Blood pressure and dementia risk share surprising link, study suggests
In a large, randomized trial, researchers led by First Hospital of China Medical University discovered that "intensive blood pressure control" resulted in a 15% reduced dementia risk among participants and a 16% reduced risk of cognitive impairment.
The study included 33,995 people in rural China aged 40 or older who had "uncontrolled hypertension."
The participants were divided into two groups. One received "usual care," while the other was assigned to "trained non-physician community healthcare providers" who prescribed "titrated antihypertensive medications."
For the latter group, the medications helped them achieve a systolic blood pressure goal of <130 mm Hg and a diastolic blood pressure goal of <80 mm Hg, according to the study findings in Nature Medicine.
"The primary outcome of all-cause dementia was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the usual care group," the researchers wrote.
They were also less likely to experience "serious adverse events."
This was one of the first large-scale, randomized, controlled effectiveness trials to demonstrate a "significant reduction in all-cause dementia associated with lowering blood pressure," the researchers concluded.
There were some limitations of the study, the article acknowledged, including the absence of baseline and follow-up cognitive assessments.
Dr. Bradley Serwer, a cardiologist and chief medical officer at VitalSolution, a Cincinnati, Ohio-based company that offers cardiovascular and anesthesiology services to hospitals nationwide, said this study presents an "intriguing approach" to addressing dementia in individuals with uncontrolled hypertension.
"Unlike studies performed in the United States, this study employed non-physicians to significantly reduce blood pressure in rural China through a 'cluster' blinding method," Serwer, who was not involved in the study, told Fox News Digital.
"While the study can be subject to scrutiny, it raises a pertinent question: How crucial is modification of cardiovascular risk factors in the development of dementia?"
The primary medications used in the study to lower blood pressure were calcium channel blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers, Serwer noted.
"These commonly prescribed medications have been independently associated with a reduced risk of dementia, irrespective of the magnitude of blood pressure reduction they achieve," he said.
"This raises the possibility that the lower rates of dementia observed may be attributed to other beneficial effects of the medications rather than solely to blood pressure reduction."
To confirm the findings, Serwer said it would be beneficial to include baseline cognitive assessments of the patients and to identify the prevalence of Alzheimer's dementia within the communities.
"The most significant takeaway from this study is the profound importance of addressing blood pressure, cholesterol, smoking and sedentary lifestyles," the cardiologist said.
"By prioritizing these factors, we not only aim to prevent heart attacks and strokes, but also strive to enhance overall quality of life."
The study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China, Chinese Society of Cardiology Foundation, and the Science and Technology Program of Liaoning Province, China.
Fox News Digital reached out to the researchers for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
8 minutes ago
- UPI
Study: Diets low on processed foods more effective for weight loss
A University College London study suggests weight loss diets are more effective when they eschew ultra-processed foods for minimally-processed sustenance. File Photo by Gary C. Caskey/UPI | License Photo Want to drop some pounds? Drop the ultra-processed foods, a new study says. People lost twice as much weight on a diet with minimally processed foods compared to one with ultra-processed products, even though both diets were nutritionally matched, researchers reported Aug. 4 in the journal Nature Medicine. "The global food system at the moment drives diet-related poor health and obesity, particularly because of the wide availability of cheap, unhealthy food," researcher Chris van Tulleken, an associate professor with the University College London, said in a news release. "This study highlights the importance of ultra-processing in driving health outcomes in addition to the role of nutrients like fat, salt and sugar," van Tulleken said. Ultra-processed foods are made mostly from substances extracted from whole foods, like saturated fats, starches and added sugars. They also contain a wide variety of additives to make them more tasty, attractive and shelf-stable, including colors, emulsifiers, flavors and stabilizers. Examples include packaged baked goods, sugary cereals, frozen pizza, instant soups and deli cold cuts. For this study, researchers recruited 55 adults to take turns eating a diet of minimally processed or ultra-processed eats. For eight weeks, participants ate minimally processed meals like oatmeal or homemade spaghetti Bolognese. Then for another eight weeks, they munched on ultra-processed food like breakfast oat bars or ready-to-eat packaged lasagna. Meals were delivered to the participants' homes, and they were told to eat as much or as little as they wanted. The people were provided more food than they needed, and not told to limit their intake. Both types of diets were nutritionally matched in accordance with U.K. guidelines on a healthy, balanced diet, researchers said. They included recommended levels of saturated