Supreme Court appears to favor parents' right to opt out of LGBTQ+ stories for their children
At issue are new 'LGBTQ-inclusive' storybooks used for classroom reading for pre-kindergarten to 5th grade in Montgomery County, Md., a suburb of Washington where three justices reside.
In recent years, the court's six conservatives have invoked the 'free exercise of religion' to protect Catholic schools from illegal job-bias claims from teachers and to give parents an equal right to use state grants to send their children to religious schools.
During an argument on Tuesday, they strongly suggested they would extend religious liberty rights to parents with children in public schools.
'They are not asking to change what is taught in the classroom,' Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh told an attorney for the court.
'As a lifelong resident of the county, I'm mystified at how it came to this. They had promised parents they would be notified and allow to opt out' if they objected to the new storybooks, he said. 'But the next day, they changed the rule.'
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Neil M. Gorsuch also live in Montgomery County, and both have been reliable supporters of religious liberty claims.
Nearly every state, including Maryland and California, has a law that allows parents to opt out of sex education classes for their children.
When the new storybooks were introduced in the fall of 2022, parents were told their young children could be removed from those lessons. But when 'unsustainably high numbers' of children were absent, the school board revoked the opt-out rule.
They explained this state rule applied to older students and sex education, but not to reading lessons for elementary children.
In reaction, a group of Muslim, Catholic and Ukrainian Orthodox parents filed a suit in federal court, seeking an order that would allow their children be removed from class during the reading lessons.
They said the books conflicted with the religious and moral views they taught their children.
A federal judge and the 4th Circuit Court refused to intervene. Those judges said the 'free exercise' of religion protects people from being forced to change their conduct or their beliefs, neither of which were at issue in the school case.
But the Supreme Court voted to hear the parents' appeal in the case of Mahmoud vs. Taylor.
Representing the parents, Eric Baxter, an attorney for the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, stressed they 'were not objecting to books being on the shelf or in the library. No student has a right to tell the school which books to choose,' he said. 'Here, the school board is imposing indoctrination on these children.'
Alan Shoenfeld, an attorney for the school board, said its goal for the new storybooks was 'to foster mutual respect. The lesson is that they should treat their peers with respect.'
He cautioned the court against adding a broad new right for parents and students to object to ideas or messages that offend them.
The Becket attorneys in their legal brief described seven books they found objectionable.
One of them, 'Pride Puppy,' is a picture book directed at 3- and 4-year-olds. It 'describes a Pride parade and what a child might find there,' they said. 'The book invites students barely old enough to tie their own shoes to search for images of 'underwear,' 'leather,' 'lip ring,' [drag] king' and [drag] queen.''
Another — 'Love, Violet' — is about two young girls and their same-sex playground romance.
'Born Ready' tells the story of a biological girl named Penelope who identifies as a boy.
'Intersection Allies' is a picture book also intended for early elementary school classes.
'It invites children to ponder what it means to be 'transgender' or 'non-binary' and asks 'what pronouns fit you?'' they said. Teachers were told 'to instruct students that, at birth, doctors 'guess about our gender,' but '[w]e know ourselves best.''
They said teachers were instructed to 'disrupt the either/or thinking' of elementary students about biological sex.
