Simon Harris calls for Trump's 90-day tariff pause not to be extended
Tánaiste Simon Harris has appealed to US President Donald Trump not to extend his 90-day tariff pause beyond July 9.
He stated that an extension would only create uncertainty and that a deal must be reached before the deadline.
In April, President Trump confirmed that all goods entering the US from the EU would be slapped with a 20 per cent tariff.
Days later, he confirmed that a 90-day pause would be implemented to allow countries time to negotiate with the US. This pause is due to end on July 9.
Halfway through the pause, President Trump announced he was placing a 50 per cent tariff on the EU as negotiations were 'going nowhere'. However, this pause was later reinstated.
On Thursday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt hinted that President Trump may extend his upcoming self-imposed deadlines, stating that the date 'is not critical'.
However, Mr Harris, who is also the Trade Minister, said that a delay would not be a positive development and would cause more concern.
The Tánaiste said: 'I heard overnight some comments from the White House press secretary that President Trump might consider extending the deadline beyond July 9.
'On one level, people might say that's a positive. I don't see it as such.
'We need to work really intensively to try and get a deal, at least a framework deal, in advance of July 9, for one very big reason – Uncertainty.
'Uncertainty is causing people to pause their investment decisions. That has an impact on jobs.
'There's people in factories today in Ireland who want that certainty. Businesses want certainty.
'What we don't need is an elongation of the period of uncertainty. I'd really encourage everybody not to consider, at this moment in time, extensions of deadlines, but actually consider how we can get an agreement in place by the deadline.'
Mr Harris said Ireland wants to see an agreement struck between the US and the EU and appealed to both sides to 'intensify' efforts to get a deal done before the July 9 deadline.
He said he believes an agreement is "possible".
He continued: 'In fact, I believe an agreement is absolutely essential because the level of trade between the US and the EU is far too high to be sniffed at.
'Regardless of who the occupant of the Oval Office is, we are interdependent.
"And certainly in my conversations with President Trump's Trade Representative, Ambassador Jamieson Greer, I specifically made the case that we need to come up with creative solutions in relation to the pharma industry that are good for the US and good for the EU because our global supply chains are interdependent, patients depend on it and, actually, Ireland and the European Union can assist in making sure that US pharma companies have access to a very large market of 460 million consumers in the European Union.'
The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
3 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Why new homes may not get planning in Dublin after 2028
"The chain is only as strong as its weakest link." Eighteenth century philosopher Thomas Reid's quote could be applied to building houses in Dublin. That weak link is water. Local authorities in the capital will be unable to grant planning for new homes from 2028 onwards unless Uisce Éireann, formerly Irish Water, gets the green light for a massive new drainage scheme. For a city facing an acute housing crisis, that would be catastrophic. The Ringsend treatment plant in Dublin's south inner city is currently approaching maximum capacity. Other facilities are near or above their limits. If Dublin continues to build homes without additional wastewater capacity it risks polluting the sea around the capital, putting Ireland in breach of EU water standards affecting users of amenities such as beaches and swimming areas. If there is not sufficient water treatment, councils may have to turn down planning applications. Uisce Éireann's plan is called the Greater Dublin Drainage scheme. It would provide water treatment for half a million people in the capital and in parts of Meath and Kildare. It includes a 14km orbital sewer from Abbotstown which would connect a treatment plant in Clonsagh with an 11km outfall pipe running far out to sea north of Howth. But the project has been tied up in the planning process for seven years at a time when the housing crisis has worsened. A planning application was originally lodged for the scheme in 2018, it was subject to a judicial challenge in 2020, and due to one legal defect went back to An Coimisiún Pleanála in 2021. Uisce Éireann submitted further information last year and is still waiting for approval. This lengthy process was triggered by an appeal by one sea swimmer. The seven-year delay has seen costs for the project rise from €600m to €1.3bn. Even if the planning board gives permission for the drainage scheme, it could still be delayed again by another judicial review. If that happens, local authorities are unlikely to be able to give planning approval for new homes in many parts of north Dublin. This is an area where there are plans for significant numbers of new housing projects. Undoubtedly wastewater is the most acute issue facing Uisce Éireann. But the provision of water itself is a huge challenge too. Currently the River Liffey supplies 85% of the requirements for 1.7m people, and that is not viewed as sustainable. Uisce Éireann says the impact of climate change is already evident, and it will worsen. It says: "Extreme weather in the form of both droughts and intense rainfall will affect both the availability and quality of water." There are serious concerns about supplies for the capital and the midlands with residents in Mullingar already living with restrictions. The current sustainable production of water in the Greater Dublin Area is 620 million litres daily. In the week up to Sunday 22 June this year, the average usage was 635 million litres with storage in treated water reservoirs also used to meet demand. Supplies are very tight and there is little headroom for more housing with the population expected to grow by 25% by 2040. Uisce Éireann's plan is to use 2% of the water flowing from the River Shannon and pipe it to Dublin. It would be sourced from the Parteen Basin in Lough Derg which lies between Co Clare and Co Tipperary. Parteen is a reservoir which holds water used at the Ardnacrusha hydroelectric plant. The water would be treated nearby at Birdhill, Co Tipperary and transferred by gravity to a reservoir in south Dublin via a buried pipeline. This is not a new plan. The current iteration dates back to 1996. It has been agreed by the Government, and Uisce Éireann expects to submit a planning application at the end of this year. But there are objections to its environmental impact. The schemes to address water supplies and drainage to keep up with the demands for housing will require more money. Some €10.3bn has been allocated to Uisce Éireann for capital projects between now and 2029. The organisation says it requires a further €2bn. Next month the National Development Plan will be published by the Government and it is likely to address funding for Uisce Éireann. But even if the money is allocated, the organisation has a steep hill to climb if it is to make sufficient progress to meet growing requirements for more homes.