fat, protein, carbs, salt, fiber and fruits and veggies. But results show that people lost about 2% of their body weight when eating minimally processed foods, compared with only 1% on the ultra-processed diet. "Though a 2% reduction may not seem very big, that is only over eight weeks and without people trying to actively reduce their intake," said lead researcher Samuel Dicken, a research fellow at the University College London Center for Obesity Research. "If we scaled these results up over the course of a year, we'd expect to see a 13% weight reduction in men and a 9% reduction in women on the minimally processed diet, but only a 4% weight reduction in men and 5% in women after the ultra-processed diet," Dicken said in a news release. "Over time this would start to become a big difference." The observed weight loss corresponded to the average amount of calories people ate on either diet, researchers said. Participants had a daily 290-calorie deficit on the minimally processed diet, but only a 120-calorie deficit when eating ultra-processed foods. Ultra-processed foods tend to be calorie-dense, so people are more likely to take in more energy even if they eat smaller portions. People eating a minimally processed diet also had a twofold greater improvement in their overall control over food cravings, compared to when they ate ultra-processed foods, researchers found. That included a fourfold greater improvement in resisting cravings for savory foods, and a nearly twofold greater improvement in resisting their favorite foods, results show. "The best advice to people would be to stick as closely to nutritional guidelines as they can by moderating overall energy intake, limiting intake of salt, sugar and saturated fat, and prioritizing high-fiber foods such as fruits, vegetables, pulses and nuts," senior researcher Dr. Rachel Batterham, an honorary professor with the University College London Center for Obesity Research, said in a news release. (Pulses include beans, lentils, dried peas and the like.) "Choosing less processed options such as whole foods and cooking from scratch, rather than ultra-processed, packaged foods or ready meals, is likely to offer additional benefits in terms of body weight, body composition and overall health," Batterham added. More information Stanford Medicine has more on ultra-processed foods. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Cosmopolitan
8 minutes ago
- Cosmopolitan
7 Times Egg Freezing Is Worth the Investment
If you're curious about freezing your eggs, join the club. According to the most recent data, the number of egg freezing cycles in the U.S. rose nearly 39 percent between 2022 to 2023, per the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART). It's becoming increasingly common in the public eye, too, thanks to influencers and celebrities like Paige Desorbo, who's been candid about freezing her eggs on her podcast, Giggly Squad. And the reproductive technology industry is changing as quickly as it's growing. We published this guide to egg freezing in 2021, and some of the information is already outdated. Here's what's still true though: Freezing your eggs is pretty much the only proven way to preserve and extend your fertility, explains Marcia C. Inhorn, PhD, a professor of anthropology at Yale University and author of Motherhood on Ice: The Mating Gap and Why Women Freeze Their Eggs. Also still true: It's expensive. These days, one round of egg freezing typically costs between $10,000 and $15,000, says Natalie Crawford, MD, a reproductive endocrinologist and the co-founder of Fora Fertility. The procedure has gotten pricier in the last few years, but thanks to workplace benefits, it's also become more accessible. In 2024, 21% of companies with 500 or more employees offered benefits that covered egg freezing, up from 11% in 2020, according to a national survey. While wanting to freeze your eggs for future use is reason enough to go for it, we asked experts for the circumstances that make the treatment an even better investment. For some, this procedure takes the pressure off, ultimately making that sense of relief is worth the money, time, and emotional commitment. You probably already know: When you're younger, you have more eggs in your ovaries, and those eggs are typically more likely to result in a healthy pregnancy. Between the ages of 35 and 36, there's generally a big drop in both the number of eggs you have and the quality of those eggs, says Ellen Goldstein, MD, a reproductive endocrinologist and the co-founder of Beverly Hills Fertility. Before 35, patients are able to freeze an average of 15 eggs per cycle. Once they reach age 40 and above, that average declines to just 6 or 7 per cycle, according to data from Extend Fertility, a New York-based fertility center (this is not a nationally representative sample, JFYI). And because freezing your eggs is a numbers game—the more you have frozen, the more chances you have to get pregnant in the future—you want to freeze as many eggs per cycle as possible. You're also less likely to run into issues with egg quality before age 37, says Natalie Stentz, MD, an ob-gyn and fertility specialist. When experts talk about egg quality, they're referring to how likely the egg is to have genetic or cellular abnormalities, explains Dr. Stentz. According to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, once you reach your mid-to-late 30s, your eggs are more likely to have a condition where they have the wrong number of chromosomes. It can lead to miscarriage, developmental issues, and birth defects. Fertility