logo
Man arrested in Monaghan on suspected human trafficking offences

Man arrested in Monaghan on suspected human trafficking offences

Gardaí arrested the man at an undisclosed location in the county this morning under Section 50 of the Criminal Justice Act, 1984.
That period of detention allows senior investigators to question the man for a period of up to seven days before a decision must be taken to either charge or release him from garda custody.
A garda spokesperson said the arrest came on foot of an 'ongoing investigation' into human trafficking 'for the purpose of sexual exploitation and forced criminality'.
'Gardaí attached to the Human Trafficking Investigation and Co-Ordination Unit (HTICU) at the Garda National Protective Services Bureau (GNPSB) arrested a man (50s) this morning, Monday 9th of June, 2025 in Co. Monaghan,' said the spokesperson.
'The male was arrested on suspicion of human trafficking offences.
'He is currently detained under Section 50 of the Criminal Justice Act, 1984 at a Garda Station in the north eastern region.'
Gardaí have also issued an appeal to anyone who may be the victim of human trafficking for sexual exploitation to come forward and speak with them at any Garda Station in person or by phone, or by calling the freephone Garda Confidential Line: 1800 666 111.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Three family members of suspected burglary gang charged with organised crime offences
Three family members of suspected burglary gang charged with organised crime offences

Sunday World

time37 minutes ago

  • Sunday World

Three family members of suspected burglary gang charged with organised crime offences

The men, from Dublin, who are related and include a father and son, were denied bail at Sligo District Court and remanded in continuing custody. Three suspected members of a burglary gang were charged yesterday with organised crime offences. The men, from Dublin, who are related and include a father and son, were denied bail at Sligo District Court and remanded in continuing custody. The court previously heard the case against them was part of a wider investigation into a large number of burglaries, mostly in the west of Ireland. The three are Edward Connors (50) and his son Larry Connors (27), both of Bridgeview, Cloverhill Road, Clondalkin, and Edward Connors (28), of Drumkerring Park, Fettercairn, Tallaght. Edward Connors (50) Today's News in 90 Seconds - July 4th They face a range of charges linked to separate burglary and associated offences. They were brought before Sligo District Court yesterday and charged with organised crime offences as part of an investigation carried out by gardaí from the Western Region. The elder Edward Connors was charged with one count under Section 72 of the Criminal Justice Act 2006 of facilitating and enhancing the activities of a criminal organisation in relation to a garda interception in Co Kildare last November. He was further charged under Section 73 of the same act, which states that a person who commits a serious offence for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with, a criminal organisation is guilty of an offence. In his case, these alleged offences are concerned with two burglaries, in Co Sligo in April 2023 and Co Tipperary last August. Larry Connors (27) Among other offences he is charged with is alleged criminal damage to a van that occurred in Co Roscommon last November. Larry Connors was charged with the same two offences under the Criminal Justice Act, with his Section 73 charge related to an alleged burglary in Co Roscommon last November. The men are further charged with handling stolen jewellery The younger Edward Connors was charged with a single Section 72 offence under the organised crime legislation. As with the other two defendants, this charge is related to the circumstances of his arrest in Co Kildare last November 29. Gardaí had earlier charged all three men with having in their possess­ion gloves, torches, a pry bar, pliers, a heavy-duty axe, screwdrivers, a signal interference device, a telescopic ladder, a vehicle refuelling kit, surface disinfectant and two sets of number plates not matching the car they were travelling in, when they were stopped at Cadamstown, Johnstownbridge, Co Kildare, last November 29. They have been in custody since their arrests last November. All three were refused High Court bail during an application before Mr Justice Tony Hunt in early January and were again refused bail at yesterday's hearing. Bail could not have been granted to them at the district court on the organised crime charges. Convictions in relation to Section 72 or 73 of the act can attract a maximum prison sentence of 15 years. Their case is expected to be sent forward to the next sitting of Sligo Circuit Criminal Court, and it has been remanded for a week for service of books of evidence. The men are further charged with handling stolen jewellery taken during the course of a burglary at a house in Tuam, Co Galway, last ­November 28. They are charged with further separate offences, some of which were upgraded at yesterday's court sitting.

