Commentary: What does it matter if Singaporeans spend their CDC or SG60 vouchers on ‘frivolous' items?
Retailers have lost no time in offering discounts and promotions to entice Singaporeans to spend their vouchers on their products and services.
However, a newspaper article published in May suggesting fun ways to make use of CDC vouchers – such as on dance apparel and craft workshops - prompted a flurry of online responses from netizens who felt that spending the vouchers on 'frivolous' items went against the stated intent of the vouchers, namely to help Singaporeans with the cost of living.
IS THE ANGST JUSTIFIED?
The truth is that while the vouchers are a lifeline for some households and individuals struggling with high living costs, they are for others no more than extra pocket money or even spare change.
So is the angst over how the vouchers are spent justified? There are those who feel that SG60 vouchers should be distinguished from CDC vouchers in that the former are a celebratory gift while the latter are aimed at easing hardship.
Others are not bothered about how vouchers – whether CDC or SG60 – are used. Their view is that once public money passes into private hands, people should be free to do whatever they want with it. After all, whether the vouchers are used to buy bread or a fancy meal, the spending will ultimately benefit businesses and boost the economy.
Some have asked: Could the government have ringfenced the use of the vouchers to daily necessities?
It is hard to draw a clear line between essential and discretionary expenditure. Moreover, money is fungible – saving on any kind of purchase frees up financial resources for spending on other items.
There is a strong consensus among economists that giving assistance in cash or near-cash does more to improve consumer welfare than support that comes with conditions or restrictions because it offers recipients greater freedom of choice.
DIFFERING SOCIAL BENEFIT PARADIGMS
The crux of the issue may lie in differing concepts of what is prudent use of government money.
On the one hand, there are Singaporeans who prefer not to receive cash handouts or vouchers as they feel that such support ought to be chanelled to the lower-income. This group is more likely to take umbrage at the use of vouchers for non-essential purchases.
Targeting government support at those who need it most is still the approach adopted for most forms of social support in Singapore. These include means-tested housing and healthcare subsidies, as well as permanent social transfers such as the Workfare Income Supplement, Silver Support and the Goods and Services Tax Voucher.
This paradigm of social support contrasts with models of universal welfare where social support is seen as a citizenship right. The latter, however, necessitates high taxes to enable extensive redistribution.
In Singapore, the government's priority is to keep taxes on the middle class low in order to encourage work and enterprise. Under what is known as a 'progressive' system of taxes and benefits, the rich bear a larger burden of taxes, while those with lower income receive more in social transfers or benefits.
Consistent with this approach, the Ministry of Finance estimates that the bottom 20 per cent of households by income receives around S$4 in benefits for every dollar of tax paid, while the top 20 per cent receive just S$0.30 for every tax dollar.
On the other hand, there are Singaporean who feel that all citizens who contribute to the state's coffers should be entitled to a range of benefits, and not just limited to public goods such as national security or infrastructure.
Some may feel aggrieved if they are excluded from certain benefits on account of their income or wealth, particularly if they are contributing a significant amount in taxes.
Like wealthy donors at a charity dinner who take pleasure in good food and a door gift, these high-income earners derive satisfaction from receiving vouchers and other Budget goodies, even if these offset only a small fraction of what they pay in taxes.
AN INJECTION OF UNIVERSALISM
Singapore's approach towards social benefits is in fact evolving.
More recently, the COVID-19 pandemic saw the government disburse a 'solidarity payment' of S$600 to all adult Singaporeans in recognition of the broad impact of the pandemic on the population, with additional support given to seniors and families with children.
Rebates on utilities and service and conservancy charges, however, were tiered according to Housing and Development Board (HDB) flat type. Those who lost jobs or saw a significant fall in income could apply for further financial help through the COVID-19 Support Grant or COVID-19 Recovery Grant.
Taken together, Singapore's COVID-19 support can be seen as a form of 'progressive universalism' – where everyone receives some benefits, but those with greater needs receive more.
Following the pandemic, supply chain disruptions saw inflation shoot up across the world, including in Singapore. The government responded with a series of payouts to all Singaporeans in the form of CDC vouchers – the vouchers having the dual aim of providing cost of living support while giving heartland merchants a leg-up.
Notwithstanding these examples of universal benefits, most social support is still means-tested or tiered according to income or home value. There are advantages to having a mix of benefits – some universal and others means-tested with differing qualifying income thresholds.
