Countries have a duty to fight climate change, court says
The ICJ decision "confirms that states' obligations to protect human rights require taking measures to protect the climate system ... including mitigation and adaptation measures," judge Hilary Charlesworth, an Australian member of the court, said in a separate opinion.
"The ICJ's decision brings us closer to a world where governments can no longer turn a blind eye to their legal responsibilities," Vishal Prasad, director of the Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change, said. "It affirms a simple truth of climate justice: those who did the least to fuel this crisis deserve protection , reparations and a future". The 133-page opinion was in response to two questions that the United Nations General Assembly put to the UN court: what are countries obliged to do under international law to protect the climate and environment from human-caused greenhouse gas emissions; and what are the legal consequences for governments when their acts, or lack of action, have significantly harmed the climate and environment? Vanuatu Minister for Climate Change Adaptation Ralph Regenvanu called the deliberation a "very important course correction in this critically important time".
"For the first time in history, the ICJ has spoken directly about the biggest threat facing humanity," he said at The Hague.
Judge Iwasawa said the two questions "represent more than a legal problem: they concern an existential problem of planetary proportions that imperils all forms of life and the very health of our planet". "International law, whose authority has been invoked by the General Assembly, has an important but ultimately limited role in resolving this problem," he said. "A complete solution to this daunting, and self-inflicted, problem requires the contribution of all fields of human knowledge, whether law, science, economics or any other. "Above all, a lasting and satisfactory solution requires human will and wisdom — at the individual, social and political levels — to change our habits, comforts and current way of life in order to secure a future for ourselves and those who are yet to come."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
2 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Pro-Palestinian Harbour Bridge protest case to face Supreme Court at midday
Thousands of people were expected to join the Sydney Harbour Bridge procession on Sunday opposing Israel's bombardment of the blockaded enclave, before police confirmed they would not permit it. Organising group Palestine Action Group Sydney has vowed to rally regardless, without specifying where, of the court outcome, ending a Facebook post with "whatever happens, see you on Sunday". Premier Chris Minns, who has blamed demonstrators for draining police resources for nearly two years in their facilitation of weekly protests in the city's centre, said he "cannot allow Sydney to descend into chaos". NSW has a permit system that allows protest participants to block public roads and infrastructure, but police can go to court to deny permission. But in an open letter, lawyers have again questioned NSW's protest laws and argued they run contrary to Australia's civil rights obligations under an international treaty. "As a party to the core United Nations human rights treaties, Australia has recognised that freedom of assembly is a fundamental human right and, in consequence, NSW must protect it," Australian Lawyers for Human Rights vice president Kerry Weste said. "The right of peaceful assembly extends to all gatherings for peaceful purposes, wherever they take place. and regardless of whether they occur in the form of demonstrations, protests, meetings, processions, rallies, sit-ins, candle-lit vigils or even flash mobs." The bridge has previously been shut including for a reconciliation rally in 2000 which attracted more than 250,000 people, a World Pride event with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's participation and a Hollywood film production. The number of Palestinians killed during Israel's post-October-7 assault on the enclave is more than 60,000, according to local health authorities. Since the war began, the Gaza health ministry has recorded 156 deaths from starvation and malnutrition, most of them in recent weeks, including at least 90 children. Dozens have also been killed by Israeli fire across the enclave in the last 24 hours, including 12 people among crowds who had gathered to receive aid, Gaza health authorities said. The Israeli military said its troops had fired warning shots to disperse crowds, and had not identified any casualties. Confronted by rising international outrage over images of starving children, Israel said on Sunday it would halt military operations for 10 hours a day in parts of Gaza and designate secure routes for convoys delivering food and medicine. SBS News reported this week that Israel's Ambassador to Australia Amir Maimon and deputy chief of mission Amir Meron were called in for a meeting with the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT).
ABC News
17 hours ago
- ABC News
NSW farmers fear job cuts at DPIRD could leave them open to biosecurity threats
Farmers fear proposed cuts to research and development roles at the NSW Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) could leave the state vulnerable to biosecurity and climate threats. The NSW government on Tuesday announced plans to cut 165 jobs from the department, equating to a 4 per cent reduction in staff. The Public Service Association (PSA) told the ABC 55 of those jobs would be from the DPIRD's agriculture and biosecurity teams. Farmers in the north of the state are concerned the cuts will leave the agriculture industry open to biosecurity threats at a state and federal level. Toorooka cattle farmer David Duff pointed to biosecurity issues producers were already facing. "We've had varroa mite, we've had tropical soda apple and we've got red fire ants that are on the march over the border down into New South Wales," he said. "If you haven't got the staff on the ground to be able to implement biosecurity measures when we have outbreaks of whatever it is, the consequences to primary industry production are massive, and then to the country." Mr Duff said safeguarding the agriculture industry needed to be a priority. Moree-based NSW Farmers Association vice president Rebecca Reardon said the job cuts were a "short-sighted" move and fewer boots on the ground could be "devastating" for biosecurity in the state. "We've got so many challenges in agriculture — around climate change, input costs, biosecurity threats, pressure to decrease emissions, productivity issues — that to cut back on research when we're aiming to be a $30 billion output industry just seems very short-sighted on the government's part," Ms Reardon said. She said with threats such as lumpy skin disease and mad cow disease "on the back doorstep," maintaining strong biosecurity was vital. "Any savings they make by cutting staff and those on the ground, well they'll be blown out of the water if we have one of these incursions," Ms Reardon said. DPIRD secretary Steve Orr previously told the ABC the job cuts were set to affect roles that were made permanent despite only having temporary funding, back office administrative roles and duplicate management positions across several divisions. He said there would not be an impact on frontline services offered by the department. The Wollongbar Primary Industries Institute, which tests soil and water quality following floods and fires, will be significantly impacted by the cuts. The PSA said all 12 to 13 jobs at the institute's environmental lab would be lost. Earlier this week, a DPIRD spokesperson said there would be no changes to its office locations and all impacted staff would have the opportunity to be redeployed across the department or other parts of the NSW public service. The union said the planned relocation of the environment lab, from northern NSW to Wagga Wagga in the state's south-west, would complicate the redeployment of its staff. Greens MP and rice farmer Sue Higginson said she had seen firsthand the research and development work conducted at the site. "We can't afford any job losses in our region right now, particularly ones that are doing this kind of deeper scientific research about how to build our resilience, how to understand our changing climate and how we adapt," she said. The ABC has contacted the NSW Agriculture Minister Tara Moriarty and Lismore MP Janelle Saffin for comment. Mr Orr was also contacted for further comment.
