University Of Auckland Vice-Chancellor To Step Down In 2026
Professor Dawn Freshwater has raised the Universitys profile internationally among peers in higher education and research, and alongside Prime Ministers and political leaders on overseas missions.
Professor Dawn Freshwater will step down from her role as Vice-Chancellor at Waipapa Taumata Rau, University of Auckland after nearly six years in office.
Professor Dawn Freshwater became the University's first female Vice-Chancellor in March 2020 on the eve of the Covid-19 pandemic. She successfully guided the University through a swift transition to online teaching, enabling domestic students and offshore international students to continue their studies.
University Chancellor Cecilia Tarrant said Professor Freshwater has worked tirelessly in the face of extraordinary times for the tertiary education sector and will leave the University in a position of strength.
'Under Professor Freshwater's leadership, the University has sustained its global positioning as a top-100 University (QS 65), maintained solid financials in an increasingly complex national and global context, increased domestic and international student numbers, and, in particular, seen significant growth in postgraduate students.
'During Covid-19, Professor Freshwater supported an extensive staff process to develop a new vision and strategy: Taumata Teitei Vision 2030 and Strategic Plan 2025, which was updated in 2024. This launched a significant transformation agenda, which has been realised in the years since.
'We are grateful that Professor Freshwater has given us an extended notice period. This will allow the University to commence a full international search for a new Vice-Chancellor, while maintaining our momentum.''
Professor Freshwater has led the University with a focus on excellence. This has seen a growing number of academics recognised among the top two percent of researchers in the world, of which she is one. Notable developments include research partnerships through Horizon Europe, the success of the Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship and the development of the Newmarket Innovation Precinct.
Ensuring the nation's leading University offers students a positive, rewarding, and quality experience was a priority for the Vice-Chancellor. The University of Auckland is ranked No. 1 in the country for graduate employability, and this year's opening of the partially student-funded Hiwa Recreation Centre was a further highlight. She is currently leading the University's response to the challenges and opportunities presented by the accelerated adoption of AI.
The Vice-Chancellor commented that 'It is critical for the University of Auckland to remain a comprehensive university, offering students a wide range of options and undertaking research across all disciplines. I believe, unlike many parts of a polarising world, that New Zealanders continue to value what we offer our communities and broader society.'
Professor Freshwater commented on cuts to research funding, particularly for the humanities and social sciences. 'The nature of the world's great challenges requires contributions from all disciplines to address them, and that we must not lose sight of people as the world advances through technology.'
The outgoing Vice-Chancellor has also commented globally on the challenges facing universities and university leadership, particularly the complex international issues impacting staff and students and misinformation and disinformation. She has described the importance of moral courage in navigating this environment.
Professor Freshwater has raised the University's profile internationally among peers in higher education and research, and alongside Prime Ministers and political leaders on overseas missions. She has also forged city partnerships, notably with Eden Park, the Auckland Business Chamber and others that reflect the institution's commitment to Tāmaki Mākaurau.
Professor Freshwater chairs Universities NZ's Research Committee and serves as the deputy chair of Research Australia. She is a globally recognised leader, Chair of APRU, Director of U21, and a sought-after speaker at higher education conferences around the world.
