Breastfeed ‘too long' and you're a creep; choose formula and you must not love your child
The worlds of daytime TV and infant feeding collided recently, in a controversy involving chatshow-host Vanessa Feltz, fashion designer Karen Millen, and a video of an American TikTok influencer, Madison Simpson, who recently wound up her journey with extended breastfeeding.
Feltz invited Millen and others to comment on a video posted by Simpson that shows her nursing her three-year-old daughter. It's hard to know why Millen felt a need to comment on this woman's breastfeeding (calling it 'selfish', 'weird' and questioning whether it was good for the child), or how she felt confident enough to declare that there was 'no benefit'. But it's also hard to understand some of the reaction to her remarks, which might have been more appropriate if Millen was some kind of surgeon general gone rogue.
Soon after – and following considerable
backlash – Millen delivered a prostrated apology, in which she explained that her views were restricted to the specific question of breastfeeding a three-year-old, not breastfeeding writ large,
and in an act of sacrificial allegiance, she describes her challenges breastfeeding her own three children, including recurring mastitis and suffering with 'cracked and sore nipples'. She then declares 'breast is best' and finishes by saying she respects women's choices. A sombre-looking Feltz then reads from the World Health Organisation's infant feeding guidelines.
Leaving aside the issue of why anyone would look to clothing expert Millen for enlightened opinions on health decision-making, it is somewhat depressing to witness Millen's apology shift from one position of censure (extended breastfeeding is selfish) to another judgmental position in saying: 'I [breastfed] because I knew it was the best thing for them' and 'breast milk is the best'. There is something about this issue that seems to compel people to speak in normative and captious terms.
READ MORE
[
It's time for a little more realism and empathy on breastfeeding
Opens in new window
]
Perhaps public health rhetoric plays a role. The HSE breastfeeding guidance, for example, can be dogmatic:
'Your breast milk contains essential enzymes, hormones and antibodies. These are vital for your baby's normal growth, development and good health.'
It's easy to understand how someone reading this might infer that those who don't breastfeed are doing something pretty bad if they willingly deprive babies of something that is
vital
for normal growth and good health. I suppose I just have to be grateful I can manage to type this with my own abnormally grown fingers.
But the controversy struck me as interesting for another reason. As the first generation of social media parents, my cohort really have to grapple with the boundaries around children's digital privacy. Of course, feeding our children (however we do it) is one of the main things we do in their early years, so it's not surprising it ends up online. However, I understand people reacting strongly to the inclusion of small children in content that is posted as part of trying to build a career online. Kids need to be protected from the online world, but they also need to be protected from our engagement with it. For younger ones, it'll be a while until they can tell us how they feel about their likenesses being shared. It's a good exercise to think about how their adolescent selves might feel about the images we post. .
A perfect storm of social media companies encouraging us to 'share' idealised versions of parenting and overblown institutional rhetoric that frames the main drivers of children's welfare outcomes in individualistic terms have contributed to this strange environment in which a woman feeding her child becomes the subject of a daytime TV storm.. Nothing, it seems, is more scrutinised than decision-making about children. I've experienced this reflexive meanness writing for this newspaper, with people commenting 'some are just not made to be mums' beneath a social media post
about an article
about letting my daughter take little walks along our terrace. Similarly, the discourse around both ends of infant feeding has become totally unnecessarily hostile: breastfeed 'too long' and they'll call you a creep; choose formula and they'll say you don't love your child enough.
[
Stop framing breastfeeding versus bottle-feeding as a question of mothers at war
Opens in new window
]
I spent most of this week in London at a British Academy conference on
the Ethics of Health Communication
, where I spoke about the toxic state of infant feeding rhetoric and the complex state of the research. My presentation featured images of the poisonous commentary directed at both formula use and extended breastfeeding – two sides of the same miserable coin and examples of the rhetorical poison that flows through the motherhood discourse online.
