logo
I had to demolish my entire conservatory because of my neighbour's bamboo... we couldn't believe our eyes when we first discovered it

I had to demolish my entire conservatory because of my neighbour's bamboo... we couldn't believe our eyes when we first discovered it

Daily Mail​24-05-2025
Peter Barnes and his wife had been happily living in their detached property in Brighton for a year when they started to notice green leaves growing inside their conservatory.
They assumed it was grass from their garden but as the plant started to emerge from the walls and floor the couple realised they had a bigger problem on their hands.
Their neighbours had planted bamboo and the trendy weed had blasted its roots underground, growing between the two properties.
After lifting sections of the conservatory floor and removing plaster from the walls they discovered the bamboo had been lurking under its concrete base, inside the cavity walls and extending into the brickwork of the house.
'There was a large stand of bamboo growing next door when we bought the property, but we didn't think anything of it and nothing came up on the survey,' Mr Barnes explained.
'When we first saw the green leaves emerging inside our conservatory we thought it was some kind of grass, but then pretty quickly we realised it was bamboo.'
Bamboo grows rapidly and can be stronger than steel, giving it the ability to punch through walls and turn over entire patios, making it the fastest-growing plant on earth.
Mr Barnes added: 'We hoped that if we dug up the rhizome underneath the path between our properties that would solve the problem, but it quickly became apparent that it was much more serious.
'When the conservatory floor was taken up and we saw the mass of bamboo underneath, we couldn't believe it.'
Bamboo spreads through underground stems called rhizomes, and Mr Barnes discovered an intricate network of them.
The rhizomes are 'aggressive' and can form a colony, creating new shoots, sometimes meters away from the original plant.
Bamboo is removed by excavating the root ball from the ground and getting rid of every plant stem, including those that have been severed to prevent new shoots from emerging.
The only way to deal with their invasion was to demolish the entire conservatory – a cost which is being borne by the neighbour's building insurer under a liability damage claim.
But on average the price of removal is hefty - costing between three and six thousand pounds per residential property.
The demand for bamboo removal has skyrocked in the past through years, explained Emily Grant, director of Environet.
'We're receiving significantly more calls about bamboo infestations than Japanese knotweed these days, and in most cases the damage caused to property is far greater,' she explained.
Despite this increasing demand homeowners and gardeners continue to underestimate the risk posed by bamboo.
In fact, 54 per cent of people are unaware that it can cause problems such as property damage or a legal dispute, a YouGov survey found.
There was a craze for bamboo in the late nineties and early 2000s, and only now are we seeing the repercussions, explained Ms Grant.
'There was a particular craze for bamboo around 15 - 20 years ago and where it's been planted into the ground rather than in a pot, those plants are now fully mature and causing havoc.'
Bamboo is still a popular plant because of it is considered a great screen in gardens.
Unfortunately, it is sold in garden centres and plant nurseries with minimal warnings or advice.
Ms Grant said: 'If you do decide to plant bamboo in your garden, it's your responsibility to make sure it doesn't spread into adjoining properties. Choose a clumping variety and plant it in a pot lined with a bamboo-proof root barrier.
'If bamboo is present on a property you want to buy, or on the boundary, it's a good idea to get a bamboo survey so you understand any risk you're taking on and ensure there's no chance of a legal claim against you as soon as you move in.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Methodist church in Boston gets £250,000 for renovation work
Methodist church in Boston gets £250,000 for renovation work

BBC News

time10 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Methodist church in Boston gets £250,000 for renovation work

Boston's Centenary Methodist Church has been awarded £250,000 for renovations by the borough church said the funding was vital for the upkeep of the Grade II* listed plans to create a new community room, and said the money would help support the services it provides to people in money has been allocated from Levelling Up funds. The Reverend Val Ogden told BBC Radio Lincolnshire: "We need to do things like doors and floors and walls."We had damp problems to fix. We needed to refurbish one of the upper rooms that's underused at the moment, which will be for community space."The church provides services including community meals and providing a warm space during cold church said in a statement: "This investment ensures the long-term future of a cherished community space that serves people across the town and the borough."Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here. Download the BBC News app from the App Store for iPhone and iPad or Google Play for Android devices

Museums 'could close' over UK watchdog guidance on single sex spaces
Museums 'could close' over UK watchdog guidance on single sex spaces