research is pretty limited, but a 2016 study published in Fertility and Sterility found that people who froze their eggs before or at age 35 had a 50% chance of having a live birth, whereas people who froze their eggs after 35 only had a 22.9% chance of the same outcome. This is not to say that this whole process is pointless if you're at the tail end of your 30s or even in your early 40s. You just might have to go through more cycles or do more transfers in order to end up with a baby. Those who start earlier may have better odds, thus getting more bang for their buck. No matter how old you are, if you'd like to have a bigger family, freezing your eggs could improve your chances of making more babies. Say you have your first kid at 35. By the time you're ready for your next round of trying for a baby, you could be 37 or older. Obviously, there is absolutely nothing wrong with that, but if you're worried about your odds of conceiving, freezing your eggs could make it easier. It might be helpful to know that not everyone will produce as many healthy, mature eggs in a single freezing cycle. If you're curious how many eggs you'd need to freeze at your current age based on your future family goals, Dr. Goldstein recommends checking out this calculator created by two reproductive endocrinologists. Though it's not a scientifically proven tool, it may estimate your chances of having a baby based on how many eggs you produce. After one cycle of egg freezing, your doctor might recommend additional rounds. That suggestion really depends on the number of eggs you end up with, the quality of those eggs, and how many children you'd like to have, explains Lora Shahine, MD, a reproductive endocrinologist at Pacific NW Fertility and host of the Brave & Curious podcast. 'A thorough consultation with a reproductive endocrinologist is key to understanding both the benefits and limitations of egg freezing based on [your] individual health and goals,' she says. Regardless of how old you are or how many kids you want to have, if your company pays for egg freezing, it could be worth doing. As I mentioned above, last year 21 percent of companies with 500 or more employees offered egg freezing as part of their fertility benefits. But that coverage can look different, depending on your company's plan. Before you book any appointments, ask your HR rep or the fertility benefit provider for a full summary of what's covered. Read up on whether consults, testing, medication, and storage are part of the package or not, says Lucky Sekhon, MD, a reproductive endocrinologist and the author of The Lucky Egg: Understanding Your Fertility and How to Get Pregnant Now. You should also find out if the plan requires you to use certain clinics, and whether you'll need to pay up front before getting reimbursed, or if they bill your company directly, she adds. From the first consultation to the eggs entering the freezer, you can expect to spend at least four to six weeks in this process, says Dr. Goldstein. In between all of that, there are lots of appointments to make, prescriptions to fill and take, and shots to give yourself. That's why freezing your eggs is most worth it when you can dedicate the time to doing it right. Here's what the whole ordeal looks like: Before you freeze your eggs, you'll need to do an initial consultation and fertility evaluation, including bloodwork and an ultrasound to check out your ovaries. If your doctor agrees you're a good candidate, you'll start the 10-to-14-day process of ovarian stimulation, says Dr. Shahine, aka the part where you inject yourself with hormones that help eggs to mature. During this phase, you'll have more bloodwork and ultrasounds every two to three days to monitor how those eggs are developing, explains Dr. Crawford. Once the eggs are mature, it's time for the egg retrieval. At this point, you're put under anesthesia so that your eggs can be removed from your ovaries using a thin needle and then frozen in the lab. The procedure itself only takes 15 to 30 minutes. You'll just need someone to drive you home afterward, thanks to the sedation. How quickly you can start the hormonal injections and schedule your retrieval depends on a few factors, though. Some fertility clinics require you to start the shots at the beginning of your menstrual cycle, while others might have a different protocol. Your birth control can also influence the timeline, says Dr. Goldstein. For example, if you're on the pill, you'll also need to stop using it and give your body time to readjust before starting the egg freezing protocol. That could make the whole process longer, says Dr. Goldstein. If you want to increase your chances of having a successful pregnancy, it could be worth turning those eggs into embryos before they enter the freezer. Especially if you're certain that you want your current partner to be your future co-parent (and said partner can produce sperm). Freezing embryos is more expensive because it requires additional steps to fertilize the eggs, but if you go this route, you'll have a clearer picture of what your options look like down the road. If you freeze embryos and genetically test them for abnormalities, you'll know how many healthy embryos you're working with. That said, there's not enough data to say for certain whether your chances of having a healthy baby are higher when you freeze an embryo versus freezing an egg. For example, this study from 2017 found no significant difference in live birth rates from frozen embryos vs. frozen eggs: "In our study, live birth rates and perinatal outcomes were not