
Foundations laid for tribunal to try Putin for Ukraine invasion, EU says
In a statement late on Tuesday, the EU executive declared a breakthrough that it said would mean the Russian political and military leaders 'who bear the greatest responsibility' would be held to account.
The tribunal's creation was initially proposed by Ukraine just days after the full-scale invasion, but for nearly three years lawyers have wrangled over finding the right courtroom.
'There is no doubt that Putin has committed the crime of aggression, which is deciding to attack another country,' the EU's foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas told reporters. 'And without that crime, there wouldn't be any killings on the ground. There wouldn't be any attacks on civilian infrastructure, civilians, rapes.'
Setting up a tribunal, she said, was also about 'putting pressure' on Putin and the regime 'to really stop this war, and also to give a clear signal to other aggressors or would-be aggressors who are, or may be contemplating attacking neighbouring countries'.
Talks, which began last June between the EU, Ukraine, pan-European human rights body the Council of Europe (CoE) and 37 other countries, had been held up over whether Putin and other Russian leaders should be granted immunity. As a compromise, it is understood that Putin and senior figures would not be prosecuted while in office.
In a separate development, Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he would agree to direct talks with Putin to end the war that will reach a grim three-year milestone later this month.
British journalist Piers Morgan asked Zelenskyy how he would feel if he sat opposite Putin at a negotiating table. 'If that is the only set-up in which we can bring peace to the citizens of Ukraine and not lose people, definitely we will go for this set-up,' Zelenskyy said, adding that he would also require other 'participants' to be present.
In the interview with Morgan, Zelenskyy put Ukrainian casualties against Russia at 45,100, with 390,000 injured since the full-scale invasion in February 2022. He estimated the Russian dead at 350,000 and injured at between 600,000 and 700,000, and said Russian forces had 'many' missing in action.
The international criminal court (ICC) in The Hague has issued an arrest warrant for Putin and other senior Russian officials over the abduction of Ukrainian children. But it does not have the power to try crimes of aggression, as Russia has not ratified the ICC treaty.
Another mooted option is the amendment of the ICC Rome Statute in the UN general assembly, but many experts argue that would be unworkable, as many members of the court have not submitted to its jurisdiction over the crime of aggression. To break the logjam, the CoE, which has 46 member states and expelled Russia after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, has offered to host the tribunal.
The talks sped up as Donald Trump prepared to return to the White House, throwing uncertainty over US support for Ukraine. Nearly 40 countries have been involved in the talks, after a plea for justice from Zelenskyy, who has cited 'burned cities and tortured people' during the atrocities of Bucha and Mariupol, and missile strikes against ordinary civilians.
Iryna Mudra, the deputy head of the office of president Zelenskyy, said Ukraine's people wanted to hold the invaders accountable 'and to show the world that such horrible war crimes will have serious consequences. [Zelenskyy's] message is clear,' she went on. 'Evil must not remain unpunished. Peace must be just. Ukraine cannot and will not compromise on justice.'
A Ukrainian Nobel peace laureate, Oleksandra Matviichuk, has also called for the swift creation of a tribunal to try Putin, arguing that it could deter Russian forces from inflicting atrocities on Ukraine.
The CoE's secretary general, Alain Berset, said he hoped work on a text to create the tribunal would be finished this year. Berset, who met Trump in Paris for the reopening of Notre Dame in December, said it was 'not so clear' how the tribunal would be affected by any peace talks launched by the US administration: 'We try to go as fast as possible in a highly uncertain context.'
Berset, a former president of Switzerland, signalled that US support was needed if the tribunal was to work. 'I think it's also clear for everybody that without the G7 [the tribunal] will never fly.'