Man who led Garda Armed Support Unit on high speed chase to border avoids jail
Man who led Garda Armed Support Unit on high speed chase to border avoids jail

Sunday World

time38 minutes ago

  • Sunday World

Man who led Garda Armed Support Unit on high speed chase to border avoids jail

Daniel O'Riordan contested the charges, testifying that he was not behind the wheel. A motorist who led Gardaí on a high speed chase from North Louth to the border during which he overtook other traffic at speed and ignored road signs has avoided a prison sentence. Last April, Daniel O'Riordan (37), Mullacrew, Louth Village, and originally from Bellurgan Point, Dundalk, was convicted of five counts of dangerous driving. He contested the charges, testifying that he was not behind the wheel, nor even in the area where the pursuit commenced. His girlfriend also gave evidence that he was with her the whole time. However, at the conclusion of evidence, Judge Nicola Andrews convicted the defendant of dangerous driving at Jenkinstown Post Office, Bellurgan, Ballymascanlon, Thistle Cross and Carrickaneena, before adjourning finalisation of the case for reports. There were 61 previous convictions, 27 under the Road Traffic Act, including for dangerous driving causing death for which a five-year sentence was imposed in February 2011. Judge Andrews sentenced him to 120 hours community service in lieu of four months imprisonment for dangerous driving at Jenkinstown Post Office along with a two-year driving disqualification. The other charges were taken into consideration. Legal aid was granted. The district court had heard that Gardaí began a surveillance operation at the post office at 8.30am on December 2, 2024, to apprehend Mr O'Riordan who had eight outstanding bench warrants. Gda Ian McDonnell said that he was in an unmarked car and at 4.27pm he spotted a silver Volkswagen Passat arrive. The defendant, whom he knew, was the sole occupant. A high speed pursuit subsequently began, along the main Dundalk Road, past the Ballymascanlon Hotel and through Thistle Cross. It ended when the Passat overtook on a bend under a railway bridge and crossed into Northern Ireland. Gda McDonnell said that he could see it driving dangerously along Edenappa Road. The PSNI was alerted. The pursuit was over 8.6km and lasted approximately eight minutes. On December 10 at 7.10am, the court heard, Mr O'Riordan was arrested with the assistance of the Garda Armed Support Unit at a residence in Mullacrew. Dundalk Courthouse Today's News in 90 Seconds - July 4th The offending car was parked tight to the rear of the dwelling so it couldn't be seen from the road. Daniel O'Riordan testified that he didn't go to Bellurgan that day. His girlfriend drove him to a yard in Culloville, Co. Armagh to collect his wages. He continued that he was in Bellurgan the next day. He gets the 'Dole' in Jenkinstown Post Office. 'I wasn't driving. I wasn't even in Jenkinstown. It's not my car. I don't know who has access to it,' he said. Funded by the Courts Reporting Scheme

Claims woman was raped by mum and uncle described as 'mindboggling' by accused
Claims woman was raped by mum and uncle described as 'mindboggling' by accused

