Meet the 'Moderates' Trying to Make Trump's Tax Bill More Regressive
All Johnson, Lawler, and other Republican moderates ask in return is to expand the budget deficit (which is already more than doubled under the bill) by another half-trillion or so in order to kill off the only progressive component to Trump's 2017 tax law. With moderates like these, who needs extremists?
What Republican moderates seek to reinstate, as much as they possibly can, is the deduction on federal tax returns for state and local tax payments, also known as SALT. Before 2018, these tax payments were fully deductible. The 2017 tax law capped the deductible amount at $10,000. This change was progressive because most of the people who paid $10,000 or more in state and local taxes were in the top 1 percent of the nation's income distribution, and nearly all of them were in the top 5 percent. For the vast majority of Americans below the 95th income percentile, state and local taxes remained fully deductible.
Full SALT deductibility was ended to partially offset the cost of the 2017 tax bill's giveaways to corporations and wealthy individuals. In effect, the law traded in one regressive tax break (SALT) in exchange for several other much costlier regressive tax breaks (top corporate tax rate lowered from 35 percent to 21 percent; top marginal income tax rate lowered from 39.6 percent to 37 percent; and a 20 percent 'pass through' deduction for business owners).
The politics of the SALT deduction are a little wacky. Its traditional constituency is liberal. That's because the deduction's benefits, though regressive, flow mostly to the much-despised coastal elites who live in high-tax blue states. Liberals argued (some still do) that limiting the SALT deduction put downward pressure on spending at the state and local level, which is true. Conservatives answered that taxpayers shouldn't have to subsidize city and state governments in wealthier locales where they don't live, which is also true.
Some of the most cogent critiques of the SALT deduction's regressive effects come from conservative commentators like Charles Lane of the Free Press and Ken Girardin of the Manhattan Institute. For the record, I've opposed the SALT deduction since the 1980s, when its elimination was briefly considered for what eventually became the 1986 tax reform law. To my way of thinking, a progressive tax system should tax rich liberals as well as rich conservatives.
Republicans removed the SALT cap in 2017 mainly because that penalized non-Republican states. They then exerted considerable effort not to notice the resulting evidence that you could raise taxes for wealthy people by hundreds of billions of dollars and the earth wouldn't spin off its axis and fly into the sun. (The very wealthiest did not pay additional tax because they tended to pay the Alternative Minimum Tax instead, and the AMT already disallowed any SALT deduction.)
Joe Biden pledged during the 2020 campaign to eliminate Trump's SALT cap; later dropped the idea; still later raised the deduction cap from $10,000 to a preposterously high $80,000 in his House-passed Build Back Better bill, which died in the Senate; and eventually included no SALT change in his successor bill, the Inflation Reduction Act. In the 2024 election, Kamala Harris took no position on SALT. That about sums up the Democrats' ambivalence today.
Eliminating the SALT cap became a Republican cause in the 2024 election when, on the eve of an appearance in Long Island, Trump pledged to 'get SALT back'—even though he was the guy who took it away. The House version of Trump's 'big, beautiful' budget reconciliation bill raises the SALT threshold to $40,000, at a cost to the Treasury of perhaps $320 billion. The Senate version leaves the cap at $10,000, but as I write, blue-state Senate Republicans are negotiating with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent for SALT relief. It's expected that either the threshold will rise or that eligibility for the deduction will be limited to people below a certain income level (or perhaps some combination of both).
If no bargain—or a bargain that's perceived to be weak—results from these negotiations, then blue-state Republicans risk being voted out of office. Consequently, even those Democrats who favor eliminating the SALT cap are either keeping their mouths shut (the best option) or, in the case of Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, trying to score points by taunting Republicans for not reinstating enough of this regressive deduction. Schumer is of course also Senate minority leader, in which capacity he's committing political malpractice by bragging that Democrats would give the haute bourgeoisie even deeper tax cuts. The Democrats, Mr. Minority Leader, are the party of the working class. If you can't understand that, then perhaps it's time you stepped aside for someone who can.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
4 reasons Longhorns may have dodged a bullet by losing 5-star Felix Ojo to Texas Tech
On the afternoon of Independence Day, five-star offensive tackle Felix Ojo committed to Texas Tech. Thought to be a heavy Longhorns lean, the Mansfield, TX native reportedly accepted a late deal from the Red Raiders for $5.1 million dollars over three years. The 6-foot-6, 275-pound prospect didn't even list Tech as a final four and told Rivals last week it was between Ohio State and Texas. In the end, Ojo took the big money from Texas Tech mega-booster and Matador Club founder Chad Campbell. Advertisement Could this end up being a blessing for Texas? Ojo was reportedly the Longhorns No. 1 target during this recruiting cycle. Texas spent a lot of time, effort and capital to get him to Austin. No one blames a 17 or 18 year old for taking the biggest offer. But it is how Ojo handled himself over the past 10 days that should put up red flags. Cash over player development While taking the biggest offer is understandable, it is shortsighted. No one would say the player development at Texas Tech is as good as the Longhorns have been under Steve Sarkisian. Texas has the most NFL Draft picks over the past two years and have a great record of getting offensive