significantly different in patients after oocyte and embryo cryopreservation." Just a heads up, if you end up not wanting or needing to use your frozen embryos, things could get messy. In 2024, the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos are considered children under its state law. And in Louisiana, it's illegal to destroy frozen embryos even if you've decided you don't want to use them. Other states like Arizona and New Jersey have laws that impact what happens to embryos after divorce, and whether they count as property. There are certainly workarounds (like storing your embryos in another state that allows disposal), but if you want to avoid potential legal hurdles, freezing your eggs may be a better option. There aren't currently any laws that prohibit you from destroying frozen eggs. Aside from your age, your genes and some medical diagnoses can make egg freezing worth the investment. If you have a condition like polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) or endometriosis, you might have a hard time getting pregnant the old-fashioned way. Because you might need fertility treatment later on to help you conceive, freezing your eggs now could give you better odds of a healthy pregnancy whenever you're ready to start a family. It's a good idea to talk to a reproductive endocrinologist to decide whether this makes sense for you, says Dr. Goldstein. The same goes for if you have a family history of early menopause—particularly in your mom or a sibling. It's not always genetic, but if a close family member stopped getting their period before the age of 40, you'll also want to talk to a reproductive endocrinologist to figure out whether you're at risk and if you need to think about fertility preservation, she explains. If you're about to start chemotherapy, your state (like Illinois and Utah) might even legally require your insurance company to cover egg freezing and in vitro fertilization. To find out when your health insurance covers egg freezing (and when they don't), reach out to your provider and ask for an explanation of benefits (EOB). That will help you understand what's covered and any necessary pre-approval steps, says Dr. Sekhon. If you're willing to pay for the initial consult, your fertility doc's administrative staff should also be able to help you figure out the ins and outs of your insurance coverage, adds Dr. Goldstein. As you think about your budget for egg freezing, you'll need to factor in the storage costs too. On average, keeping your eggs frozen costs between $500 to $1,000 per year, says Dr. Stentz. For some, that's no different than the annual fee on a fancy credit card. But if you're worried about the price of this procedure, and you'll be waiting five or 10 years to have a kiddo, it's something to think about.
New York Post
37 minutes ago
- New York Post
Former X CEO Linda Yaccarino lands new gig at digital health firm focused on weight loss drugs
Former X CEO Linda Yaccarino landed a new gig to head a digital health startup on Tuesday – just weeks after she abruptly stepped down from the helm of Elon Musk's social media site. Yaccarino, 61, will take over as CEO of Miami-based eMed Population Health, which provides support and resources for patients on Ozempic and other popular GLP-1 drugs used to treat obesity and diabetes, the company announced. EMed cited the advertising veteran's 'undeniable ability to negotiate new partnerships' as a key factor as it looks to secure more deals with employers and government agencies. Advertisement 3 Linda Yaccarino is the new CEO of eMed. AFP via Getty Images 'The healthcare industry has been disrupted by technology, but not yet completely transformed by it,' Yaccarino said in a statement. 'There is an opportunity to combine technology, lifestyle, and data in a new powerful way through the digital channels that impact consumers directly in ways that have never been done before,' she added. Yaccarino resigned from X last month after two chaotic years working alongside Musk, who faced intense scrutiny over his work with President Trump's Department of Government Efficiency. Advertisement Her exit was announced just one day after a glitch caused X's Grok chatbot to spew antisemitic views, including referred to itself as 'MechaHitler.' 3 Linda Yaccarino stepped down as CEO of X last month. AP However, a source close to the situation told The Post at the time that Yaccarino's departure was already in the works and was unrelated to that incident. Advertisement 'She got advertisers back and made it profitable again,' the source said. '(She) felt it was time to move on.' 3 Linda Yaccarino was a former ad executive at NBCUniversal. REUTERS The former NBCUniversial advertising executive joined X in 2023, shortly after Musk bought the site formerly known as Twitter, and was tasked with mending fences with major corporate advertisers stemming from the mogul's overhaul of the platform. Under Yaccarino's leadership, X filed a federal antitrust lawsuit targeting the World Federation of Advertisers and a shadowy ad cabal known as the 'Global Alliance for Responsible Media initiative,' or GARM, as part of a broader push for holding 'brand safety' firms accountable for alleged censorship. Advertisement She will now take her talents to eMed, which was founded in 2020. The Miami-based company touts a range of services on its website, including 'at-home diagnostics, proctor-led screenings, physician-guided prescribing,' according to a press release. It also claims it can help reduce the cost of a weight-loss program by up to 50% for patients.