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Trump says he is terminating trade talks with Canada over tax on tech firms
US President Donald Trump said he is suspending trade talks with Canada over its plans to continue with its tax on technology firms, which he called 'a direct and blatant attack on our country'. Mr Trump, in a post on his social media network, said Canada had just informed the US that it was sticking to its plan to impose the digital services tax, which applies to Canadian and foreign businesses that engage with online users in Canada. The tax is set to go into effect on Monday. 'Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately. We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period,' Mr Trump said in his Truth Social post. Mr Trump's announcement was the latest move in the trade war he has launched since taking office for a second term in January. Progress with Canada has been a roller coaster, starting with the US president repeatedly suggesting it would be absorbed as a US state. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney (Patrick Doyle/The Canadian Press via AP) Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Friday that his country would 'continue to conduct these complex negotiations in the best interests of Canadians. It's a negotiation'. Mr Trump later said he expects that Canada will remove the tax. 'Economically we have such power over Canada. We'd rather not use it,' Mr Trump said in the Oval Office. 'It's not going to work out well for Canada. They were foolish to do it.' When asked if Canada could do anything to restart talks, he suggested Canada could remove the tax, predicted it will but said: 'It doesn't matter to me.' Mr Carney visited Mr Trump in May at the White House. Mr Trump last week travelled to Canada for the G7 summit in Alberta, where Mr Carney said Canada and the US had set a 30-day deadline for trade talks. The digital services tax will hit companies including Amazon, Google, Meta, Uber and Airbnb with a 3% levy on revenue from Canadian users. It will apply retroactively, leaving US companies with a two billion US dollar (£1.4 billion) bill due at the end of the month. 'We appreciate the Administration's decisive response to Canada's discriminatory tax on US digital exports,' Matt Schruers, chief executive of the Computer & Communications Industry Association, said in a statement. Canada and the US have been discussing easing a series of steep tariffs Mr Trump imposed on goods from America's neighbour. The Republican president earlier told reporters that the US was soon preparing to send letters to different countries, informing them of the new tariff rate his administration would impose on them. Mr Trump has imposed 50% tariffs on steel and aluminium as well as 25% tariffs on cars. He is also charging a 10% tax on imports from most countries, though he could raise rates on July 9, after the 90-day negotiating period he set would expire. Canada and Mexico face separate tariffs of as much as 25% that Mr Trump put into place under the auspices of stopping fentanyl smuggling, though some products are still protected under the 2020 US-Mexico-Canada Agreement signed during Mr Trump's first term. Addressing reporters after a private meeting with Republican senators on Friday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent declined to comment on news that Mr Trump had ended trade talks with Canada. 'I was in the meeting,' Mr Bessent said before moving on to the next question. 80% Proportion of Canada's exports that go to the US About 60% of US crude oil imports are from Canada, and 85% of US electricity imports as well. Canada is also the largest foreign supplier of steel, aluminium and uranium to the US and has 34 critical minerals and metals that the Pentagon is eager to obtain. About 80% of Canada's exports go to the US. Daniel Beland, a political science professor at McGill University in Montreal, said it is a domestic tax issue, but it has been a source of tensions between Canada and the US for a while because it targets US tech giants. 'The Digital Services Tax Act was signed into law a year ago so the advent of this new tax has been known for a long time,' Mr Beland said. 'Yet, President Trump waited just before its implementation to create drama over it in the context of ongoing and highly uncertain trade negotiations between the two countries.'
The Journal
3 hours ago
- The Journal
Ban on short-term lets under 90 days being considered by EU commission
A BAN ON short-term lets under 90 days is being considered by the EU in its response to the housing crisis. The proposal may be included in the report by the EU to enforce a minimum letting period on homes, vice chair of the European Parliament's committee on housing and MEP Ciaran Mullooly has said. It is understood that the European Commission, which is seeking to tackle the affordability crisis in Europe, is taking a cautious approach to making any changes to short term let regulations due to the EU's lucrative tourism sector. New regulations with short-term lets will soon come into effect in Europe, which will force platforms such as Airbnb and to register properties in order to establish the number of active listings. The data will be used by the Commission to determine if European intervention is needed, a senior source said, but the EU is concerned that any interventions could have a harsh impact on the tourism industry. Advertisement Similar concerns have been highlighted in Ireland following the announcement of a potential ban on planning permissions for short-term lets in towns with populations of more than 10,000 . Independent Ireland's Mullooly believes a limit on the length of terms allowed for listings will be proposed by the European Parliament's housing committee report later this year. He told The Journal in Brussels that while the committee is 'limited' in what it is able to propose, it is seeking to take some action to address short-term lets, and their impact on the local housing supply. Labour MEP Aodhán Ó Ríordáin, a substitute member of the committee, said there is nothing that should be counted out by politicians when drafting the final report. He added that there is also a need to standardise tenants' rights in Europe. The Commission is of the view that it is the role of the Irish government to regulate the local housing market, while its housing policy will explore methods to boost financing and delivery of housing. It has already conceded that state aid rules for local authorities will be relaxed to increase the construction of social homes. It is understood that it will also seek to guarantee money from lenders so firms building new housing have security in their funding. The EU cannot directly set housing targets and does not have the power to regulate the property market in individual member states. However, it is possible for the commission to provide better access to funds and underwrite loans to improve delivery . Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