This approach avoids a 'cliff effect' where benefits drop off suddenly when one's income crosses a particular threshold, which could discourage career and income advancement. Some elements of universality also make for greater inclusivity and sense of solidarity among citizens.
A MIDDLE WAY?
As inflation has receded from the post-pandemic highs, we may see fewer CDC vouchers disbursed in future. But for this year at least, vouchers are very much a part of the conversation.
Singaporeans who have no need for this support can easily donate unused vouchers to their preferred Institutions of Public Character via the CDC voucher website; they will even qualify for a 250 per cent tax deduction.
For those who are still in two minds on how government vouchers ought to be spent, perhaps a good strategy would be to set aside a portion of the vouchers to give away, and then spend the rest on whatever you wish with a clear conscience.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Grower champagnes: What makes these small-producer bottles special (and worth the hype)?
At Singapore-based Convivial Champagne Bar, the by-the-glass wine list offers a curated selection of champagnes. With one exception, none of them comes from the major-name champagne houses. Instead, the list features producers like Larmandier-Bernier, Andre Clouet and Domaine la Borderie – names that may be unfamiliar to most people. Among champagne lovers, however, these names carry weight. These are grower champagnes: Wines made by independent, often family-run vineyards in the Champagne region, and they are worth seeking out. For years, grower champagne was an insider's secret, a case of 'if-you-know-you-know.' But not anymore. Over the past two decades, this once-quiet movement has gone global, elevating boutique producers to cult status. Labels like Pascal Agrapart, Egly Ouriet, and Ulysse Collin now command prices comparable to those of prestige brands such as Dom Perignon and Krug, if not more. WHAT SETS GROWER CHAMPAGNE APART Prized for their authenticity, sustainability practices and sense of place, grower champagnes were once nicknamed 'farmer fizz.' The Champagne region is home to 15,900 farmers, each owning an average of just two hectares across the 319 villages permitted to produce champagne. Historically, most growers sold their grapes to prestige champagne houses from Champagne Ayala to Champagne Pol Roger to LVMH's vast stable of Krug, Dom Pérignon, Ruinart, Veuve Clicquot and Moet & Chandon. Only a few growers bottled wines under their own names. Initially meant for local consumption, these small-batch wines attracted international attention in the 2000s. Discerning importers and sommeliers championed the category, and a quiet revolution began. While both major houses and growers produce non-vintage and multi-vintage blends, the difference lies in scale and control. Growers craft their wines exclusively from vineyards they own and manage (with some exceptions who now buy grapes from others and have changed their status from growers to micro-negotiants), offering complete control from vine to bottle. Production remains modest. Most growers produce 20,000 to 35,000 bottles annually; a minuscule output compared to Veuve Cliquot's annual production of 19 million bottles or Moet Chandon's almost 30 million bottles a year. Consider cult micro-producer Jerome Prevost, who built his stellar reputation on just two hectares of land in the Montagne de Reims, producing only 13,000 bottles. His entire production amounts to what a major house might label in an hour. A GROWING DIFFERENCE At the Vintage Club in Singapore, general manager Stephanie Rigourd encourages wine lovers to consider the diversity of Champagne's villages, plots and subplots. 'Champagne offers a huge diversity of terroir,' she said and pointed out the terroir nuances across the five sub-regions – Cote des Blancs, Montagne de Reims, Vallee de la Marne, Cote des Bars, and Cote de Sezanne. 'We don't have the same topography or microclimate from one slope to another.' Small producers often highlight these distinctions through site-specific wines: Single-grape cuvees (many of them, like Laherte Freres, produce 100 per cent Pinot Meunier-based Champagnes), single-vineyard or single-village bottlings, and single-vintage expressions. By contrast, larger houses lose this level of nuance in mass-produced blends. 'Smaller producers have generally shown a closer connection to their lands and focus on 'better' farming practices — tending towards sustainable if not organic, regenerative or biodynamic practices,' said Matt Lamb, beverage director of The Lo and Behold Group. But terroir alone doesn't amount to the rising prominence. The farming and winemaking practices are equally distinct, as in the case of revered grower Anselme Selosse of Domain Jacques Selosse. An early pioneer, Selosse sought inspiration from Spain and Burgundy in 1974 when he embraced organic farming, lower yields, indigenous yeast and eschewed the use of sulphur. 'There's a greater sense of exploration,' said Lamb, noting the use of unconventional vessels such as concrete and ceramics for vinification. Dosage – a mix of wine and sugar added to champagne before the final bottling – is another differentiator. Growers tend to use lower dosages. 