As Punjab's AAP govt weighs death penalty for sacrilege, a look at previous Bills with harsh punishment
Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann has been proposing the death penalty for anyone guilty of sacrilege. The government is seeking a legal opinion on whether it can propose the death penalty for sacrilege. If the government gets the go-ahead, the Bill will propose capital punishment for sacrilege during the Assembly's two-day special session.
The AAP government wants to table a 'historic' piece of legislation in the Assembly with the harshest punishment ever proposed by its predecessors. The Bill will be in line with provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), while the earlier Bills were proposed insertions in the Indian Penal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Centre has returned the previous Bills as they sought amendments to the IPC and the CrPC, while the country's criminal law framework has shifted to the BNS, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA).
During Amarinder's tenure as chief minister, the Vidhan Sabha unanimously passed the Indian Penal Code (Punjab Amendment) Bill 2018 and the Code of Criminal Procedure (Punjab Amendment) Bill 2018, which stipulated punishment up to life imprisonment for injury, damage or sacrilege to the Guru Granth Sahib, Bhagwat Gita, Quran and the Bible with the intention to hurt the religious feelings of the people.
The Indian Penal Code (Punjab Amendment) Bill 2018 sought to amend the IPC by inserting section 295AA, under which a convict was to get a maximum of three years' imprisonment with or without a fine. It also enhanced the punishment under IPC section 295 (injuring or defiling a place of worship with intent to insult the religion of any class) from two to 10 years of imprisonment.
In March 2016, the SAD-BJP government brought in the Indian Penal Code (Punjab Amendment) Bill 2016 and the Code of Criminal Procedure (Punjab Amendment) Bill 2016, recommending a life sentence for the desecration of the Guru Granth Sahib only.
The Centre, however, returned the Bill saying all religions should be treated equally given the secular nature of the Constitution. It added that it could not single out one religion and propose life imprisonment for the desecration of the Guru Granth Sahib. It asked the Punjab government to either withdraw the Bill or include all religions in the proposed amendment. The state government argued that the Guru Granth Sahib is not a holy book but a live Guru, unlike the scriptures of other religions.
In October 2015, during SAD-BJP rule, an alleged instance of sacrilege of the Guru Granth Sahib in Bargari changed the political narrative in Punjab. It was felt that the quantum of punishment for sacrilege as per the provisions of sections 295 and 295 A of the Indian Penal Code was too inadequate.
Also, the government move comes at a time when the health of a protester who has been demanding harsher punishment while sitting atop a BSNL tower in Samana since October 2024, is deteriorating. Concerns are mounting that if something happens to Gurjeet Singh Khalsa, the protester, it would trigger a political storm and create a law and order situation.
There has been a debate that sacrilege laws could send wrong signals as such harsher punishment could embolden politicians and police to misuse them to harass critics. The Centre has asked the state to reconsider these Bills. Against the backdrop of this debate, it remains to be seen if the state government is able to propose the death penalty for sacrilege.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Scheduled Caste women activists assaulted, FIR names BJP spokesperson
Bengaluru: BJP spokesperson Lohitaksha and several others have been booked for allegedly assaulting women, including Karnataka Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribes Nomadic Development Corporation president Pallavi G, during a July 5 community meeting in Bengaluru, held in the presence of former minister H Anjaneya. The FIR was filed at High Grounds police station, Seshadripuram, based on a complaint by Prabhavathi, 57, who was with Pallavi. The complainant has accused Lohitaksha and others of criminal intimidation, assault, and other offences under BNS. Prabhavathi, who is the district president of the women's wing of Akhil Karnataka Kuluva Mahasangha, complained that on July 5, at Gandhi Bhavan, a meeting of the Karnataka SC nomadic communities was convened by Anjaneya. What started at about 11am continued through noon, following which, the complainants said, "Lohitaksha, a BJP spokesperson, stated that of the 51 SC recognised, only 49 were genuine nomads; the Korama and Koracha communities were not nomads. This created a conflict among the community members, and the commotion cut the meeting short." You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru While the meeting resumed after a while, Pallavi is said to have tried to give her opinion, and the accused are said to have prevented her from speaking and asked her to leave. "When Pallavi condemned the false narratives, she was verbally abused. She and Prabhavathi were manhandled and inappropriately touched," stated the complaint. The women added that they were scratched and had their saris torn, aside from being given death threats, all in the presence of Anjaneya in a public forum.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
SDPI leader booked for making inflammatory statements in Udupi
Udupi: A case was registered against SDPI state secretary Riyaz Kadambu for allegedly making inflammatory statements during a press conference that could disrupt public order and incite communal hatred. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now On July 5, at 6pm, Bharatesh Kankanawadi, sub-inspector of Udupi Town police station, came across a video being circulated on WhatsApp in which Riyaz was seen making baseless allegations and provocative comments while speaking to the media. Police stated that the speech was intended to mislead the public, disturb peace, and provoke religious communities. Based on the video evidence, a case was filed at Udupi Town police station under Section 353(2) of the BNS. The investigation is in progress.
NDTV
5 hours ago
- NDTV
Lathi Charge, Case Against 16 After Attempt To Divert Muharram Procession Route In Ujjain
Bhopal: Tensions flared during a Muharram procession in Ujjain's Begumbagh area when a group of men allegedly broke police barricades and attempted to divert the religious procession from its pre-approved route. The incident led to a mild lathi charge by police, injuries to two officers, and legal action against 16 people, including the procession organiser Irfan Khan alias Lalla. According to the police, the incident occurred during the traditional 9th Muharram horse procession. While the route had been decided and mutually agreed upon by the administration and community leaders in meetings held over the past ten days, Mr Khan and his associates allegedly attempted to divert the procession from the designated Khajurwali Masjid-Nikas Chauraha path towards Abdalpura. When stopped, they reportedly broke through police barricades, leading to chaos. "In the past ten days, multiple meetings were held with the Muslim community to finalise the procession route. Everyone signed an agreement. Despite this, the barricades were broken. Two policemen were injured, and mild force was used to disperse the crowd," said Ujjain SP Pradeep Sharma. The police registered a First Information Report (FIR) under sections 191, 192, and 132 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including charges related to obstruction of public servants and disobedience of lawful orders. CCTV footage from the area is being analysed to identify and arrest the other accused. The Seerat Committee - a group formed within Muslim communities dedicated to promoting the understanding of the Seerat (also known as Sirah), which refers to the life, character, and teachings of the Prophet Muhammad - acknowledged the fault. Maqsood Ali, Joint Secretary of the Committee, said, "The police had clearly decided the route during prior meetings, and even a bond was signed. If any changes were required, they should have been communicated in those meetings. Violating the decided path was wrong, and those responsible must face action." The injured policemen are reported to be stable. Meanwhile, the Ujjain police have said they are conducting a thorough review to avoid such confrontations in the future.
