Malegaon blast verdict: Victims' kin to challenge acquittal of Pragya Thakur, others in High Court
"We will file an appeal independently," the advocate told ANI. | Follow LIVE Updates on the Malegaon Blast Verdict here
An NIA special court on Thursday acquitted all 7 accused, including former MP Sadhvi Pragya, Major (retired) Ramesh Upadhyay, Sudhakar Chaturvedi, Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhankar Dhar Dwivedi (Shankaracharya) and Sameer Kulkarni. The people were acquitted of all charges under the UAPA, Arms Act and others.
"It is sad that we were waiting for the judgment for 17 years. But this is not the victim's fault that the acquittal happened; they just suffered. The victims had come from Malegaon to show their wounds, the court gave the benefit of the doubt because the agency had failed, the ATS and government failed. The victims have no role in this," the lawyer said.
Talking about the verdict, the lawyer said that the court has agreed that a blast happened, and has awarded compensation for the same.
"The court said that the funds were not used for bomb blast, but it has agreed that the bomb blast happened, the other side had said that the blast had not happened only," he added.
Earlier on Thursday, Mumbai's Special NIA court acquitted all seven accused of being involved in the 2008 Malegaon blasts, with the court saying that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond a reasonable doubt. The NIA court has also ordered the Maharashtra government to award ₹2 lakh compensation to the families of the victims and ₹50,000 compensation to the injured.
A total of 7 people were accused, including former MP Sadhvi Pragya, Major (retired) Ramesh Upadhyay, Sudhakar Chaturvedi, Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhankar Dhar Dwivedi (Shankaracharya) and Sameer Kulkarni have been acquitted.
The court had examined 323 prosecution witnesses and 8 defence witnesses before pronouncing the verdict. The 7 people have been acquitted of all charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, Arms act and all other charges.
"Prosecution proved that a blast occurred in Malegaon but failed to prove that bomb was placed in that motorcycle," Judge Abhay Lohati said.
On September 29 2008, six people were killed and 95 others injured when an explosive device strapped to a motorcycle detonated near a mosque in Malegaon City's Bhikku Chowk. Originally, 11 people were accused in the case; however, the court ultimately framed charges against 7, including former MP Sadhvi Pragya. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
11 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Debate over Age of Consent: Legal reform should not enable predators
RAGHAVENDRA KUMARAs the debate over lowering the age of sexual consent from 18 to 16 years gathers momentum, it is critical to pause and evaluate the issue not just from a legal or romantic lens, but through the prism of child and adolescent development, mental health, and long-term well-being. The guiding principle must always remain the 'Best Interest of the Child', as enshrined in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), to which India is a vs. Capacity: A Developmental MismatchWhile the physical appearance of maturity in adolescents may be misleading, neuroscience clearly demonstrates that the adolescent brain continues to develop well into the early twenties – especially areas responsible for impulse control, risk assessment, and emotional regulation. Legal consent assumes not only willingness but the capacity to understand consequences, resist coercion, and assess risks – capacities that are still under construction in many romance must not be the age of consent involves the risks of overestimating adolescent decision-making capacity, especially in emotionally charged or asymmetrical relationships. Consent must not be reduced to a checkbox or a technicality. It must reflect true autonomy, which many adolescents have not yet developmentally vs Criminalisation: A False BinaryIt is important to acknowledge that the current legal framework under the POCSO Act has occasionally led to the criminalisation of non-exploitative relationships between adolescents. However, this must not prompt a wholesale lowering of the age threshold. Instead, greater judicial discretion and contextual interpretation can be employed in such cases – particularly, when both parties are close in age and no coercion, manipulation, or exploitation is must not be compromised is the law's core protective intent. POCSO was designed to act as a safeguard against child sexual abuse, especially in a country where a majority of perpetrators are known to the child and where systemic redress is difficult. Any dilution of the Act must not come at the cost of weakening its shield against predatory Power Imbalance, and Risk AmplificationAdolescents are highly susceptible to grooming – a gradual process where an older individual gains trust with the intent to manipulate or exploit. Lowering the age of consent may provide legal cover for exploitative relationships, especially where there are differences in age, power, or access. This contradicts the very spirit of the 'Best Interest of the Child' doctrine, which obligates all institutions – legal, medical, and educational – to act in ways that prioritise safety, dignity, and reforms must not inadvertently enable predators or reduce the threshold of accountability under the