Former SEBI chief Madhabi Puri Buch gets clean chit from Lokpal; No credible evidence from complainants
The complaints alleged corruption and quid pro quo involving the former SEBI chief and the Adani Group.
The Lokpal in its findings stated that it found 'no credible evidence' of any 'undue advantage' or 'quid pro quo'.
The findings further said that SEBI's processes, including investigations involving Adani and others, were upheld by the Supreme Court and handled by independent institutional mechanisms.
The Lokpal asserted that the past investments and consultancy incomes were adequately disclosed, legitimate, and outside the scope of corruption statutes and the report of Hindenburg, a known short-seller, was not deemed reliable or sufficient to base a corruption case.
The Lokpal order affirms that the allegations of regulatory favouritism involving the Adani Group were 'completely baseless.'
In its order, the Lokpal viewed the Hindenburg Report as an 'unreliable' and 'partisan' document authored by a known short-seller.
In its report published in August 2024, US-based short seller Hindenburg Research made allegations against Madhavi Puri Buch, accusing her of a conflict of interest.
Hindenburg Research had also alleged that SEBI Chairperson Madhabi Puri Buch and her husband Dhaval Buch had stakes in 'both the obscure offshore entities used in the Adani money siphoning scandal.'
SEBI Chairperson Madhabi Puri Buch and her husband Dhaval Buch had termed the allegations labelled against them as 'false, incorrect, malicious and motivated'.
The Adani Group had also termed the allegations as malicious, mischievous, and manipulative selections of publicly available information to arrive at pre-determined conclusions for 'personal profiteering with wanton disregard for facts and the law.'
It is publicly known that Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Mahua Moitra and former IPS officer Amitabh Thakur had filed complaints with the Lokpal, seeking a probe into the former SEBI chief's case. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
30 minutes ago
- India Today
Not acceptable: Top Trump aide accuses India of financing Russia's war in Ukraine
A top aide to US President Donald Trump criticised India for buying Russian oil, accusing the country of indirectly funding Russia's war in Ukraine. This comes as the Trump administration intensifies pressure on nations that continue purchasing oil from Miller, one of Trump's most influential advisors, said that Trump clearly believes India should stop buying Russian oil. "What he (Trump) said very clearly is that it is not acceptable for India to continue financing this war by purchasing oil from Russia," Miller said on Sunday Morning seemed surprised at the scale of India's oil trade with Russia. On Fox News, he said, "People will be shocked to learn that India is basically tied with China in purchasing Russian oil. That's an astonishing fact." Despite the US pressure, India has shown no sign of stopping its purchases. According to the news agency Reuters, Indian government sources said they will continue to import oil from Miller tempered his criticism by noting Trump's relationship with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, which he described as "tremendous."TRUMP SLAPS TARIFFS ON INDIAOn July 30, Donald Trump announced a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods and warned of potential penalties over India's purchase of Russian arms and oil. Immediately after the tariff announcement, Trump launched a blistering attack on New Delhi's ties with Moscow, dismissing both countries as "dead economies" and bluntly stating that he "does not care" what India does with has said he would consider imposing steep tariffs -- as high as 100% -- on imports from any country that continues to purchase oil from Russia unless Russia agrees to peace deal with TRADE WITH MOSCOW POINT OF IRRITATION: RUBIOWhile US Secretary of State Marco Rubio also criticised India's growing ties with Moscow. He called India a "strategic partner" but said its ongoing oil trade with Russia is a "point of irritation" in US-India imports of Russian oil have grown rapidly over the past few years. According to Reuters, before the Ukraine war in 2021, only 3% of India's oil came from Russia. That number has now jumped to between 35% and 40% of its total oil imports.- EndsWith inputs from Agencies Must Watch
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Gujarat races ahead in IPO rush, tops Q1 listings and fundraising
Ahmedabad: Gujarat has surged ahead in the IPO race, topping the charts for the highest number of listings in the first quarter of FY26. A total of 14 companies from the state went public across the NSE and BSE platforms, collectively raising over Rs 3,495 crore, edging out heavyweights like Maharashtra and Delhi. Data from the National Stock Exchange (NSE) shows that nine Gujarat-based firms listed on both the mainboard and NSE Emerge, mobilised Rs 3,374 crore during April-June 2025. Maharashtra matched Gujarat in terms of the number of NSE listings but trailed slightly in proceeds at Rs 3,300 crore. Meanwhile, four companies from the NCT of Delhi raised the highest capital among states, mopping up Rs 3,657 crore. On the BSE SME platform, Gujarat again led in terms of company count, with five firms raising Rs 121.6 crore, nearly a third of the total SME IPOs during the quarter. "Among the companies listed in Q1, Gujarat led with the highest number of nine listings, reflecting the state's growing dominance in capital market activity," the NSE noted. You Can Also Check: Ahmedabad AQI | Weather in Ahmedabad | Bank Holidays in Ahmedabad | Public Holidays in Ahmedabad Nationally, the sectoral breakdown of IPO activity reveals broad-based investor interest in sectors such as industrials, consumer discretionary, and energy. The industrial sector led with 13 companies raising Rs 2,176 crore, followed by consumer discretionary players, who raised a whopping Rs 9,033 crore from eight firms — the highest in terms of proceeds. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why Seniors Are Snapping Up This TV Box, We Explain! Techno Mag Learn More Undo The energy sector saw just two listings, but raised a sizeable Rs 2,873 crore, putting it second in terms of capital raised. According to BSE SME data, 12 companies listed on the exchange's SME platform in Q1, raising a cumulative Rs 387.26 crore. Gujarat led with five listings, followed by Maharashtra, Haryana, Delhi and Uttar Pradesh. Vaibhav Shah, director at the Association of National Exchanges Members of India (ANMI), attributed the trend to strong governance and rising equity awareness among Gujarat's entrepreneurs. "Gujarat-based companies have seen rapid growth in recent years. Many are now eyeing aggressive expansion, and IPOs are the natural route. Strong governance frameworks and a solid understanding of equity markets are driving the surge in SME IPOs," he said. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC upholds ITAT order granting 80G approval to Raipur-based society
Raipur: In a significant judgment, the Chhattisgarh High Court upheld a decision by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) that allowed a Raipur-based society to receive tax exemption benefits under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. The court ruled that since the society already had a valid registration under Section 12AA—which confirms its charitable status—the Income Tax Department could not deny 80G approval by questioning its activities. The court dismissed the department's appeal, stating that the ITAT followed legal precedent and committed no error in granting the relief. The High Court ruled that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) was correct in directing that a society should be granted approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as long as its registration under Section 12AA of the Act is in existence. The court dismissed an appeal filed by the Income Tax Department, stating that no illegality or irregularity was committed by the ITAT in setting aside an order from the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT). Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 provides tax deductions to individuals and companies who donate to charitable institutions and funds in India, while Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 deals with the registration of trusts and other charitable or religious institutions to avail tax exemptions on their income. The case involves a society that applied for approval under Section 80G of the Act on 28 Feb 2014. The CIT, Raipur, rejected the application on 25 Aug 2014, finding that the society was engaged in commercial activities and could not be considered a charitable organisation. The CIT noted that the society was running institutes on commercial lines, took large bank loans for infrastructure, and rented out its buildings for commercial purposes. The society filed an appeal with the ITAT, Raipur Bench, which allowed the appeal on 15 Jan 2019. The ITAT set aside the CIT's order and directed that the society be granted approval under Section 80G. The Income Tax Department, challenging the ITAT's decision, argued that the tribunal failed to appreciate that the society was providing vocational education for a fee, which it said did not qualify as "education" under Section 2(15) of the Act. The department contended that the society's work was commercial and not charitable. Counsels for the society, Sumesh Bajaj and Rishabh Bajaj, supported the ITAT's order. They argued that benefits under Section 80G of the Act cannot be denied if registration under Section 12AA is valid and has not been cancelled. They stated that the society's registration was renewed until Assessment Year 2026-27. The counsel cited judgments from the Supreme Court and the High Courts of Gujarat and Punjab and Haryana to support their arguments. After hearing both sides and reviewing the orders, Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha and Justice Bibhu Datta Guru ruled in favour of the society. The court noted that the ITAT's decision was based on a precedent from the Gujarat High Court, which held that once registration under Section 12AA of the Act is granted, the benefits cannot be denied. The court observed that the department had not presented any material to show that the decision relied upon by the ITAT was set aside by a higher judicial forum. It held that the ITAT had not committed any illegality or irregularity. The High Court answered the substantial question of law in favour of the respondent and against the appellant. It upheld the ITAT's decision, ruling that as long as the registration under Section 12AA of the Act is in existence, the Income Tax Department cannot make a further enquiry into the genuineness of the society's activities and whether they are charitable. The appeal filed by the Income Tax Department was dismissed. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
