logo
What Really Happened to Liberal Men? Why Are They Leaving the Democratic Party?

What Really Happened to Liberal Men? Why Are They Leaving the Democratic Party?

Newsweek5 days ago
Something is quietly happening in American politics: a noticeable number of traditional liberal men are drifting away from the Democratic Party. These aren't far-right converts or angry trolls online. They're everyday guys—teachers, tech workers, dads, artists—who once voted blue without hesitation. And now, many of them are either sitting elections out or reluctantly voting Republican. What changed?
At the heart of this shift is a growing discomfort with how masculinity is talked about on the left. For a while now, terms like "toxic masculinity" have dominated progressive conversations. The original idea behind it—critiquing aggressive or harmful male behavior—was fair and necessary. But somewhere along the line, the term morphed into a broader cultural critique that often paints masculinity itself as dangerous or outdated.
Horizontal photo of a Democratic Party flag with a stylized donkey on top of the U.S. flag.
Horizontal photo of a Democratic Party flag with a stylized donkey on top of the U.S. flag.
Getty Images
Many men who've identified with liberal values for years now feel like they're being told that being male is an obstacle. Traits like confidence, competitiveness, risk-taking, or wanting to provide for a family—things that used to be seen as strengths—are now viewed by some progressive voices as relics of the patriarchy.
Furthermore, liberal men often feel unfairly generalized by prominent liberal women. Blanket statements like "Men are the problem," ignore that many men face real financial, emotional, and social struggles. It's left a lot of men asking: "If my identity and values are unwelcome here, why am I still voting for this party?"
Another major reason for the shift is the rise of lawfare—the use of legal tools and institutions to target individuals, especially men, in ways that feel more political or ideological than fair. Whether it's family court systems that feel stacked against fathers or highly publicized sexual assault cases where guilt is assumed before facts are in, many liberal men feel like due process is being replaced by social punishment. That creates a lot of unease.
The #MeToo movement was an important and overdue reckoning. No one should downplay how necessary it was to hold abusers accountable. But many men now feel like the pendulum has swung too far. They're afraid of being falsely accused, of having a clumsy date or a poorly worded joke ruin their career or social standing. That fear is real, and it's impacting how men relate to women in professional and personal settings. Ironically, it's also hurting women, who are finding men more hesitant to engage, hire, mentor, or even speak freely with.
Cancel culture adds to the anxiety. In a world where a single misstep—or even a misunderstood comment from years ago—can get you publicly shamed or fired, a lot of men have chosen to simply opt out of certain conversations, workplaces, dating rituals, or social groups. They're pulling back, not because they hate progress, but because they're tired of feeling like they're always one sentence away from disaster.
So how do Democrats win these men back?
First, it starts by making room for positive masculinity again. That doesn't mean turning back the clock to some 1950s ideal. It means recognizing that men and women are different—and that's a good thing. Men have their own strengths, just like women do. We should be able to celebrate courage, protection, responsibility, and leadership without suspicion or shame.
The party also needs to move toward a fairer legal culture. Men need to know they'll get a fair hearing in courtrooms, HR departments, and public opinion. That doesn't mean ignoring victims or softening on accountability—it means making sure that justice is based on evidence, not assumptions.
And instead of constantly attacking each other online, Democrats could encourage more honest conversations about dating, relationships, and gender dynamics in general. A lot of people are confused about how to interact in today's social climate, and men especially feel like they're navigating a minefield. Giving people room to ask questions and make mistakes without ruining their lives is a sign of a mature, compassionate society—not a regressive one.
Most importantly, Democrats need to realize that losing liberal men isn't just a cultural issue—it's a political one. These men are still out there, still voting, still caring about big-picture issues like climate change and economic justice. But if they feel dismissed or disrespected, they'll take their votes elsewhere—or just stay home. Neither outcome helps liberals.
Rebuilding that trust doesn't require giving up on feminism or equality. It just requires a shift in tone and approach. It means treating men not as threats, but as partners in building a better world.
If the Democratic Party can do that—if it can speak to men not just as a voting bloc, but as human beings with complex identities and real concerns—then a lot of those lost voters might just come home.
Zoltan Istvan writes and speaks on transhumanism, artificial intelligence, and the future. He is raising two young daughters with his wife in San Francisco.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas dispute highlights nation's long history of partisan gerrymandering. Is it legal?
Texas dispute highlights nation's long history of partisan gerrymandering. Is it legal?

Boston Globe

time15 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Texas dispute highlights nation's long history of partisan gerrymandering. Is it legal?

