logo
Could parents of Indianapolis teens involved in crime be charged? Maybe

Could parents of Indianapolis teens involved in crime be charged? Maybe

The frustration in Indianapolis police chief Chris Bailey's voice was palpable as he spoke to media in the early morning hours of July 5. Hours after the Independence Day fireworks show, hundreds of unsupervised teens lingered around downtown, and the atmosphere was chaotic.
"I don't know how many times I have to say it. We are not your children's keepers. You are," Bailey said. "And parents and guardians have got to step up."
As police were in the process of breaking up a fight at around 1:30 a.m. on July 5, they heard gunfire from a mass shooting that killed Xavion Jackson, 16, and Azareaon S. Cole, 15. Two other teens and three adults were also injured.
On July 7, the Marion County Prosecutor's Office announced charges against four teens who were found downtown with guns around the time of the shooting. None of the teens, who range in age from 13 to 17, have been accused of committing the shooting, but are charged with possessing guns under the age of 18.
That charge, known as "dangerous possession of a firearm," is the most common charge filed in Marion County's juvenile court. It's increased dramatically in the last few years, Prosecutor Ryan Mears said. The eldest teen, who is being charged as an adult, already has a prior conviction for that charge.
Article continues below gallery.
More: Ralph Durrett hopes to create 'positive childhood experiences' for Indianapolis' youth
To Bailey, Indianapolis' ongoing struggle with youth violence is at least in part due to guardians' negligence.
"If I can convince the prosecutor to hold parents accountable, I'm gonna do that, too," Bailey said on July 5.
Mears said more cases are expected to be filed in the coming days, and the possibility of cases against parents or guardians "will certainly be investigated."
It's not an entirely novel idea: in 2024, the parents of a Michigan school shooter were separately convicted of involuntary manslaughter, even though neither was directly involved in the killings.
Charges of that nature will likely require forensic analyses of phones and social media because investigators are looking for proof that parents knew or should have known their child had a gun.
Parents of the charged teens have not been "super cooperative in answering law enforcement questions," according to Mears.
"It's beyond ridiculous that a 13-year-old was walking around downtown with a gun," Mears said.
Article continues below gallery.
The city announced plans to enforce a youth curfew prohibiting teens between 15 and 17 from being unaccompanied in public between 11 p.m. and 5 a.m.
A similar plan was announced more than a year ago after a different downtown Indianapolis mass shooting wounded seven teens. In April 2024, a feud between teens escalated into a gunfight, shining a national spotlight on the city's struggle to curb youth violence.
The results of that initiative are unclear. IndyStar has asked the city for the number of teens cited under the curfew over the past two years and has not yet received a response.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Indiana school banned mom for recording principal. Think tank says it's unconstitutional
Indiana school banned mom for recording principal. Think tank says it's unconstitutional

Indianapolis Star

time7 hours ago

  • Indianapolis Star

Indiana school banned mom for recording principal. Think tank says it's unconstitutional

After Northeast Indiana mom recorded a meeting with her daughter's principal last year and then posted it online, she was banned from school grounds and limited in her communications with school employees. Nicole Graves was disciplined after twice violating a Whitley County district policy not to record meetings without the building administrator's permission, according to a district letter sent to her. The Goldwater Institute, a conservative-leaning Arizona-based think tank, is pushing to rescind the policy, arguing that it violates the right to free expression protected under the First Amendment. It's a policy found in other schools around the state and the country. "We're very hopeful that the school district will simply just change the recording policy," attorney Adam Shelton said. "However, we are still open to litigation depending on how the conversation with the school district continues to go." If the school restricted Graves from talking about the meeting or drafting a transcript, Shelton said, it would undoubtedly violate the First Amendment. He questions why a recording would be any different. "This is just a measure the school's adopted to prevent the most accurate record of conversation from being taken," he said. The school has since lifted its punishments as part of a typical end-of-school-year review, said Laura McDermott, superintendent of Whitley County Consolidated Schools, in a statement. The statement did not mention the recording policy, and McDermott has not responded to additional IndyStar questions. In a prior statement to Fort Wayne TV station WPTA, she said Graves violated the recording policy meant to protect student privacy. "The parent was not restricted from school property for expressing concerns, but rather due to a pattern of aggressive interactions with school staff and public commentary involving children other than her own," the statement to IndyStar reads. "As a school district, we have an obligation to protect the privacy and well-being of all students and to maintain a safe, respectful environment for staff and families." Nicole Graves asked to meet with Indian Springs Middle School principal, Wesley Mullett, after her daughter reported an incident on the school bus. In a video produced by Goldwater, Graves said her daughter's school bus driver was smacking his belt against his hand and had his underwear visible. Graves asked to meet with Mullett to ask about the incident and why she wasn't notified when her daughter reported the driver's behavior. She also previously had issues with other bus drivers in the district, Shelton said. Graves said she lost confidence in the school after hearing Mullett's explanations about the situation and later posted the meeting recording on social media. She decided to record the meeting so she could accurately recount what was said, according to Goldwater. Graves received a letter detailing punishments for violating the district's recording policy. She was asked to take down the audio clip, according to the letter. Goldwater argues Graves' Fourteenth Amendment rights to control her child's education were violated. Shelton said Graves should have been notified about her child's report of the bus driver, and there are concerns about her subsequent punishment limiting access to her daughter's education. In a letter sent to school officials in May, Shelton and Goldwater argue that the school's policy violates her rights to free expression. Though Graves is no longer banned from school grounds, Shelton said the think tank wants to see this policy rolled back. McDermott did not respond to an IndyStar question about the details of the policy and whether it is under review. The First Amendment extends to conduct that is inherently expressive, which courts have decided does include video and audio recordings in some cases. Goldwater's argument lands in a legal gray area. Shelton believes the right to record government officials is protected and argues that freedom should not be limited to a public setting if there are no other privacy concerns at play. "There's no meaningful constitutional difference between speaking about what happened at a meeting and recording what happened at a meeting," Shelton said. Still, there isn't clear case law on this issue. The USA TODAY Network - Indiana's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners.