In a related effort to make Russia pay for the damage it has inflicted on Ukraine, the Commission also proposed joining possible talks on an 'International Claims Commission' for Ukraine.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
a few seconds ago
- The Guardian
Mike Johnson would have ‘great pause' about a Ghislaine Maxwell pardon
The US House speaker, Mike Johnson, said on Sunday he would have 'great pause' about granting a pardon or commutation to Ghislaine Maxwell while another House Republican said it should be considered as part of an effort to obtain more information about Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. Donald Trump and his allies, including Johnson, have been under immense pressure to disclose more information about Epstein for weeks, especially amid scrutiny over the extent of Trump's relationship with Epstein. The splits over what to do with Maxwell illustrate the complicated challenge posed by the scandal for Trump, his Maga base and the broader Republican party. Johnson weighed in on the possibility of a pardon after Todd Blanche, the deputy attorney general, met with Maxwell, who is serving a 20 year prison sentence for sex trafficking, over two days last week. The one-time British socialite was Epstein's close confidante for years and his partner-in-crime. Epstein killed himself in jail in 2019. The House speaker was asked about the possibility of a pardon by Kristen Welker during an appearance on NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday. 'If you're asking my opinion, I think 20 years was a pittance. I think she should have a life sentence at least. I mean, think of all these unspeakable crimes,' he said. 'It's hard to put into words how evil this was, and that she orchestrated it and was a big part of it, at least under the criminal sanction, I think is an unforgivable thing. So again, not my decision, but I have great pause about that, as any reasonable person would.' Pressed directly on whether he favored a pardon, Johnson deferred to Trump. 'Obviously that's a decision of the president. He said he had not adequately considered that. I won't get it in front of him. That's not my lane,' he said. Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican who has been pushing for disclosure of more Epstein information, said a pardon should be on the table for Maxwell. 'That would be up to the president. But if she has information that could help us, then I think she should testify. Let's get that out there. And whatever they need to do to compel that testimony, as long as it's truthful, I would be in favor of,' he told Welker on Meet the Press. Representative Ro Khanna, a California Democrat who has joined Massie's effort to release more information, said he did not support a pardon for Maxwell, who was charged with perjury in connection to a civil deposition in 2016 (prosecutors did not move forward with those charges once they obtained her sex-trafficking conviction.) 'I'm concerned that the deputy attorney general Todd Blanche is meeting with her supposedly one-on-one. Look, I agree with Congressman Massie that she should testify. But she's been indicted twice on perjury. This is why we need the files. This is why we need independent evidence,' he said on Meet the Press. After Trump pledged to disclose more information about Epstein on the campaign trail, the justice department said earlier this month it had determined Epstein did not have a 'client list' and did not blackmail anyone. Johnson adjourned the US House of Representatives early last week to avoid a vote on releasing Epstein files. He said on Sunday he favored 'maximum disclosure'. During his appearance on Meet the Press, he defended that decision, saying the legislation being pushed by Massie and Khanna would require the release of uncorroborated information and could harm the victims of Epstein and Maxwell's crimes. 'You have to protect innocent people's names and reputations whose names might be, as you noted at the outset of the program, intertwined into all these files,' he said. 'These are minors in many cases who were subjected to unspeakable crimes, abject evil. They've already suffered great harm. We do not need their names being unmasked.' That kind of argument is a 'straw man' Massie said on Sunday. 'Ro and I carefully crafted this legislation so that the victims' names will be redacted and that no child pornography will be released. So they're hiding behind that,' he said. Khanna also pushed back on the idea that releasing the information could damage reputations. 'Different people feel that the rich and the powerful have been not held accountable, that they have a different set of rules, and that there may be government officials involved,' he said. 'They're going to be able to distinguish between someone who got a grant for Jeffrey Epstein to do cancer research versus rich and powerful men who were abusing underage girls.'


