logo
US-EU Trade Deal to Reshape Energy and Investment Landscape

US-EU Trade Deal to Reshape Energy and Investment Landscape

Arabian Post28-07-2025
A transformative trade agreement between the United States and the European Union is poised to redefine their economic relations. US President Donald Trump announced the deal, which is set to have far-reaching implications on both sides of the Atlantic. The agreement includes the unprecedented opening of trade at zero tariffs, along with a significant commitment from the EU to purchase $750 billion worth of energy over the next decade. Moreover, the EU has pledged to invest an additional $600 billion in various sectors, significantly surpassing previous investment targets.
The deal was hailed by the Trump administration as a major victory for the US economy, promising to bolster energy exports and enhance investment flows. While the specifics of the energy sectors involved remain under discussion, the agreement signals a substantial shift in the global energy market. The US, a major producer of natural gas and oil, is expected to benefit from increased exports, particularly in liquefied natural gas and other energy resources.
At the heart of the deal is the mutual understanding that both parties will benefit from zero tariffs on industrial goods, which has been a longstanding issue in US-EU trade talks. The tariff reduction is expected to boost economic growth on both sides, especially for sectors such as automotive, technology, and agriculture. For the EU, the opening of the US market is seen as a crucial opportunity to tap into the world's largest economy without facing the heavy tariffs that have traditionally limited market access.
ADVERTISEMENT
Investment plays a pivotal role in the agreement, with the EU's commitment to direct $600 billion more than previously agreed upon into US infrastructure, technology, and innovation. This will likely lead to a surge in American jobs, particularly in industries poised for growth. It also presents a major opportunity for EU businesses to secure a foothold in the burgeoning US tech sector, which has long been a hotspot for investment.
The announcement of the deal was accompanied by optimistic rhetoric from both US and EU officials, who described the agreement as an example of transatlantic cooperation that will not only benefit both economies but also foster stronger geopolitical ties. Experts believe the trade deal could serve as a model for future trade relations, potentially influencing global trade dynamics and setting a precedent for other international agreements.
However, the deal has faced criticism from some quarters. Critics argue that the focus on energy purchases and large-scale investments could overshadow critical issues like labour rights, environmental protections, and fair competition. Some environmental groups have voiced concerns about the potential long-term environmental impact of increased energy trade, particularly if it leads to more fossil fuel reliance. These concerns underscore the ongoing debates about the balance between economic growth and sustainability, a tension that continues to shape global trade discussions.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Administration says it will withhold disaster funding to states that boycott Israel
Trump Administration says it will withhold disaster funding to states that boycott Israel

Middle East Eye

time29 minutes ago

  • Middle East Eye

Trump Administration says it will withhold disaster funding to states that boycott Israel

US states and territories that boycott Israeli companies or companies operating in Israel will be denied federal funds for natural disaster preparation, Reuters reported on Monday. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) stated in a notice of funding on Friday that it was making nearly $1 billion available to states to protect themselves from natural disasters. The funding announced on Friday applies to 15 different grant programmes that protect states from natural disasters such as floods, tornadoes, hurricanes, and fires as well as terrorist attacks and cyber disruptions. FEMA has also announced an additional $2.2 bn in funding for disaster preparation since 25 July. However, Reuters said that at least $1.9 billion of this funding was conditional on states following Department of Homeland conditions laid out in April that they will not cut 'commercial relations specifically with Israeli companies or companies doing business in or with Israel' to qualify, according to 11 agency grant notices it reviewed. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters However, the ruling is seen to be largely symbolic. More than 30 US states already have laws that require 'public entities to certify they do not and will not boycott Israel', according to an essay titled 'Anti-BDS laws and the politics of political boycotts' in the University of Pennsylvania's Journal of Law and Social Change. However, in recent months, calls for boycotts of Israeli and international companies who are doing business with Israel have increased. Most recently, UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese's called for action after she published a scathing new report in which she names over 60 companies, including major technology firms like Google, Amazon and Microsoft, alleging their involvement in what she calls "the transformation of Israel's economy of occupation to an economy of genocide". Albanese was sanctioned by the US after she published the report. Political blackmail It is the latest escalation in the Trump administration making war on institutions, departments, or states that do not fall in line with its goals and priorities such as its hardline approach to immigration or issues such as climate change. For example, FEMA's statement on Friday laid out that recipients will no longer be able to spend the funds 'to house illegal immigrants at luxury hotels, fund climate change pet projects or empower radical organizations with unseemly ties that don't serve the interest of the American people'. The statement also said that recipients are required to spend 10 percent minimum on 'supporting border crisis response and enforcement'.

Gaza: Family of frail boy killed at GHF site months ago still haven't received his body
Gaza: Family of frail boy killed at GHF site months ago still haven't received his body

Middle East Eye

time30 minutes ago

  • Middle East Eye

Gaza: Family of frail boy killed at GHF site months ago still haven't received his body