'Healthy fruit picked with flavour and balance shouldn't have to be too far adjusted with excessively high levels of dosage', explained Lamb. Valentin Krug of Artisan Cellars, the first Singapore importer to carry grower labels believes transparency offered by these producers is a major draw. 'The growers give so much transparency,' said Krug. 'The back labels and websites detail the village name, base vintage year, harvest date, disgorgement date, years on lees and more.' He also pointed to the human element. 'You can speak to a human on the other side and not a sales force,' he said. Many grower estates are family-run, with winemaking philosophies shaped by generations of tradition and hands-on involvement. 'Champagne is the most exciting region for discovery, and the reason is grower champagnes,' Krug added. Today, worldwide demand for boutique champagne is on a steady rise. In 2023, grower and cooperative champagnes accounted for 28 per cent of the total exports (73 million of 271 million bottles). In France, boutique labels accounted for almost half the local champagne consumption. THE SINGAPORE AWAKENING With prices of prestige labels and white burgundies rising sharply in recent years, both sommeliers and collectors have sought alternatives, bringing grower champagnes into focus. 'Grower champagnes are certainly picking up pace in Singapore,' said Convivial founder Yeo Xi Yang. 'Wine merchants are making a deliberate effort to visit Champagne and discover new growers who are not yet distributed in Singapore.' 'Local consumers are very educated now. They are moving away from the big names because they finally understand champagne better,' affirmed Rigourd. When she arrived in Singapore in 2009, only one grower, Champagne Selosse, was available. By 2024, the market had expanded to include 155 grower labels. Singapore is fortunate to have good selection of growers, said JM Seleque's winemaker, Jean-Marc Seleque. 'By the time a grower champagne reaches Singapore, it's already been through a kind of curation.' Prices are climbing in tandem with demand. 'In 2018, we were selling Ulysse Collin for S$150. Today, it is priced at S$450 and sells out the day we release it,' said Krug. The maturity of our market is reflected in Singapore's first champagne festival, held in March 2025, which was declared a rousing success. 'The consumers certainly loved the in-person experience and connections developed,' reported Lamb, who organised the festival and facilitated travel for multiple champagne growers to meet with Singapore's vibrant consumer base. Besides the star-producers, Yeo offers more suggestions for newcomers like Girard-Bonnet, Nowack and Herbert & Co. 'At Convival, we do our best to source for alternatives, like their neighbours from the same village where the soil type and grape varieties planted are similar.' Here are five stunning grower champagnes, considerably more affordable than Krug and available widely in Singapore. JM Seleque Solessence Extra Brut NV (based on 2021 vintage) Jean-Marc Seleque is a third-generation winemaker based in Pierry, a premier-cru village just outside Epernay, in the Vallee de la Marne. His grandfather planted the first vines in 1965, and his father started bottling his grower champagne in the 1970s. When Jean-Marc took over in 2008, he put his own stamp on the Champagne. 'My father didn't move out of Champagne. When I took over, I had all this culture from my travels to other regions,' Seleque shared. He embraced single-vineyard bottlings, sustainable viticulture and low-intervention winemaking. Today, Seleque is regarded as a modernist among champagne producers, with a production of 100,000 bottles from 9 hectares spread across 45 plots. Solessence is a blend of 50 per cent Chardonnay, 40 per cent Pinot Meunier, and 10 per cent Pinot Noir, incorporating a significant portion of reserve wines. This zero-dosage cuvee opens to floral notes and offers layers of citrus zest complemented by brioche and bright, refreshing acidity. S$94, Artisan Cellars. Andre Robert les Jardins du Mesnil Blanc de Blanc Brut Nature NV Les Jardins du Mesnil is crafted from a selection of chalk-rich small plots in the grand cru village of Le Mesnil Sur Oger, located in Cote des Blancs. The village is celebrated for producing some of the most intense and precise expressions of Chardonnay – a reputation cemented by iconic champagnes like Salon's Salon Le Mesnil and Krug Clos du Mesnil. The house of Andre Robert traced its roots to the 1800s and is now led by fifth-generation winemaker Claire Robert and her husband, Jean-Baptiste Denizart. Their Les Jardins du Mesnil is an elegant wine marked by a citrus-fruited core, crushed stone minerality and a refined texture. S$130, Clink Clink Champagne Gounel Lassalle Les Agneaux Blanc de Noirs Brut Nature NV Fourth-generation grower-winemaker Arnaud Gounel and his wife Sophie Lassalle channel their deep connection to the land into every bottle they produce. Their estate, named Les Agneaux — meaning 'the lambs' in French is in reference to the sheep that once grazed the vineyards — is a three-hectare certified organic and biodynamic plot in the premier cru village of Chigny-les-Roses, in Montagne de Reims. The