UN rights council rejects Eritrea's bid to end human rights investigation
Eritrea's rare bid to scrap the mandate of the UN special rapporteur on its human rights record was defeated on Friday, with only four votes in favour, 25 against, and 18 abstentions.
The move by Eritrea surprised some observers and marked one of the few times a state under active investigation tried to end such scrutiny through a formal vote.
Human Rights Watch welcomed the outcome, calling it 'an important message that the international community is not fooled by Eritrea's efforts to distract from, and discredit, independent human rights reporting on the country's dire rights record.'
Eritrea's motion argued that alleged rights violations were not systemic and blamed 'capacity constraints' common to other developing nations. But European states responded with a counter-resolution to extend the mandate for another year, which passed with ease.
In his latest report in June, Mohamed Abdelsalam Babiker, the UN-appointed special rapporteur and a Sudanese human rights lawyer, said Eritrea had shown 'no meaningful progress' on accountability.
He referenced the 2016 UN inquiry that found 'systematic, widespread and gross human rights violations … committed in Eritrea under the authority of the Government … may constitute crimes against humanity.'
In the 2016 report, the UN's Commission of Inquiry (COI) for Eritrea said the government of President Isaias Afwerki had committed heinous crimes since independence a quarter-century ago, including the 'enslavement' of 400,000 people.
Many of those abuses are allegedly linked to a harsh national service programme in the secretive Horn of Africa state, which for many is almost impossible to escape and which the COI compared to lifetime enslavement.
Ending investigation would enable 'impunity'
DefendDefenders, a pan-African human rights organisation, said Babiker's role remained vital for victims and the wider Eritrean diaspora.
'The expert plays an indispensable role, not only for the victims and survivors of Eritrea's abuses, but also for the Eritrean diaspora,' the group said in a statement.
The EU warned that terminating the mandate would enable 'impunity and repression to deepen in silence.'
Eritrea's representative, Habtom Zerai Ghirmai, lashed out at the decision, accusing the EU of displaying a 'neo-colonial saviour mentality complex'.
He added, 'The continued extension of the Special Rapporteur's mandate is an affront to reason and justice.'
Iran, Sudan and Russia – all under their own UN investigations – supported Eritrea's motion. China also backed the move, arguing that such mandates were a misuse of international resources.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
14 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
What's in Trump's ceasefire proposal and can it end Israel's war on Gaza?
Discussions of a ceasefire in Gaza have picked up in recent days. United States President Donald Trump said last week that Israel agreed to the conditions for a 60-day ceasefire, and negotiators could meet to carve out a path to finally ending Israel's nearly 21-month-long war on Gaza. Hamas said it delivered a 'positive response' to mediators, with amendments, while Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the Palestinian group's asks 'unacceptable' but sent negotiators to the Qatari capital, Doha, for talks nonetheless. Netanyahu is set to visit Washington, DC, on Monday, where reports say Trump would like a deal. 'There could be a Gaza deal next week,' Trump told reporters on Saturday, adding that he had not been briefed yet about Hamas's counterproposal but that it was 'good' that they had responded. Here's all you need to know: What is Hamas asking for? According to reports, there are three main demands: At least 743 Palestinians have been killed seeking aid at GHF sites in Gaza in recent weeks. In late June, the Haaretz newspaper reported that Israeli soldiers were deliberately ordered to fire on unarmed people waiting for food. Humanitarians have repeatedly said they are able to distribute aid and food to Palestinians in Gaza and have criticised the GHF for furthering Israel's political agenda. 'It makes aid conditional on political and military aims,' Tom Fletcher, the United Nations chief humanitarian, said in May. 'It makes starvation a bargaining chip. It is a cynical sideshow … A fig leaf for further violence and displacement.' Hamas wants the Israeli military to withdraw to the positions it held before it violated the ceasefire in March of this year. In May, the Israeli military began extensive new ground operations in Gaza, killing hundreds of Palestinians, to take 'operational control' of large swaths of the Strip. The Israeli military had already created the Netzarim Corridor, which splits the Gaza Strip into northern and southern sectors, soon after launching the war, and in April, Netanyahu announced the creation of the Morag Corridor in the southern Gaza Strip. In March, Israel unilaterally broke a ceasefire that had been agreed in January, despite the conditions for the ceasefire being upheld by the Palestinian side. This time, Hamas and other Palestinian groups want international assurances