The family of a 10-year-old boy who was killed whilst trying to receive aid at the controversial Israeli- and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) have yet to receive his body, more than two months after he went missing and a week after a US whistleblower said he saw Israeli forces shoot him dead. Last week, retired US army soldier Anthony Aguilar, who worked as a security subcontractor at the GHF, said he saw Israeli forces kill Abdulrahim 'Amir' al-Jarabe'a on 28 May, whilst he was manning a GHF aid distribution point in southern Gaza. "This young boy, Amir, walked up to me, barefoot and wearing tattered clothes that hung off his emaciated body," Aguilar told the UnXeptable podcast. "He walked 12km to get there, and when he got there, he thanked us for the remnants and the small crumbs that he got. "He set them down on the ground, because I was kneeling at this point, and he sets his food down, and he places his hands on my face, on the side of my face, on my cheeks, these frail, skeleton, emaciated hands - dirty - and he puts them on my face, and he kissed me. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "He kissed me, and he said thank you in English, thank you. And he collected his items, and he walked back to the group," he said. "Then he was shot at with pepper spray, tear gas, stun grenades and bullets shot at his feet [and then] in the air, and he runs away scared, and the IDF [Israeli army] were shooting at the crowd. "They're shooting into this crowd and Palestinians - civilians, human beings - are dropping to the ground, getting shot. And Amir was one of them." Amir's cousin, Qusai al-Jarabe'a, told Middle East Eye that the family had held out hope that he may still be alive despite him being missing for more than two months. "He is still missing, his fate is unknown," Qusai said, referring to the fact that his body had yet to be recovered. "Everyone's heartbroken. But he's not the first child, nor will he be the last [to go missing]. Israel is targeting children," he added. Exclusive: The family of 10-year-old Abdulrahim Mohammed al-Jarabe'a, known by his nickname Amir, has renewed calls for an international investigation into his disappearance, after a widely circulated video showed him receiving aid from a US soldier in southern Gaza. Abdulrahim… — Middle East Eye (@MiddleEastEye) August 1, 2025 Since 28 May, when Amir is reported to have visited a GHF aid site in southern Gaza, his step-mother Siham al-Jarabe'a said that she had reached out to every functioning clinic and hospital for any sign of life. MEE also contacted hospitals and morgues but was told no one matching his name or description had been admitted between 28 May and 1 August. "The family is heartbroken," Siham told MEE, as she pleaded with international bodies, including the Red Cross, to help find his remains. "He went to get food, and he never came back. If a dog had gone missing like this, people would have asked where it went - but because he's a Palestinian child, the world stays silent," she said. According to Siham, the boy was in high spirits and continued to help his relatives hunt for food after his father was killed on 29 December in an Israeli air strike in Bani Suheila, in the Khan Younis governorate of the Gaza Strip. "Where did Amir go, to which place?" Siham asked. "Did he go to the soldiers, or somewhere else? If I would have seen him leave to go get aid, I would have brought him back." 'Bodies are piling up' On Monday, the Palestinian NGO, the Addameer Foundation, said that at least 54 Palestinians were unaccounted for after heading to aid centres operated by the GHF. "We have documented arrests of aid seekers, including children," it said as it blamed Israeli forces for blocking efforts to recover the bodies of those reportedly killed near GHF sites. "Bodies are piling up near aid sites, and in many cases, the IOF [Israeli army] has bulldozed them without allowing proper recovery or identification." Starving child in Gaza was reportedly killed minutes after receiving aid, former US military contractor says Read More » According to the United Nations, more than 1,000 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces while trying to access food in Gaza since the controversial GHF began operations in late May. Last month, a displaced Palestinian in Gaza, compared trying to collect food at a GHF site to the TV show Squid Game, in which killing was entertainment. The GHF has sternly denied it is to blame for the mounting death toll and chaotic distribution of aid, instead seeking to blame the UN. "If you can prove to us you can save more lives, feed more families, restore more hope, come on," Johnnie Moore, the executive chairman of the GHF, said at the Heritage Foundation in Washington on Thursday. "Until then, we're going to judge every actor not by their intentions or by their pedigree but by their results." The GHF was brought in as an attempted alternative to UN aid agencies in Gaza, which have decades of experience, after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu imposed a total siege on the strip in March. It began operations in May and had a rocky start after its first CEO resigned, citing human rights concerns. The staff is made up of military contractors from the US, with some from the UK. GHF's funding remains a mystery, though the Trump administration has now approved $30m for the organisation, despite initially describing it as a completely independent undertaking that is not government-linked.

US President Trump Announces Increased Tariffs on India
US President Trump Announces Increased Tariffs on India

UAE Moments

time37 minutes ago

  • UAE Moments

US President Trump Announces Increased Tariffs on India

U.S. President Donald Trump announced via Truth Social on Monday, August 4, that the United States would 'substantially' increase tariffs on all goods imported from India, specifically targeting its ongoing purchase and resale of Russian oil. Trump accused India of buying "massive amounts of Russian Oil" and reselling much of it on the open market for profit, while showing 'no care' for the human toll of Russia's war in Ukraine. His administration had already imposed a 25% tariff on Indian goods starting August 1, labeling India's trade barriers as 'strenuous and obnoxious'. A senior Trump aide on Fox News further accused India of nearly matching China as Russia's largest oil buyer, indirectly funding Moscow's war efforts, and described India's continued energy trade as 'astonishing'. The move arrives amid growing global economic tensions. Analysts warn the tariff announcement has rattled markets, contributing to a stock sell‑off and elevated inflation concerns, while triggering fears of fragmented global supply chains. In India, trade officials have confirmed that New Delhi plans to continue sourcing energy from Russia despite U.S. pressure. Meanwhile, exporters are bracing for fallout, particularly in sectors like engineering goods, with projections of a $12 billion annual hit due to the tariff regime. This latest escalation follows Trump's broader trade policy framework launched in April—referred to as 'Liberation Day'—which imposed a universal 10% baseline tariff on all imports and higher country-specific duties under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). At the same time, U.S. financial markets remain nervous: following weak jobs data and fears of a prolonged trade war, equity indices have declined sharply, and investor sentiment remains volatile. The announcement marks a significant escalation in U.S.–India trade tensions, driven by geopolitical implications of energy policy, defense ties, and global alignment. India's strategic balancing between its energy needs and relations with both Russia and the United States is now under intense pressure, economically and diplomatically. With further details yet to emerge on the final tariff levels, all eyes are on how markets and policymakers will respond.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store