal support. In recent years, NGA has helped states prepare for infrastructure investments, address the opioid crisis and expand broadband access. This doesn't happen through political speeches, but through quiet coordination and real action. Most recently, NGA has facilitated some of the most effective conversations about permitting reform in our nation. Governors from both sides of the aisle recognize how necessary it is to have a streamlined, effective permitting process to ensure the U.S. continues to lead on the global stage. That's why the NGA operates by consensus. Some criticize that model. We call it a critical mission. It means that when we speak publicly, we speak as one. And when we disagree, we talk to each other. This year, we're launching a joint initiative focused on workforce transformation—building more pathways to careers in cutting-edge fields like energy, AI, and cybersecurity. These are good-paying jobs that are critical for our future. But we hear from too many workers who can't find jobs, and too many employers who can't fill promising positions. It's a matter of training, not talent. And college isn't the only path. To build bridges between Americans seeking good jobs and employers eager to hire them, we've established Good Jobs Funds in our states. And we're inviting other governors to do the same. Leveraging support from state, philanthropic, and federal programs, the Good Jobs initiative is designed to expand proven programs, strengthen employer partnerships, scale what works, and modernize our talent systems. We want to give everyone in our states an on-ramp to live their American Dream—however they define it. This work isn't red or blue; it's critical for our future competitiveness and security. We're also committed to helping all governors, regardless of party, access the tools and resources they need to serve their constituents effectively. We don't pretend to agree on everything. But the NGA proves that disagreement doesn't have to mean dysfunction. That bipartisanship isn't naïve, but necessary. And that cooperation, when done right, is a sign of strength, not weakness. At a time when many Americans feel disillusioned by national politics, we offer this reminder: Governors still lead. Governors still listen. And governors still deliver results. Governor Kevin Stitt is the Republican governor of Oklahoma and the 2025–2026 chair of the National Governors Association. Governor Wes Moore is the Democratic governor of Maryland and the vice chair of the National Governors Association. The views expressed in this article are the writers' own.
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Where the summer COVID-19 infections are hitting hardest
The number of people with COVID-19 in the U.S. is low but increasing, according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data released Friday. COVID-19 is trending up in many Mid-Atlantic, Southeast, Southern, and West Coast states. The agency said infections are 'growing or likely growing' in 40 states, based on emergency department visit data as of July 29. Infections were unchanged in nine states. The weekly percentage of emergency department visits among people diagnosed with COVID-19 is low, but growing, CDC said. Visits were highest for children younger than 4 years old, which experts said makes sense because many remain unvaccinated. WastewaterSCAN, which monitors infectious diseases through municipal wastewater systems, categorized national coronavirus levels as 'high' and trending upward since mid-July. According to CDC, the wastewater viral activity level for coronavirus is currently low, and only Alabama, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, California, Alaska and Texas reported 'high' or 'very high' levels. Experts say a lack of data is making it harder to track COVID-19 in real time, but the available information indicates the expected seasonal wave is happening. Ever since 2020, COVID-19 has peaked twice a year. Cases rise in the winter and drop into the spring, and then again in the summer as travel peaks and people seek air-conditioned indoor spaces away from the heat. While other respiratory viruses remain at low levels until the winter, experts have said COVID-19's ability to mutate sets it apart and contributes to a much higher baseline infection rate. More cases circulating year-round means more opportunities for the virus to mutate. The vaccine being updated for the coming fall season is targeted to the JN.1 variant, as it was last year. But Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has significantly narrowed recommendations on who should get the vaccine, raising significant questions about the availability and affordability come the fall. In May, Kennedy said the shots would no longer be recommended for healthy kids, a decision that health experts have said lacks scientific basis. A coalition of medical groups subsequently sued over the move. In addition, a new policy requires all updated COVID-19 vaccines to undergo extensive placebo-controlled clinical trials, as if it were a new shot rather than an update to one that already exists. The updated Covid shots are expected to be available in the fall to adults 65 and up and kids and adults with at least one medical condition that puts them at risk for severe illness — the groups exempt from the clinical trial requirement.
