
Supreme Court upholds federal internet subsidy program
The Supreme Court in a 6-3 decision upheld a multibillion-dollar subsidy program that funds phone and internet services in rural areas and schools on Friday, rejecting a conservative group's claims that Congress delegated away too much power in setting it up.
Established in 1996, the Universal Service Fund (USF) is intended to help the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) accomplish its decades-long aim of affordable 'universal service' nationwide by providing subsidies to rural and low-income consumers as well as schools, libraries and health care facilities. It spends roughly $8 billion annually.
Conservative nonprofit Consumers' Research challenged how Congress delegated determining how much telecommunications companies must contribute to the fund to the FCC, which it, in turn, sets based on a private company's financial projections.
The group claimed the two layers combined violates the nondelegation doctrine, which prevents Congress from delegating its legislative authority to the executive branch without an intelligible principle.
'Nothing in those arrangements, either separately or together, violates the Constitution,' Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the majority, which comprised the court's three Democratic-appointed justices and three of the six Republican-appointed justices.
Justice Neil Gorsuch, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, dissented.
'When it comes to other aspects of the separation of powers, we have found manageable ways to honor the Constitution's design. This one requires no less of us,' Gorsuch wrote.
Anti-regulatory interests had hoped the Supreme Court would use the case to revitalize the nondelegation doctrine, which the high court has not used to strike down a statute in 90 years.
But the justices instead sided with the federal government, keeping the USF intact. Both the Biden and Trump-era Justice Departments defended the program.
Among others, Consumers' Research challenge was backed by Americans for Prosperity Foundation, a libertarian advocacy group affiliated with the Koch brothers; the conservative Christian legal powerhouse Alliance Defending Freedom; Former Vice President Pence's advocacy group, Advancing American Freedom; the Trump-aligned America First Legal Foundation; and the Cato Institute, a prominent libertarian think tank.
Meanwhile, a bipartisan group of 22 state attorneys general, consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, broadband groups and the American Library Association and others filed briefs in support of USF.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why USA Rare Earth Stock Fell Today
China and the U.S. have apparently signed a trade deal that will free up rare earth magnet exports from China. USA Rare Earth doesn't yet make magnets, but wants to. For the time being, the company has no revenue and no profit. 10 stocks we like better than Usa Rare Earth › Shares of USA Rare Earth (NASDAQ: USAR) stock fell an unlucky 13% through 1:30 p.m. ET Friday. And why? Well, last night President Trump announced the signing of a trade deal with China, and this morning, China's Ministry of Commerce confirmed the news, stating its intention to "approve export applications for items subject to export control rules," as CNBC just reported. China's referring first and foremost to applications for the export of rare earth magnets. And the reason this is bad news for USA Rare Earth is that the company is itself trying to break into the rare earth biz, by mining, processing, and supplying rare earths extracted from a mine in Sierra Blanca, Texas. Any increase in cheap rare earth exports from China could torpedo USA Rare Earth's business model, which is really predicated on China not allowing rare earth exports, such that rare earth sourced from within the U.S. will be the only way U.S. companies can access the products at all. Still, a couple caveats are worth pointing out. First and foremost, USA Rare Earth -- which only formed in 2019 -- doesn't actually mine any rare earths itself... yet. The company has no revenue, operating profit, or free cash flow whatsoever. Its entire $40 million net profit over the past year came from the "gain on fair market value of financial instruments" it holds. As such, it doesn't really matter what China does (or doesn't do) until USA starts producing some rare earths of its own, and proves itself a viable business. Unless and until that happens, I consider the stock entirely speculative -- and probably a sell. Before you buy stock in Usa Rare Earth, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Usa Rare Earth wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $704,676!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $950,198!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 175% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Rich Smith has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why USA Rare Earth Stock Fell Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
PCE Inflation Increased In Line With Expectations
