ICMSA: 50c/L base price ‘fully justified' for May milk
The chair of the association's dairy committee, Noel Murphy, made the comments ahead of milk price announcements for last month from co-ops.
He said that co-op boards 'should resist any attempt for milk price reductions for May given the current conditions in the marketplace'.
Noel Murphy, ICMSA Dairy Committee chair. Image: Domnick Walsh Eye Focus
Murphy said that 'milk supplies globally and in particular in the EU remain constrained'.
'There is no evidence to suggest that milk supplies will increase to any great extent in the foreseeable future while demand for dairy products is strengthening in advance of the holiday period and dairy demand is looking strong in the medium term.
'The Global Dairy Trade (GDT) is higher today than it was at the start of 2025, the average milk price across the EU is at 53c/kg while the Dutch quotations have shown improvements in the order of 2c/L over the course of May,' he said.
'It would be simply unacceptable for milk processors, some of whom are conditioning farmers for a reduction, to cut milk prices to boost their own profits for 2025.
'The reality is that no one else in the milk processor supply chain will be taking or expected to take a cut,' he added.
'Co-op boards are fully justified in insisting that milk price is set at least at 50c/L for May milk and provide dairy farmers with the confidence to invest in their business and for the next generation to reconsider dairying as an attractive option for their future career.
'It is clear at this stage that dairy markets are relatively stable and dairy farmers expect at a minimum that their milk will remain stable or else move up to 50c/L if currently below that level,' Murphy said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
12 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
What the proposed CAP changes mean for Irish farmers
The proposed EU budget post-2027 has caused waves in the agricultural sphere, with calls to action and pushback coming from all angles. The main worry is the proposed absorption of the CAP under the National and Regional Partnerships Plans (NRPP). The European Commission advertises this move to be more efficient and have a stronger, impactful use of EU funding with agricultural policy 'at its core'. Concerns have been raised revolving around whether money normally allocated to the CAP will be redirected and funnelled into other sections of the NRPP. Initially proposed for the NRPP is €865bn within the 2028-2034 EU budget. Billy Kelleher, MEP for Ireland South, said: 'The 21% cut in CAP funding will cause havoc among farm families in Ireland and across the [European] Union.' Another concern within the proposal is that the income support of €300bn ringfenced for EU farmers post 2027. This is a drop from the €387bn previously set aside for farmers within the current budget. This would mean the nearly 120,000 farmers who avail of EU-funded supports such as Basic Income Support for Sustainability (BISS) or Complimentary Redistributive Income Support for Sustainability (CRISS) could experience drops in the amount they receive. Billy Kelleher, MEP for Ireland South, said: The 21% cut in CAP funding will cause havoc among farm families in Ireland and across the [European] Union… "Perhaps it's a negotiating tactic to force member states to increase their national contributions or to agree on new own resources. Either way, it will make farmers deeply worried about their future viability,' said . According to the 2024 National Farm Survey conducted by Teagasc, direct payments amounted to 60% contribution to a family farm income in 2024 across the sectors examined (dairy, cattle rearing, cattle other, sheep, and tillage). This cut will have significant effects on farming families' incomes and livelihoods if a ringfence of €300bn is agreed. A 'Unity Safety Net' of €900m per year of the budget — a total of €6.3bn — is proposed for emergencies within the sector. This is meant to help ensure stable markets and to assist in times of crisis such as extreme weather events, geopolitical situations or persistent structural challenges for EU-based farmers. With the proposals of a single 'rule book', streamlined payments and a young and new farmers' 'starter pack' for targeted supports could benefit small enterprise farmers and young farmers entering or inheriting within the industry, reducing administrative burdens and offering lump sums. Overview is vague on eco schemes Notably vague within the proposal overview made public by the EU Commission was any mention of farming sustainability and eco schemes. Mentions of sustainability schemes and practices were made with no clear outline or budget proposed. In contrast, a leaked document that was circulated before the initial official proposal made several mentions of eco and sustainability schemes with recommendations to enhance these and similar areas for farmers to receive support based on uptake of beneficial practices. Areas outlined in this leaked document suggested support be provided for farmers or individuals who commit to climate change adaptations, climate change mitigations, soil health, preservation of biodiversity, and development of organic farming. Ireland's presidency of the EU Council With the uproar surrounding the proposed EU budget post-2027, the Irish presidency of the EU Council, occurring in the second semester of 2026, will take place throughout a period of finalisation of the 2028-2034 EU budget. Ultimately, this will have farmers and their organisations alike watching the Department of Agriculture closely. The Irish presidency of the EU Council will mean Irish ministers chairing council meetings, and our very own agriculture minister will chair talks that will focus on the finalisation of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) in the context of agriculture. 