ABC News
a day ago
- ABC News
Tax fossil fuel exports or risk losing revenue to other nations, says Zali Steggall
Climate change has been left on the sidelines of the government's upcoming productivity roundtable, Zali Steggall warns, as she pitches a proposal to ensure Australia collects on fossil fuel exports rather than foreign nations. The federal government is hosting the event in search of new solutions to overcome Australia's falling productivity, which risks limiting incomes and the overall quality of life for Australians. Ms Steggall said climate change was already hurting the economy and weighing on the federal budget, pointing to record-breaking floods in NSW and Queensland earlier this year and the ongoing algal bloom in South Australia, killing marine life in the thousands. "I have been discussing with a number of ministers the need for climate resilience to be at that roundtable, there is no productivity without resilience," Ms Steggall said. "Let's be really clear, as soon as climate risk hits, productivity is down to zero. You can't really talk about a strong future Australian economy without the resilience piece underpinning everything." Ms Steggall said a $10 billion climate resilience fund that could invest in infrastructure to mitigate the impact of climate disasters would help to limit local economies from grinding to a halt when disasters struck. Her pitch follows a visit to parliament by the United Nations' chief climate diplomat, Simon Stiell, who warned climate disasters were already costing Australian home owners $4 billion a year, but that Australia could reap "colossal" rewards by embracing clean energy. One of the key measures Ms Steggall proposes is for Australia to get the jump on collecting revenue from an emissions price on exported fossil fuel prices, instead of that being collected by a foreign nation. She said the revenue from that could help to pay for the proposed resilience fund without burdening taxpayers. Known as 'carbon border adjustment mechanisms', several nations, including the European Union and the United Kingdom, are moving to establish levies at the border on polluting imports, priced based on the emissions intensity of those products. But those levies only collect where emissions have not been priced in earlier in the supply chain. While Australia's 'safeguard mechanism' requires the biggest polluting industries to progressively cut their direct emissions over time, and penalises them for each gram of emissions over a set amount, it does not apply to emissions resulting from products exported for consumption overseas, exposing those goods to possible levies imposed by foreign nations. Ms Steggall said that rather than emissions price revenue being collected overseas, Australia should introduce its own fossil fuel export levy, set at the same effective emissions price as the safeguard mechanism, so that revenue was not lost. "The EU's is due to come into effect in 2026, other jurisdictions in 2027, so it's not like this is something that's not happening around the world … we don't have the luxury of time," Ms Steggall said. In exchange, the Sydney MP proposes Australia should also introduce its own levy at the border to level the playing field for domestic industries, so they are not having to unfairly compete with imported products that do not have to pay an emissions price. Australian National University economist Emma Aisbett, who helped to develop Ms Steggall's pitch, said the mechanisms could help to drive new clean industries. "The whole point is Australia has a huge opportunity to grow industries that we have struggled with traditionally, like steel, because we can make clean and green steel," Dr Aisbett said. "Australia, despite being the world's biggest iron ore exporter, actually imports all of its steel … it's really about enabling an environment for growing those clean industries." A government-commissioned review investigating the feasibility of a carbon border adjustment mechanism, particularly concerning steel and cement, is due to be handed to the government later this year. Dr Aisbett said, unlike market-distorting tariffs, a carbon border adjustment was designed to make it fair for those already paying a carbon price domestically, with those importing products into the country. Federal and state governments have committed billions of dollars collectively to incentivise home owners to take up more energy-efficient products, rooftop solar, and batteries — including federal Labor's election promise to establish a $3 billion subsidy to household batteries. But Ms Steggall said there were opportunities for the government to change rules that were causing roadblocks for renters, landlords, apartment owners, and strata companies who want to adopt renewable and energy-efficient technologies. As an example, she said exemptions for stratas in the government's battery subsidy scheme were limiting opportunities to make apartments more efficient. "We need to look at some of the regulatory roadblocks — it's not just about subsidies, it is sometimes that the regulations don't permit," Ms Steggall said. "It seems counterproductive. There is still a process of picking winners and losers." She said the National Construction Code should also be updated so that new builds were made energy efficient and resilient to climate change. Ms Steggall also suggested tax breaks, such as negative gearing, could be limited where rental properties did not meet minimum energy standards — using an already existing subsidy to drive an outcome desired by the government. Ms Steggall's proposals will be submitted alongside a raft of ideas from industry, unions, community groups, and other politicians to next month's roundtable. She hoped the government, with its massive majority in parliament, would consider the opportunity it has to do more than just tinker around the edges. But Ms Steggall also joined several other voices who have expressed skepticism over whether the government was entering the event with a pre-determined plan already in mind. "I hope this is not a situation where they have got a policy setting they want to go in and they're reverse-engineering a roundtable to suit their purposes," she said. "I certainly hope the treasurer and the prime minister look at this term of government with their big majority to genuinely be change makers."