Jon Jones 'a little disappointed' with Dana White's concerns of UFC White House booking
Jon Jones 'a little disappointed' with Dana White's concerns of UFC White House booking

USA Today

timea day ago

  • USA Today

Jon Jones 'a little disappointed' with Dana White's concerns of UFC White House booking

Jon Jones was disappointed to hear Dana White show concern over booking him for the proposed UFC White House card. The UFC CEO made it known that he isn't sure he can trust the former heavyweight champion with headlining such a major event that could take place on the White House grounds on Independence Day in 2026. At the UFC 318 post-event news conference, White said he isn't sure Jones can be trusted not to get in trouble leading up to the event. "It's not even about him winning the belt," White told MMA Junkie and other reporters. "You know how I felt about him. You know I can't risk putting him in big positions in a big spot and have something go wrong – especially the White House card." Jones has given the promotion multiple headaches throughout his career. "Bones" refused to fight Chael Sonnen on short notice after Dan Henderson got injured, which prompted the cancellation of the entire UFC 151 card. Jones was stripped of the light heavyweight title ahead of UFC 187 after a hit-and-run accident. In the days ahead of UFC 200, Jones failed a pre-fight drug test, leading to his removal from the main event against Daniel Cormier on fight week. A year later, he made it to the cage to face Cormier, but later failed another drug test, causing his third-round stoppage to be overturned to a no contest. White announced Jones' intention to retire during a post-fight news conference in Baku, Azerbaijan. Jones would confirm the news shortly after, but more headlines soon followed. Jones was allegedly involved in another hit-and-run accident, one in which he was suspected of driving under the influence, and fled the scene after a car crash, leaving a woman behind in the passenger seat. He also allegedly threatened the life of a responding officer over the phone. The timing of everything has led many, including White, to publicly wonder if Jones' latest legal issue is why he decided to retire and relinquish the heavyweight title to interim champion Tom Aspinall. However, once president Donald Trump announced the idea of hosting a UFC event at the White House, Jones quickly changed his tune on fighting, stating his intention to return on that card. Initially, White seemed on board, stating his dream headliner for the event would be Jones vs. Aspinall. White's latest comments indicate hesitation to place Jones in such an important potential spot given his history, which prompted a reply on social media. "I heard the comments made at last night's press conference," Jones wrote on X (formerly Twitter). "While I was a little disappointed, I'm still in the UFC's drug testing pool, staying sharp, and continuing to train like a professional. I'll be ready for whatever comes next. "In a recent interview, I shared that the opportunity to fight at the White House gave me something deeper to fight for, a 'why' that goes beyond paychecks or belts. Fighting for my country gives me a greater purpose!" Jones continued, playing up how important it would be for him to further his legacy, despite seeming content with retirement before the idea of a White House event. "The silver lining in all this is knowing the fans see my heart," Jones wrote. "They see, I am ready and willing to take on anyone, to represent my country on a historic stage. For me, it's never been just about the opponent. I'm chasing legacy, something timeless, something bigger than the moment. "So for now, I'll keep grinding, stay patient, and stay faithful. I'm ready to fight on July 4th. #IndependenceDay"

Number missing in Texas floods drops from 97 to 3, officials say
Number missing in Texas floods drops from 97 to 3, officials say

USA Today

time2 days ago

  • USA Today

Number missing in Texas floods drops from 97 to 3, officials say

The number of people thought to be missing in the devastating floods in Kerr County, Texas, over the Fourth of July holiday weekend has been revised down from at least 97 to three, officials announced July 19. The city of Kerrville, Texas, said the Kerr County Flood Disaster Joint Information Center confirmed that "through extensive follow-up work among state and local agencies, many individuals who were initially reported as missing have been verified as safe and removed from the list." 'We are profoundly grateful to the more than 1,000 local, state, and federal authorities who have worked tirelessly in the wake of the devastating flood that struck our community,' Kerrville City Manager Dalton Rice said. On July 15, Gov. Greg Abbott said 97 people were still listed as missing in the greater Kerrville area, down from 160-plus about a week ago. 'This remarkable progress reflects countless hours of coordinated search and rescue operations, careful investigative work, and an unwavering commitment to bringing clarity and hope to families during an unimaginably difficult time,' Rice said. Kerr County Judge Rob Kelly thanked law enforcement and others who helped verify the number missing. 'Your dedication, professionalism, and compassion have brought comfort and answers to so many." Kelly had said earlier that a large percentage of those unaccounted for were probably visiting the area. He said many tourists had come for the Independence Day weekend fireworks and concert. Historic flooding overwhelmed the banks of the Guadalupe River in the predawn hours of July 4. Recovery operations are continuing to search for those still missing. As of July 17, Abbott said, the death toll stood at 135 statewide, with 116 from Kerr County perishing in the floods. Contributing: John Bacon

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store