After the case reached the Supreme Court, two of the seven books were dropped by the school board, including 'Pride Puppy.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Why Trump can't revoke native-born U.S. citizenship
President Trump on Saturday floated revoking comedian Rosie O'Donnell's U.S. citizenship, though he has no clear constitutional avenue to do so. The big picture: His Saturday Truth Social post, in which he called his longtime critic a "Threat to Humanity," marked a major escalation in the way the president targets his foes. Zoom out: Trump has made similar threats in the past, notably toward his former ally, Elon Musk. Asked earlier this month whether he'd consider deporting Musk after their once-friendly relationship turned sour, Trump said he'd have to "take a look." He's also baselessly questioned New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's citizenship status. Musk and Mamdani are naturalized U.S. citizens. And O'Donnell, who was born in New York, has a constitutional right to U.S. citizenship. Catch up quick: " Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship," Trump wrote, adding she "should remain in the wonderful Country of Ireland, if they want her." O'Donnell moved to Ireland earlier this year. Has the Trump administration denaturalized anyone? The Trump administration, during its immigration crackdown, has sought to restrict pathways to citizenship and revoke people's status. The Department of Justice under Trump has begun prioritizing denaturalization when naturalized citizens are charged with crimes, and the administration has moved to restrict birthright citizenship, though doing so faces several legal hurdles. Zoom in: The Justice Department in June announced it had "secured the denaturalization" of a convicted collector and distributor of child sexual abuse material. "If you commit serious crimes before you become a U.S. citizen and then lie about them during your naturalization process, the Justice Department will discover the truth and come after you," Assistant Attorney General Brett A. Shumate said in a statement about the case. Yes, but: The president does not have the authority to strip a native-born U.S. citizen of their citizenship, University of Virginia School of Law professor Amanda Frost told the Associated Press. Can Trump constitutionally revoke O'Donnell's citizenship? The 14th Amendment guarantees citizenship to anyone born in the U.S. — though the Trump administration has sought to chip away at those rights. It states, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." Citizens can relinquish their U.S. nationality, according to the State Department, but it must be voluntary. Naturalized citizens can have their citizenship revoked, but there are specific requirements and a process that must be followed. How did the Supreme Court protect people from losing their citizenship? The Supreme Court in 1967 ruled that the government can't usually strip citizenship without the person's consent. The high court left open the door for cases that involved fraud in the citizenship process, but denaturalization became rare after the decision, law professors Irina Manta and Cassandra Burke Robertson write. Yes, but: The number of denaturalization cases has surged in recent years, Axios' Jason Lalljee reported. "Denaturalization is no longer so rare," said Cassandra Burke Robertson, a professor at Case Western Reserve University's law school, in 2019, noting that the rise began under the Obama administration. She continued, "But the Trump administration, with its overall immigration crackdown, is taking denaturalization to new levels."
Time Magazine
2 hours ago
- Time Magazine
Rosie O'Donnell Responds as Trump Threatens Her Citizenship
Comedian and actor Rosie O'Donnell has responded to President Donald Trump's threat to have her U.S. citizenship revoked, the latest move in a yearslong back-and-forth between the two New York-born former TV stars. Taking to her Instagram on Saturday, hours after Trump's threat, O'Donnell uploaded a picture of the U.S. President with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Trump socialised with Epstein decades ago and is now embroiled in a charged public discourse as people demand for his Administration to release the full Epstein files, something he seemed inclined to do during his campaign. Captioning the pointed image, O'Donnell, who is currently living in Ireland and seeking Irish citizenship through her grandparents' roots, said: 'I'm everything you fear. A loud woman, a queer woman, a mother who tells the truth, an American who got out of the country before you set it ablaze. You are everything that is wrong with America—and I'm everything you hate about what's still right with it.' 