vineyard is primarily planted with Pinot Meunier, and most of the cuvees are crafted in oak barrels with minimal sulphur, no malolactic fermentation, and zero dosage, resulting in pure and expressive wines. Their Blanc de Noirs is aromatic, vibrant, and creamy, offering notes of red apple skin and orchard fruits with a clean, defined saline finish. S$130, Clink Clink Champagne Francois Seconde La Loge Blac de Noir NV Montagne de Reims In the Champagne subregion of Montagne de Reims, oenologist Jerome Groslambert cultivates 5.5 hectares of Pinot Noir and Chardonnay vineyards spread across four villages surrounding Sillery, a grand cru village. Unlike many in the region, Groslambert did not inherit the estate; he spent a decade working alongside the previous owner before acquiring the majority share from the late Seconde's widow. Since taking the helm, he has embraced sustainable viticulture and remains deeply involved in every aspect of winemaking. Each year, he disgorges 60 jeroboams (three-litre bottles) and 20 Methuselahs (six-litre bottles) by hand — a labour-intensive task he shared during our last meeting. One of his standout wines, a 100 per cent Pinot Noir, reveals layers of fresh raspberries and shortcrust pastry, delivered with a seductive, elegant mousse. SG$99, Inflorescence Asia Champagne Marie Courtin 2009 Cuvee "Indulgence" Rose Extra Brut Once derided as the poor cousin of Champagne, Cote de Bar is a hotbed for grower and artisanal champagne houses. Here, the dynamic Dominique Moreau crafts a series of single-vineyard, single-variety, single-vintage, zero-dosage Champagnes in the village of Polisot, at her 2.5-hectare estate named after her grandmother. She has maintained a strong reputation for biodynamic viticulture since 2006.
Straits Times
5 hours ago
- Straits Times
Las Vegas Sands' new development part of S'pore's broader, more ambitious transformation: PM Wong
The new complex is set to be completed by 2030, and to open in the first quarter of 2031. SINGAPORE - Singapore's skyline will get a soaring new addition come 2030 when Las Vegas Sands' US$8 billion (S$10.3 billion) new hotel tower is completed. Speaking at the development's ground-breaking ceremony on July 15, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong said the plans for Marina Bay are just one part of the Republic's broader, more ambitious transformation of its entire southern waterfront. A 30km stretch of coastline from Gardens by the Bay East to Pasir Panjang that is six times the size of Marina Bay, it will have more commercial, recreational and entertainment options, alongside new residential precincts that include public housing for Singaporeans, he added. The authorities said in May that the first of these homes – around 1,000 Housing Board Build-To-Order flats to be built on the site of the former Keppel Club – will be launched for sale in October. PM Wong said: 'That's what we mean when we say we are never done building Singapore. We will always keep on improving, keep renewing and keep on moving forward.' The Greater Southern Waterfront project was first announced by then Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at the 2013 National Day Rally, where he outlined a vision to consolidate container port activities in Tanjong Pagar, Keppel, Brani and Pasir Panjang at a unified port in Tuas, freeing up prime waterfront land for redevelopment. PM Wong was addressing about 200 guests gathered at the ground-breaking site next to Marina Bay Sands' (MBS') Hotel Tower 1. They included Las Vegas Sands co-founder Miriam Adelson, chairman and chief executive officer Robert Goldstein, and president and chief operating officer Patrick Dumont. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Economic headwinds do not dampen outlook for new Marina Bay development: Las Vegas Sands president Business MAS records net profit of $19.7 billion, fuelled by investment gains Singapore Man charged with attempted murder of woman at Kallang Wave Mall Singapore CDL's long-time director Philip Yeo to depart after boardroom feud Singapore Ex-cleaner jailed over safety lapses linked to guard's death near 1-Altitude rooftop bar Life The Violinist, Singapore's first animated historical film, set for August 2026 release Singapore 'Nobody deserves to be alone': Why Mummy and Acha have fostered over 20 children in the past 22 years The new Las Vegas Sands complex will comprise 570 luxury hotel suites, a casino, a 15,000-seat entertainment arena, 200,000 sq ft of meeting and convention space, and numerous high-end restaurants. It is set to be completed by 2030 and to open in the first quarter of 2031. Like MBS, it is designed by US-based firm Safdie Architects, and it will have a distinct roof in the form of an elliptical Skyloop, which will have 360-degree views, and both public and private facilities. PM Wong called Marina Bay a symbol of the Singapore Story – that of a thriving financial and business hub, a vibrant destination for meetings, conventions, tourism and entertainment, as well as a key node connecting Singapore to the global economy. But more than just an economic success story, it has become deeply embedded in the national consciousness, he added. Prime Minister Lawrence Wong speaking at the ground-breaking ceremony for the new Las Vegas Sands hotel tower on July 15. ST PHOTO: AZMI ATHNI This is as the bay is where Singaporeans come together to celebrate milestones such as the National Day Parade and year-end countdowns, and to make memories. The skyline is also instantly recognisable around the world as being Singapore, whether in movies, documentaries or music videos, he said. 