Daily Record

timean hour ago

  • Daily Record

Museums 'could close' over UK watchdog guidance on single sex spaces

Museums Galleries Scotland made the claim in light of guidance issued by the Equality and Human Rights Commission A publicly-funded body has claimed museums could shut over guidance about trans people and women's toilets. ‌ Museums Galleries Scotland said the 'time and resources' needed to implement new guidance by a watchdog could force closures. ‌ In a landmark decision in April, the Supreme Court ruled that "sex" in the Equality Act 2010 refers to biological sex. ‌ The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) recently closed a consultation on proposed changes to statutory guidance in the wake of the ruling. An interim EHRC update said trans women should not be permitted to use women's facilities and trans men should not be allowed to use men's facilities. A response from MGS said the Commission's proposals may "risk leaving trans people with no facilities at all" if changes could not be made. ‌ It urged the UK-wide watchdog to understand the "impacts and needs of trans individuals and organisations committed to trans inclusion". A consultation response from MSG said: "We have concerns that the content and process of the EHRC Code of Practice does not uphold the spirit of inclusion. "There is no guidance on how to include trans people, there is only information on how to exclude them. This has not made sufficient effort to offer advice to organisations who wish to remain or become trans inclusive." ‌ The response added: "When there is a need to 'prove' your sex, what proof will be acceptable given gender recognition certificates are not, nor are altered birth certificates. It is likely this role would fall on front-of-house staff, which we believe puts undue pressure on them." It added: "To avoid discrimination, it would require every person using toilets to be checked, adding substantial workload and staff costs. "The guidance implies that to allow trans people to use toilets that fit their identity would put organisations at risk of legal consequences. Yet, to not check everyone could lead to individuals in museums taking decisions to exclude trans people based on subjective tests, related largely to appearance." ‌ It also warned that some museums may be forced to close "while they invest time and resources to ensure adequate facilities". The response said MSG was aware of the public "policing toilets at heritage sites by making assumptions based on stereotypes". They said this created an "environment of suspicion and policing of everyone's gender presentation'. The response concluded: "We strongly encourage the EHRC to review their processes around this guidance and take the necessary time to understand the impacts and needs of trans individuals and organisations committed to trans inclusion." However, a spokesperson for analysts MurrayBlackburnMackenzie said: 'It is deeply concerning that a major national institution signed off and submitted such an ill-informed response to the EHRC consultation. The response fails to consider the needs of women and instead repeats trans activist talking points.'

Readers reply: Are there too many pets?
Readers reply: Are there too many pets?

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Readers reply: Are there too many pets?

Are there too many pets? Pet ownership goes up and up, particularly dogs and cats. But how many is too many? Gene Leonard, London Send new questions to nq@ This needs to be qualified: 'There are too many pets … for people who dislike dogs so much they can't enjoy green spaces, cafes and other public areas.' rewilder As I get older, I find myself questioning pet ownership. A pet exists for the sole purpose of pleasing its owner, giving it comfort, pleasure and companionship but also putting it at risk of abuse, pain, displeasure and abandonment. They are bred (often conforming to a human-designed ideal) or captured in order to perform human-pleasing duties. So, yes, there are too many pets for their human masters. 02Dscythe This is probably true unless you live with a cat, in which case the roles are reversed. kiramango I think there are too many abandoned pets, too many pets in rescue, too many designer pets with health problems because of their breed standards and too many dogs tied up outside leading lonely, deprived lives. We have one rescued dog, who is adored. He is walked on a lead three times daily, enjoys off-lead time playing in the fully fenced back yard, is fed the best possible food and is treated like a member of the family in all ways. I love cats, but I also love birds; I wish people would keep their cats indoors to protect the birds. The worst problem in our world is too many irresponsible humans, not too many animals. MythKenner From an ecological point of view there are too many of everything associated with humans, so yes, there are definitely too many pets. I doubt there's an easy way to solve that, though. unclestinky There are certainly far too many people involved in the selling of mindless rubbish surrounding the keeping of animals at home. Cat and dog fashion, cosmetics, toys: too many containers of senseless junk being shipped around the world. There are way too many nonsense pet food brands as well: 'Delicious morsels lovingly selected and served with rosemary and green beans.' What? It's a pooch, or a moggy; it can't read, it doesn't understand infantile advertising slop and it's not Jay Rayner. Pets are for companionship, a haven from loneliness for many, also to assist in teaching children about caring, responsibility, kindness, life, death and how not to develop into cruel, selfish brutes who think only of themselves and the next fix of cheap entertainment. bricklayersoption How many is too many? Well, I did a house-sit with 17 cats and I can tell you, categorically: that's too many. (Now, I ask people to define 'a few cats'.) Leoned There are far too many dogs now. Every public space, outdoor and indoor, is overrun with them. It's time to reintroduce the dog licence at a realistic (high) level and set some rules and expectations around dog ownership, as there are currently none. So, one dog a household. On leads in all public spaces except enclosed dog fields, which would be funded by the licence fee. Breeding banned. Tougher rules on dangerous dogs. Some basic hygiene requirements on cafe and pub owners who allow dogs. Ownership banned if you fail to pick up dog mess – no excuses. This'll do for starters. Dennis1970 'Every public space, outdoor and indoor, is overrun with them'? They really aren't. And cafes and pubs already have to meet hygiene standards. And there are rules and expectations around dog ownership. You can argue they need strengthening, but saying there are none is just untrue. Oldhairynose Too many inconsiderate dog owners use those extending leads in public spaces and expect others to get out of the way or else trip over them, or let their dogs foul the public spaces they insist on using for their dog's toilet needs. Add to that letting poorly trained dogs off their leads and then saying: 'He won't hurt you, he just wants to play!' Sundaygal NYC has too many. The streets reek of dog urine and too many owners don't clean up faeces – especially in Brooklyn – so walking is a dangerous hopscotch around smears of festering mess. It can't be very friendly for the dogs, either, which are kept locked up most of the day, against their nature. 80xd35 Dogs are an environmental disaster, from the contamination of waterways from improperly disposed waste – and how long will it take for those plastic poo bags to degrade even if they're used properly? – to the harmful effects on wildlife. Dylan Dog ownership is shown to improve people's physical health, pet ownership improves mental health and many people socially benefit from pets. The frustration is those few who mistreat their pets, have too many pets, don't pick up after their pets, let their cats out to kill birds – and those who spend all their time moaning about other people's pets. But the majority, who own pets with kindness and with social benefit, shouldn't have to be judged by the minority. specklefreckle We need dogs. They take us out, even in the rain. They help us to relax. They are true friends. It would be a sad world without them. Anne Meile I'd welcome a ban on the 'exotic pet' trade. Murdomania

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store