'You want to revoke my citizenship? Go ahead and try, King Joffrey with a tangerine spray tan,' concluded O'Donnell, making reference to the villainous child-king from the hit HBO series Game of Thrones. O'Donnell commented further during an appearance on the Sunday with Miriam show on Ireland's RTÉ Radio 1. "I reacted with a little post that I jotted off in five minutes, and that's been getting a lot of attention online," she said, reiterating her response to Trump's threat. "I am very proud to be opposed to every single thing he says and does and represents." Read More: White House Speaks Out Amid Backlash Over Meme of Trump as Superman On Saturday, Trump had told his more than 10 million followers on Truth Social that he was giving 'serious consideration' to stripping O'Donnell of her citizenship, claiming she 'is not in the best interests' of the U.S. 'She is a threat to humanity and should remain in the wonderful country of Ireland, if they want her,' the U.S. President said. Trump's threat comes as his Administration continues its attempt to rollback birthright citizenship law. On Thursday, a federal judge placed a temporary nationwide block on Trump's order ending birthright citizenship. Experts argue that a 1967 Supreme Court ruling means that the U.S. government does not have the ability to revoke the citizenship of a native-born U.S. citizen under the fourteenth amendment. Just recently, Trump has threatened to revoke the U.S. citizenship of his one-time ally and now key critic, Elon Musk, who was born in South Africa, and the Democratic New York City mayoral candidate, Zohran Mamdani, who was born in Uganda. However, his threat against O'Donnell is particularly loaded, as the pair share a fraught history that goes back years. O'Donnell notably criticized Trump in 2006 during an episode of the round-table talk show The View, of which she was a long-time panelist. O'Donnell mocked Trump in relation to a press conference he appeared in for the Miss USA contest, which he co-owned at the time. Meanwhile, Trump lashed out in an episode of The Apprentice at a boardroom meeting, during which he called O'Donnell 'disgusting' multiple times. During his 2016 presidential campaign, Trump brought up the comedian. In a debate with his opponent, Hillary Clinton, he said: 'Rosie O'Donnell—I said very tough things to her, and I think everybody would agree that she deserves it and nobody feels sorry for her.' O'Donnell responded at the time, saying Trump "will never be President," in one post and calling him an 'orange an-s' in another. Meanwhile, O'Donnell's choice to post an image of Trump and Epstein comes at an interesting time. On Saturday night, Trump defended Attorney General Pam Bondi, who has come under fire for not releasing the Epstein files in full. There have long been calls to see a so-called "client list" supposedly belonging to Epstein. (Bondi's previous release of some files were heavily redacted and informed the public of little they had not learned before.)'What's going on with my 'boys' and, in some cases, 'gals?' They're all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a FANTASTIC JOB! We're on one team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening. We have a PERFECT Administration, THE TALK OF THE WORLD, and 'selfish people' are trying to hurt it, all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein. For years, it's Epstein, over and over again,' Trump said, encouraging people to move from the topic. 'One year ago our country was dead, now it's the hottest country anywhere in the world. Let's keep it that way, and not waste time and energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about.' Trump's input comes amid backlash over the publication of a memo from the Justice Department and FBI, who conducted a review of the Epstein investigation. Per the memo, their findings concluded there is no evidence Epstein kept a 'client list' or was murdered. It also said "no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions." Read More: Where Things Stand With the Epstein Files Following Musk's Allegation Against Trump Trump's commentary about Epstein has been of high interest, especially since Musk, in a now-deleted social media post, alleged that Trump is listed in the files related to the late financier and alleged sex trafficker. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk said in early June. He did not provide evidence pertaining to this. Trump's connection to Epstein dates back decades. In an interview with New York magazine in 2002, he said that Epstein was 'a lot of fun to be with.' 'It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side,' Trump told the reporter. In July 2019, NBC News' TODAY released video footage believed to be from 1992, which showed Trump hosting Epstein at his Mar-a-Lago estate. After Epstein's 2019 arrest on federal sex trafficking charges, Trump made an effort to distance himself. Speaking in the Oval Office in 2019, Trump said: 'I had a falling out with him [Epstein]. I haven't spoken to him in 15 years. I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you.'