'Every recruit who does basic military training, their graduation parades are held here, reminding them of why they are defending Singapore and what they are defending,' he said. 'So we are very proud of what Marina Bay has become, but we're not done yet because we believe the best still lies ahead.' (From left) Populous senior principal Andrew Tulen, architect Moshe Safdie, Las Vegas Sands chief operating officer Patrick Dumont, Las Vegas Sands co-founder Miriam Adelson, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong, Minister for Sustainability and the Environment Grace Fu, Las Vegas Sands chairman and chief executive Robert Goldstein, Las Vegas Sands executive vice-president of Asia operations Grant Chum and Marina Bay Sands chief operating officer Paul Town at the ground-breaking ceremony on July 15. ST PHOTO: AZMI ATHNI He noted that the Las Vegas Sands development will both refresh Singapore's skyline and introduce new attractions, including the rooftop Skyloop and the 15,000-seat arena for world-class concerts and performances. Added convention and exhibition space will also further strengthen Singapore's position as a leading Mice (meetings, incentives, conferences and exhibitions) destination globally, he added. Alongside the upcoming NS Square, which is set to be completed by 2027, PM Wong said these developments will add buzz and vibrancy to the bay area, which will draw more visitors and create new opportunities for Singaporeans in hospitality and tourism. An artist's impression of the Skyloop from an aerial view. PHOTO: SAFDIE ARCHITECTS Singapore is able to keep renewing itself and moving forward because of strong partnerships, such as with Las Vegas Sands, said PM Wong. He noted its 'bold commitment' when the integrated resort was first mooted in 2005. The American casino and resort company committed to an initial investment of $3.85 billion, which is apart from another $1.2 billion in land cost for the site. 'It was... a major investment, underpinned by confidence in Singapore, and in Singapore's future,' he said. 'I'm glad this partnership has flourished, and I'm even happier that we are now taking it to the next level.' Mr Goldstein said that Marina Bay Sands has become the most successful integrated resort in history and the industry's gold standard since it opened in 2010. 'We have every intention of delivering a product that will be the envy of the hospitality industry and ushers in a new era of luxury tourism in Singapore,' the Las Vegas Sands chairman and CEO said of the new tower.
Online Citizen
5 hours ago
- Online Citizen
PM Wong reaffirms ‘full support and confidence' in ST as netizens question its impartiality
SINGAPORE: Prime Minister Lawrence Wong has underlined the importance of trusted journalism, declaring that Singapore needs credible media more than ever to help society distinguish fact from falsehood in an increasingly complex world. Speaking on 11 July 2025 at a dinner celebrating the 180th anniversary of The Straits Times (ST), Wong reiterated the government's 'full support and confidence' in the publication's mission to inform, educate, and hold Singapore society together. His backing comes amid ongoing debate over the independence of Singapore's main English-language newspaper. Many Singaporeans have taken to social media to question whether ST can operate free of state influence, especially after substantial government funding was pledged to its parent, SPH Media Trust (SMT). In February 2022, the government announced up to S$900 million in funding over five years for SMT, which operates ST. This support, of up to S$180 million a year, is intended to sustain quality journalism and keep the national newspaper financially viable as advertising revenues fall and audiences move online. The injection of public money followed SMT's restructuring in 2021, when it was separated from Singapore Press Holdings to function as a not-for-profit entity. The move was aimed at ensuring that the nation's flagship paper could adapt to the challenges of digital disruption and remain a trusted source of news. PM Wong: Government support essential to keep public service media viable, independent, and accountable Wong acknowledged that globally, traditional news outlets face shrinking newsrooms and commercial pressures that threaten editorial quality. He cautioned against allowing Singapore's national newspaper to fall into the hands of private billionaires with partisan aims or to let public trust in the press erode as a result of poor funding. 'We cannot allow that to happen here in Singapore,' Wong said. 