'John Brennan, Gina Haspel era is over': Ratcliffe, allies promise workforce changes at CIA
"There will be changes during my tenure as director," the new leader of America's top spy agency wrote in an agency-wide workforce message. Ratcliffe is currently reviewing all top staff and planning to put his own fingerprints on the senior level of the agency, Fox News Digital has learned.
"We will collect intelligence in every corner of the globe, no matter how dark or difficult. We will produce insightful, objective, all-source analysis, never allowing political or personal biases to cloud our judgment or infect our products," Ratcliffe went on in his email.
"And we will conduct covert action at the direction of the President, going places no one else can go and doing things no one else can do."
New Cia Boss Ratcliffe Says Biden-era Report Backing Lab-leak Theory Released To 'Restore' Trust
As agents conduct work in what Ratcliffe defined as the "most challenging national security environment in our nation's history," he promised the CIA would be the "ultimate meritocracy."
Read On The Fox News App
"Our shared mission will bind us together."
A source familiar with Ratcliffe's thinking said, "This was a message to Agency's workforce that the John Brennan era, the Gina Haspel era, the eras of promoting leftwing political agendas or subverting the President — those days are over."
Haspel was President Donald Trump's CIA director from 2018 to 2021 – while Ratcliffe was Trump's director of national intelligence. Brennan headed up the agency under former President Barack Obama.
"I'm sure it'll rub some of the political activists burrowed in there the wrong way, but there are a lot of red-blooded, mission-focused agency officers reading this and cheering him on," the source added.
Ratcliffe Says Us Faces 'Most Challenging Security Environment' Ever In Confirmation Hearing
Ratcliffe is also looking for ways to streamline the agency's many tech-focused offices – the directorate of digital innovation; directorate of science and technology; transnational and technology mission center; office of the chief technology officer; and directorate of analysis, which has been developing AI-powered tools – to stake out clear lines of authority and tasks.
"Nobody comes to CIA to be somebody. Our successes remain hidden. Even our medals are presented behind closed doors, our sacrifices memorialized by stars on a marble wall. But each one of those stars represents somebody who wanted to do something, regardless of whether history would know their name," Ratcliffe continued.
"That's what makes this place special. That's what we must preserve."
Ratcliffe was confirmed by the Senate last Thursday in a 74-25 vote.
Under its new director, the CIA released a new assessment of the COVID-19 origin which favors a lab origin with "low confidence."
The review was ordered by former President Joe Biden's national security advisor Jake Sullivan toward the end of Biden's time in office.
John Ratcliffe Confirmed As Next Cia Director
The agency has maintained for years it did not have enough intelligence to conclude whether COVID-19 originated in a lab or a wet market in Wuhan, China.
Ratcliffe recently told Breitbart News he no longer wanted the CIA to sit "on the sidelines" of the debate over the origins of COVID-19. He has long said he believes the virus originated in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
"I had the opportunity on my first day to make public an assessment that actually took place in the Biden administration, so it can't be accused of being political," he told "Sunday Morning Futures" host Maria Bartiromo on Sunday.
"And the CIA has assessed that the most likely cause of this pandemic that has wrought so much devastation around the world was because of a lab-related incident in Wuhan, so we'll continue to investigate that moving forward."Original article source: 'John Brennan, Gina Haspel era is over': Ratcliffe, allies promise workforce changes at CIA
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
7 hours ago
- Fox News
Biden admin spent hefty sum of US tax dollars to upgrade embassy swimming pools in Iraq, Russia
The Biden administration's State Department authorized more than $1 million in taxpayer funds for renovating swimming pools at U.S. embassies and mission residences in war-torn countries such as Haiti, Sudan and Iraq, a report from Sen. Joni Ernst's office found. "The Biden State Department threw a blowout summer pool party on your dime," Ernst, R-Iowa, said in a statement provided to Fox News Digital. "Bureaucrats might think wasting millions is a drop in the bucket, but I am sick and tired of taxpayers getting tossed in the deep end by Washington," Ernst added. "I will continue working with the Trump administration to put a stop to the splashy spending of the Biden years." Ernst's office found that the State Department under the Biden administration authorized that two pools in Haiti, five in Iraq, three in Sudan, one in Russia, one in Zimbabwe and one in Ghana be renovated, totaling more than $1.2 million, according to the New York Post, which first reported on the pool renovations on Thursday. Taxpayers spent $41,259 to rehabilitate the pool at the U.S. embassy in Moscow in a contract inked three months after Russia invaded Ukraine in a war that has continued raging. The purchase order was dated June 3, 2022, through Aug. 15, 2022, after the war began in