The University expects to formally farewell Professor Freshwater in the first half of 2026.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
'Butter Is Expensive Right Now. There's No Getting Away From That' - Finance Minister Nicola Willis
The Finance Minister does not believe New Zealanders are getting a "raw deal" on butter, but has accepted there is no getting away from how expensive it is right now. Nicola Willis met with Fonterra's chief executive Miles Hurrell at Parliament on Tuesday evening. While the two meet regularly, there was increased interest in the meeting due to the current price of butter. Willis had earlier said it was something she would discuss with Hurrell. Characterising the meeting as "constructive and engaging," Willis said Hurrell was candid about the way butter was priced in New Zealand. Her summarisation of her meeting with Fonterra largely zeroed in on her drive to increase supermarket competition. The large proportion of what people pay for butter is dictated by global demand, which is something the government could not control. "Were that price to come down, you would expect that to be reflected in the prices that New Zealand shoppers pay," Willis said. Hurrell had told her that butter had once been the hardest product for Fonterra to sell globally, but the increasing demand was due to reporting on its health benefits. "It was once viewed as a bogeyman," she said. The meeting had reinforced Willis' interest in increasing supermarket competition to put downward pressure on the price of butter. "All roads lead back to supermarket competition. I continue to believe that is the most powerful lever that the government has on this issue. We will never be able to control global dairy prices. What we can influence is the amount of competition in New Zealand's grocery sector and we have a lot of work underway to address that." Fonterra had also observed the supermarket competition. "Miles specifically conveyed that Fonterra operates in a number of markets around the world, most of which have a more competitive supermarket sector, and that it does feel different in New Zealand." She would leave it to supermarkets and Fonterra to argue who was charging what margin. "The sense that I got from my engagement with Miles is that it's a constant battle between them. Each party are probably going to point fingers at the other." Hurrell would not answer questions when RNZ approached him outside Parliament on Tuesday night, but a Fonterra spokesperson said the meeting was "constructive". Willis said she had encouraged Hurrell to front, in particular to explain what proportion of the margins go to Fonterra and what goes to supermarkets. Acknowledging that Fonterra's job was to get the best possible price for its shareholders, Willis also accepted New Zealanders saw the downsides of that when they were shopping. "I've been satisfied that I don't think consumers are getting a raw deal. I think that there is good work going on to ensure that there is pressure and competition from Fonterra to try and keep its prices low. But I get it. Butter is expensive right now. There's no getting away from that."
Techday NZ
3 hours ago
- Techday NZ
New Zealand's place in global cyber defence - From medieval knights to cybercriminals
During World War I, the British Expeditionary Force was the first military unit to cross the English Channel. This highly trained army featuring cavalry armed with lances, sabres, and rifles was the last reminder of medieval warfare. They were quickly brought low by machine guns, barbed wire and trenches. By the time the war ended, a mere 13 years after the invention of flight, the skies were filled with fighter planes. Conflict quickly reveals what works and what doesn't. In 2025, global instability has reshaped the battlefield once again. This time, it's digital. The rise of digital guerilla warfare We are witnessing a new kind of conflict: digital guerrilla war. This is where decentralised cybercriminal groups are being funded by shadowy nation states to carry out cyber-attacks. These hidden attackers "live off the land" by using legitimate tools to infiltrate systems and strike when least expected. Government entities are frequent targets, but private and listed companies are just as vulnerable. A major attack on them wouldn't just impact businesses, it could affect national stability and disrupt the economy. New Zealand, like the rest of the world, is locked in a cyber battle where threats can come from anywhere, at any time. Today, the front line is everywhere. This might sound excessive and overdramatic, but that's the reality all business leaders need to understand. A key concept in cyber security is that the investment to prevent harm should be in proportion to the needs of the business. But for many businesses, simple technology choices supported by people and processes are enough to mitigate most threats. But some organisations play integral roles in society and we can't afford for them not have the best security procedures in place. The Government must lead on critical infrastructure Critical infrastructure faces a much bigger threat. Last year, the United States Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), found proof that a state backed cyber security group, Volt Typhoon, had secretly infiltrated critical infrastructure providers across the Western world. Their goal? To cause disruption at a key moment. Another group, backed by the same nation-state, Salt Typhoon, has infiltrated nine major U.S. telecoms, accessing call data, text messages, and even recordings of prominent national leaders. New Zealanders have a right to know that our infrastructure is being protected, and that the government is investing in national cyber defence before disaster strikes. Cyber threats are no longer just a business problem; they're a national security issue. Is New Zealand doing enough to protect its critical infrastructure? Right now, the answer is no. We're at risk of falling behind. In late 2024, Australia passed sweeping cybersecurity legislation to harden national defences. The new laws require industries to uphold high security standards and give the government powers to intervene in the event of a serious breach. These reforms came in the wake of a string of devastating cyber incidents, including major data breaches at Medibank, Optus, and Latitude Finance in 2022 and 2023. The Latitude breach alone became the second largest in Australian history and the most damaging for citizens. It was also New Zealand's largest-ever data breach, exposing the personal information of 20% of our population. Australia has been put serious effort into building its cyber posture at a national level, with a vision of being a global leader in cybersecurity by 2030. In a world reliant on digital infrastructure, this will be a key competitive advantage. New Zealand has the chance to tell the same story, but only if we act soon. That's why we need the government to enact legislation that will protect our country and people. I appreciate developing legislation is not trivial, but the template has been created in Australia and it's in everyone's interest to reflect that over here. This will require some businesses to invest more to become compliant, but that's the point, that we all incur comparable costs to achieve a common standard. Cyber security is complex to understand. Humans evolved to recognise that a warrior charging at you is a threat, not a remote network of industrialised guerilla fighters with keyboards, backed by nations hiding their true intent. New Zealand must not wait until we're reacting to disaster. We need a nationally unified, proactive cyber defence to protect our people, businesses, and critical systems before it's too late.
