‘The numbers aren't sensible', blasts boffin as row erupts over claim United Ireland would cost just €3bn in first year
The estimate comes in a report this week by Professor John Doyle at
Advertisement
The tab is dramatically lower than previous figures of €9billion to €20billion a year.
Prof Doyle's lower sum is based partly on a more conservative estimate of the cost of
The new report suggests the cost of a United Ireland has been exaggerated partly because of how much the
It also maintains that not enough attention has been given to any potential growth if Northern Ireland was back in the
Advertisement
Read more in Money
Report author Professor Doyle, Vice President for Research in Dublin City University, insists convergence with the south would spark economic growth in the north.
He said: 'With the same set of policies on education, infrastructure, tax and Foreign Direct Investment, there is no obvious reason why Northern Ireland would remain so much poorer and so much less economically productive than, for example, Munster.
'Convergence with the more productive and wealthier Southern economy will take time, but the deficit will close much more quickly.'
But Professor John FitzGerald, from the Department of Economics at Trinity College in Dublin, branded the figures in the work published by DCU around the cost of pensions as 'unrealistic'.
Advertisement
Most read in Money
A report he co-authored put the cost of unity at €8billion to €20billion a year.
Prof FitzGerald said his view was shared by Dr Esmond Birnie from UU and Professor Edgar Morgenroth from DCU.
'THE NUMBERS AREN'T SENSIBLE'
He rapped: 'You have three economists saying the numbers aren't sensible.'
Dr Birnie, from UU, also told how he believes Professor Doyle is minimising the assumed financial costs of a United Ireland.
Advertisement
He said: 'Prof Doyle, as in his 2021 ARINs article, rather optimistically assumes that the UK government would both meet all public sector pension obligations and release NI from its pro rata share of UK public debt.'
'NOT CONVICING'
Dr Birnie described the report's funding requirements under different future growth scenarios as 'not all that convincing.'
He said: 'It would be desirable if NI moved on to a higher growth path but chronic under-performance in the NI economy suggests some of these things are not easily changed.
'Major constitutional change is neither a necessary or sufficient condition of improving economic performance and this report does not provide evidence that a United Ireland per se would spur performance.'
Advertisement
In response, Prof Doyle said previous work on the cost of a united Ireland in Prof FitzGerald and Prof Morgenroth's report, Northern Ireland Subvention: Possible Unification Effect, contained 'errors/unreasonable assumptions', which he replied to at length in this week's report.
1
A row has erupted over the estimated cost of a United Ireland
Credit: Shutterstock
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
2 days ago
- The Irish Sun
‘Targeted' social welfare increase latest after Child Benefit plot in ‘key' budget move as shock report details poverty
TARGETED social welfare supports are "essential" in Budget 2026 for Irish families at highest risk of poverty, experts have claimed. The Economic and Social Research Institute made the claim after it published a shocking report on the complexities of income poverty. Almost a fifth of people were deemed at risk of On average, 22 per cent of the population experienced deprivation at least once in two consecutive years from 2016 to 2023. And almost half of these were in persistent deprivation, slightly less than a third were exiting deprivation and about a quarter were entering deprivation. The study noted that there was a post-pandemic spike observed amongst lone-parent families, 30 to 65-year-old single people, adults above 65, and especially amongst single people over 65. READ MORE IN NEWS It found that one parent families, large families, and households with a working-age adult with a disability faced the highest risks of persistent at-risk-of-poverty rate and deprivation. And children in lone parent families, in particular, are most at risk. An average of 33 per cent of them are persistently deprived, and 21 per cent are persistently at-risk-of-poverty, between 2016 and 2023. The report said that implementing 'targeted' policy measures to support lone parents, large families, and households with a person with disabilities is essential to help those at high risk of poverty. Most read in Money It said timely adjustments to social welfare payments, including pensions, would be 'critical' to New online application system opens for €360 or €180 Domiciliary Care Allowance applications The ESRI previously found that Ireland's system of child-related cash and in-kind benefits has significantly reduced child income poverty and deprivation. And considering further ways to reduce child poverty, the researchers called for a second tier of means-tested Child Benefit, claiming it would be the "most cost-effective option". CHILD BENEFIT CALLS The call comes after the government confirmed it is "working on" a second-tier of the monthly €140 Child Benefit is a universal payment, meaning Irish parents can receive the cash regardless of their income and PRSI record up until a child is 18. A second tier of the social welfare payment would lift 55,000 children out of income poverty and bring 25,000 more from consistent poverty. The 'LARGE FAMILIES MOST AT RISK' Co-author Anousheh Alamir said today's report highlighted 'the complex nature of poverty'. She also said it spotlighted how different groups face different risks over various time periods. She said: "Over two year stretches, lone parent families and households with a disabled adult are found to be the most at risk of income poverty and/or material deprivation for one year only. 'And while they are also the most likely to be materially deprived two years in a row, large families are the most at risk of income poverty during that time. 'Thus, different groups are vulnerable to different forms and durations of poverty, an insight that should be key for effective policy.' 1 The annual risk of poverty declined last year Credit: Getty Images