February that same year. The U.S. embassy in Baghdad was awarded a whopping $444,000 to replace its indoor dehumidification system for its pool in a contract that began on Sept. 27, 2024. While the U.S. Consulate in Erbil, Iraq received over $10,000 to conduct mechanical repairs to its pool, according to the Ernst report reviewed by Fox News Digital. In Sudan, taxpayers spent $24,000 in 2021 for the installation of a pool deck. Sudan has notably been under a State Department do not travel advisory "due to armed conflict, civil unrest, crime, terrorism, and kidnapping," with the embassy in Khartoum suspending operations in 2023 over the ongoing violent conflicts in the nation. Some of the contracts detailed in the report have not been fully paid out, such as a $173,000 award to conduct work on a swimming pool in Indonesia at the embassy in Jakarta. The federal government has previously been criticized for the amount of taxpayer funds spent on U.S. embassies overseas, including spending hefty sums on artwork under the Obama administration, Fox Digital reported at the time. U.S. embassies are primarily funded through congressional appropriations to the U.S. Department of State. Ernst's report follows months of the Department of Government Efficiency reporting it has saved the federal government billions of dollars amid its ongoing investigations into various federal agencies in search of corruption, overspending and mismanagement. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has been at the forefront of gutting departments and programs under State's purview, including shuttering USAID earlier in July for failing to ensure its programs actually supported America's interests. "This era of government-sanctioned inefficiency has officially come to an end. Under the Trump administration, we will finally have a foreign funding mission in America that prioritizes our national interests. As of July 1st, USAID will officially cease to implement foreign assistance. Foreign assistance programs that align with administration policies – and which advance American interests – will be administered by the State Department, where they will be delivered with more accountability, strategy, and efficiency," Rubio said in comment regarding shuttering USAID.
New York Post
9 hours ago
- New York Post
Trump's approval on his top issue slips: new poll
President Trump appears to be losing some ground with the overall public on his top issue — immigration — even as his base remains steadfastly behind him, a new poll shows. More Americans are souring on Trump's handling of the situation, with now 44% approving and 56% disapproving, according to a CBS News/YouGov survey. That approval rating is down significantly from March, when he had 54% backing him and 46% disapproving of his administration's actions. Even in June, his rating on the issue stood at a dead even 50%. Immigration and border security were top concerns during the 2024 campaign cycle, and Trump had rapidly moved to restore order to the border after winning re-election. Last month, there were a paltry 9,306 encounters between federal agents and migrants at the southwest land border, down dramatically from a peak of 301,981 encounters during the Biden administration in December 2023, according to data from US Customs and Border Protection. 3 President Trump has earned a solid approval rating among Republicans but is faltering among the general public when it comes to immigration. AP 3 The Trump administration has pursued an aggressive deportation policy. AFP via Getty Images More than 64% of the latest respondents concluded that Trump's policies resulted in illegal border crossings plummeting. But there appear to be lingering concerns about his aggressive approach to deportation. Now that Trump has quickly stemmed the border crisis, the public appears to think his tactics are going too far, with 54% describing his approach as too tough, compared to 18% who said it's not tough enough and 29% seeing it as about right. Former President Joe Biden had long been dogged by abysmal ratings from voters for being too soft on immigration. Additionally, there has been a growing perception that the Trump administration has been prioritizing the deportation of people who aren't dangerous criminals (56%) rather than dangerous criminals (44%). Polls have long pegged immigration and border security to be Trump's crucial political issue. CBS News/YouGov is one of several polls that has indicated Trump's ratings on immigration are softening. 3 The poll's respondents said immigration policy remains the top issue they use to evaluate President Trump's performance. AP Still, the US adults sampled said immigration matters 'a lot' to them in their assessment of his performance, eclipsing inflation (56%), the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (56%) and the Jeffrey Epstein case (36%). Trump has signaled plans to recalibrate his approach to immigration and work to mitigate the impact of his deportation policies on farms and the service sector. This reportedly includes plans to fast-track visas for foreign laborers. Despite the lower marks from the public on immigration, Trump's approval from Republicans remains very strong. A whopping 89% of Republicans approve of his presidency overall. The CBS News/YouGov survey sampled 2,343 US adults from July 16-18 with a margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percentage points.