'We do not want our national newspaper to be owned by billionaires with narrow or partisan agendas. Nor do we want public trust in the media to be eroded.' He explained that government support is essential to keep public service media viable, independent, and accountable to Singaporeans. PM Wong: ST must adapt and stay relevant Wong also acknowledged that ST faces unprecedented competition, not just from other reputable outlets but from content creators and distractions across countless digital platforms. He called on the paper's editors and journalists to adapt boldly to remain relevant to future readers, even if that means significant changes to the newspaper's style, tone, or length in the coming decade. 'I believe there will still be a place for print, and we should all do our best to keep print newspapers viable in Singapore for as long as possible,' Wong said. He added that while the government supports ST's mission, it would not dictate the editorial choices needed to keep the paper meaningful to Singaporeans. Minister Josephine Teo echoes call for trusted news Communications and Information Minister Josephine Teo also emphasised the government's commitment to trusted media. She noted that Singaporeans must have reliable sources to inform decisions affecting their daily lives and futures. 'We remain very committed to ensuring that our public service media can continue to capture the attention of our audience,' Teo said. Public doubts over impartiality: 'Will ST pose hard questions to those in power?' Despite such reassurances, scepticism persists. Many Singaporeans have questioned whether the government's financial backing allows ST to remain truly independent. On social media platforms such as Reddit and Facebook, netizens have asked if journalists at ST will pose hard questions to those in power. Some doubt whether the paper can avoid serving as a government mouthpiece, given its reliance on state funding. One Reddit comment described the newspaper as a 'monopoly' that still requires government help despite diversifying its business interests into property and aged care. Concerns about media control Another comment criticised what they saw as irony in PM Wong's rejection of billionaire-owned outlets, pointing out that ST is already heavily funded and indirectly controlled by the state. Some argued that both billionaire ownership and state control can threaten true journalistic independence. One user wrote that Singaporeans should not have to choose between 'billionaire-owned media and state-owned media,' but should instead have independent journalists who report in the public interest. Comparisons to other countries Several netizens compared Singapore's situation to international examples. One noted that while government ownership carries a partisan slant, at least an elected government is accountable to citizens — unlike unelected billionaires. However, others countered that real media independence comes from autonomy, not state or corporate influence. One cited the BBC as an outlet that once enjoyed a reputation for neutrality but has struggled to maintain it amid funding debates. The user suggested that ST could position itself as a truly neutral outlet providing balanced coverage of both Eastern and Western perspectives, arguing that doing so could fill a gap left by declining trust in other global media brands. Ravi Philemon: ST already heavily funded and controlled by the state Ravi Philemon, Chief of Red Dot United, also weighed in the debate, criticised PM Wong's remark about rejecting billionaire-owned media as ironic, pointing out that The ST is already heavily funded and controlled by the state. 'It is already funded to the tune of one billion dollars to keep a ruling party, one that seems more aligned with the filthy rich than with anyone else, in power,' Philemon commented in a FB post on 12 July. He argued that Singapore's ruling party uses public money to maintain a media system that serves its own power rather than true public interest journalism. He highlighted that despite claims of independence, the press avoids asking tough questions and fails to challenge the government meaningfully. Philemon warned that this controlled media environment keeps Singaporeans uninformed about real struggles like rising debt and inequality. He warned that the real threat is not foreign billionaires, but a media kept loyal through state funding, which preserves a system that benefits the wealthy and entrenches political power. Calls for media literacy and critical reading Some Singaporeans stressed the importance of critical reading and media literacy. They argued that citizens should consult a range of credible outlets rather than depend solely on one publication, whether state-backed or privately owned. One user commented that media must serve the people and retain enough autonomy to scrutinise those in power without fear or favour. Another urged fellow Singaporeans to read widely, pointing out that a healthy democracy relies on an informed citizenry capable of questioning any narrative. Singapore ranks low on press freedom, with RSF citing lack of editorial independence According to the 2025 World Press Freedom Index published by Reporters Without Borders on 2 May, Singapore ranked 123rd out of 180 countries. The report criticised Singapore as an example not to follow, citing a severe lack of editorial independence and little respect for press freedom. RSF noted that independent political journalism is scarce, with outlets like The Online Citizen forced into exile.