NZ Herald
5 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Swann reflects on Gisborne's Rugby Park redevelopment, surge in player numbers
Swann said the success of locally born-and-bred Black Ferns and Black Ferns Sevens players such as Renee Holmes, Charmaine McMenamin, Kaipo Olsen-Baker and Kelsey Teneti also promoted women's rugby and showed there was a pathway for talented players. He said Horowhenua-Kāpiti was the only one of the other 25 unions to match Poverty Bay's increased player numbers, which came at a time of economic challenges and growing competition from other codes. The Covid-19 era was another testing time, Swann said. 'We were still having matches. Rugby was operating in a bubble. We worked so hard. It was really, really hard to keep going, but we did. 'We were wiping down posts and pads. We were wiping everything. We were breaking people down into groups, but we got there.' Gisborne's Kelsey Teneti in action for New Zealand against France at the Singapore 7s earlier this year. The success of Teneti and other Gisborne-connected female players is a factor in the increase in female player numbers in Tairāwhiti, says Hayden Swann in reflecting on his tenure as Poverty Bay Rugby Football Union chairman. Photo / Jayne Russell, Photosport The annual report said the Rugby Park redevelopment had been impacted significantly by the Covid-19 pandemic, Cyclone Gabrielle and inflation. But the union decided to develop 'our ageing asset' and the $12.5 million grandstand redevelopment, originally costed at $8m, had been fully funded by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment/ Kanoa Regional Economic Development and Investment Unit and Trust Tairāwhiti. Swann told the Herald the union was showing huge profits for the past two years of around $2.5 million, 'which of course' related to capital project funding for the grandstand redevelopment which had not yet been spent. 'It is not a real profit.' But the union had made an operating profit in 2024 of $45,000. Swann attributed that to an increase in commercial revenue and New Zealand Rugby (NZR) funding being boosted because of increased player registrations. The union retained strong relationships with local sponsors and funders and took a conservative approach to spending, resulting in more revenue and less spending in 2024, he said. The union was now endeavouring to 'put money away'. Swann said interest earned from the union's $500,000 share of the Silverlake equity payout to NZR would be ring-fenced for maintaining assets and would not be spent on staffing or operations. The union wanted to avoid the example of other sporting infrastructure in the district ageing to a point where it was not fit-for-purpose. The grandstand was due for completion next June and would result in a significant uplift in the equity of the union. Swann said the union had assets of only $321,000 back in 2018 and recorded a deficit of $129,000. Swann, who has stepped aside after serving as an independent member of the PBRFU board for the maximum period of three three-year terms (seven years as chairman), said his nine years had been the most rewarding and enjoyable time of any organisation he had served on. 'Being chairman is a privileged position because you are working for New Zealand Rugby,' the Makaraka School principal said. 'There are 25 other provincial union chairmen [and] you learn from their knowledge, experience and capabilities. 'Rugby is such a neat network and such a giving network.' The new union chairman is Trust Tairāwhiti general manager economic development Hayden Green.