Forbes
9 hours ago
- Forbes
Trump Shouldn't Let Big Beautiful Bill Boost China's Clean Energy Edge
President Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bil (OBBB) into law on July 4th, significantly changing ... More the American energy landscape as it rolls back measures from the Inflation Reduction Act. (Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / POOL / AFP) (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/POOL/AFP via Getty Images) On July Fourth, President Donald Trump signed the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' into law, introducing significant changes that will dramatically reshape America's energy landscape. The newly minted OBBB Act leaves businesses and policymakers trying to determine its potential impact on jobs, investment, and the nation's position in the global energy race. The OBBB, especially 'Title 5-Ending Green New Deal Spending, Promoting America-first Energy, and Other Reforms,' introduces significant reductions to clean energy tax credits, and reduces the eligibility timeline for credits and accessibility to them, while extending these for fossil fuels such as the coal used in steelmaking. The Biden-era Inflation Reduction Act overemphasized renewable energy over oil and gas. Both of these are energy sources that the U.S. has a significant opportunity to leverage for growth and security. It makes sense to play to America's strengths. However, some experts warn that the OBBB risks creating an overcorrection. Zigzagging in the race for energy dominance may wind up costing the U.S. the geo-economic race against China. Charting a course that allows the country to excel on all energy fronts might work better in the medium and long term. While insisting on renewables instead of hydrocarbons, and even vilifying fossil fuels and nuclear, was questionable for a country rich in oil and gas, continued American presence in the renewable energy sector is critical to the future of the U.S. and America's ability to compete with foreign powers, especially China. What's New in the OBBB? The sweeping, nearly 1,000-page OBBB brings significant changes to IRA provisions that prioritized clean energy investments and manufacturing in the U.S. over other options. The OBBB sets a placed-in-service deadline for wind and solar projects, making any project that started a year after the IRA became law ineligible for tax unless it is placed in service before the end of 2027. This will create additional risks for projects grappling with supply chain delays and complex permitting and construction timelines. Many developers may decide to turn down new projects rather than trying to race against the regulatory clock. On the other hand, metallurgical coal, which is used in steelmaking, will now qualify for tax credits. Besides this being contradictory to the OBBB's goal of making needed budget cuts, it also works against innovation, providing credits to coal at the expense of developing a green steel industry. The U.S. was an early leader in this field, but now Europe leads globally, and China is working to catch up quickly through low-carbon policies, R&D, and incentives for innovation. China continues to pursue green measures across its economy while the OBBB puts the United States ... More behind in the field. The OBBB also tightens Foreign Entity of Concern rules with more clear and explicit designations. As we explained earlier, the IRA's rather broad treatment of this issue tended to deter investment in companies 'with even a tiny stake of Chinese ownership, or doing business in Russia' and to discourage U.S. partners in resource-rich areas such as Central Asia. The new definitions per the OBBB will limit tax credit eligibility for producers using inputs coming mainly from Chinese companies. Although this aims to reduce supply chain dependence on China and prevent Chinese companies from benefiting from subsidies, the complexity and uncertainty around how to actually apply these provisions for clean energy projects means these rules can backfire, reducing domestic clean energy production and innovation and sharpening the competitive edge of Chinese alternatives, helping Beijing to become even more dominant in the global market. Can the OBBB Help American Manufacturing? Policy uncertainty has chilling effects on investment, and as far as the OBBB, this is already happening. According to E2, since January 2025, over $14 billion in clean energy projects and more than 10,000 announced jobs had been cancelled before the Senate even passed the bill. The proposed timeline for building and operationalizing wind and solar projects is significantly affected by the new law, which creates obstacles for manufacturers in the clean energy space and, consequently, for proposed new projects, no matter how innovative. Speeding up America's slow and overly bureaucratic review process is admirable, but deadlines need to be realistic. Lawmakers were able to secure a one-year extension of existing wind and solar tax breaks. However, renewable energy industry leaders and advocates argue that this short-term extension is insufficient to encourage the kind of long-term, large-scale investments needed for projects like billion-dollar battery plants or large solar farms. For the U.S. to truly revive domestic manufacturing and lead in global energy, it must encourage the industries of the future (without breaking the bank), quickly innovate in sectors like steel, and scale up solar and battery production alongside a renewed focus on America's existing core competencies in oil, gas, and nuclear. This is not a zero-sum game. It is vital to an 'all of the above' energy strategy. The Trump Administration has already indicated an appetite for 'energy abundance', encouraging LNG exports, grid modernization, and nuclear energy development. An energy policy prioritizing abundant, affordable, cutting-edge energy must keep renewable advancements on the table, even though they are not yet suitable to fully replace other forms of generation. China is forging ahead aggressively, aiming to dominate the clean energy space of tomorrow, and seeking to push the U.S. down the global energy sector totem pole. President Trump's energy priorities surround taking advantage of the United States' advantageous ... More position in the oil and gas sectors, but renewable development is necessary to remain competitive and pursue energy dominance. While the OBBB is focused on rolling back IRA measures that put the green transition ahead of America's advantages and interests in the energy space, its provisions risk making the U.S. less competitive as China and other powers strive to advance renewables and their associated technologies. The Trump Administration is seeking to ensure a modern workforce and achieving energy dominance in the long term, so it needs to start investing in the future, which will include the energy industries the president has already prioritized, as well as those currently dominated by China. Exceling on all fronts will serve America's interests better than abandoning certain key arenas to the key geo-economic competition of the 21st century.