Who is responsible for gerrymandering? In many states, like Texas, the state legislature is responsible for drawing congressional districts, subject to the approval or veto of the governor. District maps must be redrawn every 10 years, after each census, to balance the population in districts. But in some states, nothing prevents legislatures from conducting redistricting more often. In an effort to limit gerrymandering, some states have entrusted redistricting to special commissions composed of citizens or bipartisan panels of politicians. Democratic officials in some states with commissions are now talking of trying to sidestep them to counter Republican redistricting in Texas. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up How does a gerrymander work? Advertisement If a political party controls both the legislature and governor's office — or has such a large legislative majority that it can override vetoes — it can effectively draw districts to its advantage. One common method of gerrymandering is for a majority party to draw maps that pack voters who support the opposing party into a few districts, thus allowing the majority party to win a greater number of surrounding districts. Another common method is for the majority party to dilute the power of an opposing party's voters by spreading them among multiple districts. Why is it called gerrymandering? The term dates to 1812, when Massachusetts Gov. Elbridge Gerry signed a bill redrawing state Senate districts to benefit the Democratic-Republican Party. Some thought an oddly shaped district looked like a salamander. A newspaper illustration dubbed it 'The Gerry-mander' — a term that later came to describe any district drawn for political advantage. Gerry lost re-election as governor in 1812 but won election that same year as vice president with President James Madison. Advertisement Is political gerrymandering illegal? Not under the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court, in a 2019 case originating from North Carolina, ruled that federal courts have no authority to decide whether partisan gerrymandering goes too far. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote: 'The Constitution supplies no objective measure for assessing whether a districting map treats a political party fairly.' The Supreme Court noted that partisan gerrymandering claims could continue to be decided in state courts under their own constitutions and laws. But some state courts, including North Carolina's highest court, have ruled that they also have no authority to decide partisan gerrymandering claims. Are there any limits on redistricting? Yes. Though it's difficult to challenge legislative districts on political grounds, the Supreme Court has upheld challenges on racial grounds. In a 2023 case from Alabama, the high court said the congressional districts drawn by the state's Republican-led Legislature likely violated the Voting Rights Act by diluting the voting strength of Black residents. The court let a similar claim proceed in Louisiana. Both states subsequently redrew their districts. What does data show about gerrymandering? Statisticians and political scientists have developed a variety of ways to try to quantify the partisan advantage that may be attributable to gerrymandering. Republicans, who control redistricting in more states than Democrats, used the 2010 census data to create a strong gerrymander. An Associated Press analysis of that decade's redistricting found that Republicans enjoyed a greater political advantage in more states than either party had in the past 50 years. Advertisement But Democrats responded to match Republican gerrymandering after the 2020 census. The adoption of redistricting commissions also limited gerrymandering in some states. An AP analysis of the 2022 elections — the first under new maps — found that Republicans won just one more U.S. House seat than would have been expected based on the average share of the vote they received nationwide. That was one of the most politically balanced outcomes in years.

Trump on Sydney Sweeney controversy: If she's Republican, ‘I think her ad is fantastic'
Trump on Sydney Sweeney controversy: If she's Republican, ‘I think her ad is fantastic'

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump on Sydney Sweeney controversy: If she's Republican, ‘I think her ad is fantastic'

President Trump on Sunday weighed in on actor Sydney Sweeney and her recent controversial ad campaign with American Eagle. 'You'd be surprised at how many people are Republicans,' the president said after a reporter stated that the 'White Lotus' and 'Euphoria' star is a registered Republican. 'That's what I wouldn't have known, but I'm glad you told me that. If Sydney Sweeney is a registered Republican, I think her ad is fantastic,' the president said while en route back to Washington on Sunday evening from Bedminster, N.J. BuzzFeed reported over the weekend that Sweeney has been registered to the Republican Party of Florida since June 2024. The ad featuring Sweeney has caused backlash online, with social media users criticizing what they claim are racist undertones surrounding the campaign's message that Sweeney 'has great jeans,' a riff on the idea of 'good genes.' 'Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality, and even eye color,' Sweeney says in one video. 'My jeans are blue.' Vice President Vance mocked critics of the ad in a recent interview, blaming Democrats for those who argue the commercial backs eugenics. 'So you have a pretty girl doing a jeans ad and they can't help but freak out. It reveals a lot more about them than it does us. No question,' Vance said on the 'Ruthless Podcast.' White House communications director Steven Cheung pointed to the backlash as an example of 'cancel culture run amok.' The Hill has reached out to a contact for Sweeney for comment. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Texas and California joust for political advantage

