Rebate checks coming to bank accounts of millions - Trump floats payouts to Americans amid Epstein fallout
Donald Trump has hinted that he might send Americans rebate checks that would be paid for by higher tariff revenue. The announcement comes at a time when people are once again talking about Trump's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Trump is trying to shift the focus to economic gains while staying away from the ongoing Epstein fallout.
Trump suggested cash relief while promoting his most recent trade agreements on Friday, after saying that "people should really focus on how well the country is doing" instead of his ties to the deceased child trafficker, as per a report by the Daily Beast.
At the White House, he told reporters, "We're thinking about that actually—we have so much money coming in, we're thinking about a little rebate.' 'We have so much money coming in from tariffs that a little rebate for people of a certain income level might be very nice.'
He is doing this by collecting more than $100 billion in tariffs. According to U.S. Treasury data, tariff revenue topped $100 billion for the first time this fiscal year, indicating that the Trump administration's policies have resulted in higher levies.
ALSO READ: National chicken finger day: Here's how to get a free chicken finger this July 27
The U.S. government could receive $2.8 trillion in tariff revenue over the next ten years, according to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who stated on Tuesday that he anticipates the growth to continue.Although the administration has previously suggested a rebate, Trump's remarks come as he tries to shift the public's attention away from the Epstein scandal and toward more conventional GOP areas of strength, like immigration and the economy, as per a areport by the Daily Beast.However, despite efforts to calm the situation, it appears to be getting worse in battleground states that will be crucial for the midterm elections next year as well as in Washington, where House Republicans joined Democrats on Wednesday to vote on the release of the Epstein files.Pennsylvania-based GOP consultant Christopher Nicholas told The Daily Beast, "It's resonating in the'real world,' as you might say, only because it's pretty obvious that no one knows what they're doing about it."Additionally, issues of this nature simply cut across traditional partisan divides. Everyone in society agrees that child abuse is horrible and wrong, and it appears that this case has been handled badly from the beginning.The announcement, however, didn't happen in a vacuum. It followed days of escalating attention on Trump's past relationship with Epstein, the disgraced financier who died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal trafficking charges.Though Trump has long denied any close connection to Epstein, his comments Friday made it clear he's feeling the heat. According to Trump, the public ought to concentrate on Epstein's other associates, citing former Harvard president and Treasury Secretary Larry Summers as well as former President Bill Clinton. He even offered to give a "list" of individuals to examine, claiming that it would include "hedge fund guys" who shared a residence with Epstein.And as the 2026 midterms get closer, Trump seems eager to get more support from voters with lower and middle incomes. He is relying on a promise of real financial help, along with claims of being a good economic steward, to protect himself from a scandal that won't go away.The rebate plan is still just that: a plan. But the timing, tone, and purpose of his actions show that Trump knows exactly what kind of political storm he's trying to avoid. Whether Americans believe the economic pitch or want more information about Epstein is a question that could shape the next few months.
Who would be eligible for Trump's proposed rebate checks?Trump suggested that they could target people with specific income levels, but he did not elaborate.
Is this the first time President Trump has mentioned tariff rebates? No, but it's the first time he's mentioned it in light of the growing controversy surrounding Epstein's ties.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
8 minutes ago
- First Post
The US has taken in $125 billion in tariffs in 2025. Here's why experts are worried
US President Donald Trump shocked many when he announced 'reciprocal tariffs' on US trading partners in April. The declaration, which came on 'Liberation Day', sent tremors through the world markets. The US in 2025 has taken in $125.6 billion in tariffs thus far – a massive increase from 2024 when tariffs generated $79 billion over the entire year. So why are experts worried? read more The US is raking it in from tariffs. US President Donald Trump shocked many when he announced 'reciprocal tariffs' on US trading partners including China and India in April. The declaration, which came on 'Liberation Day', sent tremors through the world markets. Trump has been obsessed with tariffs since his first term. He has mused about tariffs paying down the federal debt and even potentially replacing income tax. But how much money is America taking in from tariffs? STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Let's take a closer look: What do we know? As of July 29, America has taken in $125.6 billion in tariffs. The data show tariffs have been steadily climbing the entire year. In January, tariff revenues were at around $8 billion. In April, the levies had generated $16.3 billion. By June, tariffs added another $26.6 billion to the kitty. In July, that figure increased by another $28 billion. That's a massive increase from 2024 when America took in $79 billion in tariffs over the entire year. In 2022, tariffs were at $98 billion. The Yale University Budget Lab has said that the average tariff rate on imported goods currently stands at 18.2 per cent. This is the highest rate since 1934. Before Trump returned to office, that figure was at 2.4 per cent. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has predicted that tariffs could generate over $300 billion in revenue. While this seems like a good thing, it is American companies who are having to pay the costs to the government. Businesses will also likely pass on the escalating costs to the consumer, who could experience sticker shock. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has predicted that tariffs could generate over $300 billion in revenue. Reuters Experts say Trump's tariffs will inevitably cause prices to rise. According to the Federal Reserve, inflation ought to be at two per cent. Inflation was at 2.7 per cent in January, 2.4 per cent in May and 3 per cent in June. They say a number of firms stockpiling products has thus far resulted in consumers having to avoid shelling out extra. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But they say there are signs that the US customer will soon start paying the price for Trump's tariffs. From major appliances to sports equipment and toys, many products that Trump has levied tariffs on have witnessed price increases. While some in the administration have argued that tariffs could eventually replace income tax, this is still far short of the $2.4 trillion income tax the federal government took in last year. Trump tears up post WW-II playbook Since his return to the White House US President Donald Trump tore up the US post-WWII economic policy playbook of favouring free trade, slapping tariffs on trading partners and on certain products like steel. The US has subsequently reached deals with a number of countries that will see considerably higher tariffs apply than were in place, but for the most part also considerably lower than the highest rates that Trump threatened to impose. Trump said Thursday that sweeping tariffs he has imposed on nations around the world were making the country 'great & rich again' as governments raced to strike deals with Washington less than 24 hours before an August 1 deadline. 'ONE YEAR AGO, AMERICA WAS A DEAD COUNTRY, NOW IT IS THE 'HOTTEST' COUNTRY ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD,' he wrote on his Truth Social platform. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The deals that the US reached with trading partners will also go into effect on August one, as will a 50 percent levy on copper imports. For around 80 countries, including the 27 members of the European Union, rates of between 11 and 50 percent are set to come into force.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
8 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Judges grill Trump over use of emergency powers for 'reciprocal tariffs'
US appeals court judges sharply questioned on Thursday whether President Donald Trump's tariffs were justified by the president's emergency powers, after a lower court said he exceeded his authority with sweeping levies on imported goods. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., is considering the legality of "reciprocal" tariffs that Trump imposed on a broad range of US trading partners in April, as well as tariffs imposed in February against China, Canada and Mexico. In hearing arguments in two cases brought by five small US businesses and 12 Democratic-led US states, judges pressed government lawyer Brett Shumate to explain how the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a 1977 law historically used for sanctioning enemies or freezing their assets, gave Trump the power to impose tariffs. Trump is the first president to use IEEPA to impose tariffs. "IEEPA doesn't even say tariffs, doesn't even mention them," one of the judges said. Shumate said that the law allows for "extraordinary" authority in an emergency, including the ability to stop imports completely. He said IEEPA authorizes tariffs because it allows a president to "regulate" imports in a crisis. The states and businesses challenging the tariffs argued that they are not permissible under IEEPA and that the US Constitution grants Congress, and not the president, authority over tariffs and other taxes. Neal Katyal, a lawyer for the businesses, said the government's justification for the tariffs amounted to "a breathtaking claim to power that no president has asserted in years." The arguments - one day before Trump plans to increase tariff rates on imported goods from nearly all US trading partners - mark the first test before a US appeals court of the scope of his tariff authority. The president has made tariffs a central instrument of his foreign policy, wielding them aggressively in his second term as leverage in trade negotiations and to push back against what he has called unfair practices. Trump has said the April tariffs were a response to persistent US trade imbalances and declining US manufacturing power. He said the tariffs against China, Canada and Mexico were appropriate because those countries were not doing enough to stop illegal fentanyl from crossing US borders. The countries have denied that claim. Shumate cited a 1975 appeals court decision that authorized President Richard Nixon's across-the board surcharge of 10% on imported merchandise to slow inflation. But that decision added that the president did not have authority to impose "whatever tariff rates he deems desirable." Shumate also said that courts cannot review a president's actions under IEEPA or impose additional limits that are not included in the law. Several judges said that the argument would essentially allow one law, IEEPA, to overwrite all other US laws related to tariffs and imports. The case is being heard by a panel of all of the court's active judges, eight appointed by Democratic presidents and three appointed by former Republican presidents. The timing of the court's decision is uncertain, and the losing side will likely appeal quickly to the US Supreme Court. TRADE NEGOTIATIONS Tariffs are starting to build into a significant revenue source for the federal government, with customs duties in June quadrupling to about $27 billion, a record, and through June have topped $100 billion for the current fiscal year. That income could be crucial to offset lost revenue from Trump's tax bill passed into law earlier this month. But economists say the duties threaten to raise prices for US consumers and reduce corporate profits. Trump's on-again, off-again tariff threats have roiled financial markets and disrupted US companies' ability to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. On May 28, a three-judge panel of the US Court of International Trade sided with the Democratic states and small businesses that challenged Trump. It said that the IEEPA did not authorize tariffs related to longstanding trade deficits. The Federal Circuit has allowed the tariffs to remain in place while it considers the administration's appeal. The case will have no impact on tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as duties on steel and aluminum imports. The president recently announced trade deals that set tariff rates on goods from the European Union and Japan, following smaller trade agreements with Britain, Indonesia and Vietnam. Trump's Department of Justice has argued that limiting the president's tariff authority could undermine ongoing trade negotiations, while other Trump officials have said that negotiations have continued with little change after the initial setback in court. Trump has set an August 1 date for higher tariffs on countries that don't negotiate new trade deals. There are at least seven other lawsuits challenging Trump's invocation of IEEPA, including cases brought by other small businesses and California. A federal judge in Washington, D.C., ruled against Trump in one of those cases, and no judge has yet backed Trump's claim of unlimited emergency tariff authority.
Time of India
8 minutes ago
- Time of India
ET Market Watch: Nifty below 24,800; Trump's tariff rattles Indian markets
Transcript Hi, you're listening to ET Markets Watch, I'm Neha Vashishth, here's your quick market wrap: Indian markets trimmed early losses but still ended lower on Thursday. Sensex dropped 296 points, Nifty closed below 24,800. That's a nearly 3% fall for July overall! The big trigger? Trump's 25% tariff threat on Indian exports starting August 1, plus an unspecified penalty. Investors took it as a negotiation tactic — not a done deal yet. Textile stocks tanked: Welspun, KPR Mills, Gokaldas Exports — all fell up to 5%. Adani Enterprises slipped 4% on weak Q1 results. FMCG stood out. Hindustan Unilever jumped 3.4% on strong rural demand and earnings. Globally, markets were mixed. China's factory data spooked investors. But Europe held steady thanks to strong bank earnings Brent crude fell to $72.64. The rupee posted its worst month in nearly 3 years, down 2% to 87.59 vs the dollar.