It's been an eventful week in terms of stock market information, leading to new all-time highs — or very near — on the major indexes. That doesn't mean all the news was great; it does mean that the biggest potential headwinds have thus far missed the marketplace, and may have already blown past us. Take tariffs, for instance. On April 9th, as indexes were falling off a cliff for a week of trading, President Trump pushed pause on his reciprocal tariff initiatives — +20% for the EU, +25 for auto imports, +49% on Vietnam, etc. — for 90 days. Yesterday, just a couple weeks from the end of that 90 days, a White House spokeswoman said those tariff deadlines were 'not critical.' Market participants rejoiced, taking this news to mean those reciprocals have been removed completely. It hasn't led to any firm trade deals with any of the U.S.'s trading partners, and now with the reciprocal tariff threat removed, they may not come at all. The U.S. has put a +10% tariff on imported goods, which so far looks to be absorbed reasonably well in the economy. There is also a framework of a new trade deal with the UK, but based on the circumstances that followed, we may expect no hard news coming on this front, either. The other threat this week came from tensions in the Middle East between Israel and Iran, into which the U.S. engaged last weekend, bombing nuclear development sites within Iran. Uncertainty gripped the markets to start the week, but as each day passes without a major international incident traced to this series of events, investors have grown comfortable in its bullishness. Pre-market futures are up this morning again. The Dow has amassed +160 points, the S&P 500 +20 and the Nasdaq +85 points. Bond yields are down nearly 20 basis points (bps) from this time a week ago: the 10-year today stands at +4.26%, the 2-year +3.73% and the 30-year — which gained prominence after tipping +5% a couple weeks ago — stoutly holds at +4.82%. This morning, the latest Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) report has been released. For the month of May, the headline PCE Index month over month was in-line with expectations at +0.1%. This matches the previous month's unrevised headline, as well. Year over year PCE was also as expected: +2.3%. The prior month was revised up 10 bps to +2.2%. Stripping out volatile food and energy prices, the core PCE level month over month reached +0.2% — higher than the +0.1% expected and the highest level since February. Core PCE year over year reached +2.7%, following +2.6% in April — both of which are +10 bps higher than anticipated. However, on Personal Income for May we swing to a negative -0.4% from an expected +0.3%, the first negative print since September of 2021, when the Covid pandemic was finally winding down. It also amounts to a big drop from the downwardly revised +0.7% the previous month. Personal Spending swung to -0.1% from an estimated +0.1%, while Real Spending sank to -0.3% from 0.0% projected. Here's how this data might be chalked up to tariff distortions: those earlier higher-than-normal levels in February, March and April were pretty clearly a pull-forward of tariff realities to come. Today's big drop in spending likely has less to do with a weakening consumer than it does an unwinding of those earlier pre-tariff stockpiles. Now, with tariff levels beginning to disappear, we may expect a smoothing-out of this data over time. Finally, Consumer Sentiment from the University of Michigan survey came in as expected for June at 60.5. This follows something of a trough the prior three months, which struck three-year lows in April and May at 52.2. Both the assessment of current conditions and future expectations jumped from somewhat depressed prior levels. For now, attention pivots back to Capitol Hill, where Republican senators continue to toil over forging a Big Beautiful tax-cut and anti-immigration Bill to present to President Trump by the 4th of July — one week from today. It seems from this vista to be an uphill slog; for one reason, the changes made in the Senate means the revised bill may not re-pass the House. But if they somehow do get this bill over the finish line, it will bring profound changes to the market. Perhaps this helps explain why markets are trading at all-time highs, as well? Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Jim Cramer on Visa: 'You'd Be Nuts to Be In This Frankly'
Visa Inc. (NYSE:V) is one of the 14 stocks Jim Cramer recently shared insights on. The company was mentioned during the episode when Cramer said: 'Over the past couple of weeks, Visa and MasterCard, two of my favorite companies, have pulled back sharply from their all-time highs. Wall Street's suddenly worried about the whole payments industry, might be threatened by advances in crypto, especially now that Congress looks like it'll pass its GENIUS Act, which establishes a framework for regulating Stablecoins. Visa fell over 10% from its high, set on June 11, to its low last Friday… This morning I spoke with Visa CEO, Ryan McInerney, and Ryan told me, I think, a story which made me feel like that, that you'd be nuts to be in this, frankly.' A close-up of a modern payments terminal with a pile of credit cards on the side. Visa (NYSE:V) is a payment technology company that provides transaction processing, credit, debit, and prepaid card products. The company provides offerings like cross-border payment solutions, fraud prevention tools, digital services, and payment integration for e-commerce platforms. While we acknowledge the potential of V as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