assumption that a 16-year-old is capable of the same self-protective decision-making as an and Socioeconomic ImpactWe must also recognise that a legal shift of this magnitude will not impact all adolescents equally. Girls, especially from rural or economically marginalised backgrounds, are more vulnerable to early marriage, school dropouts, and forced pregnancies — all of which have lifelong health and social implications. A lower age of consent may further erode protections for those who already lack voice and agency, thereby entrenching Precautionary Principle: First, Do No HarmBorrowed from medical ethics, the principle of primum non nocere ('first, do no harm') applies just as forcefully to legal reform involving children. In matters of child rights and protection, the cost of a wrong legal decision can be irreversible. Before considering what freedoms to offer, the State must ask: Will this change increase vulnerability or reduce it?A Balanced Path ForwardRather than lowering the age of consent outright, judicial sensitivity, child-centred legal interpretation, and investment in comprehensive sexuality education may be better tools to resolve the tensions within adolescent relationships and the law. These approaches allow for a compassionate response without compromising protective commitment under the UNCRC and its own constitutional values require that all legal changes affecting minors undergo the litmus test of 'Best Interest of the Child.' It is this doctrine - not romantic idealism or moral panic – that must remain our legal and moral North Star.(The writer is a child and adolescent psychiatrist and Director, Mana Mandira Healthcare, Bengaluru)
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
NIA court to pronounce order on bail plea of Kerala nuns today
A NIA court in Chhattisgarh's Bilaspur district Friday reserved its order for Saturday on a bail application filed by three persons, including two nuns from Kerala, who were arrested on July 25 for allegedly trafficking and forcibly converting three women from the state's Narayanpur district. Nuns Preethi Mary and Vandana Francis along with another person Sukaman Mandavi were arrested at Durg railway station on July 25 following a complaint by a local Bajrang Dal functionary, who accused them of forcibly converting three women from Narayanpur and trafficking them. On Thursday, a sessions court in Durg district had disposed of bail plea of two Kerala nuns, saying that the matter should be heard by an NIA court. The matter was heard by Principal District and Sessions Judge (NIA court) Sirajuddin Qureshi on Friday. Amrito Das, one of the lawyers of the accused, told The Indian Express, 'Our prime thrust was three women victims' parents clearly said they have been following Christianity for years now and there is no question of forcible conversion. All 3 women are adults. Nothing in the (case) diary said they (victims) were assaulted (by the accused). There are no ingredients for human trafficking or forcible conversion in the FIR or case diary… We argued that the nuns are aged, do not have criminal records and there was no element for registering an offense.' GRP counsel Dauram Chandravanshi told the media, 'The case diary was presented in the court… From the government's side, we argued investigations are in the initial stage and hence we are opposing their bail.'
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
NIA makes second consecutive arrest in 2024 Jiribam killings case
The National Investigation Agency (NIA) has arrested another accused in the 2024 brutal Jiribam killings case, the agency said on Friday (August 1, 2025). The accused has been identified as Lalrosang Hmar aka Rosang, of Moinathol village in Assam's Dilkhosh Grant Cachar. He was arrested in Aizawl, Mizoram, on Thursday. The arrest came hours after another key accused named Thanglienlal Hmar was held by a joint team of the NIA and the Assam police in Aizawl. 'Three women and three children were abducted and brutally murdered by militants in Borebekra area of Jiribam District of Manipur on November 11 last year. The bodies were disposed of in the Barak River. Like Thanglienlal, Lalrosang was also an active conspirator in the heinous crime. The NIA has recovered from him a mobile phone, along with a SIM card, and is examining the same as part of its continuing investigation in the case,' it said. On Friday, the Indigenous Tribes Advocacy Committee (ITAC), a body constituted by All Tribal Civil Society Organisations in Pherzawl and Jiribam districts, issued a statement expressing concern and condemning what it termed 'the arbitrary arrest of two Hmar civilians. 'This arrest, much like the arbitrary detention of other Kuki-Zomi-Hmar tribals, is yet another stark illustration of selective prosecution and targeted harassment of Hmar tribal innocent civilians under the guise of national investigation. It further exposes the deeply entrenched bias within the central agencies and the judicial seem to be operating with impunity and clear partiality in favour of the dominant Meitei community amidst the ongoing ethnic conflict in Manipur,' it alleged. Earlier this week, the NIA submitted two reports in sealed covers to the Manipur High Court on the progress it has made in the probe into the abduction and death of six women and children of the Meitei community. Taking the reports on record, the court asked the agency to file a chargesheet within a month.
