Trump hits dozens of countries with steep tariffs, including 35% for Canadian goods
Trump released an executive order, opens new tab listing higher import duty rates of 10% to 41% starting in seven days for 69 trading partners as the 12:01 a.m. EDT (0401 GMT) deadline approached. Some of them had reached tariff-reducing deals and some had no opportunity to negotiate with his administration.
The order said that goods from all other countries not listed in an annex would be subject to a 10% U.S. tariff rate.
Trump's order said that some trading partners, "despite having engaged in negotiations, have offered terms that, in my judgment, do not sufficiently address imbalances in our trading relationship or have failed to align sufficiently with the United States on economic and national-security matters."
Trump issued a separate order, opens new tab for Canada that raises the rate on Canadian goods subject to fentanyl-related tariffs to 35% from 25% previously, saying Canada had "failed to cooperate" in curbing fentanyl flows into the U.S..
The higher tariffs on Canadian goods contrasted sharply with Trump's decision to grant Mexico a 90-day reprieve from higher tariffs of 30% on many goods to provide more time to negotiate a broader trade pact.
A U.S. official told reporters that more trade deals were yet to be announced as Trump's higher "reciprocal" tariff rates were set to take effect.
"We have some deals," the official said. "And I don't want to get ahead of the President of the United States in announcing those deals."
Regarding the steep tariffs on goods from Canada, the second largest U.S. trading partner after Mexico, the official said that Canadian officials "haven't shown the same level of constructiveness that we've seen from the Mexican side."
The extension for Mexico avoids a 30% tariff on most Mexican non-automotive and non-metal goods compliant with the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement on trade and came after a Thursday morning call between Trump and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum.
"We avoided the tariff increase announced for tomorrow," Sheinbaum wrote in an X social media post, adding that the Trump call was "very good."
Approximately 85% of U.S. imports from Mexico comply with the rules of origin outlined in the USMCA, shielding them from 25% tariffs related to fentanyl, according to Mexico's economy ministry.
Trump said the U.S. would continue to levy a 50% tariff on Mexican steel, aluminum and copper and a 25% tariff on Mexican autos and on non-USMCA-compliant goods subject to tariffs related to the U.S. fentanyl crisis.
"Additionally, Mexico has agreed to immediately terminate its Non Tariff Trade Barriers, of which there were many," Trump said in a Truth Social post without providing details.
South Korea agreed on Wednesday to accept a 15% tariff on its exports to the U.S., including autos, down from a threatened 25%, as part of a deal that includes a pledge to invest $350 billion in U.S. projects to be chosen by Trump.
But goods from India appeared to be headed for a 25% tariff after talks bogged down over access to India's agriculture sector, drawing a higher-rate threat from Trump that also included an unspecified penalty for India's purchases of Russian oil.
Although negotiations with India were continuing, New Delhi vowed to protect the country's labor-intensive farm sector, triggering outrage from the opposition party and a slump in the rupee.
Trump's rollout of higher import taxes on Friday comes amid more evidence they have begun driving up consumer goods prices.
Commerce Department data released Thursday showed prices for home furnishings and durable household equipment jumped 1.3% in June, the biggest gain since March 2022, after increasing 0.6% in May. Recreational goods and vehicles prices shot up 0.9%, the most since February 2024, after being unchanged in May. Prices for clothing and footwear rose 0.4%.
Trump hit Brazil on Wednesday with a steep 50% tariff as he escalated his fight with Latin America's largest economy over its prosecution of his friend and former President Jair Bolsonaro, but softened the blow by excluding sectors such as aircraft, energy and orange juice from heavier levies.
The run-up to Trump's tariff deadline was unfolding as federal appeals court judges sharply questioned Trump's use of a sweeping emergency powers law to justify his sweeping tariffs of up to 50% on nearly all trading partners.
Trump invoked the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act to declare an emergency over the growing U.S. trade deficit and impose his "reciprocal" tariffs and a separate fentanyl emergency.
The Court of International Trade ruled in May that the actions exceeded his executive authority, and questions from judges during oral arguments before the U.S. Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit in Washington indicated further skepticism.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said earlier that the United States believes it has the makings of a trade deal with China, but it is "not 100% done," and still needs Trump's approval.
U.S. negotiators "pushed back quite a bit" over two days of trade talks with the Chinese in Stockholm this week, Bessent said in an interview with CNBC.