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Vivek Ramaswamy: Resist the left's Mamdani trap — fight his ideas, not his ethnicity
Back in 2021, in my book 'Woke, Inc.,' I argued that the modern left's obsession with race unnecessarily divides Americans by pitting us against one another: If race is paramount, the only solution to racism is more racism. Mercifully, after the election of President Donald Trump and some key Supreme Court rulings, the peak of woke insanity appears to be behind us. Calling someone 'racist' no longer shuts down important policy debates. So why is an online fringe of the 'right' developing a fresh obsession with race that mirrors the worst impulses of the woke left? Take a look at the most-viewed responses to my recent social media post featuring a photo of my wife Apoorva, our two sons Karthik and Arjun, and myself — dressed in red, white, and blue — at an Independence Day parade. 'They wear our identity like a skin suit,' went one. 'We didn't invite you. Get the fuk out of our home, RamaAnchorBaby,' was another. 'GO HOME NON-WHITE INVADER . . . GO HOME!' — and so on. They're part of a trend that's picking up steam, most recently with the emergence of Zohran Mamdani, the self-described socialist who just won the Democratic primary for New York City mayor. Conservatives like me have sounded the alarm about Mamdani's wacky socialist agenda for what used to be America's marquee metropolis. Indeed, the public deserves to hear clearheaded arguments for why his policies will bankrupt New York City and make the city's dire housing shortage even worse. The real problem with Mamdani isn't his race or religion. It's his anti-capitalist worldview and his policies that risk destroying our nation's largest city. But some supposed 'conservatives' are pouncing on Mamdani not for his political views, but for his ethnicity. 'These are not Americans,' one prominent influencer claimed on X, posting side-by-side photos of Mamdani and me. 'When conservatives attack Zohran Mamdani for being a foreigner, I just want them to keep the same energy with Vivek Ramaswamy and Usha Vance,' another posted. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! These fools are imitating the woke progressives — embracing the idea that the color of your skin is more important than the essence of your beliefs. They abandon the foundational American creed that one's character and civic commitments matter more than one's race or ancestry. The left's focus on race claims to serve social justice; those pushing online right-wing racism claim to serve national cohesion. But both fail to achieve even their stated goals. Every time conservatives engage in racial grievance politics, our side unhelpfully validates the left's worldview. It's a trap — and with Mamdani, it's working. Progressives are now calling on high-profile Republicans to 'denounce' the racism (and amplify the controversy), or else stay silent and be labeled complicit. That shifts the conversation from Mamdani's radical policies to a pointless debate about race. Mission accomplished for the left. I understand the temptation: For months, the media has trumpeted Mamdani's heritage, gushing that he could be New York's 'first Muslim mayor' or 'first mayor of South Asian descent.' Mamdani himself has pledged to target 'whiter neighborhoods' with higher taxes and supports race-based reparations for black New Yorkers. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters When you've been falsely smeared as a racist for believing in merit-based systems, it's tempting to say 'Fine, two can play this game.' But that's not principled opposition; it's letting your opponents set the terms of engagement. Mamdani could be black, white, Asian, Christian, Muslim or Andrew Jackson's long-lost twin — it wouldn't matter. His policies are unhinged and will hurt everyone in New York, including the very citizens he purports to help. That's the argument conservatives should make — vocally and unapologetically. It's not about who Mamdani is, but what he stands for. I was the target of racially charged attacks during my presidential run. I expected it from the left — they've been calling successful conservatives 'coconuts' and 'Uncle Toms' for years. Adopting the same racial essentialist thinking only lends credence to the left's charges. It's wokeness with a fake new conservative veneer. Real conservatives must reject this approach. We believe in the Jeffersonian ideal that 'all men are created equal.' We take Martin Luther King, Jr. at his word, sharing his dream of a country where all are judged on the content of their character, not the color of their skin. We fought to end affirmative action and DEI not because we want to discriminate differently, but because we want to end discrimination. This isn't naïve idealism; it's the only path to a unified nation. When we reduce people to racial categories, we are, by definition, dividing people into groups, focusing on our differences and setting us against one another. Our country's strength isn't really our diversity, but what unites us across that diversity — a commitment to meritocracy, free speech, open debate and resolution of disagreements at the ballot box. That's what e pluribus unum is about. We're all Americans first. Vivek Ramaswamy is an American entrepreneur, bestselling author and a candidate for governor of Ohio.