We have a long way to go to ensure pregnancy and early parenthood are better supported. One thing experts agree on is that more robust continuity of care across maternity services would help us feel more empowered in our reproductive and early parenting decisions. Equally, it would be good to have public health guidance that is clearer about the possibility of normally grown formula-fed babies, and acknowledges that poverty and inequality are the real threats to children's good health, whatever way you feed them.
Breastfeeding can be challenging and (far from being selfish) is a selfless thing to do for a child – those who do it for longer should be given a lot of grace in how and when they decide to wean. Whether it's giving a three-month-old formula or a three-year-old breastmilk, we will all benefit from a little less mutual recrimination and maternal excoriation.
Dr Clare Moriarty is a postdoctoral researcher working at Trinity Research in Social Sciences in Trinity College Dublin
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘My 14-year-old son has been finding it hard to get to sleep at night'
Question For the last year, my 14-year-old son has been finding it hard to get to sleep at night. He says he can just lie there for hours unable to sleep (before he finally does) and then he is really tired in the morning. It was a big problem in the last term in school as he struggled to go in and then was tired and disengaged when he was there. He assures me that there was nothing worrying him about school – it was just that he could not get off to sleep. Now, in the summer, sleep is less of an issue as he goes to bed later and there is no pressure to get up in morning – thought I don't think the problem has gone away. Also he is due to start in the Gaeltacht next month which has a strict schedule in the morning and I am worried how he will manage. I should also say that he has struggled a bit in school over the years, and he is on a waiting list for an ADHD assessment. I am not sure if his main problem is his lack of a good sleep routine or ADHD or maybe a bit of both. I have also wondered about asking the GP about melatonin. I am aware that he will be starting his Junior Cert year in September and I want to get him in a better routine by then. Answer Lots of children can habitually take a long time to fall asleep when they go to bed even when there is no simple identifiable cause such as anxiety or worry. When sleep/wake-up times are delayed by more than two hours a formal diagnosis of delayed sleep phase syndrome (DSPS) is often used. DSPS is a disruption to the circadian rhythm whereby a person's sleep routine gets out of sync with desired patterns – DSPS does not mean the person does not need the sleep, it is just that they can't go to sleep when they want to. READ MORE This is, of course, can be very disruptive around school and work routines and can lead to sleep deprivation and underperformance. DSPS occurs a lot in adolescence, when sleep patterns naturally change such as needing more sleep during periods of developmental spurts or when their time of alertness can occur later in the day, etc. There is also a strong correlation between sleep problems and ADHD and, as you indicate, the interrelationship is complicated. Certainly, sleep problems can aggravate ADHD symptoms of inattention and distractibility and aspects of ADHD such as a racing mind or high physical energy can make sleep more challenging. Resetting the circadian rhythm There are lots of different things that can assist with creating a better sleep routine and it is usually a case of trial and error to find what works for your son. Many people recommend 'light therapy' as a means to reset the circadian rhythm. This means that your son should get up at the same desired each morning and immediately go outdoors to spend time in natural sunlight. In the winter you can use natural light lamps which can be turned on at wake-up time to mimic outdoor light. Additionally, increasing physical exercise can help, though this might need to be done at the right time such as early in the day so it helps build a better sleep routine. Developing relaxing wind-down activities before sleep can also be really helpful, whether this is reading a book, doing a jigsaw, drawing or listening to a podcast. Different activities work for different children – help your son choose something that he enjoys, which is relaxing, rather than stimulating and which is easily accessible before bed. In addition, lying awake for hours can be frustrating and this frustration can make it harder to sleep. As a result it is also important to agree a plan of action with your son as to what he can do on the nights he can't sleep. This might mean getting up for a few minutes and reading or doing a relaxation exercise or simply recalling happy events as