that this will not be repeated. Hamas reportedly wants a US guarantee that Israeli air attacks and ground operations, which have killed thousands of Palestinians, will not resume even if the ceasefire ends without a permanent end to the war. What does the original US-backed proposal say? There is reportedly a key focus on the remaining Israeli captives in Gaza. The plan is to release 10 living Israeli captives held by Hamas and the bodies of 18 others in exchange for Palestinians lodged in Israeli prisons. The release would be staggered over a number of days. Fifty captives are still in Gaza, with about 20 reportedly alive. On the question of aid, the UN and the International Committee of the Red Cross would contribute to distributing sufficient quantities to Palestinians. Lastly, it calls for phased pull-outs of Israeli troops from parts of Gaza. What is Israel saying? Netanyahu reportedly agreed to the original US proposal but has called Hamas's amendments 'unacceptable'. He has said he will not end the war until all captives are released and Hamas is 'destroyed'. The latter goal has been called impossible by many analysts and is believed to be an open-ended political objective for Netanyahu to continue the war as long as he believes it will serve his personal interests. Netanyahu is on trial for corruption and is still widely blamed in Israeli society for the security failures that led to Hamas's Al-Aqsa Flood operation on October 7, 2023, during which 1,139 people died in Israel and about 250 were taken captive. Analysts believe Netanyahu wants to continue the retaliatory war on Gaza until he can gain enough political leverage to dismiss the cases against him and build enough popular support to remain the leader of Israel. Netanyahu's war has been supported by his far-right ministers, particularly Itamar Ben Gvir, minister of national security, and Bezalel Smotrich, the minister of finance. They want Israel's military operations to be intensified to kill more Palestinians and to stop providing any aid to the besieged and starving people in Gaza. What is life like for Palestinians in the meantime? Israel is still launching deadly attacks on Gaza, with at least 138 Palestinians killed in the last 24 hours, according to the Ministry of Health in Gaza. In the occupied West Bank, bulldozers are demolishing homes, and Israel has killed more than 1,000 people since October 7, 2023. People in the West Bank are also suffering recurring attacks by Israeli soldiers and armed settlers from illegal settlements, as well as severe limitations on movement and access to livelihoods. What are the chances a deal will be reached? Trump appears keen on reaching one, and Palestinians in Gaza are desperate for the Israeli attacks to cease. However, one major roadblock remains. 'Israel and Netanyahu are not interested in reaching a ceasefire,' Adnan Hayajneh, professor of international relations at Qatar University, told Al Jazeera, adding that there is a 'very slim chance' of a ceasefire. 'What Israel wants is clear … a land without a people,' Hayajneh said. 'So Palestinians are given three choices … starve to death … get killed … [or] leave the land, but Palestinians have so far proven they will not leave the land, no matter what.'
Qatar Tribune
15 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Qatar Charity, OCHA hold strategic roundtable to enhance humanitarian, development coordination in Syria
DOHA: Qatar Charity and the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) convened a 'Strategic Consultative Roundtable on Enhancing Humanitarian and Development Coordination in Syria'. The event is part of a long-standing partnership aimed at advancing effective humanitarian efforts, fostering dialogue among stakeholders, and building strategic alliances that support resilience and sustainable response efforts in Syria and other crisis-affected areas ultimately creating tangible impact in the lives of beneficiaries. Hosted at Qatar Charity's headquarters in Doha, the meeting brought together representatives from relevant UN agencies, international NGOs, Syrian civil society organizations engaged in humanitarian and development work, UN implementing partners, donors, regional and global humanitarian networks, and independent experts. Some participants also joined the discussion remotely. The roundtable offered a platform for structured, inclusive dialogue among humanitarian actors in Syria. It aimed to provide a unified framework for sharing insights, strengthening coordination, identifying shared challenges, and exploring practical ways to improve the quality and effectiveness of humanitarian response. Key themes included the importance of strategic partnerships, particularly with international actors, to foster a more cohesive and sustainable humanitarian approach. In his opening remarks, Chief Governance and External Affairs Officer at Qatar Charity, Mohammed Ali Al Ghamdi welcomed the participants from around the world who had gathered to support humanitarian and development efforts in Syria. He noted that the event was taking place at a pivotal moment marked by significant shifts in the Syrian context, including the easing of restrictions that