Irish Times
3 days ago
- Irish Times
High Court refuses Gript's application for stay on publication of Press Council decision
The High Court has refused to stay an obligation on conservative news website Gript to publish a Press Council of Ireland decision upholding a complaint against the outlet. Lawyers for Gript Media Ltd, which operates the Gript site, on Wednesday sought the stay as part of judicial review proceedings it wants to bring against the Press Council. Gript wants to quash a recent decision of the Press Council, which upheld a Press Ombudsman finding that the outlet breached the council's code of practice in publishing two articles in October 2024. The articles relate to a diploma course run for secondary school teachers by Dublin City University (DCU) on Social, Personal and Health Education (SPHE) and Relationships and Sexuality Education (RSE). The articles reported on the purported material contained on the course, according to Gript's court documents. READ MORE DCU subsequently filed a complaint with the Press Ombudsman over the articles. The Press Ombudsman, in a May 1st decision, held that Gript, in publishing the articles, breached the Press Council's code of practice in three respects – truth and accuracy, fair procedures and honesty, and privacy. Gript is a member of the Press Council, and is obliged to abide by the council's code of practice. Gript unsuccessfully appealed the Press Ombudsman's decision to the Press Council. In a June 18th decision, the council upheld the finding of the ombudsman. Arising from this, Gript is obliged to publish the Press Council's decision on DCU's complaint on its website, and annotate the offending articles with a reference to the decision. In the High Court on Wednesday, Conor Rock, barrister for Gript, sought a stay on this obligation, pending the outcome of his client's judicial review proceedings against the Press Council. Mr Rock made the application on an ex-parte basis, with only Gript represented in court. Mr Rock noted that the Press Council had published its decision, and the stay application was a question of whether or not his client should be sanctioned – that is, through publication of the decision on the Gript website – pending the outcome of the proceeding. Mr Rock said his client took issue with having to include a specific reference in the articles in question, 'effectively saying' that the reports weren't truthful or accurate, breached privacy, and weren't honest. He said this could result in a breakdown in trust between Gript and its readers. Even in the event his client is successful in quashing the Press Council decision, this trust cannot be easily quantified in damage, Mr Rock said. 'It's that independent trust with the readership that's at stake here,' he said. Ms Justice Mary Rose Gearty refused the application for a stay. She noted that Gript agreed that the decision is already available publicly, and in those circumstances, she said she did not believe it was prejudicial to Gript to have to publish it. She said the matter could be addressed in terms of damages. The case returns in October.
The Journal
26-07-2025
- The Journal
News website Gript files High Court action against DCU and the Press Council
NEWS WEBSITE GRIPT has filed legal action against Dublin City University and the Press Council following a decision by the latter to uphold two complaints made by the university against Gript. Gript filed the High Court action yesterday, naming DCU and the Press Council as defendants in the case. The complaint was in relation to two articles published on 4 and 24 October 2024 by Gript about a postgraduate diploma course in SPHE/RSE run by DCU for secondary school teachers. The Gript articles were based on testimony by former SPHE teacher Mary Creedon. In its correspondence with the Press Ombudsman and Press Council, Gript said it also reviewed documents and other materials and relied on statements from other unnamed course participants. Creedon had falsely claimed that she was expected to teach extreme sexual material to children. There was also discourse over the use of an audio clip by Gript that was 'obtained through subterfuge' that the Press Ombudsman ultimately said was not justified to have been publicised and did not reveal information that substantiated Gript's reporting. Advertisement In a decision in May, the Press Ombudsman upheld DCU's complaint and remarked that Gript provided 'no evidence' that the DCU course 'gave adult teachers to understand that sexually explicit exercises used during their training were to be replicated in school classrooms'. 'Adaptation of material so that it is age appropriate is not replication and to suggest otherwise, as the publication does, is distortion,' said the Press Ombudsman. The decision was appealed by Gript to the Press Council. The Press Council appoints the Press Ombudsman and decides on appeals related to decisions of the Ombudsman. Gript had claimed that there had been an error in the Press Ombudsman's application of the Truth and Accuracy, Fair Procedures and Honesty, and Privacy principles in the Press Council's Code of Practice. However, the Press Council last month upheld the decision by the Press Ombudsman and said the Ombudsman didn't err in their application of these principles. In a statement on Monday, DCU welcomed the decisions. It noted that the Press Ombudsman found that the Gript articles 'contained no evidence that DCU was doing anything other than running a postgraduate course to enable adult teachers of SPHE/RSE to teach the subject to secondary school children'. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