he lies awake. Melatonin and sleep Melatonin is the naturally produced hormone that regulates the body's circadian rhythm. When a person's circadian rhythm is in balance, melatonin levels rise in the evening as a person winds down before they go to bed. These levels peak in the middle of the night before falling in the morning at the time of waking. For many people, taking melatonin in the evening can help reset the circadian rhythm and ensuring a better nights sleep. Melatonin is available by prescription via GPs in Ireland who may recommend this when standard sleep techniques have not been successful and when the lack of sleep is disruptive to the teenager. You could contact your GP now for an assessment or you could wait until the new school year when extra support to get into a better sleep routine might be needed. John Sharry is clinical director of the Parents Plus Charity and an adjunct professor at the UCD School of psychology. See
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Story of a Heart author Rachel Clarke: ‘I couldn't stop thinking about this story'
The Story of a Heart is a beautifully written account of how the lives of two families – both facing immeasurable suffering – become inextricably entwined through the donation of a heart from a nine-year-old girl with catastrophic brain injuries to a nine-year-old boy with end-stage heart failure. First published in 2024, with compassion and clarity, Rachel Clarke draws readers into the details of the lives of Keira Ball's family, who made the decision to donate her organs when they realised that she wasn't going to recover from the injuries she suffered in a car crash which also left her brother Bradley and her mother Loanna seriously wounded. 'I couldn't stop thinking about this story when I first read about it in 2017,' explains Clarke, a palliative care doctor and former broadcast journalist. The two families had told the story of their meeting to journalist Jeremy Armstrong. This meeting broke all the rules of anonymity, usually sacrosanct in organ donation protocols. It came months after Loanna Ball reached out to Emma Johnson, the mother of Max, after the Ball family received their anonymous letter of thanks. READ MORE In her Facebook message to Johnson, Ball wrote: 'I think you may have our daughter's heart and it's the most beautiful heart in the world.' Max's identity was already public after the Daily Mirror had earlier told the story of his long wait for a heart transplant as part of its campaign for opt-out rather than opt-in legislation for organ donation. (When the legislation for opt-out organ donation was introduced into Britain in May 2020, the law was called Max and Keira's Law). The Story of a Heart will bring readers to tears again and again as the details of parents and siblings spending time with their youngest sister before she died are told in parallel to that of a young boy, hanging on by a thread, knowing that he will die without a heart transplant Clarke made contact first with Keira's family, meeting them for several hours, asking them to consider her telling their story. 'They immediately said yes, but I gave them a few months to change their minds. When they didn't change their minds, I approached Max's family and the NHS Blood and Transplant,' she explains. Therein began four years of research and interviews with family members and key health professionals who cared for both children and worked on the transplant teams. The Story of a Heart will bring readers to tears again and again as the details of parents and siblings spending time with their youngest sister before she died are told in parallel to that of a young boy, hanging on by a thread, knowing that he will die without a heart transplant. In June, Clarke won the 2025 Women's Prize for Non-Fiction for her extraordinary book. The prize, which complements the long-running Women's Prize for Fiction, was first awarded in 2024 after research found that female non-fiction writers were less likely to be reviewed (26.5 per cent of non-fiction reviews in national newspapers were allocated to female writers) or win prizes than their male counterparts (one in three prize winners across seven UK non-fiction prizes over the past 10 years were women). In the story, Clarke writes: 'From the moment Keira was fatally injured, her heart began a journey so momentous it was scarcely believable. First, there was the emergency chest compressions at the scene of the crash… Next, the strange metaphysical limbo between life and death as Keira lay in intensive care, warm, flushed, apparently sleeping, yet somehow – unfathomably - brain dead. Then, the moment when her heart was stilled by an anaesthetist's drugs so that the surgeons, silently at work within the cave of her chest, no longer faced a moving target. 