'We'll negotiate through this proposal line by line and we'll have a very significant role to play during our EU Presidency in the second half of next year,' said agricultural minister, Martin Heydon, in a recent press release regarding the formation of a CAP consultation committee. The last Irish presidency occurred in 2013, which oversaw the agreement of the MFF of the time. Agreements were also reached on the seventh Environmental Action Programme and the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy. Mr Heydon opened the first meeting of the CAP Consultation Committee, made up of key stakeholders, on July 17, to discuss the prospective CAP and EU Budget post-2027. CAP consultation committee The committee contains representatives from: Department of Agriculture, Food & the Marine, the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage (including NPWS), the Department of Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation, the Department of Climate, Energy and the Environment, the Department of Rural and Community Development and the Gaeltacht; The Agricultural Consultants Association, An Taisce, Bord Bia, the County and City Management Association, the Environmental Pillar, the EPA, Ibec; Irish Cattle & Sheep Farmers Association (ICSA), Irish Co-operative Organisation Society (ICOS), Irish Creamery Milk Suppliers Association (ICMSA), Irish Farmers Association (IFA), Irish Grain Growers Association, Irish Natura & Hill Farmers Association, Irish Organic Association; Irish Rural Link (also representing National Rural Network), Local Development Company Network, Macra na Feirme, National Biodiversity Data Centre, National CAP Network, academic members (UCD and UCC), Teagasc, and Women in Agriculture Stakeholder Group. Mr Heydon said: 'The committee will play a crucial role in ensuring that the CAP reform process is transparent, inclusive, and responsive to the needs of various stakeholders within the agricultural and rural community.' He concluded: 'The Commission proposals for new CAP structures in a new MFF architecture will require careful analysis. This seems like a very big change, but in fact this announcement marks the starting point in a long negotiating process. "I will continue to work very closely with Commissioner Hansen, the European Parliament, and my EU counterparts to ensure that the end result delivers the best possible outcome for Irish farmers and the rural communities in which they live.' Following the committee's meeting, a spokesperson for the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine informed the Irish Examiner that: 'Committee members were briefed on the European Commission announcements, bearing in mind that the detailed CAP legislative proposals have not yet been published. Committee members gave their initial reactions to the announcements and outlined their priorities for the CAP negotiations. Opening the meeting, Mr Heydon emphasised that the commission proposals are only the first step in a lengthy negotiation process. He emphasised that stakeholders on the committee will be essential partners in the process of working to secure a robust CAP that delivers for Ireland and for all member states.'
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Pharma companies unprepared for production shift amid US tariffs
Just one in seven pharmaceutical companies could shift production to the United States within three months should US tariffs on imported drugs become too onerous, new research from consultancy Sia has found. The research, which is based on interviews carried out in June and July with seven senior executives at leading pharmaceutical firms and contract manufacturers, shows none of the organisations feel fully prepared for the potential disruptions that tariffs could cause. The majority of the organisations surveyed, based between Ireland and the US, said they are still in the early phases of scenario planning and are hesitant to commit to major changes while trade negotiations remain unresolved. The US government is reportedly considering tariffs of up to 200 per cent on pharmaceutical products from the EU, China and India – a move that could reshape global drug supply chains and significantly increase costs. [ Donald Trump says pharmaceutical tariffs could reach 200 per cent Opens in new window ] The research found the proposed tariffs would likely result in immediate cost increases, potential drug shortages and long-term consequences for innovation. Higher operational costs 'may reduce investment' in research and development, 'slow the delivery' of new treatments and 'force price increases' that would ultimately affect consumers, according to the findings. Ireland's role as a strategic export hub is also emphasised in the research. In May alone, the value of pharmaceutical and medicinal product exports from Ireland rose by nearly three-quarters to €13.7 billion compared to the same month last year. The research also shows growing momentum behind US-based manufacturing. More than $170 billion in investment has been announced or redirected toward domestic pharmaceutical capacity over the next five years, with 57 per cent of organisations planning to increase their US footprint. 'This shift reflects a broader trend toward regionalisation of supply chains and reduced reliance on geopolitically sensitive markets,' according to the report. Research from 2022 showed US pharma manufacturing facilities were operating at around 50 per cent capacity. Contract development and manufacturing organisations are operating around 55 per cent capacity, suggesting a 'near-term opportunity for expansion without the need for major infrastructure spend'. Meanwhile, staffing and talent development 'still present potential challenges'. However, 'challenges remain' in terms of workforce availability and production agility. The complexity and regulatory requirements of pharmaceutical production mean that relocating manufacturing operations is a 'slow and resource-intensive process'. With US patients already paying more than $12,000 per year on average for healthcare – the highest rate globally – the industry is bracing for additional economic pressure. Niall Cunneen, associate partner Ireland and Britain at Sia, said the pharmaceutical industry has 'long benefited' from highly optimised global supply chains, but the research shows 'these very strengths have become vulnerabilities' in the face of rapidly shifting trade policy. 'The potential Trump tariffs represent a genuine stress test – not just of operational flexibility, but of long-term strategic resilience,' he said. Mr Cunneen said many pharma companies are still waiting for regulatory clarity before making major decisions. 'That hesitation is understandable, but risky,' he said. 'In today's environment, waiting too long to act could mean losing access, margin or momentum.' 'What we're seeing is a growing pivot toward domestic investment, with more than $170 billion of US-based capacity already committed over the next five years.