time28 minutes ago

Texas and California joust for political advantage

AUSTIN, Texas -- The nation's two most populous states — California and Texas — grappled for political advantage in advance of 2026 elections that could reorder the balance of power in Washington and threaten President Donald Trump's agenda at the midpoint of his second term. In Texas, Democrats on Monday prevented their state's House of Representatives from moving forward, at least for now, with a redrawn congressional map sought by Trump to shore up Republicans' 2026 midterm prospects as his political standing falters. In California, Democrats encouraged by Gov. Gavin Newsom are considering new political maps that could slash five Republican-held House seats in the liberal-leaning state while bolstering Democratic incumbents in other battleground districts. The move is intended to undercut any GOP gains in Texas, potentially swinging House control and giving Democrats a counterweight to Trump on Capitol Hill. A draft plan aims to boost the Democratic margin in California to 48 of 52 congressional seats, according to a source familiar with the plan who was not authorized to discuss it publicly. That's up from the 43 seats the party now holds. It would need approval from lawmakers and voters, who may be skeptical to give it after handing redistricting power to an independent commission years ago. The rivalry puts a spotlight on two states that for years have dueled over jobs, innovation, prestige — even sports — with the backdrop of clashing political visions — one progressive, one conservative. After dozens of Democrats left Texas, the Republican-dominated House was unable to establish the quorum of lawmakers required to do business. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott has made threats about removing members who are absent from their seats. Democrats counter that Abbott is using 'smoke and mirrors' to assert legal authority he does not have. The House quickly issued civil arrest warrants for absent Democrats and Abbott ordered state troopers to help find and arrest them, but lawmakers physically outside Texas are beyond the jurisdiction of state authorities. 'If you continue to go down this road, there will be consequences," House Speaker Rep. Dustin Burrows said from the chamber floor, later telling reporters that includes fines. Democrats' revolt and Abbott's threats intensified a fight over congressional maps that began in Texas but now includes Democratic governors who have pitched redrawing their district maps in retaliation — even if their options are limited. The dispute also reflects Trump's aggressive view of presidential power and his grip on the Republican Party nationally, while testing the longstanding balance of powers between the federal government and individual states. The impasse centers on Trump's effort to get five more GOP-leaning congressional seats in Texas, at Democrats' expense, before the midterms. That would bolster his party's chances of preserving its fragile U.S. House majority, something Republicans were unable to do in the 2018 midterms during Trump's first presidency. Republicans currently hold 25 of Texas' 38 seats. That's nearly a 2-to-1 advantage and already a wider partisan gap than the 2024 presidential results: Trump won 56.1% of Texas ballots, while Democrat Kamala Harris received 42.5%. According to the tentative California proposal, districts now held by Republican Reps. Ken Calvert, Darrell Issa, Kevin Kiley, David Valadao and Doug LaMalfa would see right-leaning voters shaved and Democratic voters boosted in a shift that would make it likely a left-leaning candidate would prevail in each race. In battleground districts held by Democratic Reps. Dave Min, Mike Levin and Derek Tran, the party's edge would be boosted to strengthen their hold on the seats, the source said. Democratic members of California's congressional delegation were briefed on the new map on Monday, according to a person familiar with the meeting who requested anonymity to discuss private conversations. The proposal is being circulated at the same time that Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom has said he wants to advance partisan redistricting. He says he won't move ahead if Texas pauses its efforts. Newsom said he'd call a special election for the first week of November. Voters would weigh a new congressional map drawn by the Democratic-controlled Legislature. 'California will not sit by idly and watch this democracy waste away,' Newsom said Monday. More than 1,800 miles (2,900 kilometers) from Austin, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul appeared with Texas Democrats and argued their cause is national. 'We're not going to tolerate our democracy being stolen in a modern-day stagecoach heist by a bunch of law-breaking cowboys,' Hochul said Monday. 'If Republicans are willing to rewrite rules to give themselves an advantage, then they're leaving us with no choice: We must do the same. You have to fight fire with fire.' In Texas, legislators who left the state declined to say how long they'll hold out. 'We recognized when we got on the plane that we're in this for the long haul,' said Rep. Trey Martinez Fischer while in Illinois. Texas House Democratic Caucus leader Gene Wu said members 'will do whatever it takes' but added, 'What that looks like, we don't know.' Legislative walkouts often only delay passage of a bill, like in 2021, when many Democrats left Texas for 38 days to protest proposed voting restrictions. Once they returned, Republicans passed that measure. Lawmakers cannot pass bills in the 150-member House without two-thirds of members present. Democrats hold 62 seats in the majority-Republican chamber, and at least 51 left the state, according to a Democratic aide. The Texas Supreme Court held in 2021 that House leaders could 'physically compel the attendance' of missing members, but no Democrats were forcibly brought back to the state after warrants were served. Republicans answered by adopting $500 daily fines for lawmakers who don't show. Abbott, meanwhile, continues to make unsubstantiated claims that some lawmakers have committed felonies by soliciting money to pay for potential fines for leaving Texas during the session. ___

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store