Clarence Thomas Urges 'Reexamination' of 150-Year-Old Civil Rights Statute
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Associate Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in a new opinion issued Thursday that the Court should "reexamine" a century-old section of federal law that widely enables civil rights litigation.
Why It Matters
The Supreme Court's 6-3 decision along partisan lines on Thursday in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic rules that states can block Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion provider. The South Carolina case originally stems from non-abortion services including contraception, cancer screenings and pregnancy testing.
What To Know
Justice Neil Gorsuch delivered the opinion for the conservative-leaning court. Liberal justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor dissented.
But it was Justice Thomas' parting words in his dissent that also drew attention.
"The Court properly applies our precedents to resolve the question presented," Thomas writes. "As it makes clear, even under current doctrine, courts should not too readily recognize a statutory right as enforceable under §1983.
"But, given the remarkable gap between the original understanding of §1983 and its current role, a more fundamental reexamination of our §1983 jurisprudence is in order."
U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas appears before swearing in Pam Bondi as U.S. Attorney General in the Oval Office at the White House on February 05, 2025 in Washington, DC.
U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas appears before swearing in Pam Bondi as U.S. Attorney General in the Oval Office at the White House on February 05, 2025 in Washington, DC.Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, known formally as 42 U.S.C. §1983, is a federal law that allows for the suing of state and local government officials for violating constitutional rights. It's also used widely in federal civil rights litigation.
Thomas' interpretation and feelings toward the 150-year-old law have been conveyed numerous times in past Court decisions.
In 2020, Thomas dissented on cases the Court declined to hear challenging the doctrine of qualified immunity, writing: "I have previously expressed my doubts about our qualified immunity jurisprudence. Because our Section 1983 qualified immunity doctrine appears to stray from the statutory text, I would grant this petition."
He also argued that while Section 1983 makes no mention of defenses or immunities, its text provides individuals the right to sue and "applies categorically to the deprivation of constitutional rights under color of state law."
In 2023, as part of the majority reaffirming that private plaintiffs can enforce spending clause enactments under Section 1983, Thomas wrote a 36-page solo dissent arguing provisions and constitutionality under that law.
This past February, the Court ruled in a case involving petitioners from Alabama who were unemployed workers and sued the Alabama Department of Labor under Section 1983 for allegedly unlawfully delaying the processing of state unemployment benefits claims.
"As a matter of first principles, States have unfettered discretion over whether to provide a forum for §1983 claims in their courts," Thomas wrote in a dissenting opinion. "And, Alabama's exhaustion rule does not transgress the limitations that our precedents have recognized."
What People Are Saying
Alexis McGill Johnson, President and CEO of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, in a statement: "Today, the Supreme Court once again sided with politicians who believe they know better than you, who want to block you from seeing your trusted health care provider and making your own health care decisions. And the consequences are not theoretical in South Carolina or other states with hostile legislatures. Patients need access to birth control, cancer screenings, STI testing and treatment, and more."
South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster in a statement: "Seven years ago, we took a stand to protect the sanctity of life and defend South Carolina's authority and values—and today, we are finally victorious. The legality of my executive order prohibiting taxpayer dollars from being used to fund abortion providers like Planned Parenthood has been affirmed by the highest court in the land."
Lila Rose, president and founder of anti-abortion group Live Action, in a post on X: "Taxpayers shouldn't be forced to fund abortion. Let's finish the job and defund them at the state & federal levels now!"