China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached preliminary deals in May and June to end escalating tit-for-tat tariffs and a cut-off of rare earth minerals.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
43 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's DoJ is demanding states hand over election information. Officials are wondering what they intend to do with it
The Department of Justice is on a mission to collect election information, including sensitive voter information, from states as part of President Donald Trump 's executive order cracking down on voting accessibility – but it's left state officials concerned. Over the last three months, the DoJ's Voting Section has reached out to at least 15 states seeking their voter roll, information about individuals who may have violated federal voting laws, and questions about the state's process for identifying and removing ineligible voters, the Associated Press reported. Traditionally, the Voting Section's main focus is to protect citizens' right to vote, but under Trump's direction, it's cracking down on voter fraud – a rare occurrence that Trump has mischaracterized as a major problem in the United States. But some state officials have flagged concerns with the swath of information being requested, saying voter rolls contain private information about individuals and cannot be shared without congressional notification. Utah's Lieutenant Governor Deidre Henderson, the state's top election official, said she refused to provide expansive information on the state's 2.1 million voters to the DoJ. 'We've offered the public voter list. If they want protected data, there's a process for government entities to request it for lawful purposes,' Henderson told The Salt Lake Tribune. 'We'll address that if it comes,' she continued, 'but so far we haven't identified any federal or state statute that would justify handing over to the federal government the personal identifying information of 2.1 million Utah voters,' Henderson added. Officials in at least four California counties told the Associated Press that DoJ officials requested information about the number of people removed from rolls for being noncitizens, including their ID numbers, dates of birth, and voting records. Trump has sought to conduct the largest deportation of undocumented immigrants, in part by targeting individuals using government information. In Colorado, DoJ officials demanded the state hand over 'all records' pertaining to the 2024 election – a massive trove of documents that includes ballots and voting equipment information, as well as records retained from the 2020 election. Last year, the Colorado state Supreme Court tried to bar Trump from appearing on the presidential ballot, claiming he was ineligible because he violated the Fourteenth Amendment by inciting the January 6 attack on the Capitol. The U.S. Supreme Court ultimately ruled in favor of Trump, declaring that states did not have the authority to determine a federal candidate's eligibility. In Maine, Secretary of State Shenna Bellows said she was denying the DoJ's request for the state's voter registration list, the names of officials who maintain the list, and the number of ineligible voters due to noncitizenship status. Officials had sent multiple requests for information, one of which insinuated that Maine had an unusually high number of registered voters, the Maine Morning Star reported. 'The nature of these questions suggest that the DOJ is more interested in keeping people that they don't like from voting than promoting voter registration and participation,' Bellows told Maine Morning Star. Already, DoJ officials had spoken to Bellows about a potential 'information-sharing agreement' to provide the department with information on registered voters who are ineligible to vote. Similar requests were made to Arizona, Connecticut, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin. 'Why on Earth does the Department of Justice need the voter information from all 50 states?' Bellows asked. 'If Congress thought it was appropriate that there be a national voter file, Congress could have authorized the Department of Justice to do that, but they have not.' The DoJ's motivation in collecting such information appears to be to assist its efforts to identify and prosecute those who violate federal election laws. Trump has directed the attorney general and DoJ to collect election information from states to add extra safeguards to elections. Despite no evidence of mass voter fraud or noncitizen voting in the last several elections, Trump has continually claimed the 2020 election was rigged with mass voter fraud and that undocumented migrants voted in the 2024 election.
Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
'The fruits of October 7': The sickening phrase used by Hamas to describe Labour's plan to recognise a Palestinian state, 22 months on from massacre
Keir Starmer 's plan for Palestinian state recognition is 'one of the fruits of October 7,' a top Hamas official has boasted. The statement came as furore around the Prime Minister's proposal showed no sign of dying down at the weekend. Senior Hamas politician Ghazi Hamad enflamed the situation as he told news network Al Jazeera: 'The initiative by several countries to recognise the Palestinian State is one of the fruits of October 7. 'Why do all countries recognise Palestine today? Before October 7, was there a single country that dared to recognise the State of Palestine? Just give me one example. 'Now, the achievement we accomplished on October 7 is what brought the Palestinian issue to the world's attention and prompted powerful action in support of it,' Hamad said. Sir Keir and the leaders of France and Canada have faced accusations that plans to recognise a Palestinian state would be rewarding the group responsible for the biggest slaughter of Jewish people since the Holocaust and for emboldening the terror group with no clear incentive for a ceasefire. Adam Rose, a lawyer acting for the British hostage families, said: 'It comes as absolutely no surprise to us that Hamas would welcome the UK's decision to recognise the state of Palestine without first requiring Hamas to release the 50 hostages it still holds, 667 days on from 7 October, 2023. 'Indeed, and as we predicted, in the past few days since the UK's announcement, we have seen an emboldened Hamas, which released videos of emaciated hostages Rom Braslavski, 22, and 24-year-old Evyatar David, the latter being shown digging his own grave in the dungeon in which he is being held, starved and tortured.' Last week British-Israeli Emily Damari led condemnations from hostage families saying the PM was 'not standing on the right side of history' with his pledge to recognise a Palestinian state if Israel did not agree to a ceasefire before September's UN meeting. In contrast, no conditions were placed on Hamas to release the remaining hostages, giving the terror group no reason to stop the fighting. Foreign Secretary David Lammy last night posted on X: 'The images of hostages being paraded for propaganda are sickening. Every hostage must be released unconditionally. Hamas must disarm and have no control over Gaza. 'We are working with partners on a long-term solution and plan for peace. This must begin with an immediate ceasefire that frees the hostages, as well as removing inhumane aid restrictions.' Noam Sagi, whose elderly mother Ada was kidnapped into Gaza, told the Daily Mail: 'Britain should lead with moral courage, not appease evil'. Last night, Hamas said it is conditionally ready to deliver Red Cross aid to the hostages it is holding in Gaza. The terror group said that if Israel opens humanitarian corridors permanently and halts 'all forms of air traffic' during the delivery of packages to the hostages, it would allow aid to reach them.
Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Texas homeowners sue Trump for border wall plans that'll ruin their picturesque walks and fishing spots
A group of Texas landowners are railing against President Donald Trump as he seeks to force them to sell parts of their property to build his long promised border wall. Residents in Starr County, in southern Texas, are being hauled to court to face off with high-powered administration lawyers who have filed eminent domain lawsuits. Eminent domain cases are used to force landowners to sell private property for public use, even if the owner does not want to sell. Alejo Clarke, who has lived in the county for 58 years, told The Wall Street Journal he is fighting back against the order. The Trump administration is seeking one acre of his land in order to erect the 18 foot wall. Trump was elected on a campaign promise to make America safer by securing the borders and conducting mass deportations. A spokesperson for the administration noted a border wall is 'the most safe and efficient way possible.' But Clarke claims doing so would cut him off from expansive plots of land where he has fished and hunted his entire life. 'I'm not gonna beat Trump - you know it and I know it,' he said. 'But if someone is going to kick your butt, are you just going to lie down?' Clarke maintained he has not noticed any security problems on his property, and said the billions of dollars the government has allocated to building the wall would be better spent helping farmers in the region bounce back from a water shortage. He claimed the government has offered just $3,000 in compensation for the land it plans to take. Clarke tried to fight a similar plan from the Trump administration during the first term in court by himself, but said that with only a seventh-grade education, he was out of his depth. Biden returned the land to him, but it's now once again at risk. He has hired a lawyer to help him fight the eminent domain lawsuit, but will struggle to afford the associated costs, he said. 'This is the piece they want to take out of me,' he said. 'My entrance y todo.' Raquel Oliva has found herself in a similar situation, fighting to keep land which has been in her family since 1798, growing crops of cotton, hay and tomatoes. The government filed proceedings in February to take over less than three acres of the family's land to construct a portion of the wall. But Oliva said the government's use of three acres would in turn block off access to more than 100 acres where her family has hunted, farmed and operated a gas well. The 75-year-old used AI to help her draft an objection letter to the government, arguing the wall would be detrimental to her family's work. She has requested a 16-foot access gate, an irrigation pipeline and more compensation. 'No one has a problem stopping illegal immigration or drugs, but we live on the border - it's always been like this,' Oliva said. 'Now it feels like an invasion of the government on us.' Since returning to power, the government has filed dozens of eminent domain lawsuits in Texas as the administration seeks to deliver on Trump's promise of securing US borders. These cases are often complex because they involve small patches of land with generations of owners and poorly documented titles. Some of the cases list upwards of 100 defendants who have ownership claims over tiny pockets of land, while others list 'unknown heirs' of late former owners. But Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said completion of the border wall is crucial to the government's policy and national security. ' Successful mass deportations mean nothing if we don't control the border and keep future illegal aliens out,' she recently wrote in a New York Post opinion column. 'That's why the BBB legislation also funds hundreds of miles of new border wall and water-based barriers in the Rio Grande, which will permanently secure the border for decades.' Trump is also ramping up a hiring spree for Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. The administration has carried out 239,000 deportations so far this year, according to data published by The Washington Post last lmonth.