'From there, the light-aircraft dash halfway across the country to deliver the organ, chilled on ice, into gloved and poised surgical hands. Finally, the intricate knitting of the heart's great vessels into another child's torso – and the agonising wait to see if its chambers would resume their vital work.' As well as telling the personal stories so sensitively, Clarke weaves through the book rich details of medical research and history. Such as the origins of intensive care units or the importance of immunosuppressant medicines or how the heart is the first of our organs to form and the last to die. Or how, one in five children die while waiting for an organ transplant. She also includes details such as how surgeons will sometimes write up operation notes for teddy bears, used for comfort, distraction and to demonstrate to a child certain procedures. And how a nurse can find time to bring a distraught sibling for a hot chocolate while his younger brother lies in hospital close to death. Clarke draws readers into the lives of these brave and dignified families sharing a time in their lives when they are at their most vulnerable. 'How Keira's family in the darkest, bleakest circumstances can summon all their strength to look outwards to save others from the fate that befell them,' she says. [ How to be an organ donor: 'The surgeon said he wasn't going to take my kidney out if I wasn't sure' Opens in new window ] Keira Ball's family have since set up the charity, Inspired by Keira, to raise awareness of the importance of organ donation and to support families in the south of England confronting the sudden loss of a child. And while she chronicles in detail the 'the modern day miracle of transplantation' and the hundreds of health professionals who make it happen, Clarke is also cogently aware that more organs are needed to be donated. 'When then [UK] prime minster Theresa May brought in the legislation for opt-out organ donations, it was to be called, Max's Law,' explains Clarke. But, after Max himself said it should be called, Max and Keira's Law, it was. Seven years on from his transplant, Max Johnson has just completed his GCSE exams. Similar legislation to allow opt-out rather than opt-in (ie, assumption that the person agrees to donating their organs unless they have specifically registered their objection to it) was introduced into Ireland in June 2025 . 'Changing the law has helped but not as much as people thought. Awareness is what counts. Make sure that you have signed opt-in for organ donation on your driver's licence and tell loved ones what your wishes are and ask your family members and children what their views are on organ donation,' she says. Because, in spite of the opt-out legislation now in place in Britain and Ireland, ultimately, it's the family who decides when facing the death of a loved one. 'If that person's wishes to donate their organs are known, 90 per cent of families will say yes, but if that person's wishes are not known, only 40 per cent will say yes,' explains Clarke. Clarke says that studying medicine as a mature student, she has always 'cared about patients as people, not just body parts'. She says that she firmly believes stories such as this display such deep humanity, making them an antidote to the depressing newspaper headlines and 'doom scrolling' that we all do. 'It says something very profound about our species,' she adds. [ Waiting for an organ donor: 'It was the beginning of the hardest chapter in our family's life' Opens in new window ] Clarke now works as a palliative care consultant in a hospital in England. 'I knew when I returned to study medicine as a mature student [she was 29 when she left broadcast journalism to train as a doctor] that I wanted to work in oncology, haematology or palliative care,' she explains. But that didn't stop her writing. Her first book, Your Life is in My Hands chronicles her life as a junior doctor. Next came, Dear Life, a book exploring death, dying and end-of-life care. And in 2020, she wrote Breathtaking, a book about the first wave of Covid in the UK which was later adapted for a television series. Clarke says that while being around dying people makes a lot of people nervous, she finds the combination of the physical and moral challenges fulfilling. 'End-of-life care is profoundly important. There is a huge amount you can do for people at the end of their life. 'In my work, I see more of the goodness, strength and decency people are capable of. It's not just the physical complications we have to deal with, but the suffering that comes with having to lose everyone in the world dear to you.' And, yes, it has influenced her entire philosophy of life. 'We are all a whisper away from tragedy. Living your life holding on to just how precious it is is an important way to try to live. We never get enough time to be with the people we love.'