What Happens Next
The Court's decision potentially paves the way for other states to mirror how Medicaid funding is distributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
22 minutes ago
- New York Post
Babbling Biden's claims of Trump trashing the constitution are straight hypocrisy
Last week, Biden addressed the National Bar Association. He demanded $300,000. I hear he took less. Speech halting. Words scripted. His burble — minus explanation — said President Trump's trashing the Constitution. Joe Babble pumped up the Supreme Court with his ideological types, allowed transpeople into the military, supported college violations, permitted nearly 14 million foreigners through our borders and stayed caring daddy to his sticky-fingered son. What worked with Biden was a sticky middle finger. Advertisement They built to last Peter Kalikow. Realtor. Onetime, short-time owner of the now about-to-be countrywide NY Post. Some festivities. His invite says it's 100 years of celebrating Kalikow's excellence. The company. The family. 'This landmark event honors a century of the Kalikow family's legacy in New York real estate. It commemorates 100 years of leadership, innovation, and impact on the city's skyline and communities.' This whole city — minus those lying on the street — will all be there. Advertisement Jackman's clean cut past Hugh Jackman's been in the news because of his recent divorce and more recent affair with his also recent B'way co-star Sutton Foster. But I heard that once he did a semi-nude bathtub scene for the aulde 2001 movie 'Kate & Leopold.' The director cut it. Hugh said: 'Thank goodness they cut it. Now people won't give me a hard time doing nudity.' The director said the scene was cut because it 'didn't really fit the film, but it will definitely be in the DVD.' Advertisement 'Ugh,' said Jackman. Now nobody can see it — or him — except for maybe Sutton Foster. Hometown Bills Bill O'Reilly: 'I watched the Billy Joel documentary. We were both raised in Levittown. He in the Hicksville section, me in the Westbury precinct. 'Nobody had air-conditioning. We spent summer nights at the municipal swimming pool. Joel's crew was right out of 'Grease.' Slicked hair, cigarettes, T-shirt, chewing gum. We'd sing a cappella. If you sang off-key you could wind up in the pool.' Advertisement Awaiting groom NYC beauty shop owner who shall remain nameless — or customerless: 'You see bra straps that are filthy. A man wouldn't put on day-old socks — why do ladies do that? 'Females today need grooming. Also more sexual awakening. 'I have customers all ages but a woman doesn't turn beautiful until she's maybe 35. Needs character. Who wants a child? 'The right colors attract. Second is the body. Notice her tush. The curves. Her physicality. Walks well, sits well, uses all she's got. For me she has to dress well, walk well — definitely not smell. 'I beautify women all day. I certainly don't want to go to bed with a child.' Advertisement Some cable stations keep showing reruns of old TV series like 'Dick Van Dyke' or 'Laugh-In.' Forget your television set now creating exciting new content. They're offering refills. Next year you want news? It'll be an AI machine that looks like a juiced-up Walter Cronkite. Only in New York, kids, only in New York.
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Michigan Gov. Whitmer makes another White House visit to meet with Trump
WASHINGTON — Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer met with President Donald Trump at the White House on Tuesday to discuss the toll tariffs are taking on the auto industry and the potential effects of his tax and spending bill on Medicaid. It's the latest in a string of meetings between the Democratic governor and the Republican president after the two frequently clashed during his first term. In his second term, Whitmer has adopted a more diplomatic approach, drawing some backlash from fellow Democrats. But it's also resulted in multiple wins for Whitmer's state, including Trump's approving $50 million in storm relief and awarding a new fighter jet mission for an Air National Guard base in the state.
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Chuck Schumer's August battle plan
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer was in upstate New York on Tuesday to kick off a critical August recess that will have implications for whether he wins back his majority. Why it matters: Schumer forced the GOP to leave town for the summer empty-handed last week. Now he'll try to build on that momentum. On Tuesday, he was in Niagara to rail against the impact of tariffs on tourism; in Orleans to raise the alarm about job training program cuts; at a community hospital in Cayuga to talk about Medicaid cuts; and in Binghampton to hit the GOP on Social Security cuts. The last six months have armed Schumer and Democrats with plenty of lines of attack against the GOP, especially a massive tax cuts package and widespread tariffs. But they still have a hole to dig out of, with the party holding an approval rating of just 33%, according to a recent Wall Street Journal poll. Between the lines: The itinerary is an example of what Schumer wants Democrats to do — hyper-localize national issues like Medicaid cuts and funding freezes to drive down support for the GOP.