lineman drafted high. Kelvin Banks Jr. went No. 9 to the Saints in the most recent draft. Ojo simply won't get the quality of coaching at Tech as he would at UT. Most agents want the biggest deal possible. It seems logical. But sometimes that goal is at odds with the player's future. The agent wants his percentage of the money to be as much and as soon as possible. Ojo's representative Derrick Shelby probably won't be his agent when it comes time to negotiate his first NFL contract. But the cost for the client, in this case Ojo, is player development. Advertisement Disingenuous in the final days Bobby Burton has covered the Longhorns for decades. The media legend helped found Rivals and 247Sports. Burton says Ojo purposely strung the coaching staffs of Texas and Ohio State along in the waning stages of his recruitment, even though his camp had made the decision to head to Lubbock. Playing coy in the press and on social media is one thing. Being less than truthful with other coaching staffs for spot is another level. Disrespectful commitment ceremony Many recruits play the old "hat switcheroo" at their commitment announcement. A lot of prospects, and even fans, find it funny. But coaches HATE it and they remember it. It is patently disrespectful to the staff that spent their time, effort, money and emotions to recruit you. Of course, the losing school has a lot of self interest each time they recruit a prospect. But unless you were treated poorly, there's no need to rub it in their faces at the end. Ojo did a real song and dance with the Longhorns cap at his commitment ceremony. Recent struggles on the field Ojo really struggled at the Rivals Five-Star Challenge last week. I have been to several of these events. When a guy struggles as bad as Ojo struggled, it can mean the player is over-ranked. High School players can spend most of their career dominating the opposition in their own district. Mansfield Lake Ridge High School is in a district with other Mansfield, Crowley and Weatherford schools. It is a district with decent, but not great, opposition. Advertisement Sometimes when a prospect meets elite talent for the first time at a national event, they are overwhelmed. The Five-Star challenge has the hundred best players in the nation and the defensive lineman Ojo faced ran over, around and through him all day. It was so bad Ojo had to issue a national statement after the camp. Ojo looked slow and lackadaisical and flat-out bullied. Ojo might be incredible in Lubbock. He might be the No. 1 pick in the 2028 NFL Draft. He is certainly guaranteed to make a lot of money for himself and his family. But his entire recruitment does send up some warning signs that make it less likely Texas missed out on a generational talent and more likely the Horns dodged a bullet. Advertisement Follow us on X (formerly Twitter) at @LonghornsWire. This article originally appeared on Longhorns Wire: Four reasons Texas dodged a bullet losing 5-star Felix Ojo to Tech


CBS News
17 minutes ago
- CBS News
Texas Dream Act supporters sue to restore in-state tuition for undocumented students
There is a growing legal fight to reinstate the Texas Dream Act, which gave college students without legal residency access to reduced in-state tuition. Several law firms and nonprofit organizations have filed a lawsuit against the state of Texas, arguing the law is essential for educational equity. Student shares personal impact Among those on the front lines is Oscar Silva, who came to Texas at the age of 1 and has called Garland home ever since. "My senior year, I remember being terrified because I couldn't land any scholarships," Silva said. "A lot of the scholarships I tried to apply for were only for U.S. citizens, and so that was a significant barrier for me. For the longest, I thought I was just not going to be able to afford college." With the help of the Texas Dream Act, Silva was able to attend the University of North Texas for his undergraduate degree. He said it also motivated him to pursue a master's degree. Sense of belonging in college "Throughout undergrad, I just remember feeling very, very happy that I could attend college, that I could sit in classes with my peers and pretend like everything was normal—that I belonged there just as much as they did," Silva said. ACLU joins legal effort The ACLU of Texas is among the groups working to restore the law. "I feel like we have a very strong argument moving forward," said Valeria Alvarado with the ACLU of Texas. "And what I can confidently also say is that the Texas Dream Act is not going to go away without a fight." Judge rules law unconstitutional In June, a federal judge blocked the Texas Dream Act, calling it "unconstitutional and invalid." Domingo Garcia, who was a state representative in 2001, helped write the bill, which passed with bipartisan support. Supporters call repeal cruel "It's been the law of the land, and attempts to repeal it over the years have all failed," Garcia said. "It's just really cruel, manipulative and mean-spirited what is being done by the attorney general and the DOJ." Student balances school and advocacy As the issue heads to court, Silva is balancing his final year in a master's program while also joining the group intervening in the lawsuit. "I want to continue higher ed. I want to finish my master's. I want to see my degrees to the end," Silva said. "I've got to do whatever I can in my power to make sure that my education is not tampered with." Tuition costs could double Silva said without the Texas Dream Act, his tuition will nearly double. According to the University of North Texas' online tuition calculator, a master's degree in accounting costs about $7,600 per year for in-state students. For out-of-state students—now including Silva—it's more than $12,600.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says the US 'pretty much' has a deal on TikTok
ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday the United States "pretty much" has a deal on the sale of the TikTok short-video app. Last month, Trump extended to September 17 a deadline for China-based ByteDance to divest the U.S. assets of TikTok. Sign in to access your portfolio