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Flat-rate Vat removal to cost average broiler farm €12,000 a year
Removal of flat-rate Vat may cost the average poultry broiler farmer more than €12,000 per year. The Revenue Commissioners have said overcompensation of all flat-rate farmers involved in chicken production amounted to about €7 million in 2017. Revenue considers that the yearly overcompensation is approximate to the level identified in 2017, and it continued since then. The average overcompensation is around €12,500 per year, if the 560 or so poultry breeding, hatching and rearing farms in Ireland are included. The flat-rate scheme compensates farmers, that are not Vat-registered, for the Vat incurred by them on input costs used in the course of their farming activities. This is achieved through the addition of a flat-rate percentage (currently 5.1%) to the price charged by the farmer for their supplies to Vat-registered persons (such as a meat-processing business, in the case of poultry). The flat-rate scheme also reduces farmers' administrative burden of registration and returns. The scheme is provided for under EU legislation. However, a key element is that it should not lead to farmers being overcompensated for Vat incurred by them on their business costs. Following an investigation in 2018, Revenue determined that there was a significant amount of overcompensation in the poultry sector. The matter was re-examined over the last 18 months, and it has been determined that overcompensation is still occurring. This resulted in finance minister Paschal Donohoe's recent decision to remove the sector from the scheme. From September 1, 2025, farmers in the poultry (broiler) sector will not be able to charge the flat-rate addition on the sale of their goods and services. Instead they will be required to register for Vat, if the level of their poultry broiler business is above the relevant Vat registration threshold in order to claim back Vat on their inputs (but farmers can register for Vat even if they are operating below this threshold). The Vat registration thresholds are €42,500 for services and €85,000 for goods. Minister Donohoe said he is required to have regard for the welfare of all farmers who avail of the scheme (more than 85% of Irish farmers avail of the flat-rate scheme). "As the EU Vat Directive does not permit overcompensation, failure to take this action could undermine the integrity of the scheme as a whole". I understand the concern this will cause amongst impacted farmers, and want to emphasise that every effort was made to find a resolution for our poultry sector. However, this matter has come to a head and must be addressed. "I have asked Revenue to provide the appropriate level of assistance and guidance on this matter to the affected farmers. In this regard, queries can be directed to businesstaxesregistrations@ IFA Poultry Chair Nigel Sweetnam said the decision to exclude a single sector is unprecedented. He said most broiler poultry farmers also have suckler, beef, dairy, or sheep enterprises, and this complexity will make compliance with the new Vat rules more difficult, as the farmers must separate their farm enterprises for Vat purposes. The change could possibly be the first of many in Vat for farmers. Accountants say no clear intention in Vat modernisation has been published by Revenue, but it is likely that all farmers could eventually fall into the Vat net over a number of years. Following a complaint about the poultry sector, Revenue undertook a comprehensive review in 2018 to establish if there was evidence of overcompensation. This review, provided to the minister for finance in 2019, established that there was a very significant overcompensation. Due to other factors, including Brexit and the covid-19 pandemic, this matter was not further considered until July 2023. Officials in the Department of Finance and Revenue said additional information provided by the sector indicated that while the overcompensation had reduced from the initial Revenue report, it was still quite significant. Together with the CSO, they investigated the possibility of creating a sector-specific flat-rate percentage for the poultry broiler sector. Unfortunately this was not possible, but if it is developed in the future, the sector could be reinstated within the flat-rate addition scheme. The poultry broiler sector has about 430 chicken farms, and 32 duck and 100 turkey farms and produces 170,000 tonnes of poultry meat. Read More Is it the thin end of the wedge for flat rate Vat compensation scheme?