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Breastfeed ‘too long' and you're a creep; choose formula and you must not love your child
The worlds of daytime TV and infant feeding collided recently, in a controversy involving chatshow-host Vanessa Feltz, fashion designer Karen Millen, and a video of an American TikTok influencer, Madison Simpson, who recently wound up her journey with extended breastfeeding. Feltz invited Millen and others to comment on a video posted by Simpson that shows her nursing her three-year-old daughter. It's hard to know why Millen felt a need to comment on this woman's breastfeeding (calling it 'selfish', 'weird' and questioning whether it was good for the child), or how she felt confident enough to declare that there was 'no benefit'. But it's also hard to understand some of the reaction to her remarks, which might have been more appropriate if Millen was some kind of surgeon general gone rogue. Soon after – and following considerable backlash – Millen delivered a prostrated apology, in which she explained that her views were restricted to the specific question of breastfeeding a three-year-old, not breastfeeding writ large, and in an act of sacrificial allegiance, she describes her challenges breastfeeding her own three children, including recurring mastitis and suffering with 'cracked and sore nipples'. She then declares 'breast is best' and finishes by saying she respects women's choices. A sombre-looking Feltz then reads from the World Health Organisation's infant feeding guidelines. Leaving aside the issue of why anyone would look to clothing expert Millen for enlightened opinions on health decision-making, it is somewhat depressing to witness Millen's apology shift from one position of censure (extended breastfeeding is selfish) to another judgmental position in saying: 'I [breastfed] because I knew it was the best thing for them' and 'breast milk is the best'. There is something about this issue that seems to compel people to speak in normative and captious terms. READ MORE [ It's time for a little more realism and empathy on breastfeeding Opens in new window ] Perhaps public health rhetoric plays a role. The HSE breastfeeding guidance, for example, can be dogmatic: 'Your breast milk contains essential enzymes, hormones and antibodies. These are vital for your baby's normal growth, development and good health.' It's easy to understand how someone reading this might infer that those who don't breastfeed are doing something pretty bad if they willingly deprive babies of something that is vital for normal growth and good health. I suppose I just have to be grateful I can manage to type this with my own abnormally grown fingers. But the controversy struck me as interesting for another reason. As the first generation of social media parents, my cohort really have to grapple with the boundaries around children's digital privacy. Of course, feeding our children (however we do it) is one of the main things we do in their early years, so it's not surprising it ends up online. However, I understand people reacting strongly to the inclusion of small children in content that is posted as part of trying to build a career online. Kids need to be protected from the online world, but they also need to be protected from our engagement with it. For younger ones, it'll be a while until they can tell us how they feel about their likenesses being shared. It's a good exercise to think about how their adolescent selves might feel about the images we post. . A perfect storm of social media companies encouraging us to 'share' idealised versions of parenting and overblown institutional rhetoric that frames the main drivers of children's welfare outcomes in individualistic terms have contributed to this strange environment in which a woman feeding her child becomes the subject of a daytime TV storm.. Nothing, it seems, is more scrutinised than decision-making about children. I've experienced this reflexive meanness writing for this newspaper, with people commenting 'some are just not made to be mums' beneath a social media post about an article about letting my daughter take little walks along our terrace. Similarly, the discourse around both ends of infant feeding has become totally unnecessarily hostile: breastfeed 'too long' and they'll call you a creep; choose formula and they'll say you don't love your child enough. [ Stop framing breastfeeding versus bottle-feeding as a question of mothers at war Opens in new window ] I spent most of this week in London at a British Academy conference on the Ethics of Health Communication , where I spoke about the toxic state of infant feeding rhetoric and the complex state of the research. My presentation featured images of the poisonous commentary directed at both formula use and extended breastfeeding – two sides of the same miserable coin and examples of the rhetorical poison that flows through the motherhood discourse online. We have a long way to go to ensure pregnancy and early parenthood are better supported. One thing experts agree on is that more robust continuity of care across maternity services would help us feel more empowered in our reproductive and early parenting decisions. Equally, it would be good to have public health guidance that is clearer about the possibility of normally grown formula-fed babies, and acknowledges that poverty and inequality are the real threats to children's good health, whatever way you feed them. Breastfeeding can be challenging and (far from being selfish) is a selfless thing to do for a child – those who do it for longer should be given a lot of grace in how and when they decide to wean. Whether it's giving a three-month-old formula or a three-year-old breastmilk, we will all benefit from a little less mutual recrimination and maternal excoriation. Dr Clare Moriarty is a postdoctoral researcher working at Trinity Research in Social Sciences in Trinity College Dublin
