New test for coeliac disease could increase diagnosis rates
The new blood test could increase diagnosis rates, identify those at risk of severe reactions, and detect silent coeliac disease.
The test measures the immune marker interleukin 2 (IL-2), which spikes in the bloodstream of people with coeliac disease after gluten consumption.
The study showed the test could detect coeliac disease with up to 90 per cent sensitivity and 97 per cent specificity, even in patients on a gluten -free diet.
Researchers are collaborating with Novoviah Pharmaceuticals to confirm the test's accuracy across diverse populations and gather real-world data, potentially leading to faster and safer diagnoses.
'Game-changer' new blood test to detect prevalent autoimmune disease without nightmare side effects
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Study: Female pilots perform better under pressure than males
By If you're planning on jetting off for your holidays this summer, you might hope to find a woman behind the controls. Although 90 per cent of pilots are men, a new study has found that female pilots perform better under pressure than their male counterparts. The researchers say that women have 'unique strengths' that male pilots lack, which give them steadier hands and cooler heads in the cockpit. During testing, both genders performed similarly in some areas, but women made fewer errors under pressure. Women demonstrated more stable landing approaches, completed tasks faster in emergency scenarios, and showed greater situational awareness. Researchers from the University of Waterloo, Canada , tested how pilots of different genders responded to visual information while flying. Lead author Dr Naila Ayala says: 'These findings are exciting because they push us to rethink how we evaluate pilots. 'Our study shows that women may be better at keeping control and making decisions in stressful flight scenarios.' Previous studies have looked at how the different genders process visual information and perform tasks under pressure. However, little is known about how this actually affects performance in real-life scenarios such as piloting and aircraft. To study these gender differences, 20 pilots with less than 300 hours of flight time, 10 male and 10 female, completed flights in a cutting-edge flight simulator. The participants faced a mixture of typical flights and emergency situations, such as engine failures, that require quick thinking and fast reflexes. At the same time, each participant wore eye-tracking glasses to record where they were looking and how they responded to what they saw. The researchers found that both male and female pilots had nearly identical 'visual attention patterns', but female pilots still tended to make fewer mistakes. This means that, even though men and women paid attention to the same information during the flight, women responded to that information more consistently and with greater accuracy. Dr Ayala says this doesn't mean that flights are going to be safer with women in the cockpit, but rather that 'in this specific instance, female pilots may outperform male pilots.' Dr Ayala told Daily Mail: 'It is more the case that specific groups of pilots may be better equipped to manage certain types of aviation scenarios, while other groups are better equipped to manage other types of scenarios.' That could have big implications in a profession which is still massively dominated by men at all levels. Recent studies have shown that just 6.5 per cent of pilots working for UK companies are women, with a pay gap of 50 per cent or more between male and female staff at some firms. 'I think it is concerning that only 6 per cent of the aviation workforce comprises of women in general,' says Dr Ayala. 'Given the shortages in pilots, this study demonstrates that there are data to challenge traditional assumptions in aviation, which may be the source of barriers to entry or to retaining female pilots.' The researchers hope that these findings can change the way pilots are assessed and encourage companies to recruit more women. Co-author Suzanne Kearns says: 'Understanding how different people perform under pressure helps us build better training programs for everyone, safer cockpits, and more inclusive aviation systems. 'At a time when the industry is facing a pilot shortage, tapping into the full potential of all pilots, regardless of gender, is more important than ever.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Study: Avoiding ultra-processed foods while dieting can double weight loss
By Consuming a diet low in ultra-processed foods could help supercharge weight loss , promising research suggested today. Additive-laden foods such as crisps and sweets have been vilified for decades over their supposed risks, with dozens of studies linking them to type 2 diabetes , heart disease and cancer . Experts have even called for UPFs—typically anything edible that has more artificial ingredients than natural ones—to be slashed from diets. Now, British scientists who tracked dozens of adults have discovered those who ate a diet rich in minimally processed foods and avoided UPFs, lost twice as much weight as those who often consumed UPFs. Sticking to meals cooked from scratch could also help curb food cravings, they also found. However, diets high in UPFs had little impact on blood pressure, heart rate, liver function and cholesterol. 'But not all ultra-processed foods are inherently unhealthy based on their nutritional profile.' In the study, the researchers tracked 50 people who were already consuming diets packed with UPFs and split them into two groups. Half were given an eight-week diet plan comprising minimally processed foods, such as overnight oats and spaghetti bolognese, while the other half were given foods like breakfast oat bars or lasagne ready meals. After completing one diet, the groups then switched. Researchers matched the two diets nutritionally on levels of fat, saturated fat, protein, carbohydrates, salt and fibre using the Eatwell Guide, which outlines recommendations on how to eat a healthy, balanced diet. They found those on the minimally processed diet lost more weight (2.06 per cent) compared to the UPF diet (1.05 per cent loss). The UPF diet also did not result in significant fat loss, the researchers said. Dr Dicken added: 'Though a 2 per cent reduction may not seem very big, that is only over eight weeks and without people trying to actively reduce their intake. 