Daily Mail
a few seconds ago
- Daily Mail
Doctors strikes will be banned under the Tories like police and prison officers, vows Kemi Badenoch
Doctors strikes will be banned under a Conservative government in the same way as police and prison officers, Kemi Badenoch has vowed. The Tory party leader today announced she would amend the law to bar the protests as she insisted the British Medical Association (BMA) is 'out of control'. It comes following 11 strikes in the past 18 months which Ms Badenoch said had resulted in patients dying. Her comments were made on GB News amid the ongoing five-day series of strikes by resident doctors in support of a pay claim. Urging Sir Keir Starmer to take similar action, Ms Badenoch said: 'The BMA has become militant, these strikes are going too far, and it is time for action. 'Doctors do incredibly important work. Medicine is a vocation – not just a job. That is why in government we offered a fair deal that supported doctors, but protected taxpayers too. 'These strikes will have a significant economic effect, but they will also mean cancelled operations, worry for families of the sick, and suffering for those who are unwell. We know that previous strike action by doctors even led to some patients losing their lives. 'That is why Conservatives are stepping in, and setting out common sense proposals to protect patients, and the public finances. And we are making an offer in the national interest – we will work with the Government to face down the BMA to help protect patients and the NHS.' Doctors hold lives in their hands. No one should lose critical healthcare because of strikes but that's what's happening now. That's why a Conservative government led by me would ban doctors' strikes, just like we do the army and police. — Kemi Badenoch (@KemiBadenoch) July 27, 2025 Police, the military and prison officers are banned from taking strike action under the 1992 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act. The Conservatives would amend this to include doctors. Action short of a strike such as working to rule and banning overtime would still be permitted - with doctors remaining able to unionise through the BMA, like the police, which has the police federation to represent members' interests. Minimum service levels have also been proposed by the Conservatives, which would aim to ensure a basic service provision in not just healthcare but other essential sectors like education and transport. The party has argued proposed changes would bring the UK in line with other nations such as Australia and Canada who have tighter restrictions on doctors strikes, as well as European nations like Greece, Italy and Portugal that have minimum service levels laws in place across their health services. Under Australia's Fair Work Act 2009, the Fair Work Commission is required to suspend or terminate strike action that endangers the safety, health or welfare of the population. Attempts to block doctors' strike action are likely to be challenged in the courts, specifically under Article 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights. Police officers have been banned from taking strike action since 1919 when the Police Act made it a criminal offence and all armed forces members are bound by the King's Regulations which make unionisation illegal. The Conservatives' proposed primary legislation would restrict the ability of for doctors at all levels to engage in strike action as regulated by the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. This would be done through exempting doctors from the part of the act that gives the right to strike. The Conservatives said they will also look at introducing back-to-work orders in a similar vein to other European countries. Stuart Andrew MP, Shadow Health Secretary, said: 'The Conservative Party has always respected the important work that healthcare professionals do, but enough is enough. 'The BMA has taken our NHS hostage and used this Labour Government's weakness to demand more and more – with taxpayers and patients left to suffer the consequences. 'As our health service faces yet another round of damaging strike action, the Conservatives are calling time. If Labour were serious about cutting waiting lists and delivering the health system our country deserves, rather than just kowtowing to the unions, they would back our plans.'


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Major pledge on Britain being 'ready to fight' in face of China threats
Defence Secretary John Healey was challenged over threats to Taiwan as he visited HMS Prince of Wales, which is docked in Australia as part of a rare Indo-Pacific deployment Britain is ready to fight in the face of escalation from China, the Defence Secretary has said. John Healey was challenged over threats to Taiwan as he visited the British aircraft carrier, HMS Prince of Wales, which is docked in Australia as part of a rare Indo-Pacific deployment. Asked about what the UK is doing to support countries like Taiwan amid potential escalation from China, Mr Healey told The Telegraph: 'If we have to fight, as we have done in the past, Australia and the UK are nations that will fight together. 'We exercise together and by exercising together and being more ready to fight, we deter better together.' But the Cabinet minister insisted he would rather see any disputes in the Indo-Pacific resolved 'peacefully' and 'diplomatically', clarifying that he was speaking about preparation to fight in 'general terms'. Mr Healey was joined by Richard Marles, Australia's deputy prime minister, on HMS Prince of Wales, as the ship docked in Darwin to take part in war games with allies, including the US. The British aircraft carrier, which is roughly the size of three football pitches, is on an eight-month deployment, known as Operation Highmast. In April, Keir Starmer met the crew onboard HMS Prince of Wales during an overnight stay ahead of their voyage. The PM said the mission showed the UK's "leadership on global issues and security and defence". "We all know that the world is more uncertain than it felt a few months or years before - we're in a new era," Mr Starmer said at the time. "We are sending a clear message of strength to our adversaries, and a message of unity and purpose to our allies." Tensions in the Indo-pacific region have been increasing for some time, with fears mounting that China will invade Taiwan, a self-governing island. China's leader Xi Jinping has eyed forcibly incorporating Taiwan into the country. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth warned in May of China posing an "imminent" threat to Taiwan during a high-level Asia defence summit. In the UK's Strategic Defence Review, published in June, it said: "China is increasingly leveraging its economic , technological and military capabilities.. This includes: a vast increase in advanced platforms and weapons systems such as space warfare capabilities, an unprecedented diversification and growth of its conventional and nuclear missile forces with missiles that can reach the UK and Europe.' And on the China threat the SDR warns of: 'More types and greater numbers of nuclear weapons than ever before with its arsenal expected to double to 1,000 nuclear warheads by 2030.'