Irish Daily Mirror

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Daily Mirror

Claims woman was raped by mum and uncle described as 'mindboggling' by accused

Two men and a woman denied allegations of sexually assaulting and raping a young girl when interviewed by Gardaí, the Central Criminal Court has heard. Memos from the three defendants' separate Garda interviews were read to the jury on Thursday. The three defendants cannot be named for legal reasons. They deny wrongdoing and have pleaded not guilty to all charges. The woman, who is in her 50s and the complainant's mother, has pleaded not guilty to 13 counts of sexual assault on dates between 2000 and 2009, and between 2012 and 2014, primarily at the family home. She also pleaded not guilty to one count of rape, in that she facilitated the rape of the complainant by her uncle. Gardaí asked her to comment on the allegation that she sexually assaulted her daughter for the first time before she was four. The woman replied 'that never happened or anything like it as far as I'm concerned'. She said she felt 'very upset, slightly sick', adding: 'I don't understand how anyone would do that, I certainly didn't.' She denied sexually assaulting her daughter on other occasions, including during a holiday to a family-owned holiday home. She said she didn't believe she had gone on that holiday. The woman further said 'that didn't happen' when asked if she allegedly sexually assaulted her daughter for a final time when the girl was 15. In direct evidence earlier in the trial, the complainant said her mother was present while the girl's uncle raped her. The woman denied facilitating this or being present. 'That never happened either,, she told Gardaí. She was also asked about the complainant's allegation that she saw her mother and uncle engage in sex with each other while she was present in a room. The woman denied having had sex with her brother. 'That's very vicious. I don't understand that at all,' she said. She denied having issues with alcohol. When Gardaí suggested that her alcohol dependency may be greater than she wanted to acknowledge, the woman said she only drank at weekends and had worked full-time until the mid 2010s. She might drink a bottle of wine on a night off she said, but rejected the suggestion she became aggressive when drunk. Gardaí suggested that the complainant had described a household of 'total chaos' when she was a child. 'This didn't happen, it's very upsetting,' the woman replied. When an extract from the complainant's statement referring to her drinking was read, the woman said these were 'very hurtful and upsetting', adding that she didn't understand why her daughter would make these allegations. Gardaí asked her about the allegation that she bit her daughter. The woman replied: 'I don't know what to say to that, I don't remember any occasion like that.' She later added that other adult relatives in the house would have 'tackled me if I did'. The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week The woman was also asked to comment on her daughter's allegation that another man orally raped her. The complainant gave evidence during the trial that this man – a friend of her mother's then partner - orally raped her, during which he told her 'Your mother knows'. The woman denied any knowledge of this. She confirmed that her daughter went to live with two female friends and later moved to the family-owned holiday home. She said she tried to get the complainant to move back but has had 'pretty much no contact' with her daughter since. The woman was asked if her daughter was a liar. 'I haven't spoken to [the complainant] in a long time, I never thought she was.' 'Do you think she is now?' Gardaí asked. 'Yes,' the woman replied. When asked how she feels about the complainant, the woman said: 'Hurt, distressed, and confused. I'm anxious about her and I'm worried about her.' She said she didn't know why her daughter would make these allegations, but suggested the complainant might have felt 'shoved out' after moving in with the two female family friends. In his Garda interviews, the complainant's uncle denied raping the complainant. This man, who is in his 40s, has pleaded not guilty to five counts of rape and one of oral rape on dates between 2003 and 2012, all at the family home. He described the allegations as 'mindboggling' and later said he didn't know why his niece would make them. He further denied raping the girl in his bedroom while her mother was present, saying: 'That never happened.' This man also denied ever engaging in sex with his sister, the complainant's mother. When asked if the complainant was a liar, he said: 'I would have said no, until this. I thought she was always telling the truth, but not after this.' The complainant's uncle denied that there was alcohol dependency in the house. A second man said he thought the allegation made against him was 'outrageous' when he was interviewed by Gardaí. This second man, aged in his 50s, has pleaded not guilty to one count of oral rape between 2008 and 2009 at the same address. The jury has heard he was a friend of the accused woman's then partner. The court heard that he replied 'I've nothing to hide' after caution. During his Garda interview, he said: 'I never touched that lady.' He said he didn't want to say more, adding: 'I never went near that girl and I swear it on my mother's and father's grave.' In other evidence, a Garda said that the complainant did not make allegations of a sexual nature when she spoke to him in 2015 about a separate matter. Two female family friends also told the jury that the complainant moved to their home when she was about 18 and again during the second Covid-19 lockdown. These women, who are sisters, said the complainant was neglected as a child and that the household was chaotic. They also said the adults in the complainant's home when she was a child all had issues with alcohol. The first woman gave direct evidence that 'alcohol had a place in their house that a cup of tea would have in someone else's'. Both women confirmed that a family-owned holiday house was left in trust to one sister for the benefit of the complainant following the death of an adult relative. Defence counsel put extracts to them from the complainant's counselling records which referred to these two women. They both agreed with defence counsel that there had been arguments while the complainant stayed with them during the second Covid-19 lockdown. One witness said she could not explain the meaning of these notes, adding that they related to the complainant. The first female family friend denied a suggestion from Desmond Dockery SC, representing the complainant's mother, that she pushed the complainant to make sexual allegations against her mother. During re-examination, this witness said she and her sister 'absolutely' did not put pressure on the complainant to make allegations against her mother. Her sister told Mr Dockery that the atmosphere turned 'septic' while the complainant was living with them during the second Covid-19 lockdown. She said there were arguments and that she had been 'terrified' for the complainant's mental health. She denied a suggestion from Mr Dockery that she or her sister put pressure on the complainant to make allegations against her mother. 'Absolutely not. I find what [the complainant] said about [her mother] appalling.' 'Why would I want her to make up a story about my friend,' she said. 'I never heard of a mom abusing her kid, I never heard of a story like that.' The trial at the Central Criminal Court continues.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store