'If we scaled these results up over the course of a year, we'd expect to see a 13 per cent weight reduction in men and a 9 per cent reduction in women on the minimally processed diet, but only a 4 per cent weight reduction in men and 5 per cent in women after the ultra-processed diet. 'Over time this would start to become a big difference.' Those on the trial were also asked to complete questionnaires on food cravings before and after starting the diets. Those eating minimally processed foods had less cravings and were able to resist them better, the study suggests. However, researchers also measured others markers like blood pressure, heart rate, liver function, glucose levels and cholesterol and found no significant negative impacts of the UPF diet. The Eatwell Guide recommends the average woman should consume around 2,000 calories a day, while an average man should consume 2,500. Both diet groups had a calorie deficit, meaning people were eating fewer calories than what they were burning, which helps with weight loss. However, the deficit was higher from minimally processed foods at around 230 calories a day, compared with 120 calories per day from UPFs. Professor Rachel Batterham, senior author of the study from the UCL centre for obesity research, said: 'Despite being widely promoted, less than 1 per cent of the UK population follows all of the recommendations in the Eatwell Guide, and most people stick to fewer than half. 'The best advice to people would be to stick as closely to nutritional guidelines as they can by moderating overall energy intake, limiting intake of salt, sugar and saturated fat, and prioritizing high-fibre foods such as fruits, vegetables, pulses and nuts. Tracy Parker, nutrition lead at the British Heart Foundation, also said: 'The way this study was designed means it is more reflective of real-world conditions than previous research on UPFs. 'The small size of the study is a limitation, and the fact that most participants were women limits how much we can generalize the findings to the general population. 'We also can't be certain how closely the diets were followed, as participants self-reported what they ate during the study. 'Larger, longer-term studies will be needed to see if the greater weight loss on the minimally processed diets seen here translates into bigger improvements in risk factors, including blood pressure and cholesterol and blood sugar levels, and a reduced risk of developing heart and circulatory diseases.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Move aside, men! Female pilots perform better under pressure than males, study finds
If you're planning on jetting off for your holidays this summer, you might hope to find a woman behind the controls. Although 90 per cent of pilots are men, a new study has found that female pilots perform better under pressure than their male counterparts. The researchers say that women have 'unique strengths' that male pilots lack, which give them steadier hands and cooler heads in the cockpit. During testing, both genders performed similarly in some areas, but women made fewer errors under pressure. Women demonstrated more stable landing approaches, completed tasks faster in emergency scenarios, and showed greater situational awareness. Researchers from the University of Waterloo, Canada, tested how pilots of different genders responded to visual information while flying. Lead author Dr Naila Ayala says: 'These findings are exciting because they push us to rethink how we evaluate pilots. 'Our study shows that women may be better at keeping control and making decisions in stressful flight scenarios.' Previous studies have looked at how the different genders process visual information and perform tasks under pressure. However, little is known about how this actually affects performance in real-life scenarios such as piloting and aircraft. To study these gender differences, 20 pilots with less than 300 hours of flight time, 10 male and 10 female, completed flights in a cutting-edge flight simulator. The participants faced a mixture of typical flights and emergency situations, such as engine failures, that require quick thinking and fast reflexes. At the same time, each participant wore eye-tracking glasses to record where they were looking and how they responded to what they saw. The researchers found that both male and female pilots had nearly identical 'visual attention patterns', but female pilots still tended to make fewer mistakes. This means that, even though men and women paid attention to the same information during the flight, women responded to that information more consistently and with greater accuracy. Dr Naila says: 'We can't assume that because two pilots are looking at the same things, they will react the same way.' In their study, Dr Naila and her co-authors conclude that these findings 'suggest that female pilots may manage task demands effectively under pressure.' That could have big implications in a profession which is still massively dominated by men at all levels. Recent studies have shown that just 6.5 per cent of pilots working for UK companies are women. That number is even lower for higher-ranking captains in commercial airlines, with a pay gap of 50 per cent or more between male and female staff at some firms. The researchers hope that these findings can change the way pilots are assessed and encourage companies to recruit more women. Co-author Suzanne Kearns says: 'Understanding how different people perform under pressure helps us build better training programs for everyone, safer cockpits, and more inclusive aviation systems. 'At a time when the industry is facing a pilot shortage, tapping into the full potential of all pilots, regardless of gender, is more important than ever.'