have hindered humanitarian operations. He emphasized that this roundtable presents a valuable opportunity to translate dialogue into practical steps redefining intervention priorities, empowering local actors, and fostering constructive contributions from all stakeholders to meet urgent needs and support long-term development. He also stressed that co-hosting this event with OCHA reflects Qatar Charity's ongoing commitment to strengthening regional and global coordination efforts and to supporting initiatives that uphold human dignity and prioritize people's needs and aspirations. Deputy Director of the Operations and Advocacy Division at OCHA in New York, Michel Saad also welcomed participants and thanked Qatar Charity for hosting and co-organizing this important event. He provided an overview of the current phase of transferring humanitarian coordination to within Syria and emphasized the importance of empowering NGOs and Syrian civil society organizations to actively contribute to development efforts. He encouraged participants to focus on presenting actionable ideas to improve efficiency and integration going forward beyond merely reviewing past accomplishments. Chief Global Operations Officer at Qatar Charity, Nawaf Abdullah Al Hammadi praised the ongoing collaboration between Qatar Charity and OCHA, including the organization of this roundtable. The roundtable featured a consultative session titled 'Field Challenges in a Changing Environment and Prospects for Joint Coordination', along with an interactive panel discussion: 'Towards Effective Empowerment of Local Organizations and Strengthening Strategic Partnerships'. Qatar Charity and OCHA concluded the roundtable by reaffirming their commitment to follow up on the event's recommendations and outcomes. They underscored the importance of strengthening humanitarian coordination and building effective partnerships in pursuit of a unified, peaceful Syria where all citizens can enjoy dignity, security, and a better future.
Al Jazeera
16 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Iran tells millions of Afghans to leave or face arrest on day of deadline
Millions of Afghan migrants and refugees in Iran have been asked to leave or face arrest as a deadline set by the government comes to an end. Sunday's target date neared amid public concerns over security in the aftermath of the 12-day conflict with Israel, which the United States joined with air strikes on Iran's uranium-enrichment facilities. But humanitarian organisations warned that mass deportations could further destabilise Afghanistan, one of the world's most impoverished nations. Iran is home to an estimated 4 million Afghan migrants and refugees, and many have lived there for decades. In 2023, Tehran launched a campaign to expel foreigners it said were living in the country 'illegally'. In March, the Iranian government ordered that Afghans without the right to remain should leave voluntarily by Sunday or face expulsion. Since then, more than 700,000 Afghans have left, and hundreds of thousands of others face expulsion. More than 230,000 departed in June alone, the United Nations International Organization for Migration said. The government has denied targeting Afghans, who have fled their homeland to escape war, poverty and Taliban rule. Batoul Akbari, a restaurant owner, told Al Jazeera that Afghans living in Tehran were hurt by 'anti-Afghan sentiment', adding that it was heartbreaking to see 'people sent away from the only home they have ever known'. 'Being born in Iran gives us the feeling of having two homelands,' Akbari said. 'Our parents are from Afghanistan, but this is what we've always known as home.' Mohammad Nasim Mazaheri, a student whose family had to leave Iran, agreed: 'The deportations have torn families apart.' The Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) estimated that Iran deported more than 30,000 Afghans on average each day during the war with Israel, up from about 2,000 earlier. 'We have always striven to be good hosts, but national security is a priority, and naturally, illegal nationals must return,' Iranian government spokesperson Fatemeh Mohajerani said on Tuesday. Late last month, the UNHCR said, of the 1.2 million returning Afghans, more than half had come from Iran after its government set its deadline on March 20. 'They are coming in buses, and sometimes, five buses arrive at one time with families and others, and the people are let out of the bus, and they are simply bewildered, disoriented and tired and hungry as well,' Arafat Jamal, the UNHCR representative in Afghanistan said as he described the scene at a border crossing. 'This has been exacerbated by the war, but I must say it has been part of an underlying trend that we have seen of returns from Iran, some of which are voluntary, but a large portion were also deportations.' Al Jazeera's Resul Serdar, reporting from Tehran, said Afghans have increasingly been blamed for economic hardships, shortages and social issues in Iran. 'These accusations have been fuelled by political rhetoric and social media campaigns following 12 days of conflict between Iran and Israel and claims that Israel has recruited Afghans as spies,' he said.
